I'm rendering a js.erb partial which enables ajax functionality to like/dislike a restaurant dish. I recently came across the around_action callback and figured yield would help perform the controller action first and render the template second. Unfortunately I'm getting a 500 (Internal Server Error) due to the respond_to never getting called.
The respond_to method works if I place it inside the controller action but not inside the callback. What am I doing wrong?
class DishesController < ApplicationController
before_action :set_dish_and_restaurant
around_action :render_vote_partial
def like
#dish.liked_by current_user
end
...
private
def set_dish_and_restaurant
#dish = Dish.find(params[:id])
end
def render_vote_partial
yield
respond_to { |format| format.js { render "vote.js.erb" } }
end
end
Console Error
ActionView::MissingTemplate (Missing template dishes/like, application/like with {:locale=>[:en], :formats=>[:js, "application/ecmascript", "application/x-ecmascript", :html, :text, :js, :css, :ics, :csv, :vcf, :png, :jpeg, :gif, :bmp, :tiff, :mpeg, :xml, :rss, :atom, :yaml, :multipart_form, :url_encoded_form, :json, :pdf, :zip], :variants=>[], :handlers=>[:erb, :builder, :raw, :ruby, :coffee, :jbuilder]}. Searched in:
* "/app/views"
* "/Library/Ruby/Gems/2.0.0/gems/devise-3.5.1/app/views"
):
app/controllers/dishes_controller.rb:29:in `render_vote_partial'
Okay so with your stack trace it is pretty clear what is happening. You have to understand the default rails behavior of convention over configuration.
As soon as you call yield, your controller action gets called. Now all controller actions by default look to render views with the same name as action, once the actions are done executing.
So calling render_to after yield doesn't make any sense, as controller action you yielded to has already called its render :)
In any case what you are trying to do is a bad design pattern, rendering views should be left to actions
Update
Theoretically speaking : As you wish to keep things DRY you could render the same view after each action by creating a common method calling it after every action. However, think about it, your render will have one line, and calling that same method will need one line too :) so where's the DRY.
In short, DRY should not be over done at the cost of simplicity. In my opinion KISS trumps DRY :)
Related
How to pass parameters from front end to back-end API in Ruby on Rails only through controllers? I do not want to use model or views for this.
I am using a Ruby Gem which captures some usage data which needs to be stored into the back end database.
I have created a controller, to which the post parameters are sent, but I get an error saying view is not found.
ActionView::MissingTemplate (Missing template usage_metrics/create, application/create with {:locale=>[:en], :formats=>[:json, :js, :html, :text, :js, :css, :ics, :csv, :vcf, :png, :jpeg, :gif, :bmp, :tiff, :mpeg, :xml, :rss, :atom, :yaml, :multipart_form, :url_encoded_form, :json, :pdf, :zip, :web_console_v2], :variants=>[], :handlers=>[:erb, :builder, :raw, :ruby, :coffee, :jbuilder]}. Searched in:
* "/home/local/www/cc2/cc_user-frontend/app/views"
* "/home/local/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.2.3/gems/ckeditor-4.2.2/app/views"
):
You need to send the request in an appropriate format (i.e. json) and ensure the controller action responds to this. At the moment it's trying to respond with html but not finding a template for this.
For example, in the action, after you've done what you need to do:
respond_to do |format|
format.json { render json: { whatever: is_needed_in_the_response } }
end
And you'll get your response that way.
Or if you don't need a response after parsing the params, you can use render nothing: true.
N.B. I think the newest versions Rails will respond with nothing / json if there's no template found. Not sure how this affects you.
Hope that helps!
if you want to return some data as json you can use
render json: data
but if you only want to return status
render json: {}, status: 200
actually i use rails for my REST API, and i need transform my object to json but when i try i got this error:
<h1>Template is missing</h1>
<p>Missing template firms/show, application/show with {:locale=>[:en], :formats=>[:html, :text, :js, :css, :ics, :csv, :png, :jpeg, :gif, :bmp, :tiff, :mpeg, :xml, :rss, :atom, :yaml, :multipart_form, :url_encoded_form, :json, :pdf, :zip], :handlers=>[:erb, :builder, :arb, :jbuilder]}. Searched in:
* "/Users/allan/Desktop/Work/back/app/views"
* "/Library/Ruby/Gems/2.0.0/gems/activeadmin-0.6.0/app/views"
* "/Library/Ruby/Gems/2.0.0/gems/kaminari-0.16.3/app/views"
* "/Library/Ruby/Gems/2.0.0/gems/devise_invitable-1.5.5/app/views"
* "/Library/Ruby/Gems/2.0.0/gems/devise-3.5.4/app/views"
</p>
This is my code
def show
firm= Firm.find_by_subdomain(params[:subdomain])
if firm.present?
respond_to do |format|
#firm = firm
format.json { render :json => #firm.to_json }
end
end
end
I hope someone here can help me :)
Solve:
def show
render json: Firm.find_by_subdomain(current_subdomain)
end
thank you
Template missing means that you asking for a html view, not doing a json request.
If you want to always return json format regardless of format param, do this:
before_action :set_default_response_format
protected
def set_default_response_format
request.format = :json
end
#source: Rails 4 - How to render JSON regardless of requested format?
