Autodesk Forge API doesn't work behind firewalls - oauth

I followed the tutorial on learnforge.autodesk.io and was able to create a functioning app that accesses data from Construction Cloud and displays them using Forge viewer. The problem is, I'm not able to access Autodesk's login screen behind a firewall (which usually happens when sales team visits a client's office).
For what it's worth, I'm using ExpressJS for backend and have HTTPS enabled. The firewall at client's site also blocks access to virtual machine services like Parsec.
I don't even know exactly what the problem is (or how to troubleshoot), all I know is that this login link:
https://developer.api.autodesk.com/authentication/v1/authorize?response_type=code
&client_id=<client_id>
&redirect_uri=<callback_url>
&scope=<scope>
doesn't work behind a firewall (it works fine through mobile data hotspot though).
So is there anything I can do on my end to make it work?
If that's not possible, what must the client do in order to access my app from behind their firewall?

Related

App rejected for lack of IPv6, is this a server or app issue?

Apple rejected an app because it didnt work on their IPv6 network. I've managed to test this on my end using an ipv6 only address and can see that the third party API i'm using is unreachable when using an IPv6-only address.
Any time i try to use the API I get the response
A server with the specified hostname could not be found
The same thing happens if I manually go the URL in safari, whereas other IPv6-ready sites like gmail etc work.
So my question is do I need to get the developers of the API I'm querying to update their servers to support IPv6 in order to get this working, or is there something I should be doing on the app side in order to make this work?
There's no need to change any external servers. It's all about the client. If by this "third party API" you mean they have a library which you include into your app, then perhaps they are doing something in their code that is not working correctly; if this is the case, then you need to ask them to fix their client library.

Adobe AIR Mobile / OAuth2.0

We are currently trying to add OAuth2.0 for authentication into an existing Adobe AIR mobile app for a client. We are trying to carry this out by using this library https://github.com/charlesbihis/actionscript-oauth2 from this article.
We have tried using instances of the 'StageWebView' class and the Feathers UI 'WebView' class to display the authorization prompt page within the mobile app itself.
When we publish the app locally on our development PCs, the whole process works ok. However, as soon as it is published to our iPad(s) for testing, it is almost as if some security setting stops the "embedded" website from communicating with to the server.
As the website we are trying to communicate with is a https:// address, I'm assuming that this might be causing issues, but I can't confirm this.
Has anyone out there found themselves in a similar situation?
Thanks,
Dave

Using OAuth for both development and production environments

I have seen other questions on SO about this (here, here, and here), but I am not satisfied with any of the solutions, so I am asking it again. I am starting a web application that will utilize OAuth from multiple providers (Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo) for authentication. I am struggling to find a configuration suitable to use for both a local development environment and a production environment.
The leading solutions I've found are to register multiple apps within each provider, receiving a different consumer key and secret for each:
"My App Production" - with a callback URI to http://www.myapp.com/callback
"My App Development" - with a callback URI to http://local.myapp.com/callback
Add an entry to your local hosts file to point local.myapp.com to 127.0.0.1 and some configuration for your application to use the proper consumer keys based on the environment, and you are good to go, right?
But my application is responsive and I need to test my development environment running on my PC from multiple other devices, like my iPhone and iPad, neither of which will be able to resolve the development callback URI.
Let's say I already have a DNS server on my network and am able to add the entry for local.myapp.com there instead of my local hosts file and can now access my development instance from any device on the network.
But my development team all operates on the same local network. Now local.myapp.com points to the same IP for everyone. Let's go back to setting the hosts file on each developer's computer so that they can all work independently from within their workstation. Now no one can test their development instance from their iPhone again. It hardly seems like the right answer for each developer to register an application with the provider just so they can specify a unique callback URI.
Normally when I get way down in the weeds with a complicated solution for a seemingly straightforward issue, it usually means I'm doing something fundamentally wrong. Am I missing something about OAuth, is it not intended to be used like this? I am tempted to scrap OAuth altogether and just go with OpenID (no app registration required and can specify the callback URI from within the app), but then I lose two of the big hitters in Facebook and Twitter. I don't really need any of the user's data, it's just a nice to have if it's available. Can someone talk me back into OAuth?
I can't speak for FB or Twitter, but in Google's Oauth implementation you can register several oauth callback URLs. So you simply need some logic in your app which senses that it is in test mode, and then starts the Oauth flow with the appropriate callback URL. There are downsides, eg clashes between the live and the test refresh tokens, but they are manageable.
In my app I have a singleton which manages all of this. When my app needs to start an Oauth flow it calls the singleton with the request URL and any other salient data (eg. debug flag) and the singleton returns the correct callback URL, client ID etc.
I posted the following answer about a rails app I wrote:
OAuth2 in development and production
It was a gem called figaro which did per env configs for google OAuth2.
I have yet to find a less manual approach that enables dev access to all concerned devices:
Assign each developer's machine a fixed IP through the local network's DHCP system based on their MAC address, or (less recommended) have them choose an IP and hope for the best
(optional*) Assign each developer's machine a DNS hostname in the local network based on that IP
Register an oauth entry for developer on each provider with the hostname of the developer's machine.
Each developer configures their application to use their unique oauth dev tokens.
Assuming all the devices in the network rely on the same DHCP and DNS servers you'll then be able to visit alice.dev.myapp.com or bob.dev.myapp.com from any device on the network.
Note, you'd manage the oauth configuration for each an every other environment separately, but following the same approach.
There are likely tools to automate registering a developer's machine IP and hostname to ease that part of the puzzle. Registering the oauth config on each provider per dev is the most tedious step.
UPDATE
*You can skip the DNS part if you use a xip.io url e.g. 10.0.0.123.xip.io if you know Alice is 10.0.0.123, but you'd still want that IP to be fixed as you don't want to keep updating the url for the oauth tokens in step 4.

