.onContinueUserActivity is never called in the state restoration example app provided by Apple.
Inside of DetailView, this method is called:
// The described activity for this view.
.userActivity(DetailView.productUserActivityType,
isActive: product.id.uuidString == selectedProductID) { userActivity in
describeUserActivity(userActivity)
}
Inside of ContentView (parent of DetailView), this method is NOT called:
.onContinueUserActivity(DetailView.productUserActivityType) { userActivity in
if let product = try? userActivity.typedPayload(Product.self) {
selectedProduct = product.id.uuidString
}
}
I know .onContinueUserActivity is not being called by placing print statements in the method, and because commenting it out has no effect on the app's restoration.
The "Test State Restoration" strategies listed here do not work.
Related
In my view model, I have two properties:
private val databaseDao = QuestionDatabase.getDatabase(context).questionDao()
val allQuestions: LiveData<List<Question>> = databaseDao.getAllQuestions()
I have observers set on "allQuestions" in my fragment and I'm noticing the observer is being called when I rotate the device. Even though the View Model is only being created once (can tell via a log statement in init()), the observer methods are still being called.
Why is this? I would think the point is to have persistency in the View Model. Ideally, I want the database questions to be only loaded once, regardless of rotation.
This happens because LiveData is lifecycle aware.
And When you rotate the screen you UI Controller [Activity/Fragment] goes through various lifecycle states and lifecycle callbacks.
And since LiveData is lifecycle aware, it updates the detail accordingly.
I have tried to explain this with following points:
When the UI Controller is offscreen, Live Data performs no updates.
When the UI Controller is back on screen, it gets current data.
(Because of this property you are getting above behavior)
When UI controller is destroyed, it performs cleanup on its own.
When new UI Controller starts observing live data, it gets current data.
add this check inside observer
if(lifecycle.currentState == Lifecycle.State.RESUMED){
//code
}
I have the same issue, after reading the jetpack guideline doc, I solve it. Just like what #SVK mentioned, after the rotation of the screen, activity/fragment were re-created.
Base on the solution https://stackoverflow.com/a/64062616,
class SingleLiveEvent<T> : MutableLiveData<T>() {
val TAG: String = "SingleLiveEvent"
private val mPending = AtomicBoolean(false)
#MainThread
override fun observe(owner: LifecycleOwner, observer: Observer<in T>) {
if (hasActiveObservers()) {
Log.w(TAG, "Multiple observers registered but only one will be notified of changes.")
}
// Observe the internal MutableLiveData
super.observe(owner, Observer<T> { t ->
if (mPending.compareAndSet(true, false)) {
observer.onChanged(t)
}
})
}
override fun observeForever(observer: Observer<in T>) {
if (hasActiveObservers()) {
Log.w(TAG, "Multiple observers registered but only one will be notified of changes.")
}
// Observe the internal MutableLiveData
super.observeForever { t ->
if (mPending.compareAndSet(true, false)) {
observer.onChanged(t)
}
}
}
#MainThread
override fun setValue(#Nullable t: T?) {
mPending.set(true)
super.setValue(t)
}
/**
* Used for cases where T is Void, to make calls cleaner.
*/
#MainThread
fun call() {
value = null
}
This one I've been researching for a few days, scouring the Swift & SwiftUI docs, SO, forums, etc. and can't seem to find an answer.
Here is the problem;
I have a SwiftUI custom View that does some state determination on a custom API request class to a remote resource. The View handles showing loading states and failure states, along with its body contents being passed through via ViewBuilder so that if the state from the API is successful and the resource data is loaded, it will show the contents of the page.
The issue is, the ViewBuilder contents does not re-render when the subclassed ObservedObject updates. The Object updates in reaction to the UI (when buttons are pressed, etc.) but the UI never re-renders/updates to reflect the change within the subclassed ObservedObject, for example the ForEach behind an array within the subclassed ObservedObject does not refresh when the array contents change. If I move it out of the custom View, the ForEach works as intended.
