I am very confused by the different CUDA versions shown by running which nvcc and nvidia-smi. I have both cuda9.2 and cuda10 installed on my ubuntu 16.04. Now I set the PATH to point to cuda9.2. So when I run
$ which nvcc
/usr/local/cuda-9.2/bin/nvcc
However, when I run
$ nvidia-smi
Wed Nov 21 19:41:32 2018
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 410.72 Driver Version: 410.72 CUDA Version: 10.0 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 GeForce GTX 106... Off | 00000000:01:00.0 Off | N/A |
| N/A 53C P0 26W / N/A | 379MiB / 6078MiB | 2% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: GPU Memory |
| GPU PID Type Process name Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 1324 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 225MiB |
| 0 2844 G compiz 146MiB |
| 0 15550 G /usr/lib/firefox/firefox 1MiB |
| 0 19992 G /usr/lib/firefox/firefox 1MiB |
| 0 23605 G /usr/lib/firefox/firefox 1MiB |
So am I using cuda9.2 as which nvcc suggests, or am I using cuda10 as nvidia-smi suggests? I saw this answer but it does not provide direct answer to the confusion, it just asks us to reinstall the CUDA Toolkit, which I already did.
CUDA has 2 primary APIs, the runtime and the driver API. Both have a corresponding version (e.g. 8.0, 9.0, etc.)
The necessary support for the driver API (e.g. libcuda.so on linux) is installed by the GPU driver installer.
The necessary support for the runtime API (e.g. libcudart.so on linux, and also nvcc) is installed by the CUDA toolkit installer (which may also have a GPU driver installer bundled in it).
In any event, the (installed) driver API version may not always match the (installed) runtime API version, especially if you install a GPU driver independently from installing CUDA (i.e. the CUDA toolkit).
The nvidia-smi tool gets installed by the GPU driver installer, and generally has the GPU driver in view, not anything installed by the CUDA toolkit installer.
Recently (somewhere between 410.48 and 410.73 driver version on linux) the powers-that-be at NVIDIA decided to add reporting of the CUDA Driver API version installed by the driver, in the output from nvidia-smi.
This has no connection to the installed CUDA runtime version.
nvcc, the CUDA compiler-driver tool that is installed with the CUDA toolkit, will always report the CUDA runtime version that it was built to recognize. It doesn't know anything about what driver version is installed, or even if a GPU driver is installed.
Therefore, by design, these two numbers don't necessarily match, as they are reflective of two different things.
If you are wondering why nvcc -V displays a version of CUDA you weren't expecting (e.g. it displays a version other than the one you think you installed) or doesn't display anything at all, version wise, it may be because you haven't followed the mandatory instructions in step 7 (prior to CUDA 11) (or step 6 in the CUDA 11 linux install guide) of the cuda linux install guide
Note that although this question mostly has linux in view, the same concepts apply to windows CUDA installs. The driver has a CUDA driver version associated with it (which can be queried with nvidia-smi, for example). The CUDA runtime also has a CUDA runtime version associated with it. The two will not necessarily match in all cases.
In most cases, if nvidia-smi reports a CUDA version that is numerically equal to or higher than the one reported by nvcc -V, this is not a cause for concern. That is a defined compatibility path in CUDA (newer drivers/driver API support "older" CUDA toolkits/runtime API). For example if nvidia-smi reports CUDA 10.2, and nvcc -V reports CUDA 10.1, that is generally not cause for concern. It should just work, and it does not necessarily mean that you "actually installed CUDA 10.2 when you meant to install CUDA 10.1"
If nvcc command doesn't report anything at all (e.g. Command 'nvcc' not found...) or if it reports an unexpected CUDA version, this may also be due to an incorrect CUDA install, i.e the mandatory steps mentioned above were not performed correctly. You can start to figure this out by using a linux utility like find or locate (use man pages to learn how, please) to find your nvcc executable. Assuming there is only one, the path to it can then be used to fix your PATH environment variable. The CUDA linux install guide also explains how to set this. You may need to adjust the CUDA version in the PATH variable to match your actual CUDA version desired/installed.
Similarly, when using docker, the nvidia-smi command will generally report the driver version installed on the base machine, whereas other version methods like nvcc --version will report the CUDA version installed inside the docker container.
Similarly, if you have used another installation method for the CUDA "toolkit" such as Anaconda, you may discover that the version indicated by Anaconda does not "match" the version indicated by nvidia-smi. However, the above comments still apply. Older CUDA toolkits installed by Anaconda can be used with newer versions reported by nvidia-smi, and the fact that nvidia-smi reports a newer/higher CUDA version than the one installed by Anaconda does not mean you have an installation problem.
