I have been trying to fine tune a BERT model to give response sentences like a character based on input sentences but I am getting a rather odd error every time . the code is
`
Here sourcetexts is a list of sentences that give the context and target_text is a list of sentences that give response to context statments
from transformers import AutoModel, AutoTokenizer
model = AutoModel.from_pretrained("bert-base-cased").to(device)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("bert-base-cased")
input_ids = \[\]
output_ids = \[\]
for i in range (0 , len(source_text):
input_ids.append(tokenizer.encode(source_texts\[i\], return_tensors="pt"))
output_ids.append(tokenizer.encode(target_texts\[i\], return_tensors="pt"))
import torch
device = torch.device("cuda")
from transformers import BertForMaskedLM, AdamW
model = BertForMaskedLM.from_pretrained("bert-base-cased")
optimizer = AdamW(model.parameters(), lr=1e-5)
loss_fn = torch.nn.CrossEntropyLoss()
def train(input_id, output_id):
input_id = input_id.to(device)
output_id = output_id.to(device)
model.zero_grad()
logits, _ = model(input_id, labels=output_id)
# Compute the loss
loss = loss_fn(logits.view(-1, logits.size(-1)), output_id.view(-1))
loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
return loss.item()
for epoch in range(50):
\# Train the model on the training dataset
train_loss = 0.0
for input_sequences, output_sequences in zip(input_ids, output_ids):
input_sequences = input_sequences.to(device)
output_sequences = output_sequences.to(device)
train_loss += train(input_sequences, output_sequences)
This is the Error that I am getting
Any help would be really appreciated .
Pls help!!
Hi i saw your code but you didn't move your model to GPU, only the inputs, pytorch by default is on CPU
import torch
device = torch.device('cuda')
model = BertForMaskedLM.from_pretrained("bert-base-cased")
model.to(device)
Related
final_poly_converter = PolynomialFeatures(degree=3,include_bias=False)
final_poly_features = final_poly_converter.fit_transform(X)
final_scaler = StandardScaler()
scaled_X = final_scaler.fit_transform(final_poly_features)
from sklearn.linear_model import Lasso
final_model = Lasso(alpha=0.004943070909225827,max_iter=1000000)
final_model.fit(scaled_X,y)
from joblib import dump,load
dump(final_model,'lasso_model.joblib')
dump(final_poly_converter,'lasso_poly_coverter.joblib')
dump(final_scaler,'scaler.joblib')
loaded_converter = load('lasso_poly_coverter.joblib')
loaded_model = load('lasso_model.joblib')
loaded_scaler = load('scaler.joblib')
campaign = [[149,22,12]]
transformed_data = loaded_converter.fit_transform(campaign)
scaled_data = loaded_scaler.transform(transformed_data)# fit_transform or only transform
loaded_model.predict(scaled_data)
The output values change when I use fit_transform() and when I use transform()
You should always use fit_transform on your train and transform on test and further predictions. If you refit your scaler on test pool you would have a different feature distribution in your test set vs train set which is something you don't want to happen. Think of scaler params that you fit as part of the model parameters. Naturally you fit all the parameters on the training set and then you don't change them on the test evaluation/prediction.
I wrote a script using xgboost to predict soil class for a certain area using data from field and satellite images. The script as below:
`
rm(list=ls())
library(xgboost)
library(caret)
library(raster)
library(sp)
library(rgeos)
library(ggplot2)
setwd("G:/DATA")
data <- read.csv('96PointsClay02finalone.csv')
head(data)
summary(data)
dim(data)
ras <- stack("Allindices04TIFF.tif")
names(ras) <- c("b1", "b2", "b3", "b4", "b5", "b6", "b7", "b10", "b11","DEM",
"R1011", "SCI", "SAVI", "NDVI", "NDSI", "NDSandI", "MBSI",
"GSI", "GSAVI", "EVI", "DryBSI", "BIL", "BI","SRCI")
set.seed(27) # set seed for generating random data.
