I have this example pipeline
pipeline {
parameters {
string(name: 'PLATFORM', description: 'target platform to build to')
}
agent {
node {
/* I want to choose 'windows-machine'
when PLATFORM matches "windows.*" */
label 'linux-machine'
}
}
}
I want jobs that target windows platforms to run on different nodes. How can you choose node labels based on whether pipeline parameters match an expression or not?
Instead of node, you can use agent selector label. Here is an example of how you can do this.
pipeline {
parameters {
string(name: 'PLATFORM', description: 'target platform to build to')
}
agent {label PLATFORM=='WINDOWS' ? 'windows': 'linux'}
stages {
stage('Test') {
steps {
script {
echo "test"
}
}
}
}
}
Related
I have a parallel stage setup, and would like to know if it's possible to run a script prior to the nested stages, so something like this:
stage('E2E-PR-CYPRESS') {
when {
allOf {
expression {
return fileExists("cypress.json")
}
branch "PR-*"
}
}
steps {
script {
stash name: 'cypress-dir', includes: 'cypress/**/*'
}
}
parallel {
stage('Cypress Tests 1') {
agent { label 'aws_micro_slave_e2e' }
options { skipDefaultCheckout() }
steps {
runE2eTests()
}
}
stage('Cypress Tests 2') {
agent { label 'aws_micro_slave_e2e' }
options { skipDefaultCheckout() }
steps {
runE2eTests()
}
}
}
post {
always {
e2eAfterCypressRun(this, true)
}
}
}
I know the above is wrong, I get the error Only one of "matrix", "parallel", "stages", or "steps" allowed for stage "E2E-PR-CYPRESS"
I already have the stash script in a setup stage at the beginning of my pipeline, but I'd like to be able to restart from this stage above on Jenkins, and so need the stash part in this stage as the parallel stages need to unstash the contents.
Updated Answer:
After playing a bit with the Restart from a Stage option there is seems to be a nice feature designed exactly for your needs called Preserving stashes for Use with Restarted Stages:
Normally, when you run the stash step in your Pipeline, the resulting
stash of artifacts is cleared when the Pipeline completes, regardless
of the result of the Pipeline. Since stash artifacts aren’t accessible
outside of the Pipeline run that created them, this has not created
any limitations on usage. But with Declarative stage restarting, you
may want to be able to unstash artifacts from a stage which ran before
the stage you’re restarting from.
To enable this, there is a job property that allows you to configure a
maximum number of completed runs whose stash artifacts should be
preserved for reuse in a restarted run. You can specify anywhere from
1 to 50 as the number of runs to preserve.
This job property can be configured in your Declarative Pipeline’s options section, as below:
options {
preserveStashes()
// or
preserveStashes(buildCount: 5)
}
This built in feature is exactly what you need to solve your issue without any special modifications to your code, as it will allow you to rerun the pipeline from any stage and still use the existing file that were previously stashed.
Original Answer:
You can actually achieve this quite simply using the scripted syntax for the parallel command, and it will also allow you to avoid the duplicate code in the parallel stages.
parallel: Execute in parallel
Takes a map from branch names to closures and an optional argument failFast which will terminate all branches upon a failure in any other branch:
parallel firstBranch: {
// do something
}, secondBranch: {
// do something else
},
failFast: true|false
In your case it can look like:
stage('E2E-PR-CYPRESS') {
when {
allOf {
expression {
return fileExists("cypress.json")
}
branch "PR-*"
}
}
steps {
script {
stash name: 'cypress-dir', includes: 'cypress/**/*'
// Define the parallel execution stages
def stages = ['Cypress Tests 1', 'Cypress Tests 2']
// Create the parallel executions and run them
parallel stages.collectEntries {
["Running ${it}": {
node('aws_micro_slave_e2e') {
skipDefaultCheckout()
runE2eTests()
}
}]
}
}
}
post {
always {
e2eAfterCypressRun(this, true)
}
}
}
This way you can easily add more parallel steps by updating the stages list, or even receive it as an input parameter. In addition you can create the parallel executions by different labels or tests suits, instead of the stage name.
