Working on Windows 10, I downloaded the simple Quarkus sample prototype.
I run it normally and be able to access http://localhost:8118/hello, except if I try to run it from the native image executable for GraalVM.
I have to say that I don't have GraalVM installed, but I'm trying to do it from a Docker container (called contenedor-graalvm-1) based on the following GraalVM image:
container-registry.oracle.com/graalvm/community:ol8-java17-22.3.0-b1
The sequence I follow is:
docker start contenedor-graalvm-1
docker exec -it contenedor-graalvm-1 bash
cd code-with-quarkus-one/target
And then, successive launch attempts:
A)
./code-with-quarkus-one-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-runner -Dquarkus.http.host=0.0.0.0 -Dquarkus.http.port=8118
B)
./code-with-quarkus-one-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-runner -Dquarkus.http.host=192.168.49.147 -Dquarkus.http.port=8118
C)
./code-with-quarkus-one-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-runner -Dquarkus.http.host=127.0.0.1 -Dquarkus.http.port=8118
D)
./code-with-quarkus-one-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-runner -Dquarkus.http.host=localhost -Dquarkus.http.port=8118
That seems to start properly (except -B- option):
But none of them allow me to access to the desired endpoint:
Any help will be appreciatted.
Related
I am trying to push a docker image on Google Cloud Platform container registry to define a custom training job directly inside a notebook.
After having prepared the correct Dockerfile and the URI where to push the image that contains my train.py script, I try to push the image directly in a notebook cell.
The exact command I try to execute is: !docker build ./ -t $IMAGE_URI, where IMAGE_URI is the environmental variable previously defined. However I try to run this command I get the error: /bin/bash: docker: command not found. I also tried to execute it with the magic cell %%bash, importing the subprocess library and also execute the command stored in a .sh file.
Unfortunately none of the above solutions work, they all return the same command not found error with code 127.
If instead I run the command from a bash present in the Jupyterlab it works fine as expected.
Is there any workaround to make the push execute inside the jupyter notebook? I was trying to keep the whole custom training process inside the same notebook.
If you follow this guide to create a user-managed notebook from Vertex AI workbench and select Python 3, then it comes with Docker available.
So you will be able to use Docker commands such as ! docker build . inside the user-managed notebook.
Example:
I'm trying to deploy the official CGAL docker. From reading the README I understand that after downloading the specific image (e.g I want to open a docker with ubuntu16+CGAL and all of it's dependencies) using the following command:
docker pull cgal/testsuite-docker:ubuntu # get a specific image by replacing TAG with some tag
I need to install the cgal library itself using the
./test_cgal.py --user **** --passwd **** --images cgal-testsuite/ubuntu
The thing is that eventually I want to start the docker with an interactive shell, i.e
docker run --rm -it -v $(pwd):/source somedocker
And I couldn't understand where is the generated image, after the CGAL installation script.
Those images are not for running CGAL. They are only images we use to define an environment for our testsuite, and run tests in it, including compiling CGAL.
test_cgal.py will download the integration branch, which is rarely working as it is the branch in which we merge our PR to test them nightly. Don't use this to get a working CGAL. To my knowledge, there is no such image as the one you are looking for. No official one anyways.
Furthermore, installing cgal at runtime in this image will not modify the image, once you close the container your installation will be lost. You need to specify how to install CGA in the Dockerfile of your image and
then build it if you want a "ready to use" image.
You can use the dockerfile of the image you found to write your own, as there should be all the dependencies specified in it, but you need to edit it to download CGAL and maybe build it if you don't want the header-only version. This is not done in test-cgal.py or anywhere in this docker repository.
According to the documentation at bazelbuild/rules_docker, it should be possible to work with these container images on OSX, and it also claims that it's possible to do so without docker.
These rules do not require / use Docker for pulling, building, or pushing images. This means:
They can be used to develop Docker containers on Windows / OSX without boot2docker or docker-machine installed.
They do not require root access on your workstation.
How do I do that? Here's a simple rule:
go_image(
name = "helloworld_image",
importpath = "github.com/nictuku/helloworld",
library = ":go_default_library",
visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
)
I can build the image with bazel build :helloworld_image. It produces a tar ball in blaze-bin, but it won't run it:
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/helloworld_image
Loaded image ID: sha256:08d312b529d30431c68741fd3a31468a02533f27a8c2c29eedc969dae5a39852
Tagging 08d312b529d30431c68741fd3a31468a02533f27a8c2c29eedc969dae5a39852 as bazel:helloworld_image
standard_init_linux.go:185: exec user process caused "exec format error"
ERROR: Non-zero return code '1' from command: Process exited with status 1.
It's trying to run the linux this is OSX, which is silly.
I also tried doing a "docker load" on the .tar content but it doesn't seem to like that format.
$ docker load -i bazel-bin/helloworld_image-layer.tar
open /var/lib/docker/tmp/docker-import-330829602/app/json: no such file or directory
Help? Thanks!