# createDataPartition() function from the caret package to split the original dataset into a training and testing set and split data into training (80%) and testing set (20%)
parts = createDataPartition(data$Clay, p = .8, list = F)
train = data[parts, ]
test = data[-parts, ]
#define predictor and response variables in training set
train_x = data.matrix(train[, -1])
train_y = train[,1]
#define predictor and response variables in testing set
test_x = data.matrix(test[, -1])
test_y = test[, 1]
#define final training and testing sets
xgb_train = xgb.DMatrix(data = train_x, label = train_y)
xgb_test = xgb.DMatrix(data = test_x, label = test_y)
#defining a watchlist
watchlist = list(train=xgb_train, test=xgb_test)
#fit XGBoost model and display training and testing data at each iteartion
model = xgb.train(data = xgb_train, max.depth = 3, watchlist=watchlist, nrounds = 100)
#define final model
model_xgboost = xgboost(data = xgb_train, max.depth = 3, nrounds = 86, verbose = 0)
summary(model_xgboost)
#use model to make predictions on test data
pred_y = predict(model_xgboost, xgb_test)
# performance metrics on the test data
mean((test_y - pred_y)^2) #mse - Mean Squared Error
caret::RMSE(test_y, pred_y) #rmse - Root Mean Squared Error
y_test_mean = mean(test_y)
rmseE<- function(error)
{
sqrt(mean(error^2))
}
y = test_y
yhat = pred_y
rmseresult=rmseE(y-yhat)
(r2 = R2(yhat , y, form = "traditional"))
cat('The R-square of the test data is ', round(r2,4), ' and the RMSE is ', round(rmseresult,4), '\n')
#use model to make predictions on satellite image
result <- predict(model_xgboost, ras[1:(nrow(ras)*ncol(ras))])
#create a result raster
res <- raster(ras)
#fill in results and add a "1" to them (to get back to initial class numbering! - see above "Prepare data" for more information)
res <- setValues(res,result+1)
#Save the output .tif file into saved directory
writeRaster(res, "xgbmodel_output", format = "GTiff", overwrite=T)
`
The script works well till it reachs
result <- predict(model_xgboost, ras[1:(nrow(ras)*ncol(ras))])
it takes some time then gives this error:
Error in predict.xgb.Booster(model_xgboost, ras[1:(nrow(ras) * ncol(ras))]) :
Feature names stored in `object` and `newdata` are different!
I realize that I am doing something wrong in that line. However, I do not know how to apply the xgboost model to a raster image that represents my study area.
It would be highly appreciated if someone give a hand, enlightened me, and helped me solve this problem....
My data as csv and raster image can be found here.
Finally, I got the reason for this error.
It was my mistake as the number of columns in the traning data was not the same as in the number of layers in the satellite image.
I am trying to tune my XGBClassifier model. But I am failing to do so. Please find the code below and please help me clean and edit the code.
import csv
from hyperopt import STATUS_OK
from timeit import default_timer as timer
MAX_EVALS = 200
N_FOLDS = 10
def objective(params, n_folds = N_FOLDS):
"""Objective function for Gradient Boosting Machine Hyperparameter Optimization"""
# Keep track of evals
global ITERATION
ITERATION += 1
# Retrieve the subsample if present otherwise set to 1.0
subsample = params['boosting_type'].get('subsample', 1.0)
# Extract the boosting type
params['boosting_type'] = params['boosting_type']['boosting_type']
params['subsample'] = subsample
# Make sure parameters that need to be integers are integers
for parameter_name in ['num_leaves', 'subsample_for_bin',
'min_child_samples']:
params[parameter_name] = int(params[parameter_name])
start = timer()
# Perform n_folds cross validation
cv_results = lgb.cv(params, train_set, num_boost_round = 10000,
nfold = n_folds, early_stopping_rounds = 100,
metrics = 'auc', seed = 50)
run_time = timer() - start
# Extract the best score
best_score = np.max(cv_results['auc-mean'])
# Loss must be minimized
loss = 1 - best_score
# Boosting rounds that returned the highest cv score
n_estimators = int(np.argmax(cv_results['auc-mean']) + 1)
# Write to the csv file ('a' means append)
of_connection = open(out_file, 'a')
writer = csv.writer(of_connection)
writer.writerow([loss, params, ITERATION, n_estimators,
run_time])
# Dictionary with information for evaluation
return {'loss': loss, 'params': params, 'iteration': ITERATION,
'estimators': n_estimators, 'train_time': run_time,
'status': STATUS_OK}
I believe I am doing something wrong in the objective function, as I am trying to edit the objective function of LightGBM.
Please help me.
