I'm trying to enable JMX for my wildfly swarm component. I'm used to seeing several mbeans for a variety of wildfly subsystems, I'm specifically interested in the data source mbeans.
I've pasted a snippet below, I've got the jmx fraction and I have statistics-enabled set to true. When thorntail is running I can connect to the JVM via JMX, but I am cannot see any datasource mbeans. Is there something else that needs to be enabled for them to show up?
The app is currently on swarm 2018.2.0.Final
swarm:
jmx:
expression-expose-model.domain-name: RemoteJMX
jmx-remoting-connector:
use-management-endpoint: true
resolved-expose-model.domain-name: RemoteJMX
show-model: true
datasources:
data-sources:
MyDataSourceName:
driver-name: com.microsoft.sqlserver
connection-url: jdbc:xyz
statistics-enabled: true
First of all, WildFly Swarm 2018.2.0.Final is very old. In the meantime, WildFly Swarm got renamed to Thorntail; you can automatically migrate by running mvn io.thorntail:thorntail-maven-plugin:2.5.0.Final:migrate-from-wildfly-swarm.
And then: if you connect to JMX, do you see any WildFly MBeans at all? I mean, is the problem with datasources only, or is it more general?
During boot, you should see JMX-related log messages, such as JMX not configured for remote access or JMX configured for remote connector: implicitly using ... interface. Do you see any of them?
Finally, it seems you want JMX exposed on the management port. Do you have a dependency on the management fraction?
I'd like to keep track of data that might be stuck in Apache Artemis queues and I'd like to leverage its JMX management abilities together with our Zabbix instance.
What steps do I need to take in order to successfully connect Zabbix to Artemis via JMX? The ones mentioned in https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/management.html are not quite clear to me.
I had to disable the internal connector and go the other way around by adding this to the artemis.profile file:
JAVA_ARGS="$JAVA_ARGS -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote"
JAVA_ARGS="$JAVA_ARGS -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false"
JAVA_ARGS="$JAVA_ARGS -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false"
JAVA_ARGS="$JAVA_ARGS -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=1099"
JAVA_ARGS="$JAVA_ARGS -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.rmi.port=1098"
JAVA_ARGS="$JAVA_ARGS -Djava.rmi.server.hostname=edimq-broker-master-az1.dc01.clouedi.local"
However, this way it's anything but secure, I know.
As the documentation states, you need to add this to your management.xml:
<connector connector-port="1099"/>
This will expose a JMX connector on localhost so if you want to be able to access it remotely from another machine on your network (i.e. your Zabbix instance) then you should do something like:
<connector connector-port="1099" connector-host="myhost" />
Also, if you have multiple IP addresses on the machine hosting the broker you'll want to set this system property in the JAVA_ARGS variable in artemis.profile:
-Djava.rmi.server.hostname=myhost
Then point your Zabbix instance at the broker using a url like:
service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://myhost:1099/jmxrmi
You can see this in action by running the jmx example shipped with Artemis in the examples/features/standard/ directory. Just navigate into that directory and run mvn verify. Running the example will create a broker instance, start the broker instance, and run the client all automatically. After the example runs you can go to into the target/server0 directory and look at all the configuration files to compare them to your own. You can also start broker independently of the example if you wish (by running ./artemis run from the target/server0/bin directory). Once the broker is running you should be able to connect to it with JConsole no problem using a JMX url like this:
service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/jmxrmi
Today I download neo4j-community-3.2.0 in windows, when i start the server, i meet one problem in browser, i meet this problem in neo4j-community-3.1.2 and i had solved it by Ticking the "Do not use Bolt" option in settings solved the issue. But in neo4j-community-3.2.0 , i can't see "Do not use Bolt" option ,and i don't know how to do.
N/A: WebSocket connection failure. Due to security constraints in your web browser, the reason for the failure is not available to this Neo4j Driver. Please use your browsers development console to determine the root cause of the failure. Common reasons include the database being unavailable, using the wrong connection URL or temporary network problems. If you have enabled encryption, ensure your browser is configured to trust the certificate Neo4j is configured to use. WebSocket readyState is: 3
This happens because the browser is trying (under the hood) to also access the bolt port, which uses an unsigned certificate.
You probably allowed the browser to access the SSL 7474 port through allowing the unsigned certificate as an exception on your browser (and if you didn't, you should in order to make it work).
The url was:
https://[neo4j_host]:7474
Do the same for the bolt certificate, allow it as an exception for url:
https://[neo4j_host]:7687
I ran into the same problem trying to use Neo4j Community Edition on an AWS Ubuntu 16.04 instance. The key thing that solved it was to open port 7687 (the bolt port) in the AWS security group settings.
Found this based on https://stackoverflow.com/a/45234105/1529646
Thus, full answer is:
Make sure to configure Neo4j correctly, ie. uncomment the line dbms.connectors.default_listen_address=0.0.0.0 AND the line dbms.connector.bolt.listen_address=:7687
Open ports 7474 AND 7687 in the AWS security group settings.
In the lower left corner of the browser gear, select do not use bolt.
Open your ${NEO4J_HOME}/conf/neo4j.conf file and edit the bolt settings. It is just about uncommenting this line dbms.connector.bolt.address=0.0.0.0:7687
Change the version of Neo4j
Check your JDK version, use JDK1.8
Adding another option, which worked for me. If your bolt's tls_level is set to REQUIRED, you need to change it to OPTIONAL, if you are not using it with SSL certificate; to get this working.