I can confirm the code compiles and runs. Observers and debugPrint()'s throughout show that the ApiObject is updating state correctly and the View reflects the ApiState change absolutely fine. It's just the Content of the ViewBuilder. In which I assume is because the ViewBuilder will only ever be called once.
EDIT: The above paragraph should have been the hint, the ApiState updates correctly, but after putting extensive logging into the application, the UI was not listening to the publishing of the subclassed ObservedObject. The properties were changing and the state was too, but the UI wasn't being reactive to it.
Also, the next sentence turned out to be false, I tested again in a VStack and the component still didn't re-render, meaning I was looking in the wrong place!
If this is the case, how does VStack and other such elements get around this?
Or is it because my ApiObjectView is being re-rendered on the state change, in which causes the child view to 'reset'? Although in this circumstance I'd expect it to then take on the new data and work as expected anyway, its just never re-rendering.
The problematic code is in the CustomDataList.swift and ApiObjectView.swift below. I've left comments to point in the right direction.
Here is the example code;
// ApiState.swift
// Stores the API state for where the request and data parse is currently at.
// This drives the ApiObjectView state UI.
import Foundation
enum ApiState: String
{
case isIdle
case isFetchingData
case hasFailedToFetchData
case isLoadingData
case hasFailedToLoadData
case hasUsableData
}
// ApiObject.swift
// A base class that the Controllers for the app extend from.
// These classes can make data requests to the remote resource API over the
// network to feed their internal data stores.
class ApiObject: ObservableObject
{
#Published var apiState: ApiState = .isIdle
let networkRequest: NetworkRequest = NetworkRequest(baseUrl: "https://api.example.com/api")
public func apiGetJson<T: Codable>(to: String, decodeAs: T.Type, onDecode: #escaping (_ unwrappedJson: T) -> Void) -> Void
{
self.apiState = .isFetchingData
self.networkRequest.send(
to: to,
onComplete: {
self.apiState = .isLoadingData
let json = self.networkRequest.decodeJsonFromResponse(decodeAs: decodeAs)
guard let unwrappedJson = json else {
self.apiState = .hasFailedToLoadData
return
}
onDecode(unwrappedJson)
self.apiState = .hasUsableData
},
onFail: {
self.apiState = .hasFailedToFetchData
}
)
}
}
// DataController.swift
// This is a genericised example of the production code.
// These controllers build, manage and serve their resource data.
// Subclassed from the ApiObject, inheriting ObservableObject
import Foundation
import Combine
class CustomDataController: ApiObject
{
#Published public var customData: [CustomDataStruct] = []
public func fetch() -> Void
{
self.apiGetJson(
to: "custom-data-endpoint ",
decodeAs: [CustomDataStruct].self,
onDecode: { unwrappedJson in
self.customData = unwrappedJson
}
)
}
}
This is the View that has the problem with re-rendering its ForEach on the ObservedObject change to its bound array property.
// CustomDataList.swift
// This is the SwiftUI View that drives the content to the user as a list
// that displays the CustomDataController.customData.
// The ForEach in this View
import SwiftUI
struct CustomDataList: View
{
#ObservedObject var customDataController: CustomDataController = CustomDataController()
var body: some View
{
ApiObjectView(
apiObject: self.customDataController,
onQuit: {}
) {
List
{
Section(header: Text("Custom Data").padding(.top, 40))
{
ForEach(self.customDataController.customData, id: \.self, content: { customData in
// This is the example that doesn't re-render when the
// customDataController updates its data. I have
// verified via printing at watching properties
// that the object is updating and pushing the
// change.
// The ObservableObject updates the array, but this ForEach
// is not run again when the data is changed.
// In the production code, there are buttons in here that
// change the array data held within customDataController.customData.
// When tapped, they update the array and the ForEach, when placed
// in the body directly does reflect the change when
// customDataController.customData updates.
