I am running Mosquitto MQTT broker on the localhost of my PC and I want to publish or subscribe data through MQTT with Mosquitto from a remote IP (another PC). Both the PCs are connect to the same Wifi public network. I have disable the firewall of the two PCs and I am able to ping one another on command prompt. I have look up on several websites and tried editing the config file of the Mosquitto MQTT broker by adding these two lines.
listener 1883
allow_anonymous true
I have started the Mosquitto broker by executing mosquitto -c mosquitto.conf -v
The following is the log appear the mosquitto start.
C:\Program Files\mosquitto>mosquitto -c mosquitto.conf -v
1665133477: mosquitto version 2.0.15 starting
1665133477: Config loaded from mosquitto.conf.
1665133477: Opening ipv6 listen socket on port 1883.
1665133477: Opening ipv4 listen socket on port 1883.
1665133477: mosquitto version 2.0.15 running
However, on the publishing PC, it prompts the error below.
C:\Program Files\mosquitto>mosquitto_pub -h XXX.XXX.XX.X -t Test -m "Hello World" -p 8883 -d
Error: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it.
The situation is same for subscribing. I am currently using the latest version of Mosquitto 2.0.15. Can anyone help me on this situation? Your help would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance!
I'm trying to run a docker image on my windows 10 pro workstation, and I'm getting this error:
docker: Error response from daemon: Ports are not available: listen tcp 0.0.0.0:80: bind: An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions.
I'm running this command:
docker run -d -p 80:80 docker/getting-started
And getting this response back:
Unable to find image 'docker/getting-started:latest' locally
latest: Pulling from docker/getting-started
188c0c94c7c5: Pull complete
617561f33ec6: Pull complete
7d856acdaa9c: Pull complete
a0d3c6e28e6d: Pull complete
af69a9b963c8: Pull complete
0739f3815ad8: Pull complete
7c7b75d0baf8: Pull complete
Digest: sha256:b821569034e3b5fae03b40e64a866017067f3bf17effe185b782bdbf02179528
Status: Downloaded newer image for docker/getting-started:latest
7907f6de2b55cc2d66b5ed3a642ac1a97e5bb5ecda5fcf76ff60d7236e8fd32d
docker: Error response from daemon: Ports are not available: listen tcp 0.0.0.0:80: bind: An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions.
How can I run a Docker container and get past this problem?
The commands that helped me were:
net stop winnat
net start winnat
Taken from here.
Check if somthing is listening on port 80 by running PowerShell command:
Get-Process -Id (Get-NetTCPConnection -LocalPort 80).OwningProcess
If the response is something like this:
NPM(K) PM(M) WS(M) CPU(s) Id SI ProcessName
------ ----- ----- ------ -- -- -----------
0 0.20 4.87 0.00 4 0 System
Then the it is taken.
terminate the process or simply change the port
docker run -d -p 81:81 docker/getting-started 5a0b1202f48ef63c06d75c2f26be2a05f29aa84fe2fbdc5b66f989aa86df98f
docker: Error response from daemon: Ports are not available: listen tcp 0.0.0.0:80: bind: An attempt was made to access a socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions.
I was also using Docker's Getting Started tutorial, ran
docker run -d -p 80:80 docker/getting-started, and got the same error.
I thought that Internet Information Services (IIS) might be using port 80 already. I verified this hunch by going to
Start > IIS > computer name > Sites > Default Web Site > highlight Default Web Site
In the right pane, I saw
Browse *.80 (http)
Yep, port 80 was already in use!
Note: To verify if any process is using port 80, run the command
Get-Process -Id (Get-NetTCPConnection -LocalPort 80).OwningProcess
and look for something like
NPM(K) PM(M) WS(M) CPU(s) Id SI ProcessName
------ ----- ----- ------ -- -- -----------
0 0.20 2.96 0.00 4 0 System
per #Tim Dunphy's answer.
Solution #1
Stop the Default Web site.
Either go to IIS per above > right pane > Manage Website > Stop or
Use the net stop http command, and stop services using the port.
Solution #2
You may not want to stop IIS or any other service running on port 80, so just change the local port! For example,
docker run -d -p 81:80 docker/getting-started
will likely do the trick, as long as you don't have services using port 81.
When I encountered this error there was nothing actively listening on the port.However, the following command showed the port had been reserved by something else
netsh interface ipv4 show excludedportrange protocol=tcp
See This article for more details. A reboot fixed the issue for me.
Most times, Windows IIS (Internet Information Service) or some other program may be using port 80, which is the default http port used by Laravel, Apache and other PHP development environments.