I created the hgboost library which provides XGBoost Hyperparameter Tuning using Hyperopt.
pip install hgboost
Examples can be found here
I am following cifar10 tutorials from https://github.com/tensorflow/models/tree/master/tutorials/image/cifar10.
In this project, there are 6 classes. After searching the internet I understood cifar10.py and cifar10_input.py classes. But I can't understand train function in cifar10_train.py. Here is the train function in cifar10_train.py class.
def train():
with tf.Graph().as_default():
global_step = tf.contrib.framework.get_or_create_global_step()
# get images and labels for cifar 10
# Force input pipeline to CPU:0 to avoid operations sometime ending on
# GPU and resulting in a slow down
with tf.device('/cpu:0'):
images, labels = cifar10.distorted_inputs()
logits = cifar10.inference(images)
loss = cifar10.loss(logits, labels)
train_op = cifar10.train(loss, global_step)
class _LoggerHook(tf.train.SessionRunHook):
def begin(self):
self._step = -1
self._start_time = time.time()
def before_run(self, run_context):
self._step += 1
return tf.train.SessionRunArgs(loss)
def after_run(self, run_context, run_values):
if self._step % FLAGS.log_frequency == 0:
current_time = time.time()
duration = current_time - self._start_time
self._start_time = current_time
loss_value = run_values.results
examples_per_sec = FLAGS.log_frequency * FLAGS.batch_size / duration
sec_per_batch = float(duration / FLAGS.log_frequency)
format_str = ('%s: step %d, loss = %.2f (%.1f examples/sec; %.3f '
'sec/batch)')
print(format_str % (datetime.now(), self._step, loss_value,
examples_per_sec, sec_per_batch))
with tf.train.MonitoredTrainingSession(
checkpoint_dir=FLAGS.train_dir,
hooks=[tf.train.StopAtStepHook(last_step=FLAGS.max_steps),
tf.train.NanTensorHook(loss),
_LoggerHook()],
config=tf.ConfigProto(
log_device_placement=FLAGS.log_device_placement)) as mon_sess:
while not mon_sess.should_stop():
mon_sess.run(train_op)
Can someone please explain what is happening in _LoggerHook class?
It uses MonitoredSession and SessionRunHook for logging the loss when training.
_LoggerHook is an implementation of SessionRunHook that runs in an order described below:
call hooks.begin()
sess = tf.Session()
call hooks.after_create_session()
while not stop is requested:
call hooks.before_run()
try:
results = sess.run(merged_fetches, feed_dict=merged_feeds)
except (errors.OutOfRangeError, StopIteration):
break
call hooks.after_run()
call hooks.end()
sess.close()
It's from here.
It collects loss data before the session.run then outputs loss with a predefined format.
A tutorial: https://www.tensorflow.org/tutorials/layers
Hope this hopes.
I am trying with SVC classifier to classify text.
#self.vectorizer = HashingVectorizer(non_negative=True)
#self.vectorizer = TfidfVectorizer(sublinear_tf=True, max_df=0.5, stop_words='english')
self.hasher = FeatureHasher(input_type='string',non_negative=True)
from sklearn.svm import SVC
self.clf = SVC(probability=True)
for text in self.data_train.data:
text = self.modifyQuery(text.decode('utf-8','ignore'))
training_data.append(text)
raw_X = (self.token_ques(text) for text in training_data)
#X_train = self.vectorizer.transform(training_data)
X_train = self.hasher.transform(raw_X)
y_train = self.data_train.target
self.clf.fit(X_train, y_train)
test classifier:
raw_X = (self.token_ques(text) for text in test_data)
X_test = self.hasher.transform(raw_X)
#X_test = self.vectorizer.transform(test_data)
pred = self.clf.predict(X_test)
print("pred=>", pred)
self.categories = self.data_train.target_names
for doc, category in zip(test_data, pred):
print('%r => %s' % (doc, self.categories[category]))
index = 1
predict_prob = self.clf.predict_proba(X_test)
for doc, category_list in zip(test_data, predict_prob):
#print values
I tried with hashing, feature, tfidf vectorizer but still it gives wrong answer for all queries (class with highest datasize comes as answer). While using naive bayes it gives correct result as per class and input query.
Am I doing anything wrong in code?
Update
I have total 8 classes, and each class having 100-200 lines of sentences. One class with 480 lines. This class always comes as a answer currently