// However, when inside the ApiObjectView, as by this example,
// it does not.
Text(customData.textProperty)
})
}
}
.listStyle(GroupedListStyle())
}
.navigationBarTitle(Text("Learn"))
.onAppear() {
self.customDataController.fetch()
}
}
}
struct CustomDataList_Previews: PreviewProvider
{
static var previews: some View
{
CustomDataList()
}
}
This is the custom View in question that doesn't re-render its Content.
// ApiObjectView
// This is the containing View that is designed to assist in the UI rendering of ApiObjects
// by handling the state automatically and only showing the ViewBuilder contents when
// the state is such that the data is loaded and ready, in a non errornous, ready state.
// The ViewBuilder contents loads fine when the view is rendered or the state changes,
// but the Content is never re-rendered if it changes.
// The state renders fine and is reactive to the object, the apiObjectContent
// however, is not.
import SwiftUI
struct ApiObjectView<Content: View>: View {
#ObservedObject var apiObject: ApiObject
let onQuit: () -> Void
let apiObjectContent: () -> Content
#inlinable public init(apiObject: ApiObject, onQuit: #escaping () -> Void, #ViewBuilder content: #escaping () -> Content) {
self.apiObject = apiObject
self.onQuit = onQuit
self.apiObjectContent = content
}
func determineViewBody() -> AnyView
{
switch (self.apiObject.apiState) {
case .isIdle:
return AnyView(
ActivityIndicator(
isAnimating: .constant(true),
style: .large
)
)
case .isFetchingData:
return AnyView(
ActivityIndicator(
isAnimating: .constant(true),
style: .large
)
)
case .isLoadingData:
return AnyView(
ActivityIndicator(
isAnimating: .constant(true),
style: .large
)
)
case .hasFailedToFetchData:
return AnyView(
VStack
{
Text("Failed to load data!")
.padding(.bottom)
QuitButton(action: self.onQuit)
}
)
case .hasFailedToLoadData:
return AnyView(
VStack
{
Text("Failed to load data!")
.padding(.bottom)
QuitButton(action: self.onQuit)
}
)
case .hasUsableData:
return AnyView(
VStack
{
self.apiObjectContent()
}
)
}
}
var body: some View
{
self.determineViewBody()
}
}
struct ApiObjectView_Previews: PreviewProvider {
static var previews: some View {
ApiObjectView(
apiObject: ApiObject(),
onQuit: {
print("I quit.")
}
) {
EmptyView()
}
}
}
Now, all the above code works absolutely fine, if the ApiObjectView isn't used and the contents placed in the View directly.
But, that is horrendous for code reuse and architecture, this way its nice and neat, but doesn't work.
Is there any other way to approach this, e.g. via a ViewModifier or a View extension?
Any help on this would be really appreciated.
As I said, I can't seem to find anyone with this problem or any resource online that can point me in the right direction to solve this problem, or what might be causing it, such as outlined in documentation for ViewBuilder.
EDIT: To throw something interesting in, I've since added a countdown timer to CustomDataList, which updates a label every 1 second. IF the text is updated by that timer object, the view is re-rendered, but ONLY when the text on the label displaying the countdown time is updated.
Figured it out after pulling my hair out for a week, its an undocumented issue with subclassing an ObservableObject, as seen in this SO answer.
This is particularily annoying as Xcode obviously prompts you to remove the class as the parent class provides that inheritence to ObservableObject, so in my mind all was well.
The fix is, within the subclassed class to manually fire the generic state change self.objectWillChange.send() via the willSet listener on the #Published variable in question, or any you require.
In the examples I provided, the base class ApiObject in the question remains the same.
Although, the CustomDataController needs to be modified as follows:
// DataController.swift
// This is a genericised example of the production code.
