One IP address per virtual terminal "screen" on Ubuntu - network-programming

I have multiple public IP address and I need to associate one per virtual terminal "screen".
Example:
IP 1: screen -dmS nameScreen1 ffmpeg etc...
IP 2: screen -dmS nameScreen2 ffmpeg etc...
IP 2: screen -dmS nameScreen3 streamlink etc...
IP 2: screen -dmS nameScreen4 youtube-dl etc...
IP 3: screen -dmS nameScreen5 ffmpeg etc...
I thinked about using X-Forwarded-For in --header to associate a private IP per "screen". With Squid or Network-manager write something like: For private IP 1 use public IP 1. But I don't know if it can works and how to do it.
I would be grateful if you have an other idea to solve this problem too.
Thanks to help me with this :).

Related

Using Beaglebone black in Window 10

I want to using beaglebone black in IOT.
My OS is window, so I use "Putty" connecting with debian.
IP address is 192.168.7.2, Port 22 and Connection type is SSH.
I want to confirm networking state so enter "ping 192.168.7.1".
Then, putty is not working.
so i adjust entering like "ping -c 2 192.168.7.1".
output is receive 0 and loss 100%.
I don't know the reason why output is like that.
I connect computer by ethernet, and beagle connecting p4.
BBB is configured by default to use the dynamic host configuration protocol DHCP, so ti will get some random IP address if you are using ethernet and not USB. However, you have some options to find it out:
You can attach a display and check the IP address asigned to the BBB;
You can connect to the BBB via serial console (although you need a specail cable for it);
You can connect your BBB via USB for the first time and configure a static address as described here and here
Attention, 192.168.7.2 is default BBB ip on Virtual ETH via USB (in Windows). You try connect usb and open SSH on 192.168.7.2:22. If fine, you can to change IP configuration on /etc/network/interfaces

What is the correct way to do Port Forwarding using VMWare

I have created a VM which has a server running at localhost:8675/ which I had wanted to connect to my host machine at the same port for ease of understanding. I was following these to documents for information:
https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html
http://www.howtogeek.com/122641/how-to-forward-ports-to-a-virtual-machine-and-use-it-as-a-server/
When I was in my VMWare Workstation, I clicked on my VM, then did: Edit > Virtual Network Editor. After that, enabled Change Settings which relaunched the window in admin mode. I clicked on the Row with Type NAT and external Connection NAT and in the VMNet Information with the NAT radio button pressed, I clicked the NAT Settings Button.
I said: Add... and then did:
Host: 8675
Type: TCP
VMIP: 127.0.0.1:8675
Description: Port Foward of 8675 from Host to VM.
It looks like everything is good. I say Ok and Apply in succession. It looked like it shut down nat and restarted some services.
I confirmed in the VM, the 127.0.0.1:8675 is correct.
In the HOST, I tried to go to: http://localhost:8675/ and it says: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED
I figured this was all I needed to do.
I was looking up some additional information and noticed that some people have had to configure firewalls. I wasnt sure if i needed to though, as I was thinking that the HOST and VM are all in 1 actual machine, it might be entirely self contained.
Is there a critical task I am missing?
I saw this post: https://superuser.com/questions/571196/port-forwarding-to-a-vmware-workstation-virtual-machine
which told me to just adjust it to bridged and use it that way. Does this solve the issue of connecting HOST / VM Issue.
I don't want to say this is the correct answer though as the question itself is particular to NAT, but this is a valid alternative answer that does work.
This is solves the base issue at hand, but not the question.
When you use NAT, the host system and the guest boxes have completely different IP addresses on their virtual subnet, so my guess is that when from the host system you try to connect to localhost:8675 you are actually trying to connect to port 8675 of the host and not of the guest. So don't use the localhost or 127.0.0.1 syntax, but discover the real IP address of the guest and use it.
If your guest is Windows use the ipconfig command, if Linux use ifconfig.
Probably you will also have to configure the firewall on the guest side.
EDIT:
Commenting the sentence "NAT: Used to share the host's IP address.": it probably refers to the IP address of the real ethernet adapter you have on your host and that is shared by host and guests to access the internet. That's not related to the way your host and guests communicate together. For example I use VMware Workstation to run a virtual Linux box in Windows. Selecting NAT, VMware creates a virtual subnet called VMnet8. In this subnet the virtual router has address 192.168.120.0, my Windows host is assigned a virtual ethernet adapter with address 192.168.120.1 and my Linux guest has got address 192.168.120.128. So when I want to access a Samba shared folder from Windows I type "net use * \192.168.120.128" in a Windows command prompt. When I want to access a Windows shared folder from Linux I type "sudo mount.cifs //192.168.120.1/path_to_shared_folder target_folder".
I believe you actually answered your question correctly as I was following it and achieved desired outcome.
IMHO, the error: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED indicates that a firewall on your host OS or guest OS (your VM) or on both doesn't allow the communication through the given ports.
The easiest thing would be to try to disable firewalls on boths, your HOST and GUEST OS.
Not sure what are your OSes, but here is just a good guide for setting up firewall rules on Ubuntu

Cisco find switch and port of remote device [port-channel, vpc]

