Catch a TimeoutError of a promise beforehand - timeout

I have a bluebird promise which can be cancelled. When cancelled, I have to do some work to neatly abort the running task. A task can be cancelled in two ways: via promise.cancel() or promise.timeout(delay).
In order to be able to neatly abort the task when cancelled or timed out, I have to catch CancellationErrors and TimeoutErrors. Catching a CancellationError works, but for some reason I can't catch a TimeoutError:
var Promise = require('bluebird');
function task() {
return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {
// ... a long running task ...
})
.cancellable()
.catch(Promise.CancellationError, function(error) {
// ... must neatly abort the task ...
console.log('Task cancelled', error);
})
.catch(Promise.TimeoutError, function(error) {
// ... must neatly abort the task ...
console.log('Task timed out', error);
});
}
var promise = task();
//promise.cancel(); // this works fine, CancellationError is caught
promise.timeout(1000); // PROBLEM: this TimeoutError isn't caught!
How can I catch timeout errors before a timeout is set?

when you cancel a promise, the cancellation first bubbles to its parents as long as a parents are found that are still cancellable, this is very different from normal rejection which only propagates to children.
.timeout does a simple normal rejection, it doesn't do cancellation, so that's why it's not possible to do it like this.
You can either cancel after a delay:
var promise = task();
Promise.delay(1000).then(function() { promise.cancel(); });
or set the timeout in the task function:
var promise = task(1000);
function task(timeout) {
return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {
// ... a long running task ...
})
.timeout(timeout)
.cancellable()
.catch(Promise.CancellationError, function(error) {
// ... must neatly abort the task ...
console.log('Task cancelled', error);
})
.catch(Promise.TimeoutError, function(error) {
// ... must neatly abort the task ...
console.log('Task timed out', error);
});
}
You can also create a method like:
Promise.prototype.cancelAfter = function(ms) {
var self = this;
setTimeout(function() {
self.cancel();
}, ms);
return this;
};
Then
function task() {
return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {
// ... a long running task ...
})
.cancellable()
.catch(Promise.CancellationError, function(error) {
// ... must neatly abort the task ...
console.log('Task cancelled', error);
})
}
var promise = task();
// Since it's a cancellation, it will propagate upwards so you can
// clean up in the task function
promise.cancelAfter(1000);