Try to add .json at the end of you query when querying your route. Without this, it will try to render html and it will go search for view file that might not be present in your case.
i have a method called def createCustomer so i created a .html.erb file called createCustomer within the folder name charge which is the name of the controller. This charge folder is in under the views folder.
i am getting this on my logs
ActionView::MissingTemplate (Missing template charge/createCustomer, application/createCustomer with {:locale=>[:en], :formats=>[:html, :text, :js, :css, :ics, :csv, :vcf, :png, :jpeg, :gif, :bmp, :tiff, :mpeg, :xml, :rss, :atom, :yaml, :multipart_form, :url_encoded_form, :json, :pdf, :zip], :variants=>[], :handlers=>[:erb, :builder, :raw, :ruby, :coffee, :jbuilder]}. Searched in: 2016-01-26T23:00:34.324498+00:00 app[web.1]: * "/app/app/views"
To add to the comments, you need to equate yourself with the Rails infrastructure (convention over configuration):
Class names are CamelCase, file names are snake_case
Controllers are plural (mostly)
You should keep your controllers resourceful
Here's how it should be structured:
# config/routes.rb
resources :customers #-> url.com/customers/new
# app/controllers/customers_controller.rb
class CustomersController < ApplicationController
def new
#customer = Customer.new
end
def create
#customer = Customer.new customer_params
redirect_to #customer if #customer.save
end
private
def customer_params
params.require(:customer).permit(...)
end
end
# app/views/customers/new.html.erb
<%= form_for #customer do |f| %>
...
I'm using RSpec to test my views. I want to test that the view for the edit action contains a field (or text) "Director". It's choking on render. Here's my code:
# spec/views/movies/edit.html.haml_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'
describe 'movies/edit.html.haml' do
it 'displays \'director\' field on edit page' do
render
expect(rendered).to have_content("Director")
end
end
On running this I get the following error:
Failure/Error: render
ActionView::Template::Error:
No route matches {:action=>"show", :controller=>"movies", :id=>nil}
My understanding is that convention over configuration means that render without any arguments should render the intended view app/views/movies/edit.html.haml I don't know why it's looking for the route to the action show. That route does exist, though it has nothing to do with this spec.
I've tried a number of permuations of arguments to render with no luck:
render :edit
render action: :edit # is this even valid?
render :action => :edit
render "edit"
render "edit.html.haml"
render action: "edit"
render action: "edit.html.haml"
render :action => "edit"
render :action => "edit.html.haml"
All the above produce one of two errors:
ArgumentError:
You invoked render but did not give any of :partial, :template, :inline, :file or :text option.
OR
ActionView::MissingTemplate:
Missing partial /edit, movies/edit with {:locale=>[:en], :formats=>[:html, :text, :js, :css, :ics, :csv, :png, :jpeg, :gif, :bmp, :tiff, :mpeg, :xml, :rss, :atom, :yaml, :multipart_form, :url_encoded_form, :json, :pdf, :zip], :handlers=>[:erb, :builder, :coffee, :haml]}.
I'm not trying to render a partial, I'm trying to render the full view. Am I using the convention incorrectly, or using render incorrectly?
Edit1: I don't think it's a partial. There is a view at app/views/movies/edit.html.haml. I may not properly understand what a partial is.
Edit2: I tried the same spec for the new action and it seems to run fine (fails when the text is not there, passes when the text is there). Does this mean I need to load the edit view as a partial, or do I need to give it dummy data for #movie? And why is edit a partial?
For anyone else looking for something similar, you should be assigning a movie model for the view to render.
Something like the following should work:
describe 'movies/edit.html.haml' do
let(:movie) { Movie.create(movie_params_go_here) }
it 'displays \'director\' field on edit page' do
assign(:movie, movie)
render
expect(rendered).to have_content("Director")
end
end
Is it possible to render a js.erb in response to an AJAX request without using the respond_to method?
I am asking because of a few reasons:
I will only be making AJAX calls to my controllers;
I will not be supporting any other content types (i.e., :html, :xml, etc.); and
I want to be able to render a different js.erb file, not one named the same as the controller method (i.e., different.js.erb)
Here is some code to serve as an example.
app/views/posts/awesome.js.erb:
alert("WOOHOO");
PostsController#create
def create
#post = Post.new(params[:task])
if #post.save
render :partial => 'awesome.js.erb'
end
end
When the create method is called via AJAX, Rails complains about a partial missing:
ActionView::MissingTemplate (Missing partial post/awesome.js, application/awesome.js with {:handlers=>[:erb, :builder, :coffee, :haml], :formats=>[:js, "application/ecmascript", "application/x-ecmascript", :html, :text, :js, :css, :ics, :csv, :xml, :rss, :atom, :yaml, :multipart_form, :url_encoded_form, :json], :locale=>[:en, :en]}. Searched in:
While Kieber S. answer is correct, here is another method that I think would be valuable for those who want to support the "conventional" method of creating js.erb files.
Instead of using render :partial use render :template. The caveat here, however, is that the search path for the template isn't automatically scoped to the name of the controller (i.e., app/views/posts). Instead, Rails starts at app/views/. So to reference the "template", you need to add the subfolder you want to look into, if it isn't in the root. In my case, I had to add posts.
def create
#post = Post.new(params[:task])
if #post.save
# using :template and added 'posts/' to path
render :template => 'posts/awesome.js.erb'
end
end
The benefit here is that if you should so happen to want to use the respond_to method and follow convention, you wouldn't need to rename your js.erb by removing the underscore.
Partial files need to be named as with a underscore.
Try to rename your partial to app/views/posts/_awesome.js.erb