Can we can download or listen to the queries(streams) sent to gcp STT service.
Currently i am using GCP STT, and facing below issues.
the queries are not timely responded or response is incomplete
Also we see that STT response text is very different then "what is spoken".
So is there a way, where we can download or listen to the queries sent to gcp STT service.
I worry that my code sometime fails to send whole stream to STT service or may be sometime code is writing the frame slowly .
just want to make sure that my code is sending the stream correctly or not.
Azure has similiar capbility where in we can listen to the saved streams sent to STT service for a particular subscription.
Thanks
Gaurav
Tried to search the gcp documents but could not found a way download or listen to the queries sent to gcp STT service.
Also posted the query here
Related
I have a custom VPN (with a custom protocol for receiving and sending packets) hosted on my local machine and running a Network Extension (NE for short) on my phone. All the configuration for the NE is set and the NE is running and logging to the console. The setup is as follows:
NE is reading packets from the packetFlow using packetFlow.readPacketsWithCompletionHandler
Packets are then sent to the VPN. I used two different methods for testing: the AsyncCocoaSocket library or the native NWTCPConnection to connect to the VPN.
I listen to responses from one options mentioned in 2 to receive the response packets.
Finally, I write the packets received back to the IP stack using packetFlow.write
I send the packets as I receive them in the AsyncCocoaSocket delegate methods or the NWTCPConnection read completion handler. The VPN responses sent match the ones received in the NE before writing them back into the stack.
The issue I'm having is that for example when I make a browser request the site doesn't render. It only works with very basic text-based test sites and single images. It only on the first request however not always guaranteed. It is very random and no packets seem to be dropped in the flow.
Summary:
Browser => Network extension read from packet flow => forward requests to VPN through tunnel => Listen for responses in Network Extension => write responses using packetFlow write => Browser
I'd expect the browser to render the site but it doesn't and neither do the apps making requests work.
Any guidance would be appreciated.
NOTE: This all works flawlessly when I connect using an Android device.
This is linked to question: Suave stops responding with "Socket failed to accept a client" error
When I first started to use Suave, I was taking commands from a 3rd party service pushing messages and I would have an out of socket situation.
There is now more understanding of the problem:
I am receiving messages that are posted to the SNS service on AWS (it's just a queue). SNS will forward me each message it receives through a HTTP connection, as a POST message.
If I reply with Ok, I will run out of sockets. So this means that Suave is trying to keep the connection open and AWS is somehow initiating a new connection every time.
If I reply with CLOSE, the AWS' delivery starts to become odd and messages get delivered in batches followed by periods of nothing.
Since AWS will not change their system for me, I'm wondering if I can reply Ok but then somehow close the connection in Suave to not run out of sockets. Is it possible?
Or, is there a better way to handle this?
We have an IoT based application device which is configured to communication with our Dashboard via MQTT bridge from Various service providers like Google, AWS and Azure.
So the flow is:
Device start TLS session with service provider.
Subscribe to a particular topic and wait for messages from the
service provider with 5 second timeout.
Dashboard publishes messages to same topic periodically.
IoT service provider broadcast it to all devices subscribed.
Publish and subscribe messages are with MQTT QOS 1 services.
Observation:
AWS and Azure works fine with above flow, but device stop receiving messages from Google MQTT bridge after 3-5 successful iterations even though our dashboard is publishing messages to Google IoT MQTT bridge.
For Google, we have identified that control flow is different when compared with Azure and AWS.
For Google, we need to subscribe and un-subscribe for a given topic every-time before waiting to receive message while for AWS and Azure we need to subscribe once during opening a MQTT connection.
Issue:
Sometime 5 sec device timeout occurs as it could not receive messages for subscribed topic from Google MQTT bridge. Adding multiple retries to overcome timeout issue was unsuccessful as issue still persist as device could not receive message from Google MQTT bridge after 45-60sec of device operation after powering on.
Is there is constraint with Google MQTT bridge to receive messages periodically without subscribing it every-time?
How can device receive messages without timing out (5 sec) from Google MQTT bridge?
Is there any workaround to recover a device once it got timed out with establishing MQTT reconnection?
I am using google iot core as well,the device side code for the mqtt client is golang while using paho mqtt package. this client package support OnConnect handler which while using this handler I achieve the recovery which I think you are looking for.
Via this handler I am re-subscribing to the "config" topic.
I think that google does not save the subscriptions which the clients are subscribed to and therefore the client needs to re-subscribe upon successful connection
Here's the golang code I've used (inspired by gingi007's answer, thank you!)
var onConn MQTT.OnConnectHandler
onConn = func(client MQTT.Client) {
fmt.Println("connected")
client.Subscribe(topic.Config, 1, handlerFunc)
}
mqttOpts.SetOnConnectHandler(onConn)
client := MQTT.NewClient(mqttOpts)
this way config updates keep flowing to my device, while if you subscribe outside of the onConnectHandler you'll just receive one config update when you connect.
