Related
I'm trying to use lua filters to capture images in my manuscript and list their caption in a special \section at the end of it.
I am working on a rmarkdown document that itself uses a .tex template.
I wasn't able to get anywhere, so I run a very simple filter:
function Header (head) print(pandoc.utils.stringify(head)) end
and noticed that just the headers in the markdown were recognized, not the ones in the ones in the template.
The only way I found to have lua filters recognize the elements in the template was to rerun the produced .tex file with pandoc:
pandoc -f latex -t latex -o test2.tex --lua-filter=my_filters.lua test.tex
but that removed all latex formatting and structure content outside the body, e.g., \documentclass, \usepackage and other custom commands. So it's a no go.
So the question is, is there a way to force lua filter to be applied after the integration of a latex template when knitting a rmarkdown document?
There might be a way, but it most likely won't do what you need.
When pandoc reads a document, it parses it and converts it into it's internal data structure. That internal structure can then be modified with a filter. LaTeX is a very expressive and complex document format, and any conversion from LaTeX into pandoc's internal format will result in a loss of (layout) information. That's good enough in most cases, but would be a problem in your case.
There are two possible ways to do this: one is to post-process the output, which is probably tedious and error-prone. The other is to find a way to generate the desired output, e.g. via a pandoc filter, without adding it to the template first.
I believe your other question is the right way to go.
I know that sounds vague. Basically I just want Sublime to highlight custom syntax (color the text), just like it does with native syntax.
I am using Sublime to write LaTeX code. For those that don't know, LaTeX equations are typically enclosed by \[ \], e.g.
\[ E = m c^2 \]
Sublime understands that syntax and colors the enclosing code appropriately.
However, I use my custom defined command, \eq{ ... }, which wraps the \[ \] functionality (so I can globally change some settings by just redefining the \eq definition). e.g.
\eq{ E = m c^2 }
I don't know anything about Sublime under the hood beyond basic key bindings. I want to expand Sublime's understanding of syntax to incorporate my custom command without wasting a ton of time digging through tutorials and such.
Since you are mainly interested in the result and not in the reasoning, I will try to be as straight forward as I can.
The LaTeX syntax of Sublime Text will change in release 3119 and I would recommend to use that, if you want to change something.
Just download it from https://github.com/sublimehq/Packages and put the LaTeX folder into the folder, which opens when you select Preferences >> Browse Packages... in the Sublime Text menu.
Afterwards open the file LaTeX.sublime-syntax and search for ensuremath (LaTeX.sublime-syntax#L498). Duplicate that part (everything with a higher indent) and change the command to the command you wish, e.g. in your example this would be - match: '((\\)eq)(\{)'.
Aside the new syntax removes the highlighting of math environments as strings, because this has lead to several problems.
I made a small entry in the LaTeXTools wiki to explain, how you restore the highlight.
E.g., I have this Markdown cell that use the sanctioned way of using a LaTeX macro in the notebook
$\def\abc{a\,b\,c}$ The first three letters are $\abc$.
and I have what I want in the notebook. OTOH, when I "Download as PDF via LaTeX"
the conversion process fails with these errors in the standard error of the console
! Undefined control sequence.
l.229 ...c{a\,b\,c}\) The first letters are \(\abc
\).
?
! Emergency stop.
l.229 ...c{a\,b\,c}\) The first letters are \(\abc
\).
! ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produce
Transcript written on notebook.log.
because Latex itself doesn't accept a definition embedded in a mathematical expression. Because Markdown doesn't accept these definitions outside a mathematical expression I feel like I'm trapped in a Comma 22 situation.
I'm pretty sure the system can be fooled using Raw NBconvert cells and smart latex code but I'm missing some step in my head... Any help will be properly appreciated, ciao
The definition is accepted in the mathematics, but in TeX, definitions are localized to the nearest enclosing group. Math delimiters are enclosing groups, so the definition is remove after the math. Try using \gdef instead of \def to get a global definition. This will require that you load the begingroup extension in MathJax, so you will have to add that to the configuration (I don't know how that is done in IPython, though).
