YouTube Reporting API .Net Client Library CreateTime Milliseconds - youtube-api

When returning a list of reports that have been generated for a specific job, the API returns a createTime property. This property value is then used to limit future requests to only include reports createdAfter the max createTime already collected.
The problem is that the client library is not returning millsecond precision. Instead, I'm getting a string that includes only seconds such as "4/3/2017 11:25:25 AM".
When I use the API explorer, I do get milliseconds in the response json.
Question is, can the client library return milliseconds? If so, how do I get this values?
The Report property that I'm referring to is called "CreateTime".
var reportList = ytReportingService.Jobs.Reports.List(JobId);
reportList.CreatedAfter = "1900-01-01T12:00:00.000000Z";
foreach (Report report in reportListResponse.Reports)
{
//Some irrelevant code is removed
Console.WriteLine("================== Job Report ==================");
Console.WriteLine("Event: " + Event);
Console.WriteLine("ID: " + report.Id);
Console.WriteLine("DownloadUrl: " + report.DownloadUrl);
Console.WriteLine("CreateTime: " + report.CreateTime.ToString());
Console.WriteLine("StartTime: " + report.StartTime);
Console.WriteLine("EndTime: " + report.EndTime);
Console.WriteLine("JobID: " + report.JobId);
Console.WriteLine("JobExpireTime: " + report.JobExpireTime);
}
Update 20170406
CreateTime is returned from the client library as a generic object. Surprisingly, it allows both get and set.
Below I'm casting to a datetime data then back to a string and formatting explicitly.
((DateTime)job.CreateTime).ToString("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.fff"))
The result is the same. No fractional seconds are returned.
((DateTime)job.CreateTime).ToString("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.fff"))
Update 20170406
Correction - The above example is using the Job object's CreateTime property. While the job does not return fractional seconds, the report.CreateTime does return fractional seconds!
It turns out that report.CreateTime (object) when cast to string directly it does not include the fractional seconds. The solution is to cast it to a datatime datatype first. Then, the data can be formatted as needed.
((DateTime)report.CreateTime).ToString("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.fff")

Jon Skeet posted a comment that let to the answer. See the final example in the above post.

Related

thingsboard rulechain - filter script node to check if metadata timestamp is greater than server timestamp

I have created an asset variable with a timestamp attribute (dateTo) and would like to compare this to the current server time.
Ho do I get the server/system time of the Thingsboard. TBEL documentation states that "we have added Date class that you are able to use without the package name" so I should be able to get the server time with:
Date
Testing in the Test Filter Function doesn't error while using:
return Date > metadata.dateTo;
But does not assess correctly (changing the value around generates a False result either way).
Each metadata field has a string type, instead of integer as expected. So before comparison you have to convert metadata.dateTo to integer:
return Date.now() > +metadata.dateTo;

AdWords PLACEMENT_PERFORMANCE_REPORT not pulling URLs

This should be extremely simple but for some reason it doesn't seem to work. I'm trying to pull the URLs of display placements using the DISPLAY_PERFORMANCE_REPORT but instead of URLs it's just returning "--".
The code I'm using is:
var report = AdWordsApp.report(
"SELECT CampaignName, Clicks, FinalAppUrls, FinalUrls " +
"FROM PLACEMENT_PERFORMANCE_REPORT " +
"WHERE Clicks > 0 " +
"DURING LAST_30_DAYS");
var rows = report.rows();
while (rows.hasNext()) {
var row = rows.next();
var url = row["FinalUrls"];
Logger.log(url);
}
I've tried logging the CampaignName and clicks and they're working as expected, so can't understand what the issue is here. The only thing I can think of is that in the reference guide it says:
List of final URLs of the main object of this row. UrlList elements
are returned in JSON list format
I'm not entirely sure what JSON list format is, but when I log the typeof url it says it's a string, so thought it shouldn't be an issue.
The FinalAppUrls and FinalUrls list the target URLs that you set on the individual managed placements.
If you're interested in the URL (domain, rather) of the placement itself, you'll have to request either the Criteria or the DisplayName field in your report——they both contain the domain of the placement.

Handle 121 and 111 swift tag using Prowide Software API(WIFE)