What I have:
hostname, ip of Toolserver, CLI of every router/switch in the network.
What I want:
I'd like to know on which port on which switch the Toolserver is connected.
What I have done:
CLI on Gateway adress of the Toolserver IP:
sh ip arp *ip*
Now I have a MAC Address and an Interface.
sh mac address-table address *MAC*
When I now look at the ports I see that:
Po3997
That vPC status is up and is working but that doesn't really help me.
I see the interface members of that channel. But how does that help me?
Okey, I found it out myself.
sh int po{port-channel nummber}
Now I know the member in this channel: Eth1/xx und Eth2/xx
sh cdp nei
Now I know the hostname of the devices connected on that port.
Now I need to redo those 2 steps 1 more time, because there is another switch between.
Now I can do
sh mac address-table address xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx

Access Tomcat from iPad

I have installed Tomcat 7 on my Macbook. The IP address of Tomcat is : 127 . 0 . 0. 1
I would like to access it from my iPad. I don't know how to do that. I ve tried this address http:// 127. 0. 0. 1:8080 from my iPad but it doesn't work.
Do you know how to do that?
Thanks in advance.
127.0.0.1 is the ip of the current computers loop-back adapter (virtual network interface; so your device can address itself in the network, without a lookup). You need to find out your MacBooks real/ipv4 ip address. Try one of these:
System Preferences -> Network
Open a terminal -> type: ifconfig |grep inet

How do you host a Ruby on Rails application on a local network, so multiple people can access it?

I'm brand new to RoR and have pretty much 0 experience with it. I have been handed down somebody else's project and I need to find a way to host the application, so people can just access it locally. The application is a spider script/walker script/web scraper whatever you call it. Basically it connects to a website, logs in, retrieves certain data each day and maps it with the previous data. While on the local machine, you use it, go to localhost:3000, and you get the webpage the previous person designed. I was just wondering how I could get that page to be public for the people on our local network, so they could connect to some arbitrary IP and see the same page (it updates daily)?
What I tried doing is making the folder containing the application public to the network, but in order to use it, I would have to make everybody on the network allowed to write to it and each person would have to install RoR to use it. I want to avoid that since it doesn't seem logical, nor is it what I'm trying to do.
Looking at the code, I can reverse engineer and understand what it does, but when it comes to hosting web apps locally or something of that sort, I have never done this before. Please help!
Thanks in advance!
**EDIT
-This is all being done on a Windows 7 machine.
Since you're on Windows, open up a command line and run ipconfig to find out your local IP. It will be listed under 'IP Address'.
Tell people in your LAN to access http://192.168.x.x:3000 replacing 192.168.x.x by your IP address from step 1.
EDIT: One major thing that I missed, you are windows. On windows u could use thin and put it behind a load balancer. Although i would suggest hosting it on a UNIX machine :)
Although Running it in webrick(webrick is the application server for development i.e when u run rails s) will let other users access the website NEVER do the same for a production application. If you want to run this application in production, u need more powerful application servers like passenger. I would suggest you use it with Apache or Nginx instead of stand alone passenger. Once all this is setup others can use your application by entering the IP(xx.xx.xx.xx) also u can ask your system admin to setup a local DNS so your users need not remember the IP address always.
Description:
While starting Rails Server, we can also setup some options to configure the IP address and also the port number of the site under development environment to host the website in local network. So if we want to change the IP from http://127.0.0.1:3000 to http://192.168.x.x:port (x= 0 to 255 any one number), we can set that in Rails server command! But for this, we will need to find out our current IP address at our current network which will help us to serve the website in local network.
So at first step:
We will open our terminal on our PC. For Android user, we need to open Termux app. Then simply type ifconfig to get the IP address of our device in the current network. We will get an output like this one (Here I'm using Android device for development. So output might be something different than this one on your PC terminal but the process is same):
$ ifconfig
Warning: cannot open /proc/net/dev (Permission denied). Limited output.
lo: flags=XX<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu XXXXX
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.XXX.XXX.XXX
unspec 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 txqueuelen XXXX (UNSPEC)
wlan0: flags=XXXX<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu XXXX
inet 192.168.1.103 netmask 255.XXX.XXX.XXX broadcast 192.168.1.255
unspec 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 txqueuelen XXXX (UNSPEC)
X= some numbers with our device credentials which is dummied with this variable
If you are using a WiFi router then we will need the wlan0 part to get our device IP. Under wlan0 section there is a subsection of inet showing our current IP! YUP, we need that IP address 192.168.1.103! This might be different for your device and network. This is the key of this mission! Now we're going to the second important step.
So the Second Step is:
That required input command to configure the IP address.
rails s -b 192.168.1.103 -p 8080
Here:
rails s for rails server
-b 192.168.1.103 for bidding the IP address for customisation from the default IP http://127.0.0.1 which is our localhost address.
-p 8080 for port setup. This part is optional. Default port is 3000.
This is the process of changing the localhost IP (http://127.0.0.1) to local network IP which will be available for other device of the same network user.
Now our rails app is available in our local network! Other users in the same network will also be able to visit the website while the server command is running. And the link will be http://192.168.1.103:8080 if you also configure the port number. Otherwise if you have used the command rails s -b 192.168.1.103 without port configuration the link will be: http://192.168.1.103:3000
Again: 192.168.1.103 was for my case, your IP address will be different for your device. That will be needed to use for your server and link address.

Resources