Electron not getting command line arguments - electron

Trying to make an option for localhost dev in Electron.js (I have two types of config.inis for local and not-local options) and would like to run command from command line, e.g yarn dev --scope=local
However, I am not able to get process.argv to work, argv array shows only:
[
'C:\xxxx\xxxxxx\xxxxxx\xxxxxx\node_modules\electron\dist\electron.exe',
'-r',
'./internals/scripts/BabelRegister',
'./app/main.dev.ts'
]
Here it says that getting argv depends on the process type, but mine is main. Passing command line arguments to electron executable (after installing an already packaged app)
Would appreciate help!

Related

How to find a valid path to julia.exe

I try to use julia-1.6 with VScode, but I cannot find a path to the executable.
When I try to change the working directory via the julia prompt to the executable, I get an error message saying it's not a directory:
julia> cd("/Users/jjdegruijter/bin/julia")
Can anybody tell how to do it properly?
To get the path to your Julia executable, from the REPL, do:
joinpath(Sys.BINDIR, "julia")
You can start a REPL by just running julia from the terminal, or by pressing Alt-J Alt-O in VS Code (you can also instead type Ctrl-Shift-P, then choose Julia: Start REPL from that list).
Or, you can also directly run the above command from the terminal without starting a REPL: julia -e 'println(joinpath(Sys.BINDIR, "julia"))'.
If you just want to change working directory to the directory containing the executable (though I'm not sure why you'd want that here):
cd(Sys.BINDIR)

Trying to run the command 'appium-doctor' on Windows Command Prompt but getting an error

I installed Appium Desktop for windows and used the Command Prompt to install Appium server and appium-doctor via npm but I get the following error after typing 'appium-doctor' in the command prompt:
'appium-doctor' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.
How can I get appium-doctor to run?
Edit: I found out what was wrong. In %PATH%, I had two variable locations written down in the same line separated by a semicolon:
C:\Users\xyz\AppData\Roaming\npm;C:\Program Files\nodejs
I removed the semicolon and put the two variable locations in different lines:
C:\Users\xyz\AppData\Roaming\npm
C:\Program Files\nodejs
Everything is working now
you either need to specify the full path in cmd, or add the path to the executable in your os PATH environment variable

How do I debug a 'java_binary' target executed by a Bazel rule via 'ctx.actions.run(...)'?

I have a java_binary target in my workspace that I'm later passing as an executable to ctx.actions.run inside the rule. So far so good.
Now I want to debug this java_binary while Bazel is executing the rule. In order to attach a debugger I need the java_binary run in debug mode. So far, the only thing I came up with is setting jvm_flags on the java_binary. I was able to get that to work. But I was wondering if there is a way to achieve it from the command line instead of baking it into the java_binary.
java_binary(
...
jvm_flags = [
"-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=y,address=8000"
],
)
Is it possible to achieve this from the command line without hard coding jvm_flags?
Try:
bazel run //:my-target -- --debug
One strategy is to run the build with --subcommands, which will tell bazel to print out all the commands it's running during the build. Then find the command line corresponding to the invocation of the java_binary you're interested in. Then you can copy/paste that command (including the cd part) and modify it to include the debug flags, and debug it as you would any other process.
Note also that java_binary outputs a wrapper script that includes a --debug[=<port>] flag, so that should be all that needs to be added to the command line.
Note also that --subcommands will only print the commands that are actually executed during the build, so a fully cached / fully incremental build will print nothing. You may need to do a clean, or delete some of the outputs of the action you're interested in so that bazel runs that command.
It looks like you can pass the --jvm_flag option as part of the program options after the --.
BUILD:
java_binary(
name = "extract",
main_class = "com.pkg.Main",
resources = glob(["src/main/resources/**/*"]),
)
CLI:
bazel run //:extract -- --jvm_flag="-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=y,address=7942" -path %cd%\config.json
It seems that the --jvm_flag option needs to come immediately after the --, before the program options (-path in the example). This is with Bazel 3.7.0.

Different software binary being executed on Jenkins for the same path

I have installed gems binary at two places on my jenkins server, each is different version:
[myserver]$ /opt/chef/embedded/bin/gem --version
2.4.1
[myserver]$ /opt/chefdk/embedded/bin/gem --version
2.4.4
I am running a job on this jenkins server with following command : /opt/chefdk/embedded/bin/gem inabox
and I get an error saying :
ERROR: While executing gem ... (Gem::CommandLineError)
Unknown command inabox
However when i run the same command from the command line , it identifies the inabox option.
To debug , when I ran this command /opt/chefdk/embedded/bin/gem help commands from the console and command line the options available are different and the console output doesnt include "inabox" option.
To make sure that I use the correct binary , I have also exported the binary path : PATH=$PATH:/opt/chefdk/embedded/bin in the job , but that also doesnt solve any thing.
I suspect that for some reason , /opt/chef/embedded/bin/gem binary is getting executed instead of /opt/chefdk/embedded/bin/gem , but I am not sure how and how do I solve it. Any pointers?
EDIT1
Here is output of echo $PATH
Here is the output of the command when I run through Jenkins console : /opt/chefdk/embedded/bin/gem help commands
Here is the output of the command when I run through command line :
1) Restart Jenkins every time you make changes to environment variables
2) if jenkins is executing the code on a slave, you need to define the PATH in your Jenkins settings.
We identified that a GEM_PATH variable being injected into the Jenkins job was causing the gem command to not work as intended. To resolve the issue, we added the “unset GEM_PATH” line to the beginning of the shell portion of the Build steps. This allowed the gem command to again recognize the “inabox” option and successfully upload gems to the Ruby Gems server.

fpm is not recognised if executing script with jenkins and ssh

I am trying to execute a script over ssh connexion with Jenkins. I am using the SSH plugin and it is well configured. I arrive to execute the first part of the script, but when I try to execute a fpm command it says:
fpm: command not found
If I connect to the instance and run the same script that I call via Jenkins it runs and there is no error (fpm is installed).
So, I have created a test like a script test.sh:
#!/bin/bash -x
fpm
but, with Jenkins, I get the same error: fpm: command not found, while if I execute it I get a normal "parameter needed":
Missing required -s flag. What package source did you want? {:level=>:warn}
Missing required -t flag. What package output did you want? {:level=>:warn}
No parameters given. You need to pass additional command arguments so that I know what you want to build packages from. For example, for '-s dir' you would pass a list of files and directories. For '-s gem' you would pass a one or more gems to package from. As a full example, this will make an rpm of the 'json' rubygem: `fpm -s gem -t rpm json` {:level=>:warn}
Fix the above problems, and you'll be rolling packages in no time! {:level=>:fatal}
What am I missing? Why it cannot find fpm if it is installed?
Make sure fpm is in /usr/bin..
It seems that the problem came because the fpm was installed in the /home/user2connect/bin/, and the command was not recognised. For fixing this I had to call it wit the whole path:
/home/user2connect/bin/fpm ...
I have chosen to reinstall the fpm using sudo, so now it works.

Resources