I want to create an object of account entity. below is the sample code, which i need to achieve.
Account earlyAccount = new Account();
earlyAccount.Name = "Early Bound Account";
Guid earlyAccountId = service.Create(earlyAccount);
To use "Account" as entity, what i need to do ? Do i need to import any other namespace?
In order to generate Early Bound classes you need to use the CrmSvcUtil.exe included inside the CRM SDK.
However I strongly suggest to use the Early Bound Generator available inside the XrmToolBox, it has several options to generate the classes and you don't need to deal with the command line.
Use this command in MS-DOS/Developer Command Prompt for VS20xx
CrmSvcUtil.exe /url:http://serverName/organizationName/XRMServices/2011/Organization.svc /out:outputFilename.cs /username:username> /password:password /domain:domainName
Related
When using viewBinding with ConstraintLayout, maybe a lot of Ids will be create to help describe the view relationship, but will never used in Kotlin/Java.
I just found two useful tools attribute
tools:viewBindingIgnore="true" used to prevent whole layout generated in Binding, but not for single Id.
tools:viewBindingType="TextView" used for changing the Type generated in Binding.
So is there any way to ignore Id(s)? I don't want to expose them to pollute the Kotlin/Java.
Currently, there is no way to ignore view binding generation on view by view basis. If you use Proguard the unused ViewBinding IDs will be removed from the final APK.
I am using an OData model in my SAP UI5 application. I do the following:
var oView = this.getView();
this._oModel = oView.getModel();
which I thought loaded the model and allowed me to access whatever I needed to inside the model. However whenever I try to get a property using getProperty(path) it returns undefined. I know the path is correct because I used it elsewhere in my application and it worked okay. The model I am using is named "metadata.xml" if that helps.
If you read the documentation provided by SAP talking about OData services (I assume v2), you might find your answer there. Since you are using getProperty(), "you can only access single entities and properties with these methods. To access entity sets, you can get the binding contexts of all read entities via a list binding." Therefore you may want to a read() of the entity set first and then use the results of this read to access whatever property you want.
Link to doc: https://sapui5.hana.ondemand.com/#docs/guide/6c47b2b39db9404582994070ec3d57a2.html
Is there a way to add my own auto generated field to domain like id and version , If yes the please guide me . provide me URL form where i can read and under stand the core concept of Grails and Domain specific language .
use install-template in the app to get all default templates:
grails install-template
after which you would be able to see /src/templates (newly created)
Modify DomainClass.groovy under /src/templates/artifacts as below:
#artifact.package#class #artifact.name# {
//according to your need
Long myId
Integer myVersion
static constraints = {
}
}
Done!!!!
Henceforth, when create-domain-class command is used to create a domain class, those fields will be auto populated.
I am not sure I am understanding your question correctly but here is the link to the web features of Grails documentation. The "Link Generation API" may be something you are asking after.
If you would like to manage ID and version than using Spring Security (plugin or full docs) or SQL features may be the direction you want to read more about.
EDIT: Try this Stackoverflow question and answer on using inheritance. Seems to be very similar to what you are asking.
You would need to write an AST transform to inject the fields you want to add automatically. The one that injects ‘id’ and ‘version’ can be found here as an example:
https://github.com/grails/grails-core/blob/master/grails-core/src/main/groovy/org/codehaus/groovy/grails/compiler/injection/DefaultGrailsDomainClassInjector.java
You would then need to write a GORM event listener to automatically update the values of these properties. See
https://github.com/grails/grails-data-mapping/blob/master/grails-datastore-gorm/src/main/groovy/org/grails/datastore/gorm/events/AutoTimestampEventListener.java
For an example of the one that updates the dateCreated/lastUpdated properties.
These can both be written in a separate Gradle/Maven project which you then reference in the dependencies of your BuildConfig.groovy file.
Since Rails is using Ruby (dynamic language), would it be possible to create a very flexible
'configuration' class that has properties that you use throughout the website, AND have the ability to add new class properties (in the db for web modification) and then just use it in the code.
Each property would be of a specific type like a string, integer, bool etc.
You can't do this in a strongly typed language, but it must be possible with Ruby!
So say my class is like:
globalConfig.is_active
globalConfig.admin_email
I guess to make this work, I would loop through all the properties in the db, create properties in the class and assign the value right?
I actually have a settings plugin on GitHub you can use:
http://github.com/bellmyer/settings
It makes this easier for you. Right now it's not rails3-ready, so let me know if you need that. I also need to put in the time to roll it into a gem, instead of a plugin.
If you end up using it, let me know and I'll get it up to date. Otherwise, you can look at the code to see how I did things, and use that to help build your own custom solution.
I've been learning the ASP.NET MVC framework using the Apress book "Pro ASP.NET MVC Framework" by Steven Sanderson. To that end I have been trying out a few things on a project that I am not that familar with but are things that I thing I should be doing, namely:
Using repository pattern to access my database and populate my domain/business objects.
Use an interface for the repository so it can be mocked in a test project.
Use inversion of control to create my controllers
I have an MVC web app, domain library, test library.
In my database my domain items have an Id represented as an int identity column. In my domain classes the setter is internal so only the repository can set it.
So my quandries/problems are:
Effectively all classes in the domain library can set the Id property, not good for OOP as they should be read-only.
In my test library I create a fake repository. However since it's a different assembly I can't set the Id properties on classes.
What do others do when using a database data store? I imagine that many use an integer Id as unique identifier in the database and would then need to set it the object but not by anything else.
Can't you set your objects' IDs during construction and make them read-only, rather than setting IDs through a setter method?
Or do you need to set the ID at other times. If that's the case, could you explain why?
EDIT:
Would it be possible to divorce the ID and the domain object? Does anything other than the repository need to know the ID?
Remove the ID field from your domain object, and have your repository implementations track object IDs using a private Dictionary. That way anyone can create instances of your domain objects, but they can't do silly things with the IDs.
That way, the IDs of the domain objects are whatever the repository implementation decides they are - they could be ints from a database, urls, or file names.
If someone creates a new domain object outside of the repository and say, tried to save it to your repository, you can look up the ID of the object and save it as appropriate. If the ID isn't there, you can either throw an exception to say you need to create the object using a repository method, or create a new ID for it.
Is there anything that would stop you from using this pattern?
you can use the InternalsVisibleTo attribute. It will allow the types from an assembly to be visible from the tests (provided they are in different assemblies).
Otherwise you can leave the property read-only for the external objects but in the same time have a constructor which has an ID parameter and sets the ID property. Then you can call that constructor.
Hope this helps.