can we use OAUTH /OPenID in corporate LAN where Social network sites are blocked?

I am developing one website,in which I have implemented google oauth but when I am trying to run the sample in my office where there is a corporate LAN it is giving an error but the code works fine on my personal machine # my home.
Also one more question how stackoverflow is using google login I can access this site in office as well using google login.
Please give me suggestions/answers on it do we really need open internet coonection for oAuth/openID.
or will it work in corporate LAN?
Thanks
Is it blocked in your office? Or is it behind a proxy? My work puts everything behind a proxy, so I need to account for that in any OAuth code (or connect through our approved gateway).

Rails, QBOE, qbXML and integrating them all together

I am currently developing a Ruby/Rails app that will be used in-house as a sort of Enterprise application to support our business.
Our company uses Quickbooks Online to do almost all of our accounting, most importantly for invoicing.
I am looking for a way to automatically generate invoices from our Rails app into Quickbooks, as well as be able to pull customer balances and some other "basic" information into the Rails app to display on a customer information screen.
I have done a lot of research on the topic, and have yet to find an acceptable solution to what we're trying to accomplish.
Quickbooks Web Connector - Not applicable since are not running Quickbooks Pro
Intuit Anywhere app - The app we are using is certainly not a SaaS App, as it is specifically designed for our business, and the only Quickbooks file/account it will ever see is our own
Quickbooks Online/qbXML Gateway application - This seems to be the best fit
So I have spent considerable time with Keith Palmer's Consolibytes wiki, and Intuit's Official Documentation (which is great to get started, but doesn't really provide much help for the details), and have been unable to even link my application to quickbooks using the https://qbo.intuit.com/redir/addsdkapp?appid=YOUR-ID-HERE&appreferer=&appdata=1 link.
My server does have a GoDaddy generated SSL certificate, and I have visited the connection callback URL and have confirmed that everything is in working order there. However, I keep getting a "Failed to notify third party application about this connection" error. There is no evidence of a request from QB to my server in any of my logs.
So what I'm getting at here is this:
Is what I'm trying to do possible and/or practical?
Am I going the right way about it?
I'd really love to find someone out there who has done something like this before and maybe shed some light on the whole process.
Thanks!
So what I'm getting at here is this: Is what I'm trying to do possible and/or practical?
Yes.
Am I going the right way about it?
Almost. :-)
From what you posted:
My server does have a GoDaddy generated SSL certificate, and I have visited the connection callback URL and have confirmed that everything is in working order there.
It sounds like you registered in HOSTED mode.
Unfortunately, the Intuit servers don't consider GoDaddy certificates valid, and thus won't be able to HTTP POST your connection ticket to those servers. That's why you're seeing this:
Failed to notify third party application about this connection
Additionally, I believe they do reverse DNS checks, which will most likely fail because GoDaddy generally doesn't set up rDNS entries.
The solution is:
Do not register in HOSTED mode
Instead, register in DESKTOP mode.
Once you've registered, use this URL to register get your connection ticket:
https://login.quickbooks.com/j/qbn/sdkapp/confirm?appid=YOUR-APPLICATION-ID-HERE&serviceid=2004&appdata=1
(make sure to plug your actual application ID into the URL)
Instead of Intuit HTTP POSTing the connection ticket to you, the connection ticket will be displayed and you can copy/paste it. From there on in, it's as simple as HTTP POSTing additional HTTP requests to Intuit's servers.
Sample XML requests can be found on our QuickBooks integration wiki - make sure you use the DESKTOP mode examples.
Hope that helps clear things up!

Resources