What is the best way to take care of citations in Ipython Notebook? Ideally, I would like to have a bibtex file, and then, as in latex, have a list of shorthands in Ipython markdown cells, with the full references at the end of the notebook.
The relevant material I found is this: http://nbviewer.ipython.org/github/ipython/nbconvert-examples/blob/master/citations/Tutorial.ipynb
But I couldn't follow the documentation very well. Can anyone explain it? Thanks so much!!
Summary
This solution is largely based on Sylvain Deville's excellent blog post. It allows you to simply write [#citation_key] in markdown cells. The references will be formatted after document conversion. The only requirements are LaTeX and pandoc, which are both widely supported. While there is never a guarantee, this approach should therefore still work in many years time.
Step-by-Step Guide
In addition to a working installation of jupyter you need:
LaTeX (installation guide).
Pandoc (installation guide).
A citation style language. Download a citation style, e.g., APA. Save the .csl file (e.g., apa.csl) into the same folder as your jupyter notebook (or specify the path to the .csl file later).
A .bib file with your references. I am using a sample bib file list.bib. Save to the same folder as your jupyter notebook (or specify the path to the .bib file later).
Once you completed these steps, the rest is easy:
Use markdown syntax for references in markdown cells in your jupyter notebook. E.g., [#Sh:1] where the syntax works like this: ([#citationkey_in_bib_file]). I much prefer this syntax over other solutions because it is so fast to type [#something].
At the end of your ipython notebook, create a code cell with the following syntax to automatically convert your document (note that this is R code, use an equivalent command to system() for python):
#automatic document conversion to markdown and then to word
#first convert the ipython notebook paper.ipynb to markdown
system("jupyter nbconvert --to markdown paper.ipynb")
#next convert markdown to ms word
conversion <- paste0("pandoc -s paper.md -t docx -o paper.docx",
" --filter pandoc-citeproc",
" --bibliography="listb.bib",
" --csl="apa.csl")
system(conversion)
Run this cell (or simply run all cells). Note that the 2nd system call is simply pandoc -s paper.md -t docx -o paper.docx --filter pandoc-citeproc --bibliography=listb.bib --csl=apa.csl. I merely used paste0() to be able to spread this over multiple lines and make it nicer to read.
The output is a word document. If you prefer another document, check out this guide for alternative syntax.
#Extras
If you do not like that your converted document includes the syntax for the document conversion, insert a markdown cell above and below the code cell with the syntax for the conversion. In the cell above, enter <!-- and in the cell below enter -->. This is a regular HTML command for a comment, so the syntax will in between these two cells will be evaluated but not printed.
You can also include a yaml header in your first cell. E.g.,
---
title: This is a great title.
author: Author Name
abstract: This is a great abstract
---
You can use the Document Tools of the Calico suite, which can be installed separately with:
sudo ipython install-nbextension https://bitbucket.org/ipre/calico/downloads/calico-document-tools-1.0.zip
Read the tutorial and watch the YouTube video for more details.
Warning: only the cited references are processed. Therefore, if you fail to cite an article, it won't appear in the References section. As a little working example, copy the following in a Markdown cell and press the "book" icon.
<!--bibtex
#Article{PER-GRA:2007,
Author = {P\'erez, Fernando and Granger, Brian E.},
Title = {{IP}ython: a System for Interactive Scientific Computing},
Journal = {Computing in Science and Engineering},
Volume = {9},
Number = {3},
Pages = {21--29},
month = may,
year = 2007,
url = "http://ipython.org",
ISSN = "1521-9615",
doi = {10.1109/MCSE.2007.53},
publisher = {IEEE Computer Society},
}
#article{Papa2007,
author = {Papa, David A. and Markov, Igor L.},
journal = {Approximation algorithms and metaheuristics},
pages = {1--38},
title = {{Hypergraph partitioning and clustering}},
url = {http://www.podload.org/pubs/book/part\_survey.pdf},
year = {2007}
}
-->
Examples of citations: [CITE](#cite-PER-GRA:2007) or [CITE](#cite-Papa2007).