I am facing an issue with the presence status, following the documentation and XMPPframework example code. I have written a chat application.
Problem : When the user 1 & 2 are online I get the status successfully and they can chat with each other. However when the user 2 goes physically offline via (Wifi OFF / 3G Off) User 1 is not getting the offline status from XMPP and hence what ever messages are sent from that instant of time are lost when the user 2 comes online.
It seems since the user 2 is not notified or stored as offline in XMPP and hence its not storing the offline messages to push back to user 2 when it comes online.
I have tried to resolve this by explicitly writing a [goOffline] call to XMPP, however the call is shown in 'SEND log' for 'user 2' but not received in 'RECV log' in user 1 from XMPP, due to which the message are lost in between.
Also tried with other sources replies.
Set status for presence available and send XMPP
priority changed with values non-negative
XMPPArchiving work but this is not what I wanted.
Server side Mod_zero push enables but get only first message push notification sometimes.
Setting limit on ejabberd.cfg file for users and offline message limit.
request for offline message pull.
Can anyone help me with this?
This is very typical situation where client losses network but server can't detect that it is offline.
To detect status of each client, server need to send PING packets to every client and wait for response.
If client responds then fine otherwise server will mark that client as offline and every other online client will be informed automatically.
Here is PING Module implementation for ejabberd XMPP Server (hope you are using ejabberd server):
mod_ping:
send_pings: true
ping_interval: 10
timeout_action: kill
ping_ack_timeout: 10
This has to be written in ejabberd.yml configuration file.
At client side also we need to enable ping module to respond to server pings as:
private var xmppPing: XMPPPing?
xmppPing = XMPPPing()
xmppPing!.activate(xmppStream!)
This code has to be written while we setupStream() for iOS.
For detailed info, please go through mod_ping documentations.
Sounds like your problem is at server level. The server thinks that the user is online so it sends the message but nobody gets it. This does not really have a simple solution.
1.
The best solution would be delivery receipts. Where basically when the message is sent to your client, your client returns a confirmation of delivery receipt. If the server does not get that receipt it would resend the message every n time. Depending on your XMPP server you might find a already made solution, of not you would have to roll out your own.
2.
A possible hack would be to have your server always store and deliver last 10 messages and then at client side you discard repeated... This also depends on your server implementation. XMPP MUC and PubSub have resources along these lines.
For a long term scalable solution, you'll need to deal with this both at server and client level.
i went through this question
Lost messages over XMPP on device disconnected
but there is no answer.
When a connection is lost due to some network issue then the server is not able to recognize it and keeps on sending messages to disconnected receiver which are permanently lost.
I have a workaround in which i ping the client from server and when the client gets disconnected server is able to recognize it after 10 sec and save further messages in queue preventing them from being lost.
my question is can 100% fail save message delivery be achieved by using some other way i know psi and many other xmpp client are doing it.
on ios side i am using xmppframework
One way is to employ the Advanced Message Processing (AMP) on your server; another one is to employ the Message Delivery Receipts on your clients.
The former one requires an AMP-enabled server implementation and the initiating client has to be able to tell the server what kind of delivery status reports it wants (it wants an error to be returned if the delivery is not possible). Note that this is not bullet-proof anyway as there is a window between the moment the target client losts its connectivity with the server and the moment the TCP stack on the server's machine detects this and tells the server about it: during this window, everything sent to the client is considered by the server to be sent okay because there's no concept of message boundaries in the TCP layer and hence if the server process managed to stuff a message stanza's XML into the system buffers of its TCP connection, it considers that stanza to be sent—there's no way for it to know which bits of its stream did not get to the receiver once the TCP stack says the connection is lost.
The latter one is bullet-proof as the clients rely on explicit notifications about message reception. This does increase chattiness though. In return, no server support for this feature is required—it's implemented solely in the clients.
go with XEP-0198 and enjoy...
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0198.html
For a XMPP client I'm working on, the following mechanism is used:
Add Reachability to the project, to detect quickly when the phone is having connectivity problems.
Use a modified version of XEP-0198, adding a confirmation sent by the server. So, the client sends a message, the server confirms with a receipt. Later on, the receiving user will also confirm with a receipt. For each message you send, you get two confirmations, one from the server, one from the client. This requires modifications on the server of course.
When the app is not connected to the XMPP server, messages are queued.
When the app is logged in again to the XMPP server, the app takes all messages which were not confirmed by the server and sends them again.
For this to work, you have to locally store the messages in the app with three possible states: "Not sent", "Confirmed by server", "Confirmed by user"