I have a problem generating a iOS App archive from an application. The application compiles just fine and even works in the simulator. Now I wanted to make som ad hoc testing and cannot generate the iOS App Archive. When I click on the Product -> Archive it generates a generic xcode archive. Can anyone help me. I should mention, that I have already generated an iOS App Archive of this application. It has just stopped to generate iOS Archive for some reason. Thanks a lot.
Check Build Settings:
Skip install is NO for the main project target
Skip install is YES for framework (sub-projects) targets
In Build Phases for sub-projects, Copy Headers needs to be in Project, not Public (does not apply if building static library)
Installation Directory under Deployment is valid (/Applications for example)
This can happen if you've added a framework/library ... you need to edit the Target->Build Settings of that library and set the 'Skip Install' setting to 'Yes'. When you re-archive, XCode should start producing a 'iOS App Archive' again rather than a 'generic xcode archive'.
In addition of Skip Install to Yes and in case you opened another lib/framwork project within your app project you have to move headers (if any) from public to project in the Build Phase / Copy Headers.
I did the following to make it work for me:
I had a three20 static library, I used cocoapods to include the files within the main project
followed the skip install for all other sub projects/static libraries and switched the copy headers from public to project as stated above
most importantly: in each library your project uses go to build phases -> Copy Files and ensured that destination is changed from Absolute path to products directory. Note: see the hint below to narrow your search to find the library causing this error.
and that was it!
hint: to get an idea of the offending files that's causing your archive to create an archive file rather than an ipa do this:
Select the archive and click the Distribute button.
Select the 'Save Built Products' option.
Hit Next and Save.
Browse the created directory in Finder.
The 'libraries' subdirectory will identify the libraries that you need to set the Skip Install to Yes.
in some cases usr/local/include will identify the culprit header files you need to move from Public to Project or the files that you have to change from absolute path to products directory (or even the files you forgot to set the skip install to yes flag). but that directory (ie usr/local/include) varies depending on your sublibrary directory structure. In many cases.. you will see all the files listed under Copy Files in step 3 above listed here. If you find them here, then you have a definite answer for the cause of your problem.
update to hint: to make life even more simpler.. whatever files appears under step 4 in hint above.. simply search for it in the global search of xcode.. and you should get immediate results for what you want.. for example, this was the content of my folder (following the steps in hint above):
So I could tell it has something to do with the crypto and ssl libraries.. searching for them:
made me realize that i forgot to set skip install to yes.
If you export the archive, open it and see /urs/local/include in Products try this suggestion:
In each pod, under Packaging, Private Headers Folder Path and Public Headers Folder Path is set to /usr/local/include. If I clear them then I get a valid archive.
Worked for me after upgrading my React Native app to 0.11.0, Xcode 7 and CocoaPods 0.39.0.beta.4.
If you're using CocoaPods as well as WatchKit or a Today Extension, there is an open issue on the CocoaPods repo explaining what your problem might be.
The solution for me was to remove the Copy Pod Resources phase from the WatchKit Extension and Today Extension targets under Build Phases. The project compiled and archived as expected once I did this.
Hope this helps someone, this had me stumped for an entire day!
If any of the above answers don't work, your issue is probably with cocoaPods. The latest update 0.38.1 messed things up for me, but then i downgraded to 0.37.1 and things returned to normal. Using Xcode 6.3.1
Later edit: updating to 0.38.2 will also fix this. More info about what caused this issue here: Cocoapods 0.38.1 failed to create valid Archive
Although I'm using Xcode5 and what sorted it for me was editing the Build Scheme - trying all of the above suggestions that were applicable didn't help in my case.
I had two targets, say, "App" and "App FREE". My problems with the generic archive happened when I was trying to Archive the FREE version, which I added after the 'normal' version of the app. In my case, when I selected its Scheme in the toolbar and chose Edit Scheme ... I saw that Build section had two targets, namely App and App FREE.
I unchecked all columns for App, leaving only App FREE's columns checked, and clicked OK. Next time I chose Product > Archive I got my App FREE instead of a Generic Archive. :)
If you have only single project, maybe this solution would be useful.
This problem had occurred, when I duplicated the target. As a result I had two targets parallel built. This was causing the issue. Generic IOS archive was built.
To turn the parallel built off go to
Manage schemes,
Edit scheme,
Build,
Remove the other target.
I had this problem after updating to iOS 9 and Xcode 7. Josh H's solution worked for me:
In each pod, under Packaging, Private Headers Folder Path and Public
Headers Folder Path is set to /usr/local/include. If I clear them then
I get a valid archive.