// These controllers build, manage and serve their resource data.
import Foundation
import Combine
class CustomDataController: ApiObject
{
#Published public var customData: [CustomDataStruct] = [] {
willSet {
// This is the generic state change fire that needs to be added.
self.objectWillChange.send()
}
}
public func fetch() -> Void
{
self.apiGetJson(
to: "custom-data-endpoint ",
decodeAs: [CustomDataStruct].self,
onDecode: { unwrappedJson in
self.customData = unwrappedJson
}
)
}
}
As soon as I added that manual publishing, the issue is resolved.
An important note from the linked answer: Do not redeclare objectWillChange on the subclass, as that will again cause the state not to update properly. E.g. declaring the default
let objectWillChange = PassthroughSubject<Void, Never>()
on the subclass will break the state updating again, this needs to remain on the parent class that extends from ObservableObject directly, either my manual or automatic default definition (typed out, or not and left as inherited declaration).
Although you can still define as many custom PassthroughSubject declarations as you require without issue on the subclass, e.g.
// DataController.swift
// This is a genericised example of the production code.
// These controllers build, manage and serve their resource data.
import Foundation
import Combine
class CustomDataController: ApiObject
{
var customDataWillUpdate = PassthroughSubject<[CustomDataStruct], Never>()
#Published public var customData: [CustomDataStruct] = [] {
willSet {
// Custom state change handler.
self.customDataWillUpdate.send(newValue)
// This is the generic state change fire that needs to be added.
self.objectWillChange.send()
}
}
public func fetch() -> Void
{
self.apiGetJson(
to: "custom-data-endpoint ",
decodeAs: [CustomDataStruct].self,
onDecode: { unwrappedJson in
self.customData = unwrappedJson
}
)
}
}
As long as
The self.objectWillChange.send() remains on the #Published properties you need on the subclass
The default PassthroughSubject declaration is not re-declared on the subclass
It will work and propagate the state change correctly.
I am using ReactiveSwift for a while but suddenly encountered a strange bug or something.
I am using an MVVM architecture and have a simple view controller and a view model for it. The VM has a single property of type Signal<Void, NoError>. In the VM's init I send to its observer an empty value. On the view controller's viewDidLoad I listen for that signal and print some text.
Here is the view model:
class SomeVCModel {
let (someSignal, someSignalObserver) = Signal<Void, NoError>.pipe()
init() {
print (Thread.isMainThread)
DispatchQueue.main.async {
self.someSignalObserver.send(value: ())
}
}
}
And here is the view controller:
class SomeVC {
var model: SomeVCModel!
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
model = SomeVCModel()
model.someSignal.observeValues { (_) in
print ("Some Value")
}
}
}
In this case the print statement doesn't get called. However, when I send a value to an observer by explicitly defining the main thread from DispatchQueue everything works:
DispatchQueue.main.async {
self.someSignalObserver.send(value: ())
}
I can't figure out why is this happening. Init for the view model itself is called on the main thread, so what could cause this behaviour?
Thanks in advance.
Your model sends the value during initialization.
However, your viewDidLoad function sets the observer after it is initialized, so it is not ready to observe it. Subsequent calls will work since the observer is now configured.
You have a few options, but basically you need to change the sequence.
this Main Menu VC will be opened when the app launched for the first time or after the user back to the app (the app become active after enter the background state).
every time this main menu VC is opened, ideally I need to update the time that the date time data comes from the server. in this main menu vc class I call getDateTimeFromServer() after that I updateUI().
but to update the data after the app enter the background and back to the foreground, the getDateTimeFromServer() and updateUI() shall be activated from Appdelegate using function.
func applicationWillEnterForeground(application: UIApplication) {
}
so how do I activate a method that are exist in Main Menu VC from AppDelegate
You don’t need to call the view controller method in app delegate. Observe foreground event in your controller and call your method from there itself.
