The only options I can find that deal with custom coloring inside Visual Studio Code are those:
"editor.tokenColorCustomizations": {
"[Atom One Dark]": {
"comments": "#FF0000" // only 6 color-customizable
},
"workbench.colorCustomizations": {
"statusBar.background": "#666666",
"panel.background": "#555555",
"sideBar.background": "#444444"
},
},
Is there a way to set a custom color for these types of things? One exists for comments, for strings (inside "string"). I believe something similar should be possible for other stuff using regexps. Thanks in advance.
Search for tokenColorCustomizations and textMateRules and you will find that you can do something like this (see colorizing with textmate):
"editor.tokenColorCustomizations": {
"textMateRules": [
{
// works for a language that recognizes backticks as string templates
"scope": "string.template",
"settings": {
"foreground": "#FF0000"
}
},
{
"scope": "punctuation.definition.template-expression.begin, punctuation.definition.template-expression.end",
"settings": {
"foreground": "#F0F"
}
},
]
}
using the Inspect TM Scopes... command in the command palette. So I used that command to click inside a template literal and got the string.template.js.jsx scope. But that didn't change the ${someVar} so I inspected that scope and saw variable.other.readwrite.js.jsx plus additional scope parameters - still working on isolating that kind of a variable from other variables.
Edit: Should work in more file types by using only string.template, if the language treats backticks as a string template.
You can also change the fontStyle within a setting. There are a few answers here about using the TM Scopes command.
I wrote an SAPUI5 application in Eclipse with mockdata. When I call a specific method in formatter.js to fill an images source-property the method "formatMapUrl" isn't getting executed:
Object.view.xml:
<Image src="{ parts: [ 'ToSupplier/Address/Street', 'ToSupplier/Address/PostalCode', 'ToSupplier/Address/City', 'ToSupplier/Address/Country' ], formatter: '.formatter.formatMapUrl' }"/>
Other methods of the file formatter.js are being called within the same file:
Object.view.xml:
<ObjectHeader id="objectHeader" title="{ProductID}" number="{ path: 'Price', formatter: '.formatter.numberUnit' }"
numberUnit="{CurrencyCode}" responsive="true">
This is the related method:
formatter.js:
formatMapUrl : function (sStreet, sZIP, sCity, sCountry) {
return "https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/staticmap?zoom=15&size=640x400&markers=" + jQuery.sap.encodeURL(sStreet + ", " + sZIP + " " + sCity + ", " + sCountry);
}
The method itself should be right too, cause I used it in other applications. The dynamic paths should be right (e.g. "ToSupplier/Address/Street"), cause I successfully used them in the same app and file like this:
Object.view.xml:
<StandardListItem icon="sap-icon://map" title="{ToSupplier/Address/City}"/>
I tried to debug the app in the browser via the web console in firefox and found out that the method isn't getting executed.
In another application I created a model "Address.json" and successfully used it like this:
<Image src="{ parts: [ 'address>/Street', 'address>/ZIPCode', 'address>/City', 'address>/Country' ], formatter: '.formatter.formatMapUrl' }"/>
The notation should be
<Image src="{
parts: [
{ path: 'ToSupplier/Address/Street' },
{ path: 'ToSupplier/Address/PostalCode' },
{ path: 'ToSupplier/Address/City' },
{ path: 'ToSupplier/Address/Country' }
],
formatter: '.formatter.formatMapUrl'
}" />
(Note each path property for the parts array)
Puh...that was very weird but I think I figured it out:
In my case images, presented by Google Maps, can't be shown in Firefox or Opera. It only worked with Google Chrome. I created some applications in SAPUI5 with data within models and there the maps are being shown in every browser but in apps with mockdata it seems to be not possible. Maybe because of binding? Or related processes? I don't know. I hope I could help someone with this. Thanks to Qualiture for your help! :)
Edit (25.07.2016):
Some of the pictures aren't being shown in Chrome too due to some reasons. First I thought that would be because of wrong addresses and I entered real addresses I know into the mockdata file. But nothing changed. Maybe it's a limitation of Google itself?
Edit (26.07.2016):
I debugged the application again. This time with Google Chrome Developer Tools. And there was some interesting error shown in the console: staticmap:1 GET https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/staticmap?zoom=15&size=640x400&markers=Morning%20Drive%2c%2091602%20Hollywood%2c%20California%2c%20US 403 ()
So indeed, there are limitations by Google - depending on how many "gets" the user send to the api. Here is the link to the thread on SCN: http://scn.sap.com/thread/3936298
So, I tried to load my add-on using the about:debugging page in Firefox. But, it simply wouldn't load. Is there somewhere where an error would be logged that I could find it?