I also made a post install script for my Podfile to do this automatically!
post_install do |installer_representation|
installer_representation.pods_project.targets.each do |target|
target.build_configurations.each do |config|
config.build_settings['PUBLIC_HEADERS_FOLDER_PATH'] = [""];
config.build_settings['PRIVATE_HEADERS_FOLDER_PATH'] = [""];
end
end
end
Just add it to the bottom of your Podfile and run pod install
I had this issue. In my case, it was caused by keeping a Mac app target as a dependency of the iOS app.
The reason it was setup like this was that the Mac app was a tool used to generate some data for the iOS app, which was then included in the bundle.
I had to remove that dependency and build the tool separately before making a build of the iOS app itself.
In my scenario I was getting the erroneous "Generic Archive" only after I began including Swift code in my predominantly Objective-C project. After lots of troubleshooting and examination of the archive file that Xcode was spitting out, I noticed that the SwiftSupport folder (with the required dylibs for the Swift runtime) was in a different place in my archive than from a vanilla brand-new Swift project app archive.
I found the Installation Directory build setting and noticed it was set to a custom path in my project. I simply deleted it (setting it to its generic value of /Applications) and the next Build -> Archive I did worked as expected and gave me a proper iOS App Archive.
TL; DR: Make sure your Installation Directory build setting is set to its default value of /Applications when including Swift code in your app, especially if you are starting with an older project file that may have some unexpected legacy build settings.
I have multiple project in my workspace, (GTL, Pods and my main project) and this is what worked for me:
Select the Project, there will be 2 types there, there's the Project and there's the Targets.
For projects that is not your main like GTL or PODS:
Projects:
Skip Install = NO
Installation Directory = /Applications
// For pods
Private Headers Folder Path = ""
Public Headers Folder Path = ""
Targets:
Skip Install = YES
Installation Directory = /Applications
// For pods
Private Headers Folder Path = ""
Public Headers Folder Path = ""
For the main project (which is usually named the same as your product name):
Projects:
Skip Install = NO
Installation Directory = /Applications
Targets:
Skip Install = NO
Installation Directory = /Applications
Check the ios deployment target on each projects and targets to make sure they are all the same.
Leaving this here to save others from the same journey.
I found I needed to remove the same Copy Pod Resources build phase from a static library target in my workspace too.
Addition to Alex L 's answer.
Point 3. Change 'Build Settings' -> 'Public Header Folder Path' to 'include/xxx' also works.
If none of the above helped you...after a lot of time.......
I deleted the value in the Info.plist for Bundle Version because I was happy enough with just Bundle Version Short 1.0. Bad. Don't do this.
*Note I actually did this by editing it in the UI on the right not realizing it would put an empty key in the Info.plist file. I think that makes it invalid. My bundle showed up as other items while archiving and had no icon, and I couldn't upload to anywhere.
This boils down to invalid values in the Info.plist. If it's not a valid archive, try unzipping an old archive and dropping in / overwriting your current one and see if it fixes it when rebuilding the archive.
Go to Build Settings and add
yourAppName/Resources/dist.plist to the Code Signing Entitlements
Press cmd + B with iOS Device or a Real Device selected as Build Target
When done -> scroll to "Products" folder and right-click on yourAppName.app
Choose "Show in Finder"
Create a folder with Name Payload (capital "P")
Copy yourAppName into your Payload Folder
Create a zip from your Payload Folder
Rename the zip to yourAppName.ipa
DONE
After trying just about everything:
Clean, Archive
delete DerivedData, Archive
restart Xcode (I was using XCode7), Archive
combinations of above...
I then noticed my boot partition was 'low on free disk space'... about 1GB or so.
I rebooted, then got about 18GB free.
Then opened Xcode and project, performed Archive... and surprisingly (after an hour of trying to build an Archive) I finally got a non Generic Archive.
No idea if its a free disk issue which fixed it or a reboot of the macOS that fixed it, but it worked for me.
If you have any .xcodeproj files in Project>Targets>Build Phases>target dependencies remove it from there and then build your ipa. It works for me. Cheers
You can get answer here : xcode is creating generic xcode archive instead of iOS App Archive
In my case, i had to move both FMDB and BlocksKit to static libraries. Previously they were built as subprojects. Remember you can use lipo to create universal libraries. When building the final products, the simulator code will be stripped automagically.
Another possible reason for this is to have references in "Target Dependencies" to projects for a different platform. In my particular case, I was working on a project that shares code for OSX and iOS. In one of the iOS targets, I had accidentally added an OSX target as dependency.
In order to be thorough, I am posting my solution.
I experienced the exact same problem trying to build an Archive of an iOS project in Xcode 5.1.1 (5B1008). None of the above suggestions fixed the problem, and most of them were irrelevant (I had not added any Frameworks, and did not have any Public entries in the Copy Headers section of my Build Phases).
In my case, fixing the problem consisted of simply closing my project, deleting any archives that I had previously made, going to Preferences > Accounts, removing my developer account, quitting Xcode, relaunching, re-adding my developer account, starting the Archive process again. This fixed my problem immediately.