This should result in the following added Markdown cell:
References
^ Pérez, Fernando and Granger, Brian E.. 2007. IPython: a System for Interactive Scientific Computing. URL
^ Papa, David A. and Markov, Igor L.. 2007. Hypergraph partitioning and clustering. URL
I was able to run it with the following approach:
Insert the html citation as in the tutorial you mentioned.
Create ipython.bib in the "standard" bibtex format. It goes into the same file as your *.ipynb notebook file.
Create the template file as in the tutorial, also in the same directory or else in the (distribution dependent) directory with the other templates. On my system, that's /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/IPython/nbconvert/templates/latex.
The tutorial has the template extend latex_article.tplx. On my distribution, it's article.tplx (without latex_).
Run nbconvert with --to latex; that generates an .aux file among other things. Latex will complain about missing references.
Run bibtex yournotebook.aux; this generates yournotebook.bbl. You only need to re-run this if you change references.
Re-run nbconvert either with --to latex or with --to pdf. This generates a .tex file, or else runs all the way to a .pdf.
If you want html output, you can use pandoc to assemble the references into a tidy citation page. This may require some hand-editing to make an html page you can reference from your main document.
If you know that you will be converting your notebook to latex anyway, consider simply adding a "Raw" cell (Ctrl+M R) to the end of the document, containing the bibliography just as you would put it in pure LaTeX.
For example, when I need to reference a couple of external links, I would not even care to do a proper BibTeX thing and simply have a "Raw" cell at the end of the notebook like that:
\begin{thebibliography}{1}
\bibitem{post1}
Holography in Simple Terms. K.Tretyakov (blog post), 2015.\\
\url{http://fouryears.eu/2015/07/24/holography-in-simple-terms/}
\bibtem{book1}
The Importance of Citations. J. Smith. 2010.
\end{thebibliography}
The items can be cited in other Markdown cells using the usual <cite data-cite="post1">(KT, 2015)</cite>
Of course, you can also use proper BibTeX as well. Just add the corresponding Raw cell, e.g:
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
\bibliography{papers}
This way you do not have to bother editing a separate template file (at the price of cluttering the notebook's HTML export with raw Latex, though).
You should have a look at the latex_envs extension in https://github.com/ipython-contrib/IPython-notebook-extensions (install from this repo, it is the most recent version). This extension contains a way to integrate bibliography using bibtex files and standard latex notation, and generates a bibliography section at the end of the notebook. Style of citations can be (to some extent) customized. Some documentation here https://rawgit.com/jfbercher/latex_envs/master/doc/latex_env_doc.html
When I write math in LaTeX I often need to perform simple arithmetic on numbers in my LaTeX source, like 515.1544 + 454 = ???.
I usually copy-paste the LaTeX code into Google to get the result, but I still have to manually change the syntax, e.g.
\frac{154,7}{25} - (289 - \frac{1337}{42})
must be changed to
154,7/25 - (289 - 1337/42)
It seems trivial to write a program to do this for the most commonly used operations.
Is there a calculator which understand this syntax?
EDIT:
I know that doing this perfectly is impossible (because of the halting problem). Doing it for the simple cases I need is trivial. \frac, \cdot, \sqrt and a few other tags would do the trick. The program could just return an error for cases it does not understand.
WolframAlpha can take input in TeX form.
http://blog.wolframalpha.com/2010/09/30/talk-to-wolframalpha-in-tex/
The LaTeXCalc project is designed to do just that. It will read a TeX file and do the computations. For more information check out the home page at http://latexcalc.sourceforge.net/
The calc package allows you to do some calculations in source, but only within commands like \setcounter and \addtolength. As far as I can tell, this is not what you want.
If you already use sage, then the sagetex package is pretty awesome (if not, it's overkill). It allows you get nicely formatted output from input like this:
The square of
$\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 \\
3 & 4
\end{pmatrix}$
is \sage{matrix([[1, 2], [3,4]])^2}.