Here is my manifest.JSON code:
{
"description": "Adds a stickfigure",
"manifest_version": 2,
"name": "StickMan",
"version": "1.0",
"icons": {
"48": "icons/StickMan-48.png"
},
"applications": {
"gecko": {
"id": "extention#stick.man",
"strict_min_version": "45.0"
}
},
"permissions": [
"activeTab"
],
"background": {
"scripts": ["StickManUpdate.js"]
},
"browser_action": {
"default_icon": {
"48": "icons/StickManButton.png"
},
"default_title": "Call StickMan",
},
}
I hope that this helps other frustrated add-on creators.
Thanks in advance
The lack of loading issue is that you have multiple syntax errors in the JSON of your manifest.json file. In your manifest.json file the lines at the end of the file:
"default_title": "Call StickMan",
},
}
Should not have the extra , (which would indicate you are going to have another property in the Object):
"default_title": "Call StickMan"
}
}
If you were using the Firefox Developer Edition, the fact that you had these errors would have been obvious:
However, even if you are running Firefox 47.0.1 and had merely used the Browser Console (keyboard shortcut: Ctrl-Shift-J), as suggested in the comments, you would have seen the error:
A promise chain failed to handle a rejection. Did you forget to '.catch', or did you forget to 'return'?
See https://developer.mozilla.org/Mozilla/JavaScript_code_modules/Promise.jsm/Promise
Date: Sun Jul 17 2016 11:11:22 GMT-0700 (Pacific Standard Time)
Full Message: SyntaxError: JSON.parse: expected double-quoted property name at line 33 column 2 of the JSON data
Full Stack: readJSON/</<#resource://gre/modules/Extension.jsm:628:19
NetUtil_asyncFetch/<.onStopRequest#resource://gre/modules/NetUtil.jsm:128:17
While a bit cryptic, it still shows the line number of the first issue:
Full Message: SyntaxError: JSON.parse: expected double-quoted property name at line 33 column 2 of the JSON data
The error produced in the Browser Console of Firefox Developer Edition is a bit easier to parse as to what the issue is:
SyntaxError: JSON.parse: expected double-quoted property name at line 33 column 2 of the JSON data
Stack trace:
readJSON/</<#resource://gre/modules/Extension.jsm:859:19
NetUtil_asyncFetch/<.onStopRequest#resource://gre/modules/NetUtil.jsm:128:17
WebExtensions Development:
The WebExtensions API is currently in development. If you are developing a WebExtension, you should be using either Firefox Nightly, or Firefox Developer Edition in order to test your code.
More on your code:
Syntax error:
In addition to the above syntax errors, you have more issues. I did not attempt to resolve all of them, but did get sucked into fixing enough so that the add-on was functional. The next reported error, a syntax error, is in your StickManUpdate.js file on the code:
browser.tabs.sendMessage(
message: "End";
);
You have multiple issues here. Please see the tabs.sendMessage() documentation. You are missing the required tabId parameter. In addition, you appear to be mixing-up the difference between having an Object being passed as a parameter containing properties which are the information passed to the method versus a list of parameters which are other native types passed to a method. Note: It is not uncommon for there to be both a list of parameters of various native or non-native types and an Object containing properties which are data passed to the method.
Assuming browserAction is defined:
You use methods of browserAction in multiple locations where it should be browser.browserAction. browserAction by itself is not defined. Alternately, you could use browserAction as a shortcut by defining it like: var browserAction = browser.browserAction;.
Use of browserAction.getTitle() as if it is synchronous when in reality it is asynchronous:
You make a call to browserAction.getTitle() to get the value of the title. The value of the title is only available in the callback function, which you do not supply. This implies a lack of understanding of asynchronous programming. You might want to review some questions on that subject like:
Why isn't a global variable set immediately after defining a callback/listener function (asynchronous messaging, port.on)
Why is my variable unaltered after I modify it inside of a function? - Asynchronous code reference
How do I return the response from an asynchronous call?
Wrong parameter type supplied to browserAction.setTitle():
This appears to, again, be confusion as to the difference between parameters of other native types and a parameter that is an Object (which may be an Object literal) which contains properties which are the information passed to the method. Admittedly, WebExtensions appear to almost arbitrarily mix using actual parameters and Objects with the properties functioning as parameters when passing information to methods. It appears that being careful as to which is being used in a particular method will be required.
Not having various functions specify the ID for the tab:
In multiple calls to various methods, you do not pass the tabId when you should. You are adding your StickMan canvas to a single tab per mouse click. You should be passing the tab ID for calls to multiple methods.