Related

Wrong order of execution async handler

I have small app that execute requests to external service.
final app = Alfred();
app.post('/ctr', (req, res) async { // complex tender request
var data = await req.body;
await complexTendexAPIRequest(data as Map<String, dynamic>);
print('Hello World');
await res.json({'data': 'ok'});
});
Handler code:
complexTendexAPIRequest(Map<String, dynamic> data) async {
print('Request: $data');
try {
final response = await http.post(
Uri.parse(COMPLEX_URL),
headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'Authorization': 'bearer $ACCESS_TOKEN'},
body: json.encode(data)
);
if(response.statusCode == 200) {
var res = json.decode(response.body);
int latestId = res['id'];
String url = 'https://api.ru/v2/complex/status?id=$latestId';
stdout.write('Waiting for "complete" status from API: ');
Timer.periodic(Duration(seconds: 1), (timer) async {
final response = await http.get(
Uri.parse(url),
headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'Authorization': 'bearer $ACCESS_TOKEN'}
);
var data = json.decode(response.body);
if(data['status'] == 'completed') {
timer.cancel();
stdout.write('[DONE]');
stdout.write('\nFetching result: ');
String url = "https://api.ru/v2/complex/results?id=$latestId";
final response = await http.get(
Uri.parse(url),
headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'Authorization': 'bearer $ACCESS_TOKEN'}
);
stdout.write('[DONE]');
var data = prettyJson(json.decode(response.body));
await File('result.json').writeAsString(data.toString());
print("\nCreating dump of result: [DONE]");
}
});
}
else {
print('[ERROR] Wrong status code for complex request. StatusCode: ${response.statusCode}');
}
}
on SocketException catch(e) {
print('No Internet connection: $e');
} on TimeoutException catch(e) {
print('TenderAPI Timeout: $e');
} on Exception catch(e) {
print('Some unknown Exception: $e');
}
}
But output is very strange it's look like it's do not waiting complexTendexAPIRequest completion and go forward:
Waiting for "complete" status from API: Hello World
[DONE]
Fetching result: [DONE]
Creating dump of result: [DONE]
But should be:
Waiting for "complete" status from API: [DONE]
Fetching result: [DONE]
Creating dump of result: [DONE]
Hello World
I suppose that reason can be in Timer.periodic but how to fix it to get expected order and execution of:
print('Hello World');
await res.json({'data': 'ok'});
only after complexTendexAPIRequest completed.
upd: I rewrote code to while loop:
https://gist.github.com/bubnenkoff/fd6b4f0d7aeae7007680e7902fbdc1e9
it's seems that it's ok.
Alfred https://github.com/rknell/alfred
The problem is the Timer.periodic, as others have pointed out.
You do:
Timer.periodic(Duration(seconds: 1), (timer) async {
// do something ...
});
That sets up a timer, then immediately continues execution.
The timer triggers every second, calls the async callback (which returns a future that no-one ever waits for) and which does something which just might take longer than a second.
You can convert this to a normal loop, basically:
while (true) {
// do something ...
if (data['status'] == 'completed') {
// ...
break;
} else {
// You can choose your own delay here, doesn't have
// to be the same one every time.
await Future.delayed(const Duration(seconds: 1));
}
}
If you still want it to be timer driven, with fixed ticks, consider rewriting this as:
await for (var _ in Stream.periodic(const Duration(seconds: 1))) {
// do something ...
// Change `timer.cancel();` to a `break;` at the end of the block.
}
Here you create a stream which fires an event every second. Then you use an await for loop to wait for each steam event. If the thing you do inside the loop is asynchronous (does an await) then you are even ensured that the next stream event is delayed until the loop body is done, so you won't have two fetches running at the same time.
And if the code throws, the error will be caught by the surrounding try/catch, which I assume was intended, rather than being an uncaught error ending up in the Future that no-one listens to.
If you want to retain the Timer.periodic code, you can, but you need to do something extra to synchronize it with the async/await code around it (which only really understands futures and streams, not timers).
For example:
var timerDone = Completer();
Timer.periodic(const Duration(seconds: 1), (timer) async {
try {
// do something ...
// Add `timerDone.complete();` next to `timer.cancel()`.
} catch (e, s) {
timer.cancel();
timerDone.completeError(e, s);
}
});
await timerDone.future;
This code uses a Completer to complete a future and effectively bridge the gap between timers and futures that can be awaited (one of the listed uses of Completer in the documentation).
You may still risk the timer running concurrently if one step takes longer than a second.
Also, you can possibly use the retry package, if it's the same thing you want to retry until it works.