If you are using Neo4J Community Edition (ver 3.5.1 - in my case) from AWS Marketplace, you need to change the configuration in:
/etc/neo4j/pre-neo4j.sh
Change this line:
echo "dbms_connector_bolt_tls_level" "${dbms_connector_bolt_tls_level:=REQUIRED}"
to
echo "dbms_connector_bolt_tls_level" "${dbms_connector_bolt_tls_level:=OPTIONAL}"
You can find more about Neo4J connector configuration option here. Ideally as per docs, by default bolt.tls_level should have been OPTIONAL only. But I'm not really sure what exactly happened in my case, which got it changed to REQUIRED. Or if it came as is from AWS Marketplace.
Assuming you have valid certs and placed them under the correct certificates directory:
dbms.ssl.policy.bolt.client_auth=NONE
Version 4.0. Took it from this article.
I shared my full ssl config on this other answer.
I had the same error. New to Neo, so take this with a grain of salt, but my solution didn't match these above idea. But thanks as they did lead me to the right "water". So
I went into the conf file, noticed that there was the same port number (previously, the Neo desktop had been constantly telling me it'd needed to update the port numbers...I never checked to verity, but they'd be #, #+1 and #+2. But that didn't work yet that'd happened again and again...but now, after checking the conf file myself, I noticed that the number was the same for all three port requirements for BOLT. Tried that and it didn't work either...but maybe that was important in what did:
In the folder, where the specific database is housed, named "..neo4jdatabases/[GUID Value]" there were two directories titled "/installation-3.4.0" and "...1". I removed the ".0", restarted things and IT WORKED.
So, either there should NOT be two versions under the same database collection OR that's true AND you need the three ports to be the same.
Final add for any Neo4j experts who actually know what they're doing, I have three databases running, two without issue. This occurred AFTER I was messing around trying to see how PowerShell might be useful. Not sure if this is related, but the other databases have worked fine...but, this db is the original playground/sandbox I'd had since the beginning. Not 100% sure, I made the version update before or after, creating the other two databases. HTH.
Using a windows trial version on a Windows 10 machine. Current N4j version is 3.4.1.
Do love what I see so far with Neo BTW!!!
Please mention the correct bolt port under the Connect URL textbox.if you are using the service port the mention the service port in place of bolt port.
Then finally I resolve it by replacing the bolt port with service port inside k8s.
user: neo4j
password: neo4j
I resolve this error by replace the port 7687 with node port 30033 inside Neo4j
then it works fine.
I was facing the same issue with Neo4J version 4 installed on an Ubuntu 18 EC2 instance. Tthe workaround that did the trick for me was to replace the 0.0.0.0 entries in /etc/neo4j/neo4j.conf with the actual private IP of my instance.
Following are the lines where the replace happened:
dbms.default_listen_address=172.X.X.232
dbms.connector.bolt.address=172.X.X.232:7687
Post restart of the DB, the Connect URL when accessing from browser should also use the private IP instead of localhost.
I m trying setup a cassandra cluster as a test bed but gave the JMX remote connection error. I seem to found the answer for my error from cassandra FAQ page
Nodetool says "Connection refused to host: 127.0.1.1" for any remote host. What gives?
Nodetool relies on JMX, which in turn relies on RMI, which in turn sets up it's own listeners and connectors as needed on each end of the exchange. Normally all of this happens behind the scenes transparently, but incorrect name resolution for either the host connecting, or the one being connected to, can result in crossed wires and confusing exceptions.
If you are not using DNS, then make sure that your /etc/hosts files are accurate on both ends. If that fails try passing the -Djava.rmi.server.hostname=$IP option to the JVM at startup (where $IP is the address of the interface you can reach from the remote machine).
But can somebody help me on how to do -Djava.rmi.server.hostname=$IP
Or what to add is hosts file, i know that in hosts normally we add "IP Alias", but whose ip and alias.
I dont know much java or either linux
I m currently working on ubuntu v10.04 and cassandra v0.74
Sudesh
For JMX you need to enable JMX-remoting:
java -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote
Depending on from where you want to access the jmx-server, you also need to specify a port:
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=12345
and set or disable passwords.
Have a look at http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/management/agent.html for more details.
I'm using tomcat 6 and HypericHQ for monitoring via JMX.
The issue is the following:
hyperic, overtime, opens hundreds of jmx connection and never closes them.. after few hours our tomcat server is using 100% cpu without doing anything.
Once I stop hyperic agent, tomcat will go back to 0-1% cpu..
Here is what we are seeing virtual vm:
http://forums.hyperic.com/jiveforums/servlet/JiveServlet/download/1-11619-37096-2616/Capture.PNG
I don't know if this is an hyperic issue or not, but I wonder if there is an option to fix it via tomcat/java configuration? The reason that I don't know if this is an hyperic or a tomcat/java configuration issue is because that when we use hyperic on other standard java daemon it doesn't have the same connection leak issue.
The JMX is exposed using Spring, and it's working great when connecting with JMX clients (JConsole/VisualVM). When I close the client, I see that the number of connections drops by one.
Is there any thing that we can do to fix this via java configuration? (forcing it to close a connection that is open for more than X seconds?)
One more thing, in tomcat we see (from time to time) the following message (while hyperic is running):
Mar 7, 2011 11:30:00 AM ServerCommunicatorAdmin reqIncoming
WARNING: The server has decided to close this client connection.
Thanks