Assigning to document.body.innerHTML in stickman.js:
In general, assigning to innerHTML at any time should be avoided, if possible. It is a bad idea under most circumstances. In most instances, it may cause the entire DOM to be re-evaluated. For doing what you desire, adding HTML in text format to the DOM at the end of the HTML for an element, there is a specific function which is better/faster: insertAdjacentHTML(). Your code:
document.body.innerHTML+= '<canvas id="StickManCanvas0000000" width="100" height="200"></canvas>';
Could be written as:
document.body.insertAdjacentHTML("beforeend", '<canvas id="StickManCanvas0000000" width="100" height="200"></canvas>');
However, it is still a bad idea to use insertAdjacentHTML() here. There is a significant stigma attached to using either insertAdjacentHTML() or assigning to innerHTML. Using either will result in your add-on receiving additional scrutiny when submitted to AMO for distribution. This is mostly because there are real security issues with using either methodology for changing the DOM. The security issues are when what is being added is text that is dynamically generated from input/data which is not hard coded into your add-on. In addition, you are already mixing adding the element as text and performing changes to it using other JavaScript (e.g. assigning to canvas.style.position). You really should use one or the other. In this case, it is better to construct canvas entirely in JavaScript. It is, after all, only 4 lines to do the same thing you were doing in the two you were using for the innerHTML assignment and the getElementById() to find the canvas element.
Personally, I like using insertAdjacentHTML() in many instances with complex structures. It is generally faster to use it for inserting larget amounts of HTML. It also allows you to keep what is being inserted represented as text. Such text may be much easier to visualize the structure being added rather than figuring out what a large chunk of DOM generated using document.createElement() and setAttribute() actually looks like. However, along with the other drawbacks mentioned above, using insertAdjacentHTML() may not lend itself as easily to writing modular code.
Issues with how you insert you content script and canvas:
Every time the user clicks on your browserAction button you insert another copy of your content script into the tab. This leads to issues of errors being generated due to the consumed content scripts getting the message sent by your call to browser.tabs.sendMessage() and not being able to find the canvas. The correct solution to this is to only chrome.tabs.executeScript() the first time the button is clicked in a tab and then send a message to the content script each subsequent time the button is clicked in that tab causing the same canvas to be re-inserted into the DOM. An easy way to track if you have already loaded the StickMan into a particular tab is to use setTitle() to have the title for your button be different after the first run in that tab.
Other issues:
Note: Your code structure in stickman.js is a bit convoluted. You might want to address this.
All together
manifest.json:
{
"description": "Adds a stickfigure",
"manifest_version": 2,
"name": "StickMan",
"version": "1.0",
"icons": {
"48": "icons/StickMan-48.png"
},
"applications": {
"gecko": {
"id": "extention#stick.man",
"strict_min_version": "45.0"
}
},
"permissions": [
"activeTab"
],
"background": {
"scripts": ["StickManUpdate.js"]
},
"browser_action": {
"default_icon": {
"48": "icons/StickManButton.png"
},
"default_title": "Call StickMan",
"browser_style": true
}
}
StickManUpdate.js:
browser.browserAction.onClicked.addListener(function(tab) {
browser.browserAction.getTitle({tabId:tab.id},function(title){
if(title === 'Call StickMan') {
chrome.tabs.executeScript(tab.id, {
file: "/content_scripts/stickman.js"
});
browser.browserAction.setTitle({title:'Recall StickMan',tabId:tab.id});
} else if (title === 'Call StickMan again') {
browser.tabs.sendMessage(tab.id,"Draw");
browser.browserAction.setTitle({title:'Recall StickMan',tabId:tab.id});
}else {
browser.tabs.sendMessage(tab.id,"End");
browser.browserAction.setTitle({title:'Call StickMan again',tabId:tab.id});
}
});
});
stickman.js:
var running = true;
//document.body.insertAdjacentHTML("beforeend", '<canvas id="StickManCanvas0000000" width="100" height="200"></canvas>');
var canvas = document.createElement("canvas");
canvas.setAttribute("width",100);
canvas.setAttribute("height",200);
//var canvas = document.getElementById('StickManCanvas0000000');
canvas.style.position = 'fixed';
canvas.style.left = '0px';
canvas.style.top = (window.innerHeight-200)+'px';