The prime factorization of the current page number is \sage{factor(\thepage)}
As Andy says, the answer is yes there is a calculator that can understand most latex formulas: Emacs.
Try the following steps (assuming vanilla emacs):
Open emacs
Open your .tex file (or activate latex-mode)
position the point somewhere between the two $$ or e.g. inside the begin/end environment of the formula (or even matrix).
use calc embedded mode for maximum awesomeness
So with point in the formula you gave above:
$\frac{154,7}{25} - (289 - \frac{1337}{42})$
press C-x * d to duplicate the formula in the line below and enter calc-embedded mode which should already have activated a latex variant of calc for you. Your buffer now looks like this:
$\frac{154,7}{25} - (289 - \frac{1337}{42})$
$\frac{-37651}{150}$`
Note that the fraction as already been transformed as far as possible. Doing the same again (C-x * d) and pressing c f to convert the fractional into a floating point number yields the following buffer:
$\frac{154,7}{25} - (289 - \frac{1337}{42})$
$\frac{-37651}{150}$
$-251.006666667$
I used C-x * d to duplicate the formula and then enter embedded mode in order to have the intermediate values, however there is also C-x * e which avoids the duplication and simply enters embedded mode for the current formula.
If you are interested you should really have a look at the info page for Emacs Calc - Embedded Mode. And in general the help for the Gnu Emaca Calculator together with the awesome interactive tutorial.
You can run an R function called Sweave on a (mostly TeX with some R) file that can replace R expressions with their results in Tex.
A tutorial can be found here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/6451985/Learning-to-Sweave-in-APA-Style
My calculator can do that. To get the formatted output, double-click the result formula and press ctrl+c to copy it.
It can do fairly advanced stuff too (differentiation, easy integrals (and not that easy ones)...).
https://calculator-algebra.org/
A sample computation:
https://calculator-algebra.org:8166/#%7B%22currentPage%22%3A%22calculator%22%2C%22calculatorInput%22%3A%22%5C%5Cfrac%7B1%2B2%7D%7B3%7D%3B%20d%2Fdx(arctan%20(2x%2B3))%22%2C%22monitoring%22%3A%22true%22%7D
There is a way to do what you want just not quite how you describe.
You can use the fp package (\usepackage[options]{fp}) the floating point package will do anything you want; solving equations, adding dividing and many more. Unfortunately it will not read the LaTeX math you instead have to do something a little different, the documentation is very poor so I'll give an example here.
for instance if you want to do (2x3)/5 you would type:
\FPmul\p{2}{3} % \p is the assignment of the operation 2x3
\FPupn\p{\p{} 7 round} % upn evaluates the assignment \p and rounds to 7dp
\FPdiv\q{\p}{5} % divides the assigned value p by 5 names result q
\FPupn\q{\q{} 4 round} % rounds the result to 4 decimal places and evaluates
$\frac{2\times3}{5}=\FPprint\q$ % This will print the result of the calculations in the math.
the FP commands are always ibvisible, only FPprint prints the result associated with it so your documents will not be messy, FP commands can be placed wherever you wish (not verb) as long as they are before the associated FPprint.
You could just paste it into symbolab which as a bonus has free step by step solutions. Also since symbolab uses mathquill it instantly formats your latex.
Considering that LaTeX itself is a Turing-complete markup language I strongly doubt you can build something like this that isn't built directly into LaTeX. Furthermore, LaTeX math matkup itself has next to no semantic meaning, it merely describes the visual appearance.
That being said, you can probably hack together something which recognizes a non-programmable subset of LaTeX math markup and spits out the result in the same way. If all you're interested in is simple arithmetics with fractions and integers (careful with decimal fractions, though, as they may appear as 3{,}141... in German texts :)) this shouldn't be too hard. But once you start with integrals, matrices, etc. I fear that LaTeX lacks expressiveness to accurately describe your intentions. It is a document preparation system, after all and thus not very suitable as input for computer algebra systems.
