I have a JIRA instance setup with JIT provisioning via OIDC. Is it possible to configure JIRA so that users created by JIT provisioning are inactive by default?
Related
I am following the link to integrate One Drive SDK into an existing iOS app. I have an free account created on azure portal. Its a work account so I can see a default Azure Active Directory.
During this process, I need to register the app on the Azure portal. This link for registering apps and generating app ID does not work in my case.
I am unable to create an app ID or access existing active Azure Directory details. The portal shows me restricted access page as mentioned in this link : https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/352443/microsoft-azure-free-trial-no-access-to-acitive-di.html. The solutions mentioned in this link does not work for me as those options are not seen on the screen.
Any kind of help in understanding the trouble will be of great help!
This might be due to insuffient permissions as this is a free trial account.
Go to your Overview pane of your subscription and check if there are any directories present.
If not try creating a free trial account using a Work or school account and there you will be provided with a default directory. Then Create new Azure AD Tenant and then Connect your Azure free subscription to your new Azure AD Directory.
REFERENCES:
Associate a subscription to a directory.
Create a new tenant for your organization.
I'm currently developing a gmail add-on and am hoping to allow a few users internal to my team to test out the add-on prior to a public release. I was following the documentation here from google that states
You can allow other users to test the add-on by sharing the Apps Script project with their account (read access is required) and then prompting the users to follow the above steps.
I assume that 'read' access is equivalent to 'view' access, and have given a user 'view' access to the project.
The problem I'm running into is that even with 'view' permissions, users aren't able to do a test deployment and install the add-on to their gmail account. The blue 'Deploy' button simply isn't visible. Any ideas on how to get my add-on into a few users hands before publishing, but without giving them edit privileges?
One way to do it is to have the users copy your script and deploy it.
Another is to publish the Add-On privately and you would have control over what version of the Add-On your test users are seeing. For this your users should be of the same Google Workspace domain
I have a website which is currently live and uses Azure B2C to manage user authentication. The site has been so successful that I have decided to build App (IOS and Android) versions of the site using Xamarin.
My 2 questions are:
Can I use my existing Application Registration in B2C to authenticate both my MVC and Native Apps. If so is this done via the Allow Public Client Flows Radio button under the Advance Settings Section of the Authentication tab in Azure B2C? Will turning this from No to Yes impact the running of my registration for the website (as the system is live with thousand of users I am very wary of making updates to B2C Settings.
What is the best way for testing changes to Azure B2C? Is there an easy way to create dev environments that can then be flipped to live, switching out the live version with the dev environment?
Any help will be gratefully received.
J
Can I use my existing Application Registration in B2C to authenticate both my MVC and Native Apps. If so is this done via the
Allow Public Client Flows Radio button under the Advance Settings
Section of the Authentication tab in Azure B2C? Will turning this from
No to Yes impact the running of my registration for the website (as
the system is live with thousand of users I am very wary of making
updates to B2C Settings.
It's not recommended to use the same app registration in this case.
Please see the differences between public client and confidential client applications.
Confidential client applications are safe to keep application secrets while public clients not. If you use the same app registration, there is a conflict in keeping application secrets. And using the same app registration for multiple applications will make permission control more difficult.
So in this case, it's recommended to create a new app registration with Public client/native platform.
Turning Allow Public Client Flows from No to Yes doesn't mean to change it to native app type.
You could set "allowPublicClient": true, in the manifest file.
What is the best way for testing changes to Azure B2C? Is there an easy way to create dev environments that can then be flipped to live,
switching out the live version with the dev environment?
Creating a new app registration will not affect the use of your web application.
I'm looking for Info regrading the possibility of publishing my clients apps that our company developed through our App Store account. Is this allowed by Apple? or Should we purchase separate accounts for every client for hosting the apps?. (We have few big clients and trying to avoid any legal complications after publishing the apps).
It depends. If you're making an app for multiple clients using the same template, then it will get rejected. Apple made some changes regarding white label apps this year. It seems that your clients will have to purchase their own developer accounts to publish their apps.From the App Store Review Guidelines Section 4.2.6:
4.2.6 Apps created from a commercialized template or app generation service will be rejected unless they are submitted directly by the
provider of the app’s content. These services should not submit apps
on behalf of their clients and should offer tools that let their
clients create customized, innovative apps that provide unique
customer experiences. Another acceptable option for template providers
is to create a single binary to host all client content in an
aggregated or “picker” model, for example as a restaurant finder app
with separate customized entries or pages for each client restaurant,
or as an event app with separate entries for each client event.
I've seen a few developer businesses walk their clients through the process of purchasing a developer account and making the developer a lead role in the client's team so that they may publish and maintain the app for their client while still using the client's developer account.It might be a possibility for you too.
I am using the Box enterprise Python SDK and Java SDK. I have created a service account, and I want to access files in my enterprise from this account using the "As-User" header.
I try to list users with box_client.users(). But I keep getting access_denied_insufficient_permissions
How do I give my Service Account access to list all users?
I believe you have to have the scope set in the app and have it authorized in the enterprise admin console by an admin.