I have designed a lock icon in Sketch to add to a button in my application:
I exported it both in pdf and png (2x, 3x) to add to Xcode assets. Problem is when I run the app on iPhone (SE), heavy pixelation can be seen around the edges of the icon:
I've tried both pdf and png formats, but result stays the same. Am I missing any settings that need to be applied for image to look sharp on screen?
Bigger is not necessarily better for a UIButton's image. Try to export your icon in more or less the same size with which it will be used. (Note that this also frees up memory in comparison to a way bigger image).
To adapt to different screens' resolutions, you should provide up to three images (#1x, #2x, #3x). You should read this excellent Apple's documentation on Image Size and Resolution. It explains perfectly how big should the images you provide in Xcode be.
They also have a good explanation on which format you should use according to the purpose of the image.
EDIT:
You can also use vector ressources (.pdf files for instance) that will render perfectly for any resolution. You can read this article about how to implement it in your Xcode project (If you do so, please be careful in the attributes of the asset to check Preserve Vector Data and the Scales to Single Scale, otherwise it may not render well).
It will happen if image sizes are not correct
check the size of images. 1x,2x and 3x sizes are should be as followed
1x = 24x24 px
2x = 48x48 px
3x = 72x72 px
If images size are too big than ImageView then pixelate will happen
Hope this will help you
Related
I am having difficulties with retina images.
The screenshot below shows the UICollectionView with a UIImageView contained within each UICollectionViewCell.
Within the app I have a large image 512x512 pixels called travel.png.
The green circle shows what is displayed on the app when I name this file: travel.png. The blue circle shows what I see when I update the image name to be travel#2x.png (i.e. retina naming).
I was hoping due to the large size of the image (512x512) that simply adding the #2x suffix would be enough to convert it to twice the definition (i.e. retina) but as you can see from the two screenshots, both version images show as non-retina.
How can I update the image so that it will display in retina?
travel.png:
travel#2x.png:
* Updated *
Following request in comments below:
I load this image by calling the following function:
// Note - when this method is called: contentMode is set to .scaleAspectFit & imageName is "travel"
public func setImageName(imageName: String, contentMode: ContentMode) {
self.contentMode = contentMode
if let image = UIImage(named: imageName) {
self.image = image
}
}
Here is how the image appears in Xcode before the app renders it (as you can see it is high enough definition):
The reason why you see the low quality image is anti-aliasing. When you provide images bigger then an actual frame of UIImageView (scaleAspectFit mode) the system will automatically downscale them. During scaling some anti-aliasing effects can be added at curve shapes. To avoid the effect you should provide the exact image size you want to display on the screen.
To detect if UIImageView autoscale the image you can switch on Debug->Color Misaligned Images at Simulator menu:
Now all scaled images will highlight at simulator with yellow color. Each highlighted image may have anti-aliasing artifacts and affect CPU usage for scaling algorithms:
To resolve the issue you should use exact sizes. So the system will use them directly without any additional calculations. For example, if your button have 80x80px size you should add three images to assert catalog with following sizes and dpi: 80x80px (72 dpi), 160x160px (144 dpi) and 240x240px (216 dpi):
Now the image will be drawn at the screen without downscaling with much better visual quality:
If your intention is to have just one image for all the sizes, I would suggest it having under Assets.xcassets. It is easy to create the folder structures and manage media assets here.
Steps
On clicking + icon, you will displayed a list of actions. Choose to create a New folder.
Choosing the new folder that is created, click on the + icon again and click on New Image Set.
Choose the imageset. And choose the attributes inspector.
Select Single Scale, under Scales.
Drag and drop the image.
Rename the image name and folder names as you wish.
Now you can use this image using the image name for all the screen sizes.
TL;DR;
Change the view layer's minificationFilter to .trilinear
imageView.layer.minificationFilter = .trilinear
as illustrated by the device screenshot below
As Anton's answer correctly pointed out, the aliasing effet you observe is caused by the large difference in dimensions between the source image and the image view it's displayed in. Adding the #2x suffix won't change anything if you do not change the dimensions of the source image itself.