Observe for the UIApplicationWillEnterForeground notification in your viewController viewDidLoad:
NotificationCenter.default.addObserver(self, selector: #selector(ViewController.yourMethod), name: NSNotification.Name.UIApplicationWillEnterForeground, object: nil)
Implement this to receive callback when user enters foreground
#objc func yourMethod() {
// Call getDateTimeFromServer()
}
These types of messaging are in most cases done with static context. As it was already mentioned you could alternatively use notification center within the within the view controller to be notified of your application entering foreground. I discourage you creating custom notifications for this though (but is a possible solution as well).
Anyway for your specific case I suggest you have a model that contains your data. Then create a shared instance of it.
class MyDataModel {
static var shared: MyDataModel = {
let model = MyDataModel()
model.reloadData()
return model
}()
var myObjects: [MyObject]?
func reloadData() {
// load data asynchronously
}
}
Now when your view controller needs to reload it simply uses MyDataModel.shared.myObjects as data source.
In app delegate all you do is reload it when app comes back to foreground using MyDataModel.shared.reloadData().
So now a delegate is still missing so we add
protocol MyDataModelDelegate: class {
func myDataModel(_ sender: MyDataModel, updatedObjects objects: [MyObject]?)
}
class MyDataModel {
weak var delegate: MyDataModelDelegate?
static var shared: MyDataModel = {
Now when your view controller appears it needs to assign itself as a delegate MyDataModel.shared.delegate = self. And implement the protocol in which a reload on the view must be made.
A callout to the delegate can simply be done in a model setter:
}()
var myObjects: [MyObject]? {
didSet {
delegate.myDataModel(self, updatedObjects: myObjects)
}
}
func reloadData() {
You can do something like that, using a technique called Key-Value Observation:
class CommonObservableData: NSObject {
// Use #objc and dynamic to ensure enabling Key-Value Observation
#objc dynamic var dateTime: Date?
static let shared = CommonObservableData()
func updateFromWeb() {
// callWebThen is a function you will define that calls your Web API, then
// calls a completion handler you define, passing new value to your handler
callWeb(then: { self.dateTime = $0 })
}
}
Then you observe on it using Swift 4 's new NSKeyValueObservation.
class SomeViewController: UIViewController {
var kvo: NSKeyValueObservation?
func viewDidLoad() {
...
kvo = CommonObservableData.shared.observe(
\CommonObservableData.dateTime, { model, change in
self.label.text = "\(model.dateTime)"
})
}
}
Key-Value Observation is originally an Objective-C technique that is "somewhat revived" by Swift 4, this technique allows you to observe changes on a property (called a Key in Objective-C) of any object.
So, in the previous code snippets, we made a class, and made it a singleton, this singleton has an observable property called dateTime, where we could observe on change of this property, and make any change in this property automatically calls a method where we could update the UI.
Read about KVO here:
Key-Value Observation Apple Programming Guide
Key-Value Observation using Swift 4
Also, if you like Rx and RFP (Reactive Functional Programming), you can use RxSwift and do the observation in a cleaner way using it.
In swift 4 and 5, the notification name is changed the below code working for both.
notifyCenter.addObserver(self, selector: #selector(new), name:UIApplication.willEnterForegroundNotification, object: nil)
#objc func new(){}
I am writing a chess GUI in Swift 3 and use nvzqz/Sage as the chess model/library. Now I face a problem with a Sage closure used for piece promotion.
Sage uses (in its game class) the execute(move: promotion:) method for promotion move execution which has a closure that returns a promotion piece kind. This allows to prompt the user for a promotion piece or perform any other operations before choosing a promotion piece kind, as follows:
try game.execute(move: move) {
...
return .queen
}
I implemented a promotion view controller ("pvc") which is called in this closure so that the player may select the new piece:
// This is in the main View Controller class
/// The piece selected in promotionViewController into which a pawn shall promote
var newPiece: Piece.Kind = ._queen // default value = Queen
try game.execute(move: move) {
boardView.isUserInteractionEnabled = false
// promotionview controller appears to select new promoted piece
let pvc = PromotionViewController(nibName: nil, bundle: nil)
pvc.delegate = self
pvc.modalPresentationStyle = .overCurrentContext
self.present(pvc, animated:true)
return newPiece
}
When the button for the new piece in the pvc is pressed, the pvc dismisses itself and the data of the selected piece (the constant selectedType) is transferred back to the main view controller via delegation:
// This is in the sending PVC class
protocol PromotionViewControllerDelegate {
func processPromotion(selectedType: Piece.Kind)
}
func buttonPressed(sender: UIButton) {
let selectedType = bla bla bla ...