We are using Prowide Software (WIFE) API for parsing swift message. While processing swift messages we are getting tag 111 and 121 in MT103 swift message.due to which parser code is failing.
Could anyone please help me to know how to handle this using WIFE API?
I'm one the library authors. Field 111 and 121 are part of the optional user header (block 3) so in order to get those fields values you have to do something like:
String msg ="{1:F01CCRTIT2TA15A0000000000}{2:I103CCRTIT2TXXXXN}{3:{103:TGT}{113:NNBI}{108:FOO123}{111:001}{121:8579f4a4-a547-463e-ae63-e7c6620d59b4}}{4:\n" +
":20:0013355630808057\n" +
etc
":71A:SHA\n" +
"-}";
MT103 mt = MT103.parse(msg);
String UETR = mt.getSwiftMessage().getBlock3().getTagValue("121");
For future reference, as of SRU 2018 support for the SWIFT gpi (SWIFT Global Payment Innovation) fields has become mandatory. So the upcoming version of Prowide Core (since October 2018) includes many new API to deal with those fields.
Setters and getters have been added to the SwiftMessage object, including an empty setter setUETR() that will automatically generate a valid unique identifier.
SwiftMessage m = new SwiftMessage();
String uetr = m.setUETR();
// the uetr will contain the generated identifier such as //"eb6305c9-1f7f-49de-aed0-16487c27b42d"
Moreover, if the message is created with the MT103, MT103_STP, MT103_REMIT, MT202, MT205, MT202COV or MT205COV classes, where the UETR is mandatory, the block3 will be already initialized with a proper field 121 (UETR).
MT103 mt = new MT103(sender, receiver);
mt.append(new Field20("MYREF"));
String uetr = mt.getSwiftMessage().getUETR()
Finally, when processing incoming payments, the gpi fields can be directly retrieved with the getters:
MT103 mt = MT103.parse(fin);
if (mt.getSwiftMessage().isGpi()) {
System.out.println(mt.getSwiftMessage().getServiceIdentifier());
System.out.println(mt.getSwiftMessage().getUETR());
}

LoadRunner web_reg_save_param, ord=all, paramName_count issues

I am using LoadRunner version 12.02 - Build 2739
Looking at an old, yet correct 'guide' shows that I have used the statements correctly (3rd Point, around 1/3rd of the way down the page, inside the code block - the atoi statement).
But I am still unable to convert the _count parameter to an int-Variable.
In the script, before the call is made;
web_reg_save_param(
"ParamName=rotaPeople",
"LB=someText",
"RB=\")",
"Ord=ALL",
LAST);
After the web call the save_param function is placed before, the output log shows;
Notify: Saving Parameter "ParamName=rotaPeople_count = 21".
Inside the script, after the call is made, and the count has been totaled;
lr_output_message("RP_C:%d",lr_eval_string("{rotaPeople_count}"));
lr_output_message("RP_C:%s",lr_eval_string("{rotaPeople_count}"));
peoplesCount = atoi(lr_eval_string("{rotaPeople_count}"));
lr_output_message("PC:%d",peoplesCount);
In the logs after the above executions are made;
Warning: The string 'rotaPeople_count' with parameter delimiters is not a parameter.
RP_C:110826864
Warning: The string 'rotaPeople_count' with parameter delimiters is not a parameter.
RP_C:{rotaPeople_count}
Warning: The string 'rotaPeople_count' with parameter delimiters is not a parameter.
PC:0
Anyone have any ideas?
Note: The Warning messages are expected
Note: Workaround: Used web_reg_save_param_regex() and created a regular expression. Using the returned _count parameter within a for-loop worked. Keeping question open, as the original problem still persists
The problem is that you use a soon to be deprecated API web_reg_save_param which does not support the ParamName syntax. In this API the second parameter is always the parameter name and therefore the correct use would be:
web_reg_save_param(
"rotaPeople",
"LB=someText",
"RB=\")",
"Ord=ALL",
LAST);
The proper API to use is web_reg_save_param_ex which does support the syntax you used so the call should look like:
web_reg_save_param_ex(
"ParamName=rotaPeople",
"LB=someText",
"RB=\")",
"Ord=ALL",
LAST);
Then the rest of your code should work properly.
I am not sure what you are doing but you might want to take a look at the somewhat unknown API lr_paramarr_random which will automatically pull a random value from the parameters array.
This should help you
web_reg_save_param(
"rotaPeople",
"LB=someText",
"RB=\")",
"Ord=ALL",
LAST);
lr_output_message("PC:%d",atoi(lr_eval_string("{rotaPeople_count}")));
You are using ord=all,see the run time data which value you want to capture,If you want to capture the 10th value please use ord=10,automatically this warning will remove from output log.
Example for capturing an array of dynamic values:
Action()
{
int i;
int ncount;
char ParamName[100];
web_set_sockets_option("SSL_VERSION", "TLS");
web_reg_save_param("trackingno","LB=;","RB= (NTN 0430)","search=All","ord=all",LAST);
web_submit_data("barcode.pl",
"Action=http://qtetools.rmtc.fedex.com/barcode/cgi-bin/barcode.pl",
"Method=POST",
"TargetFrame=",
"RecContentType=text/html",
"Referer=http://qtetools.rmtc.fedex.com/barcode/html/barcode.shtml",
"Snapshot=t2.inf",
"Mode=HTML",
ITEMDATA,
"Name=formcode", "Value=0430", ENDITEM,
"Name=count", "Value=10", ENDITEM,
"Name=narrow", "Value=2", ENDITEM,
LAST);
ncount= atoi(lr_eval_string("{trackingno_count}"));
for (i =1;i <= ncount;i++)
{
sprintf(ParamName, "{trackingno_%d}", i);
lr_output_message("Value of %s: %s",ParamName,lr_eval_string(ParamName));
}
return 0;
}