Side note: You can switch to Word which has—in its current version—a math markup language which is sufficiently LaTeX-like (by now it even supports LaTeX markup) and yet still Google-friendly for simpler terms:
With the free Microsoft Math add-in you can even let Word calculate expressions in-place:
There is none, because it is generally not possible.
LaTeX math mode markup is presentational markup and there are cases in which it does not provide enough information to calculate the expression.
That was one of the reasons MathML content markup was created and also why MathML is used in Mathematica. MathML actually is sort of two languages in one:
presentation markup
content markup
To accomplish what you are after you'll have to have MathML with comibned presentation and content markup (see MathML spec).
In my opinion your best bet is to use MathML (even if it is verbose) and convert to LaTeX when necessary. That said, I also like LaTeX syntax best and maybe what we need is a compact syntax for MathML (something similar in spirit to RelaxNG compact syntax).
For calculations with LaTeX you can use a CalcTeX package.
This package understand elements of LaTeX language and makes an calculations, for example your problem is avialble on
http://sg.bzip.pl/CalcTeX/examples/frac.tgz
or just please write
\noindent
For calculation please use following enviromentals
$515.1544 + 454$
or
\[ \frac{154.7}{25}-(289-\frac{1337}{42.})
\]
or
\begin{equation}
154.7/25-(289-1337/42.)
\end{equation}
For more info please visite project web site or contact author of this project.
For performing the math within your LaTeX itself, you might also look into the pgfmath package, which is more powerful and convenient than the calc package. You can find out how to use it from Part VI of The TikZ and PGF Packages Manual, which you can find here (version 2.10 currently): http://mirror.unl.edu/ctan/graphics/pgf/base/doc/generic/pgf/pgfmanual.pdf
Emacs calc-mode accepts latex-input. I use it daily. Press "d", followed by "L" to enter latex input mode. Press "'" to open a prompt where you can paste your tex.
Anyone saing it is not possible is wrong.
IIRC Mathematica can do it.
There is none, because it is generally not possible. LaTeX math mode
markup is presentational markup and there are cases in which it does
not provide enough information to calculate the expression.
You are right. LaTeX as it is does not provide enough info to make any calculations.Moreover, it does not represent any information to do it. But nobody prevents to wright in LaTeX format a text that contains such an information.
It is a difficult path, because you need to build a system of rules superimposed on what content ofthe text in Latex format needs to contain that it would be recognizable by your interpreter. And then convince the user that it is necessary to learn, etc. etc...
The easiest way to create a logical and intuitive calculator of mathematical expressions. And the expression is already possible to convert latex. It's almost like what you said. This is implemented in the program which I have pointed to. AnEasyCalc allows to type an expression as you type the plane text in any text editor. It checks, calculates and generate LateX string by its own then. Its very easy and rapid work. Just try and you will see that.
This is not exactly what you are asking for but it is a nice package
that you can include in a LaTeX document to do all kind of operations including arithmetic, calculus and even vectors and matrices:
The package name is "calculator"
http://mirror.unl.edu/ctan/macros/latex/contrib/calculator/calculator.pdf
The latex2sympy2 Python library can parse LaTeX math expressions.
from latex2sympy2 import latex2sympy
tex_str = r"""YOUR TEX MATH HERE"""
tex_str = r"\frac{9\pi}{\ln(12)}+22" # example TeX math
sympy_object = latex2sympy(tex_str)
evaluated_tex = float(sympy_object.evalf())
print(evaluated_tex)
This Python 3 code evaluates 9𝜋/ln(12)+22 (in its LaTeX from above) to 33.37842899841745.
The snippet above only handles basic algebraic simplification (math expressions without variables). Since the library converts LaTeX math to SymPy objects, the above code can easily be tweaked and extended to handle much more complicated LaTeX math (including solving derivatives, integrals, etc...).
The latex2sympy2 library can be installed via the pip command: pip install --user latex2sympy2
<>
try the AnEasyCalc program. It allows to get the latex formula very easy:
http://steamandwater.od.ua/AnEasyCalc/
:)