Here is another question that covers similar ground. The above treatment does not in any way indicate that this answer is only applicable if you have installed multiple CUDA versions intentionally or unintentionally. The situation presents itself any time you install CUDA. The version reported by nvcc and nvidia-smi may not match, and that is expected behavior and in most cases quite normal.
nvcc is in the CUDA bin folder - as such check if the CUDA bin folder has been added to your $PATH.
Specifically, ensure that you have carried out the CUDA Post-Installation actions (e.g. from here):
Add the CUDA Bin to $PATH (i.e. add the following line to your ~/.bashrc)
export PATH=/usr/local/cuda-10.1/bin:/usr/local/cuda-10.1/NsightCompute-2019.1${PATH:+:${PATH}}
PS. Ensure the following two paths above, exist first: /usr/local/cuda-10.1/bin and /usr/local/cuda-10.1/NsightCompute-2019.1 (the NsightCompute path could have a slightly different ending depending on the version of Nsight compute installed...
Update $LD_LIBRARY_PATH (i.e. add the following line to your ~/bashrc).
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/cuda-10.1/lib64\
${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}}
After this, both nvcc and nvidia-smi (or nvtop) report the same version of CUDA...
If you are using cuda 10.2 :
export PATH=/usr/local/cuda-10.2/bin:/opt/nvidia/nsight-compute/2019.5.0${PATH:+:${PATH}}
might help because when I checked, there was no directory for nsight-compute in cuda-10.2.
I am not sure if this was just the problem with me or else why wouldn't they mention it in the official documentation.
Adding onto Robert Crovella's answer...
The difference between the device driver and the runtime driver is that, with device driver you will be able to run compiled CUDA C code. That is, you can download CUDA powered applications and they will be able to successfully execute their code on your GPU.
Whereas, with the runtime driver you will be able to able to compile the CUDA C code, which then will be executed with the help of the device driver on your GPU.
Section 2.2.3 - Cuda Development Toolkit
nvidia-smi can show a “different CUDA version” from the one that is reported by nvcc. Because they are reporting two different things:
nvidia-smi shows that maximum available CUDA version support for a given GPU driver.
And the 2nd thing which nvcc -V reports is the CUDA version that is currently being used by the system.
In short
nvidia-smi shows the highest version of CUDA supported by your driver. nvcc -V shows the version of the current CUDA installation. As long as your driver-supported version is higher than your installed version, it's fine. You can even have several versions of CUDA installed at the same time.
I bought a machine with Nvidia Geforce GTX 1650ti GPU and now I came to know that it is not listed under the CUDA GPUs.
I want to install TensorFlow on my machine. But I have seen on the web that TF doesn't support 1650ti. Can someone tell me what versions of the TensorFlow, CUDA toolkit, drivers needed to be installed to train my models?
Thanks in advance.
Edit: Installed successfully.
I want to Use Imagemagick with Nvidia 2080 GPU acceleration， How should I install imagemagick enviroment？
If I'm not mistaken, it seems that OpenCL support is explicitly disabled for Nvidia GPUs...
https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/discussions/2545
I am trying to follow: https://github.com/jetsonhacks/installTensorFlowTX2
to install tensorflow on my TX2. After ./setTensorFlowEV.sh I get the following error:
Invalid path to cuDNN toolkit. Neither of the following two files can be found:
/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/lib64/libcudnn.so.6.0.21
/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcudnn.so.6.0.21
/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcudnn.so.6.0.21
This suggest I do not have cudnn6 installed on my TX2. Since tx2 is aarch64 and not x86 I am a bit stuck as nvidia only provides binary for x86 etc and not for aarch64. I understand I can flash my device with newest jetpack to get the cudnn.
Is there any other simpler way (without flashing my device) to install cudnn6 on tx2?
You can use JetPack to install cuDNN without flashing the device. Just
open JetPack, click next until you reach the screen showing all the available packages and set everything to no action
select cuDNN, set it to install and click next
A screen will show up asking you for the ip, username and password of your Jetson. Fill that out and click next
JetPack will now SSH into your Jetson and install cuDNN for you
I am trying to run the CUDA GPU Toolkit 7.5 built with OpenCV 3.1.0 .
My graphic card is : Nvidia Quadro FX 5800 . Driver version : 341.92 (Latest available version for the same)
Nvidia classifies my Graphics card in the legacy category with the 1.3 compute capability.
I keep getting the error in the title. and can understand the driver mismatch.
I updated to the latest driver for the graphics card.
My question is what version of the GPU toolkit should i build opencv with ? that would also be compatible with VS 2013 C++ env. I tried building it with CUDA toolkit 6.0 and its not compatible with VS 2013.
Sticky situation any advice would be appreciated.
This was fixed by building OpenCV with 1.3 compute capability. Dont let Cmake choose it automatically. CUDA_ARCH_PTX was set to 1.3 ->(which is the compute capability of my legacy graphics card).