That said there is an easy way to improve the situation without resizing the original image: CALayer offers some control over the method used by the graphics back-end to resize images : minificationFilter and magnificationFilter. The first one is relevant in your case since the image size is being reduced. The default value is CALayerContentsFilter.linear, just switch to .trilinear for a much better result (more info on those wikipedia pages). This will require more GPU power (thus battery), especially if you apply it on many images.
You should really consider resizing the images before displaying them, either statically or at run-time (and maybe cache the resized versions). In addition to the bad visual quality, using such large images in quantities in your UI will decrease performance and waste lots of memory, leading to potentially other issues.
I have fixed, #DarshanKunjadiya issue.
Make sure (if you are already using assets):
Make sure images are not un-assigned
Now use images in storyboard or code without extensions. (e.g. "image" NOT "image.png")
If you are not using images from assets, move them to assets.
Demo Projects
Hope it helps.
Let me know of your feedback.
I think images without the #2x and #3x are rendered for devices with low resolutions (like the iphone 4 an 3G).
The solution I think is to always use the .xcassets file or to add the #2x or #3X in the names of your images.
In iOS, content is placed on the screen based on the iOS coordinate system. for displaying an image on a standard resolution system having 1:1 pixel density we should supply image at #1x resolution. for higher resolution displays the pixel density will be a scale factor of 2.0, 3.0 which refers in the iOS system as #2x and #3x respectively. That is high-resolution displays demands images with higher density.
For example, if you want to display an image of size 128x128 in standard resolution. You have to supply the #2x and #3x size image of the same. ie., 256x256 at #2x version and 384x384 image at #3x version.
In the following screenshot, I have supplied an image of size 256x256 for 2x version to display a 128x128 pixel image in iPhone 6s. iPhone 6s render images at #2x size. Using the three version of images such as 1x, 2x and 3x with asset catalogue will resolve your issues. So the iPhone will automatically render the correct sized image automatically with the screen resolution.
I understand how 1x, 2x and 3x image resolutions work but I'm unsure how I go about choosing the right size/resolution for custom images in general. Imagine that we have a simple layout like the following:
Now it is up to me to create the image (in Photoshop for example) for that UIImageView. What size and resolution should the highest quality version be? Do I just use the highest screen resolution of the iOS devices that are currently available as my guide?
There is not really a best size. As you said the highest screen resolution would be the maximum, because the device obviously can not display more pixels than it has provided. If the image view is only about 1/5 of the screen size then I would use a smaller image size for memory usage.
And you only need one size for background images for example. I normally place them in my assets folder into the 2x place and I am good.
For icons i use 25x25, 50x50 and 75x75 (which will display really small on the screen)
hope I could help you a little bit…
I am new in developing games with Xcode for iPhone/iPad. Thus I need some help with the correct procedure to create images/sprites for the game.
By now I have created my sprites with Illustrator and I exported them as PDF files. In Xcode I created this single scale asset and put the PDF in it.
If I understand the documentation correctly, Xcode automatically generates image files at #1x, #2x and #3x from the PDF. Does it generate PNG files?
Then I create a SKSpriteNode and set the size like this: abc.size = CGSize(width: 123, height: 123). Instead of 123, I fill in the width and height corresponding to the frame/image size I set up in Illustrator. Is this correct? I think so, because this is #1x version?!
But if I need the same image for iPhone and iPad in different sizes, i can't simply resize it, because the #1x image version isn't a vector anymore and bounded to the frame size I chose in Illustrator? What to do then? Do I have to resize my image in Illustrator and export it in a different size?
What is the correct procedure? Do I have to draw a sketch with pencil at the very beginning on a paper and the measure it with ruler? Then I would go to illustrator and set the frame width height at that what I measured manually?
So many questions. I am very confused with this images sizes, resolutions and #1x, #2x and #3x version. I am not sure why I should use vector files, if I still can't resize the images in the developing process as I would like to, because they are still bound to the frame size I chose in Illustrator.
Is there no possibility to set ratios between all my images and then just use the vector PDF file? How should I setup my Illustrator?
I hope somebody can bring some light into the dark. Thank you.