Int32.ParseInt throws FormatException after web post

Update
I've found the problem, the exception came from a 2nd field on the same form which indeed should have prompted it (because it was empty)... I was looking at an error which I thought came from trying to parse one string, when in fact it was from trying to parse another string... Sorry for wasting your time.
Original Question
I'm completely dumbfounded by this problem. I am basically running int.Parse("32") and it throws a FormatException. Here's the code in question:
private double BindGeo(string value)
{
Regex r = new Regex(#"\D*(?<deg>\d+)\D*(?<min>\d+)\D*(?<sec>\d+(\.\d*))");
Regex d = new Regex(#"(?<dir>[NSEW])");
var numbers = r.Match(value);
string degStr = numbers.Groups["deg"].ToString();
string minStr = numbers.Groups["min"].ToString();
string secStr = numbers.Groups["sec"].ToString();
Debug.Assert(degStr == "32");
var deg = int.Parse(degStr);
var min = int.Parse(minStr);
var sec = double.Parse(secStr);
var direction = d.Match(value).Groups["dir"].ToString();
var result = deg + (min / 60.0) + (sec / 3600.0);
if (direction == "S" || direction == "W") result = -result;
return result;
}
My input string is "32 19 17.25 N"
The above code runs on a .NET 4 web hosting service (aspspider) on an ASP.NET MVC 3 web application (with Razor as its view engine).
Note the assersion of degStr == "32" is valid! Also when I take the above code and run it in a console application it works just fine. I've scoured the web for an answer, nothing...
Any ideas?
UPDATE (stack trace)
[FormatException: Input string was not in a correct format.]
System.Number.StringToNumber(String str, NumberStyles options, NumberBuffer& number, NumberFormatInfo info, Boolean parseDecimal) +9586043
System.Number.ParseInt32(String s, NumberStyles style, NumberFormatInfo info) +119
System.Int32.Parse(String s) +23
ParkIt.GeoModelBinder.BindGeo(String value) in C:\MyProjects\ParkIt\ParkIt\GeoBinder.cs:42
Line 42 is var deg = int.Parse(degStr); and note that the exception is in System.Int32.Parse (not in System.Double as was suggested).
You are wrongly thinking that it is the following line that is throwing the exception:
int.Parse("32")
This line is unlikely to ever throw an exception.
In fact it is the following line:
var sec = double.Parse(secStr);
In this case secStr = "17.25";.
The reason for that is that your hosting provider uses a different culture in which the . is not a decimal separator.
You have the possibility to specify the culture in your web.config file:
<globalization culture="en-US" uiCulture="en-US" />
If you don't do that, then auto is used. This means that the culture could be set based on the client browser preferences (which are sent with each request using the Accept-Language HTTP header).
Another possibility is to specify the culture when parsing:
var sec = double.Parse(secStr, CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
This way you know for sure that . is the decimal separator for the invariant culture.
Testing this (via PowerShell):
PS [64] E:\dev #43> '32 19 17.25 N' -match "\D*(?\d+)\D*(?\d+)\D*(?\d+(\.\d*))"
True
PS [64] E:\dev #44> $Matches
Name Value
---- -----
sec 17.25
deg 32
min 19
1 .25
0 32 19 17.25
So the regex is working with all three named captures getting a value, all of which will parse OK (ie. it isn't something like \d matching something like U+0660: ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT ZERO that Int32.Parse doesn't handle).
But you do not check that the regex actually makes a match.
Therefore I suspect that the value passed to the function is not the input you expect. Put a breakpoint (or logging) at the start of the function and get the actual value of value.
I think what is happening is:
Value isn't what you think it is.
The regex fails to match.
The captures are empty
Int32.Parse("") is throwing (just confirmed: it throws a FormatException "Input string was not in a correct format.")
Adendum: Just noted you comment on the assertion.
If things seem contradictory go back to basics: at least one of your assumptions is wrong eg. there could be an off by one in the exception's line number (an edit to the file before going to that line number: very easy to do).
Stepping through with a debugger in this case is by far the easiest approach. On every expression check everything.
If you cannot use a debugger then try and remove that restriction, if not how about IntelliTrace? Othewrwise use some kind of logging (if you app doesn't have it, add it as you'll need it in the future for things like this).
try remove non unicode ( if any - non-visible) chars from string :
string s = "søme string";
s = Regex.Replace(s, #"[^\u0000-\u007F]", string.Empty);
edit
also - try to see its hex values to see where it is doing exceptio n :
BitConverter.ToString(buffer);
this will show you the hex values so you can verify...
also paste its value so we can see it.
It turns out that this is a non-question. The problem was that the exception came from a 2nd field on the same form which indeed should have prompted it (because it was empty)... I was looking at an error which I thought came from trying to parse one string, when in fact it was from trying to parse another string...
Sorry for wasting your time.

Resources