Forwarding an incoming call after task reservation timeout

I am using Twilio Flex to support a call center. I have a TaskRouter workflow set up where Task Reservation Timeout is set to 120 seconds. In its filter, I've created two routing steps. The first one finds matching workers in the main queue and has a timeout of 120 seconds. After 120 seconds, it should move to Call Forward Queue. In the call forward queue, no workers exist (target worker expression: 1==2). I'm catching all these events with a "trEventListener" function. Once a task is moved into the Call Forward queue, I call the "callForward" function which uses twiml.dial() to connect the call to an external number. I also change this task's status to "canceled" with a custom reason so I can track it in flex insights. I am using the guide in this link to form my logic: https://support.twilio.com/hc/en-us/articles/360021082934-Implementing-Voicemail-with-Twilio-Flex-TaskRouter-and-WFO.
Call forwarding is working fine but according to Flex insights, there are some calls that get handled after 120 seconds (between 120 - 300 seconds). Ideally, these should be forwarded as well. There is also no error logged for me to track down why this is happening to only a handful of calls.
Furthermore, in some cases, when I try to change the task status to cancel with my custom reason, it spits out the following error: Cannot cancel task because it is not pending or reserved. In other cases, it works fine. It's again hard to figure out why it's selectively working and not consistent in its behavior.
Here is the function code.
trEventListener.js:
exports.handler = function(context, event, callback) {
const client = context.getTwilioClient();
let task = '';
let workspace = '';
console.log(`__[trEventStream]__: Event recieved of type: ${event.EventType}`);
// setup an empty success response
let response = new Twilio.Response();
response.setStatusCode(204);
// switch on the event type
switch(event.EventType) {
case 'task-queue.entered':
// ignore events that are not entering the 'Call Forward' TaskQueue
if (event.TaskQueueName !== 'Call Forward') {
console.log(`__[trEventStream]__: Entered ${event.TaskQueueName} queue - no forwarding required!`);
return callback(null, response);
}
console.log(`__[trEventStream]__: entered ${event.TaskQueueName} queue - forwarding call!`);
task = event.TaskSid;
workspace = event.WorkspaceSid;
const ta = JSON.parse(event.TaskAttributes);
const callSid = ta.call_sid;
let url = `https://${context.DOMAIN_NAME}/forwardCall`;
// redirect call to forwardCall function
client.calls(callSid).update({
method: 'POST',
url: encodeURI(url),
}).then(() => {
console.log(`__[trEventStream]__: [SUCCESS] ~> Task with id ${task} forwarded to external DID`);
// change task status to canceled so it doesn't appear in flex or show up as a pending task
client.taskrouter.workspaces(workspace)
.tasks(task)
.update({
assignmentStatus: 'canceled',
reason: 'Call forwarded'
})
.then(task => {
console.log(`__[trEventStream]__: [SUCCESS] ~> Task canceled`);
return callback(null, response);
}).catch(err => {
console.log(`__[trEventStream]__: [ERROR] ~> Task not marked complete: `, err);
// doesn't warrant reponse 500 since call still forwarded :)
return callback(null, response);
});
}).catch(err => {
console.log(`__[trEventStream]__: [ERROR] ~> Task failed to forward to external DID: `, err);
response.setStatusCode(500);
return callback(err, response);
});
break;
default:
return callback(null, response);
}
};
callForward.js:
exports.handler = function(context, event, callback) {
console.log(`forwarding call`);
// set-up the variables that this Function will use to forward a phone call using TwiML
// REQUIRED - you must set this
let phoneNumber = event.PhoneNumber || context.NUMBER;
// OPTIONAL
let callerId = event.CallerId || null;
// OPTIONAL
let timeout = event.Timeout || null;
// OPTIONAL
let allowedCallers = event.allowedCallers || [];
let allowedThrough = true;
if (allowedCallers.length > 0) {
if (allowedCallers.indexOf(event.From) === -1) {
allowedThrough = false;
}
}
// generate the TwiML to tell Twilio how to forward this call
let twiml = new Twilio.twiml.VoiceResponse();
let dialParams = {};
if (callerId) {
dialParams.callerId = callerId;
}
if (timeout) {
dialParams.timeout = timeout;
}
if (allowedThrough) {
twiml.dial(dialParams, phoneNumber); // making call :)
}
else {
twiml.say('Sorry, you are calling from a restricted number. Good bye.');
}
// return the TwiML
callback(null, twiml);
};
Any kind of help and/or guidance will be appreciated.
Twilio developer evangelist here.
When you redirect a call from a task, its task is cancelled with the reason "redirected" so you don't need to cancel it yourself.
Your code was failing to update the task occasionally because of a race condition between your code and the task getting cancelled by Twilio.

How to handle FileSystemException in dart when watching a directory

I have written a simple command line tool in dart that watches changes in a directory if a directory does not exits I get FileSystemsException.
I have tried to handle it using try and catch clause. When the exception occurs the code in catch clause is not executed
try {
watcher.events.listen((event) {
if (event.type == ChangeType.ADD) {
print("THE FILE WAS ADDED");
print(event.path);
} else if (event.type == ChangeType.MODIFY) {
print("THE FILE WAS MODIFIED");
print(event.path);
} else {
print("THE FILE WAS REMOVED");
print(event.path);
}
});
} on FileSystemException {
print("Exception Occurs");
}
I expect the console to print "Exception Occurs"
There are two possibilities:
The exception is happening outside this block (maybe where the watcher is constructed?)
The exception is an unhandled async exception. This might be coming from either the Stream or it might be getting fired from some other Future, like perhaps the ready Future.
You can add handlers for the async exceptions like this:
try {
// If this is in an `async` method, use `await` within the try block
await watcher.ready;
// Otherwise add a error handler on the Future
watcher.ready.catchError((e) {
print('Exception in the ready Future');
});
watcher.events.listen((event) {
...
}, onError: (e) {
print('Exception in the Stream');
});
} on FileSystemException {
print("Exception Occurs");
}
My guess would be it's an error surfaced through the ready Future.