One more solution, since all the above didn't work for me...
Changed the User Header Search Paths (I suppose Header Search Paths would work just as elegantly) to "$(BUILT_PRODUCTS_DIR)/BlocksKit".
Background:
In BlockKit, the developers have structured the headers in the main project differently than the structure on deployment. So, you can't reference the headers in the project, and must reference the headers copied into the build directory.
The way this worked for me in (Xcode 5) I had 2 targets and when I edited the scheme, on the left pane of the scheme editor, you will see the [BUILD, RUN, TEST, PROFILE XXX.APP, ANALYZE, ARCHIVE] from the BUILD pane, you will see your project targets listed in a list. At the far right end you will see the ARCHIVE selections, make sure only one target is selected for archiving.
I had 2 of my targets selected in my project, I checked only the target I wanted in the product, and it worked!
I solved this error by opening solely the app project in XCode, ie. not opening a workspace comprising the application and other projects/libraries/frameworks.
Having 2 separate project, a framework or shared library and an iOS application, I had to open 2 different XCode windows, each by directly opening the .xcodeproj file instead of the common .xcworkspace, in order to preperly build each.
As a nice side effect, XCode no longer rebuilds every target of every project after I do a Clean, resulting in shorted build times.
Background: I am creating an open source SDK, and a demo iOS application. I had both opened in a single workspace.
Setting Skip install to YES on the SDK targets would prevent anyone from creating an archive, as it would be empty, so this was not an option. Using Project instead of Public headers would lead to an archive missing the header files that should be distributed, so this was not an option either.
For it was because i was working in a workspace.
The project did archived but would ne be displayed in the organizer window.
I closed the workspace and open the project on its own.
The archived has been opened in the organizer ... hope it's help.
In my case, I had a custom script that was copying some temporary files into:
${TARGET_BUILD_DIR}/myTempDir
That meant that, after investigating the archive to inspect its contents, I found right next to the .app file a myTempDir folder. Once I modified the script to save elsewhere things were sorted.
Try setting $(PROJECT_NAME)Headers in Framework projet's Public Headers Folder Path. You have to go to build settings of the Library Target then edit the Public Headers Folder path as $(PROJECT_NAME)Headers.
If using Xcode 7 with cocoapods v.0.38.2. Try removing copy pod resources from your today extension target.
I encountered this problem after adding a OS X command line tool to my iOS app's project, and Skip Install was set to NO by default for the command line tool's target. Since you obviously can't install an OS X binary to an iOS device, archiving defaulted to a generic Xcode archive. Setting Skip Install to YES for this target fixed the problem.
I have a module/framework written in Swift, intended to be used on iOS. When I try to include the framework in my app, I first notice some red "not found" hints in the build phases:
But, the project builds fine - the target dependency is found, so there are no compilation issues. It's just the resulting built framework - and sure enough, upon launching, I have a linker error, it can't find the image. Looking at the build log, it's looking here:
/Users/Craig/Projects/Fluffy/build/Debug-iphoneos/
Which makes sense - that's what is defined in the Build Settings for my framework:
But the copy fails, as the source framework doesn't exist:
PBXCp /Users/Craig/projects/Fluffy/build/Debug-iphoneos/Fluffy_iOS.framework /Users/Craig/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/MyApp-dcjfhcnyzkwzxiejuuxqlsgajreb/Build/Products/Debug-iphoneos/MyApp/Frameworks/Fluffy_iOS.framework
...
error: /Users/Craig/projects/Fluffy/build/Debug-iphoneos/Fluffy_iOS.framework: No such file or directory
However, looking at the build log for my framework, I see that it's actually ending up here:
/Users/Craig/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/Fluffy-fuuewsvogdkycegheyrsabkiicxc/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator/Fluffy_iOS.framework
I suppose that makes sense - DerivedData has for a while now been the default location for any built products.
And when I take a look at the expected build folder, there's not much, a lot of it is old, and none of it relates to the Debug configuration:
So my questions are: Why is my framework being placed in the DerivedData folder, when it seems to be asking in the Build Settings to be placed in the build folder relative to the project? Are these parameters (per-configuration build products path, etc.) consulted at all?
And, what should I do to reconcile this? How can my application know to look in the right DerivedData folder for the framework, for the right configuration (debug vs. release) in a way that is extensible and will work without me having to manually specify the absolute path to it?
Okay, so I figured out how to work around this. This assumes you have workspace and you have included the framework as a project in the workspace and you are trying to build a product from another project in the workspace which includes the framework.
What you need to do is find out where the framework is being built. It's usually some crazy directory under the DeriveData directory. Go to the Finder and find it for the configuration you just tried to build.