You are building for your host platform by default so you need to build for the container platform if you want to do that.
Since you are using a go binary, you can do cross compilation by specifying --cpu=k8 on the command line. Ideally we would be able to just say that the docker image needs a linux binary (so no need to specify the --cpu command-line flag) but this is still a work in progress in Bazel.
I am new to container world and exploring options to run my application on a container.Here are the things that I am seeing:
When I include compiling and building the C/C++ binary as part of docker image itself, it works fine with out any problems. Container starts and everything works fine.
If I try to run an already compiled and existing binary using CMD ["./helloworld"] in a container It throws me this error
standard_init_linux.go:185: exec user process caused “exec format error”.
Any ideas of how to get out of this problem? This seems like a basic problem that would have been solved already
Here is my dockerfile:
FROM ubuntu
COPY . /Users/test//Documents/CPP-Projects/HelloWorld-Static
WORKDIR /Users/test/Documents/CPP-Projects/HelloWorld-Static
CMD ["./build/exe/hellostatic/hellostatic"]
Hers is my exe:
gobjdump -a build/exe/hellostatic/hellostatic
build/exe/hellostatic/hellostatic: file format mach-o-x86-64
build/exe/hellostatic/hellostatic
Here is the error:
docker run test
standard_init_linux.go:185: exec user process caused “exec format error”
The problem is that you are trying to run an incompatible binary format in your container...
You are running an Ubuntu-based container (FROM ubuntu) line, but you are trying to run a Mach-O binary. By default, Linux will not run mach-o binaries.
Build your binary for the target platform (Ubuntu/Linux) and it will work well. It appears that you are running Mac OS X, so you could install an Ubuntu VM to compile your binary and transfer it to be used by the container.
When you build it inside the container, it works because it will be built to the right platform.
I have a task to containerize a Spring & React web-app so that non-technical staff can make use of the container to demo the app to clients. Currently we develop on OSX & deploy to Tomcat on AWS managed by a 3rd party firm, and the non-technical staff use Windows laptops for their stuff.
So far I have bash scripts in OSX which will create a Packager container that has a Java 8 SDK & maven installed, & which will compile the app into a war file. A second script creates and initializes a mongodb container & gives it a name, and the third script creates a Tomcat/Java 8 container, loads the war file into it, links it to the mongodb container & sets it running. In bash on OSX this works fine, but I found it didn't work if I tried it in cygwin on Windows 10, and my CMD/Powershell-fu is too weak to script it in a Windows native fashion.
So, I'm trying to do the script in something that'll run on both OSX, an AWS linux server & Windows 10, & being a Java developer myself I thought of Groovy. This is my first time scripting Docker using Groovy so I've ended up resorting to structures like:
println "docker build -f Dockerfile.packager -t mycontainer .".execute().text
I wonder if Docker has a Java or Groovy API that I could plug into & do things like:
docker.build("Dockerfile.packager").tag("mycontainer")
Currently my script is determining the location of the project root & building up the Docker run command as a string, like:
File emToo = new File(System.getProperty("user.dir")+"/.m2")
String currentDirectory = new File(".").getCanonicalPath()
String projectRoot = new File(currentDirectory+"/../").getCanonicalPath()
I get an option string from the user via a command line prompt, "Do you want QA or Dev?" & then:
String dockerRunCmd = "docker run -it -v $projectRoot/:/usr/local/build/myproject:cached -v ${emToo.getCanonicalPath()}:/root/.m2:cached mycontainer $option"
println dockerRunCmd.execute().text
Currently it doesn't seem to do anything after asking for the option - it's kinda bombing out. I get the run command output to screen, & if I copy/paste that into a command line in the scripts directory it falls over saying that the parent pom can't be found. Remember though that if I run the OSX bash script to do this, it works just fine. The bash script is basically:
#! /usr/bin/env bash
CWD=`pwd`
options=$1
docker run -it -v $CWD/../:/usr/local/build/myproject:cached -v ~/.m2:/root/.m2:cached --rm mycontainer $options
...which I think amounts to the same thing, right? Where's it going wrong?
UPDATE: I've found a bug - I should have been setting emToo to
new File(System.getProperty("user.home")+"/.m2"). user.dir just picks up the current directory, & the maven .m2 directory is in the user's home, usually. Currently though, the script gives me a run command that works if I cut/paste into a command line, but which doesn't allow me to call .execute() on the string in Groovy. If I can get that to work, there'll be no need for the docker-client projects suggested.
There are different ways to communicate with docker from groovy or java (sdk's are listed there https://docs.docker.com/engine/api/sdks/#other-languages):
Groovy (https://github.com/gesellix/docker-client)
Java (https://github.com/docker-java/docker-java)
Many others can be also found on github.
But as I see you are using maven so probably it will be easier for you to use awesome docker maven plugin (https://dmp.fabric8.io) which can build, push images, run containers etc.