To resolve this issue, Open a new PowerShell window as administrator and simply run this command:
net stop http
A prompt listing all services using the http port is shown and you are given the option of stopping them. enter 'Y' and press Enter. All the services are stopped and port 80 is now free for whatever you want to use it for.
Very useful for testing multiple application environments locally on Windows without having to worry about port configuration.
in my case,the task manager show that a system process is occupy port 80.
when i dive deeper, i found a svchost.exe related to port 80, and it is based on world wide web service
so,just open service list and stop the world wide web service,then everything will be ok,the name of service maybe different, but should include keywords :world wide web
just do it
netsh http add iplisten ipaddress=::
(This has to be run in a command prompt with elevated rights!)
I am using MAC OS + PyCharm(for pro) and ubuntu16.04 server.
When I try to connect to the server's docker using local pycharm, I get the following error:
( Cannot connect: java.io.IOException: Channel disconnected before any data was reveived )
( I changed the docker daemon port. )
And, I tried searching for ports, and worked well.
Port Scanning host: 163.---.---.178
Open TCP Port: 7561
Even if I tried changing tcp to https, it gave an error.
How can I fix it?
1.set this item first, then reboot your laptop. Run pycharm as administrator, it works for me.
Here is my configuration:
On the server I have a dhcp server that gives IP addresses to clients (connected on eth1) in order for the clients to be connected to the internet (on eth0).
For a special operational use, I would like to stop the IP connection between a client and the server for 30 seconds and rewarm up the link after that period. Currently I have tried to use iptable black list to put the client IP inside the black ip list with this command:
command 1: sudo iptables -I INPUT -s '.$ip.' -j DROP
then I use another iptable command to resume the ip link with this command:
command 2: sudo iptables -D INPUT -s '.$ip.' -j DROP
the both commands are encapsulated in a PHP program stored in an Ubuntu server and launched from a Windows workstation. Both command works perfectly but, unfortunately, I never get the internet connection back. From a Windows command screen I can monitor the behaviour of the line with ping commands. Here are the result of command 1:stop the network
Here are the result of command 2:start the network
Here is my Question:
Can someone thell me how to rewarm up the local IP socket in order to relaunch the tcp connection after command 2?
Another way of doing this may could have be to stop using iptable command and dynamically modify the lease time of the client IP address given by dhcp service.
Stopping the connection: by anticipating the end of lease period of the IP address. Rewarming up the connection: by attempting a http command to invoke the establishment of a tcp connection with a new lease time.
Can someone tell me how to overcome this?
Thanks very much.
I am trying to bridge my local (Windows) MQTT mosquitto broker to test.mosquitto.org. Unfortunately it raises a Unknown Error.
I am using the same configuration that is used in this question
Verify that local mosquitto MQTT Broker is bridged to test.mosquitto.org
Config file:
connection test
address test.mosquitto.org
topic oust_topicst_topic out 0
try_private false
notifications false
bridge_attempt_unsubscribe true
Output:
1489747961: mosquitto version 1.4.11 (build date 20/02/2017 23:24:29.40) starting
1489747961: Config loaded from Configurations/bridge.conf.
1489747961: Opening ipv6 listen socket on port 1883.
1489747961: Opening ipv4 listen socket on port 1883.
1489747961: Bridge local.NicolasJourdan.test doing local SUBSCRIBE on topic oust_topicst_topic
1489747961: Connecting bridge test (test.mosquitto.org:1883)
1489747961: Bridge NicolasJourdan.test sending CONNECT
1489747961: Error creating bridge: Unknown error.
1489747961: Warning: Unable to connect to bridge test.
1489747969: mosquitto version 1.4.11 terminating
What could produce this error? I am not running another instance of mosquitto and test.mosquitto.org is up
First question is whether you are running a local broker or just connecting as a client.
If you are running a broker try to first run mosquitto with -c "path to config file" to see whether your config file has an error in it. Run in terminal (example on linux):
mosquitto -c /etc/mosquitto/mosquitto.conf
If there is an error the console will show it and you take it from there.
Next, try to format your topics like this (it is called topic remapping):
topic test out 0 local/ local/
Now you can publish to local/test from your code or terminal, and the message will be published to local/test on the remote broker, which will receive messages by suscribing to the same topic.
Update September 2019
The bug on Windows as described below has reportedly been fixed in version 1.6.5 of Mosquitto.
There appears to be a bug with Mosquitto running on Windows that prevents bridging from working.
On Windows the socket is not ready before Mosquitto attempts to connect.
See https://github.com/eclipse/mosquitto/issues/478 and https://github.com/eclipse/mosquitto/issues/580. This describes the underlying issue on Windows:
After checking the code I found that the statement in bridge.c .... makes a non blocking socket connect.
...
So the the next command ... sometimes fails, since the connection has not been established, as the previous connect is non-blocking.