In the product target's General settings, under Embedded Binaries, drag that file into it. This should now place it in the Project Navigator. You should also see it in the Linked Frameworks and Libraries which was underneath Embedded Binaries.
Go to the Project Navigator and select the file and view it under the File Inspector. There, change the Location to Relative to Build Products.
In the target's Build Settings, for Framework Search Paths, add $(BUILT_PRODUCTS_DIR) and make that recursive. Delete the entry that was automatically added when you added the framework. It will be an explicit path which has the DerivedData path in it.
Do a deep clean and delete the DerivedData directory for good measure.
Build.
You should now see the framework turn black and it should work properly.
These are slightly modified steps provided by #Mobile Ben
Assume, you have the following Xcode project structure
-YourWorkspace
--YourFramework project
--YourApp project
step 1. Clear all the targets with Cmd+Shift+K and Cmd+Option+Shift+K (by choosing each of them in the Scheme selector and pressing the hotkey combination)
step 2. Select YourFramework project.
step 3. Choose a simulator and build (Cmd+B) YourFramework framework target
step 4: Choose Generic iOS Device and build (Cmd+B) YourFramework framework target
step 5: Select YourApp project. Press + in Embedded Binaries and choose the framework under YourFramework project
step 6: now locate the just added framework in Project Navigator (on the left). In File Inspector (on the right) select location Relative to build product.
NOTE: I believe the step 6 is required b/c of some bug in Xcode. But, though, not selecting Relative to build product by default might be a deliberate act
UPD#1: Since Xcode 8.0 (8A218a), step 6 is not needed anymore - the IDE sets Relative to Build Products automatically.
In addition to the above answer which works perfectly on Simulator. On device you will get dyld library not found error and a crash.
Here is the solution for that:
In the project that depends on this framework:
Under the build settings: Add a copy files phase and add this framework to the 'Frameworks' folder in copy file phase.
First of all, i'm now on this site so really sorry if i'm commiting some error posting this question.I'm trying to use the zipArchive class to manage zip files in an ipad project.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
Create a project.
Add the ZipArchive folder with their files.
Add the libz.1.2.3.dylib
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I have all the code (about ziparchive) commented, so i only have the #import #import "ZipArchive/ZipArchive.h" in my viewcontroller, and i expect to build the project without errors.
I see the following error in the compiler:
ld: warning: ignoring file /Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/DeviceSupport/4.2/Symbols/usr/lib/libSystem.dylib, missing required architecture i386 in file
ld: in /Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/DeviceSupport/4.2/Symbols/usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib, missing required architecture i386 in file for architecture i386
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Command /Developer/Platforms/iPhoneSimulator.platform/Developer/usr/bin/llvm-gcc-4.2 failed with exit code 1
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
I'm using xcode 4 a project for the ipad with the 4.2 ipad simulator on a Mac os X version 10.6.7
Please provide any additional information below.
I think the problem is with the libz.1.2.3.dylib library, and I have some guest of where might be the problem:
The libz.1.2.3.dylib path error is on iPhoneSimulator.platform, it is valid for ipad too?? If is not, which lib could i use for the same purpose with the ipad??
I'm not sure i'm adding the libz.1.2.3.dylib lib correctly. What I have done is: right-click on Resources folder -> add files to "myproject" -> search for the libz.1.2.3.dylib and add the 4.2 version of it from the path u could see in the compiler errors. I also try to add to the frameworks folder with the same results.
I'm reading lots of posts about how to fix similar problems but no one could help me.
Any idea of what I have to do to fix my problem??
Really thanks!!
You need to do this:
Delete libz.1.2.3 from your local Frameworks folder. You don't need it.
Select your project at the top of the Project Navigator.
Select your application target.
Open "Link Binary With Libraries".
Click the "+"
Search for "libz".
Select "libz.dylib".
If you are using Xcode 4.5.2 the screenshots below may aide you in proceeding through steps 2 through 5. I'm not sure if other versions of Xcode are the same or not.
If you are using xcode 4 or upper version of it than it seems that libz.1.2.3.dylib is not included in iOS5 sdk. Here is simple method to fix this:
Open your project in XCode 4.2
Remove libz.1.2.3.dylib from framework
Add new framework libz.1.2.5
Run you app
It works fine.
libz.dylib is an alias to the latest version (currently libz.1.2.5) so you can also navigate to the file's location in Terminal and create a symlink called "libz.1.2.3.dylib".
cd /Developer/Platforms/iPhoneSimulator.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneSimulator4.3.sdk/usr/lib/
sudo ln -s libz.1.2.5.dylib libz.1.2.3.dylib
You could also link to libz.dylib, which I would expect to always point to the actual latest version, which is why Tricon recommends changing the project to just include libz.dylib. I'm not sure I'd delete anything, although it's not a whole lot different from adding a new symlink...you're still mucking around deep inside the guts of Xcode....