delegate?.processPromotion(selectedType: selectedType)
presentingViewController!.dismiss(animated:true)
}
// This is in the receiving main View Controller class
extension GameViewController: PromotionViewControllerDelegate {
func processPromotion(selectedType: Piece.Kind) {
defer {
boardView.isUserInteractionEnabled = true
}
newPiece = selectedType
}
The problem I have is that the closure (in the game.execute method) does not wait until the player made his selection in the pvc (and immediately returns the newPiece variable which is still the default value) so that I never get another promotion piece processed other than the default value.
How do I make the closure wait until the player pressed a button in the pvc?
Of course, I tried to find a solution and read about callbacks, completion handlers or property observers. I do not know which is the best way forward, some thoughts:
Completion handler: the pvc dismisses itself upon button-press event so the completion handler is not in the receiving (main) view controller. How do I deal with this?
Property observer: I could call the try game.execute(move) method only after the promotion piece was set (with didset) but that would make the code difficult to read and not use the nice closure the game.execute method provides.
Callbacks may be related to completion handlers, but am not sure.
So your block in game.execute(move: move) will fully execute which is so designed by the Sage API. You can not pause it as easy but it is doable, still let's try to solve it the other way;
Why do you need to call the presentation of the view controller within this block? By all means try to move that away. The call try game.execute(move: move) { should only be called within processPromotion delegate method. You did not post any code but wherever this try game.execute(move: move) { code is it needs to be replaced by presenting a view controller alone.
Then on delegate you do not even need to preserve the value newPiece = selectedType but rather just call try game.execute(move: move) { return selectedType }.
So about pausing a block:
It is not possible to directly "pause" a block because it is a part of execution which means the whole operation needs to pause which in the end means you need to pause your whole thread. That means you need to move the call to a separate thread and pause that one. Still this will only work if the API supports the multithreading, if the callback is called on the same tread as its execute call... So there are many tools and ways on how to lock a thread so let me just use the most primitive one which is making the thread sleep:
var executionLocked: Bool = false
func foo() {
DispatchQueue(label: "confiramtion queue").async {
self.executionLocked = true
game.execute(move: move) {
// Assuming this is still on the "confiramtion queue" queue
DispatchQueue.main.async {
// UI code needs to be executed on main thread
let pvc = PromotionViewController(nibName: nil, bundle: nil)
pvc.delegate = self
pvc.modalPresentationStyle = .overCurrentContext
self.present(pvc, animated:true)
}
while self.executionLocked {
Thread.sleep(forTimeInterval: 1.0/5.0) // Check 5 times per second if unlocked
}
return self.newPiece // Or whatever the code is
}
}
}
Now in your delegate you need:
func processPromotion(selectedType: Piece.Kind) {
defer {
boardView.isUserInteractionEnabled = true
}
newPiece = selectedType
self.executionLocked = false
}
So what happens here is we start a new thread. Then lock the execution and start execution on game instance. In the block we now execute our code on main thread and then create an "endless" loop in which a thread sleeps a bit every time (the sleep is not really needed but it prevents the loop to take too much CPU power). Now all the stuff is happening on main thread which is that a new controller is presented and user may do stuff with it... Then once done a delegate will unlock the execution lock which will make the "endless" loop exit (on another thread) and return a value to your game instance.
I do not expect you to implement this but if you will then ensure you make all precautions to correctly release the loop if needed. Like if view controller is dismissed it should unlock it, if a delegate has a "cancel" version it should exit...