Service worker sync event is not getting fired again after failure in first time

This is my code of sync event. Am I doing wrong by handling the promise of sync() method? Should not I handle promise which is inside event.waitUntil() method?
`self.addEventListener('sync', function(event) {
if (event.tag == "esssync") {
event.waitUntil(sync()
.then(function(data){
console.log(data);
try{
if (Notification.permission === 'granted'){
self.registration.showNotification("Sync success" + data);
}else{
console.log("Sync success");
}
}catch(err){
console.log("Sync success");
}
})
.catch(function(err){
console.log("Could not sync, scheduled for the next time");
}));
}
});`
Jake Archibald's guide to Background Sync is a great source of information; it contains the following:
[The promise passed to event.waitUntil indicates]
the success/failure of whatever it’s trying to do. If it
fulfills, the sync is complete. If it fails, another sync will be
scheduled to retry.
You're passing in a promise that always fulfills, because you have a .catch() function at the end of it, and you don't throw an error or return a rejected promise from within that .catch(). You just have a single console.log() statement.
The .catch() function is analogous to the catch block in traditional try {} / catch {} exception handling. You need to re-throw the original error from inside your catch {} block if you want it to propagate up the call stack, and the same thing applies with .catch() if you want the error to cause the promise to reject.
event.waitUntil(
sync()
.then(data => /* do something with data */)
.catch(error => {
console.log('Could not sync; scheduled for the next time', error);
throw error; // Alternatively, `return Promise.reject(error);`
}))
);
You can also just leave out the .catch() entirely, and rely on the fact that passing in the rejected promise to event.waitUntil() should log something in the JavaScript console by default.

Wait for future to complete

I use my postgres database query to determine my next action. And I need to wait for the results before I can execute the next line of code. Now my conn.query returns a Future but I can't manage to get it async when I place my code in another function.
main() {
// get the database connection string from the settings.ini in the project root folder
db = getdb();
geturl().then((String url) => print(url));
}
Future geturl() {
connect(db).then((conn) {
conn.query("select trim(url) from crawler.crawls where content IS NULL").toList()
.then((result) { return result[0].toString(); })
.catchError((err) => print('Query error: $err'))
.whenComplete(() {
conn.close();
});
});
}
I just want geturl() to wait for the returned value but whatever I do; it fires immediately. Can anyone point me a of a piece of the docs that explains what I am missing here?
You're not actually returning a Future in geturl currently. You have to actually return the Futures that you use:
Future geturl() {
return connect(db).then((conn) {
return conn.query("select trim(url) from crawler.crawls where content IS NULL").toList()
.then((result) { return result[0].toString(); })
.catchError((err) => print('Query error: $err'))
.whenComplete(() {
conn.close();
});
});
}
To elaborate on John's comment, here's how you'd implement this using async/await. (The async/await feature was added in Dart 1.9)
main() async {
try {
var url = await getUrl();
print(url);
} on Exception catch (ex) {
print('Query error: $ex');
}
}
Future getUrl() async {
// get the database connection string from the settings.ini in the project root folder
db = getdb();
var conn = await connect(db);
try {
var sql = "select trim(url) from crawler.crawls where content IS NULL";
var result = await conn.query(sql).toList();
return result[0].toString();
} finally {
conn.close();
}
}
I prefer, in scenarios with multiple-chained futures (hopefully soon a thing of the past once await comes out), to use a Completer. It works like this:
Future geturl() {
final c = new Completer(); // declare a completer.
connect(db).then((conn) {
conn.query("select trim(url) from crawler.crawls where content IS NULL").toList()
.then((result) {
c.complete(result[0].toString()); // use the completer to return the result instead
})
.catchError((err) => print('Query error: $err'))
.whenComplete(() {
conn.close();
});
});
return c.future; // return the future to the completer instead
}
To answer your 'where are the docs' question: https://www.dartlang.org/docs/tutorials/futures/
You said that you were trying to get your geturl() function to 'wait for the returned value'. A function that returns a Future (as in the example in the previous answer) will execute and return immediately, it will not wait. In fact that is precisely what Futures are for, to avoid code doing nothing or 'blocking' while waiting for data to arrive or an external process to finish.
The key thing to understand is that when the interpreter gets to a call to then() or 'catchError()' on a Future, it does not execute the code inside, it puts it aside to be executed later when the future 'completes', and then just keeps right on executing any following code.
In other words, when using Futures in Dart you are setting up chunks of code that will be executed non-linearly.

Resources