canvas.style.backgroundColor = 'rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)';
canvas.style.border = '1px dashed red';
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
var pos = {
x:0,
headX:50,
headY:20,
bodyX:50,
bodyY:150,
leftArmX:25,
leftArmY:90,
rightArmX:75,
rightArmY:90,
leftLegX:30,
leftLegY:200,
rightLegX:70,
rightLegY:200,
};
var setPos = function(x, y) {
canvas.style.left = x+'px';
canvas.style.top = (window.innerHeight-y-200)+'px';
};
var drawMan = function(time) {
setPos(pos.x, 0);
ctx.strokeStyle = '#000000';
ctx.lineWidth = 5;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(pos.headX, pos.headY, 20, 0, Math.PI*2, false);
ctx.moveTo(pos.headX, pos.headY);
ctx.lineTo(pos.bodyX, pos.bodyY);
ctx.lineTo(pos.rightLegX, pos.rightLegY);
ctx.moveTo(pos.bodyX, pos.bodyY);
ctx.lineTo(pos.leftLegX, pos.leftLegY);
ctx.moveTo((pos.bodyX+pos.headX)/2, ((pos.bodyY+pos.headY)/5)*2);
ctx.lineTo(pos.rightArmX, pos.rightArmY);
ctx.moveTo((pos.bodyX+pos.headX)/2, ((pos.bodyY+pos.headY)/5)*2);
ctx.lineTo(pos.leftArmX, pos.leftArmY);
ctx.stroke();
ctx.fillStyle = '#888888';
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.arc(pos.headX, pos.headY, 20, 0, Math.PI*2, false);
ctx.fill();
if(running) {
window.requestAnimationFrame(drawMan);
}
};
drawMan();
document.body.appendChild(canvas);
browser.runtime.onMessage.addListener(function(m) {
if(m === 'End' && running === true) {
running = false;
document.body.removeChild(canvas);
} else if(m === 'Draw' && running === false) {
running = true;
document.body.appendChild(canvas);
}
});
Functionality demo [Note1: You must navigate to an actual webpage. Note2: The tooltips that pop up to tell you what the title is of your browser_action button are not captured with the program I used to create the following .gif. Note3: I added the browser_style property to the browser_action in your manifest.json file. It is new in Firefox 48. Without it, Firefox will issue a warning in the Browser Console when the add-on is loaded.]:
I am using JQuery UI in an Angular application. I noticed that I was repeating the same pattern for each directive: Call the JQuery UI function with a single complex object for initialization. Rather than write separate directives for each component, I have found it easier to use a stub directive. This may not be a long term solution but it works for now.
Is there a better way to inject the attributes to make the markup more readable while still keeping the generic nature of the directive? Specifically, can I avoid using a JSON string so that it reads more like a normal angular directive.
The existing line:
<button jquiw-control='{"control":"button","options":{"label":"Hello","icons": {"primary": "ui-icon-gear","secondary": "ui-icon-triangle-1-s"}}}' ng-click="jump()"></button>
<button jquiw-control="button" jquiw-button-label="Hello" jquiw-button-icons-primary= "ui-icon-gear" jquiw-button-icons-secondary="ui-icon-triangle-1-s" ng-click="jump()"></button>
Here is a plunk of a working example of my Generic ui directive. http://plnkr.co/edit/eRoOeq
At least you can put the hardcoded JSON in the controller like this
$scope.config = {
"control": "button",
"options": {
"label": "Hello",
"icons": {
"primary": "ui-icon-gear",
"secondary": "ui-icon-triangle-1-s"
}
}
};
and then change the template to
<button jquiw-control='{{config}}' ng-click="jump()"></button>
Plunker: http://plnkr.co/edit/yY1Lc2?p=preview
This is my code which I use for geolocation.
It does not log the coordinates to the console even though I have console.log. It shows an error saying "chrome/ExtensionProcessBindings:95 Error during tabs.executeScript: Unknown error."
However, when asked to alert; it alerts the right coordinates
background.html
<script>
chrome.tabs.executeScript(null, {file: "content_script.js"});
</script>
content_script.js
navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(function(position) {
console.log(position.coords.latitude+" "+position.coords.longitude);
});
manifest.json
{
"name" : "Geolocation",
"version" : "0.1",
"background_page" : "background.html",
"permissions":["tabs","http://*/*", "https://*/*","*://*/*"]
}
Your code works fine for me.
I think the problem is that you are calling chrome.tabs.executeScript() right in the beginning of a background page, which means it probably tries to inject this script right into chrome://extensions/ when you are enabling your extension.
You need to make sure you are injecting the script to a regular loaded tab. For example I tried injecting it when a user clicks on browser action icon, and it worked:
chrome.browserAction.onClicked.addListener(function() {
chrome.tabs.executeScript(null, {file: "content_script.js"});
});