Your pdf should be sized in points #1x (not pixels). The points should be the same physical size on the phone and the ipad, but if you want them smaller on the phone you need a second set of images; the asset catalog lets you swap out images based on iphone/ipad. Xcode renders your pdf to png's #1x, #2x and #3x and your app will pick the correct png based on the resolution of the device. You are correct that these are no longer vector assets and that scaling them up could leave you with blurry/pixelated images. You have a couple of choices:
1) include a scaled up version of your image at its maximum scale in app and use this version only when you need to scale up (otherwise its a waste of memory and processing if you are always rendering a much smaller image). This is probably the easiest solution.
2) leave your assets as vectors and load them as vectors, You still can render them to images for performance at a constant scale or range of scales, but you can always re-render them at any scale if needed. Most likely you want to use an SVG library for this.
3) You can directly import your assets as code using a program such as paint code. There used to be similar plugins for illustrator but I haven't seen one for Swift 3/Illustrator CC. This is obviously faster than #2 since there is no need to decode the vector file. If your file has a lot of overdraw you may still want to rasterize to images for performance.
Here's what I've found from my experience:
1) Xcode does not generate #2x and #3x from .png files. It can't really - you need to manually supply #1x, #2x, and #3x sizes.
2) Whatever size you use for the CGSize(...), that should be your #1x image, then generate #2x, and #3x from that. I started by designing the size of a level in the scene editor, then made a generic SKSpriteNode shape just to get the size I wanted, then I started making the image from the size I found that looks good.
3) Xcode supports vector based graphics (svg, pdf), but you can't use them as part of a texture atlas, which makes them much less useful in my opinion.
I couldn't find it on Icon and Image Sizes.
But I mean, what is the size of following icons?
Below mentioned article, there is a note:
Once you download this, you will see that there is a recommended size:
104x104 for 3x
70x70 for 2x
Since Apple will automatically size and re-colour the icons, it's better to use a PDF, which has the added benefit of looking sharper and a reduced risk of causing clipped edges if margins aren't used.
Here's a comparison of PDF vs PNG (exact same icon, originally and SVG exported from Sketch):
The size is also the same.
I understand that the Retina display has 2x as many pixels as the non retina displays, but what is difference between using the #2x version and taking and taking the 512 x 512 image and constraining it via the size of the frame ?
To Clarify:
if I have a button that is 72 x 72 The proper way to display that on an iPhone is to have a
image.png = 72x72
image#2x.png = 144 x 144 <---Fixed :) TY
But why not just use 1 image:
image.png = 512x512
and do something like this:
UIImageView *myImage = [[UIImageView alloc] init ];
[myImage setImage:[UIImage imageNamed:#"image.png"]];
[myImage setFrame:CGRectMake(50, 50, 72, 72)];
I am sure there is a good reason, I just dont know what it is, other then possibly a smaller app file size?
Thanks for the education!
There are several good reasons for sizing your images correctly, but the main one would have to be image clarity: When resizing images, you often end up w/ artifacts that make a picture look muddy or pixelated. By creating the images at the correct size, you'll know exactly what the end user will see on his or her screen.
Another reason would simply be to cut down on the overall file size of your binary: a 16x16 icon takes up orders of magnitude fewer bytes than a 512x512 image.
And if you need a third reason: Convenience methods such as [UIImage imageWithName:#"xxxx"] produce images of actual size and usually do not need additional frame/bounds code to go along with them. If you know the size, you can save yourself a lot of headache.
Because images may not be displayed correctly when resized. Also because larger images use more memory. But if both these are not issues for you, you can use one image for both retina and non retina displays.
Because large images consume a lot of memory and CPU/GPU cycles. Another reason is that scaling down an image causes pixel-level quality issues.
Besides the extra memory and CPU, downsampling an image is inherently lossy. Nice crisply rendered lines turn to crud.
The #2x naming convention exists in case the source image is exactly the same size as the displayed image. Then you can have a 57x57 app icon for non-retina iPhone, and 114x114 app icon for retina display iPhones.
The main advantage of using 2 images is, that both pictures can be handcrafted from the designers so everything looks fine and no up- or downscaling code needed, which cost energy, slows performance and may contains bugs.