You can add a Prepare stage at the top like this:
stages{
stage('Preperation'){
when {
allOf {
expression {
return fileExists("cypress.json")
}
branch "PR-*"
}
}
steps {
script {
stash name: 'cypress-dir', includes: 'cypress/**/*'
}
}
}
stage('E2E-PR-CYPRESS') {
parallel {
stage('Cypress Tests 1') {
agent { label 'aws_micro_slave_e2e' }
options { skipDefaultCheckout() }
steps {
runE2eTests()
}
}
stage('Cypress Tests 2') {
agent { label 'aws_micro_slave_e2e' }
options { skipDefaultCheckout() }
steps {
runE2eTests()
}
}
}
}
}
post {
always {
e2eAfterCypressRun(this, true)
}
}
An out of the box concept
Propose splitting the job into 2 parts taking the following into consideration:
Currently use an EC2 plugin, as the current agents are EC2
Running the parallel stages with the same stashed content ready to unstash
Create jenkins pipeline job 1:
This job will checkout the workspace with any type of agent
Create a packer json to create a customised AMI for the EC2
The customised AMI will stash the contents and move to a directory that will appear on the EC2 when the agent is built
Output the AMI ID, run a groovy job to update the EC2 plugin AMI ID with the customised AMI ID to temporarily set the AMI in memory on Jenkins
pipeline {
agent {
docker {
test-container
}
}
options {
buildDiscarder(
logRotator(
numToKeepStr: '10',
artifactNumToKeepStr: '10'
)
)
ansiColor('xterm')
gitConnection("git")
}
stages {
stage('Run Stash Cypress Functional Test') {
steps {
dir('functional-test') {
// develop branch is canary build, all other branches are stable builds
script {
sh """
# script to stash cypress tests
"""
}
}
}
}
stage('Functional Test AMI Build') {
steps {
dir('functional-test/packer') {
withAWS(role: 'PackerBuild', roleAccount: '123456789012', roleSessionName: 'Jenkins-Workflow-FunctionalTest-Packer') {
script {
sh """
# packer json script will require to copy contents from workspace, run the script to stash content
# packer json script will require to capture new AMI ID
# https://discuss.devopscube.com/t/how-to-get-the-ami-id-after-a-packer-build/36
# https://www.packer.io/docs/post-processors/manifest
packer validate FunctionalTestPacker.json
packer build -debug FunctionalTestPacker.json
# grab AMI ID and export as jenkins env variable
"""
}
}
}
}
}
stage('run groovy script to update AMI ID on EC2 plugin') {
steps {
dir(groovy job dir) {
script {
sh """
# run groovy job to update AMI on Jenkins EC2 plugin
# https://gist.github.com/vrivellino/97954495938e38421ba4504049fd44ea
"""
}
}
}
}
stage('Kickoff Functional Test Deploy') {
// pipeline checkbox parameter, when ticked it will automatically kick off the functional test pipeline
when {
expression {params.RUN_TESTS.toBoolean()}
}
steps {
script{
env.branch = params.BRANCH
sh """
echo "Branch is ${branch}"
"""
}
build job: 'workflow/CypressFunctionaTestDeployAndRun',
parameters: [
string(name: 'BRANCH', value: env.branch)
],
wait : false
}
}
}
post {
always {
cleanWs()
}
}
}
Create jenkins pipeline job 2:
This job will create the EC2 agents via the plugin from the customised AMI from pipeline job 1
This means your agents will have the same workspace ready to unstash - so you can execute a parallel run
Also you could move a lot of your user data script that is in the EC2 plugin as part of the customised AMI build, thus cut down the time for each EC2 agent to get ready to carry out execution
pipeline {
stages {
stage('E2E-PR-CYPRESS') {
when {
allOf {
expression {
return fileExists("cypress.json")
}
branch "PR-*"
}
}
}
parallel {
stage('Cypress Tests 1') {
agent { label 'aws_micro_slave_e2e' }
options { skipDefaultCheckout() }
steps {
runE2eTests()
}
}
stage('Cypress Tests 2') {
agent { label 'aws_micro_slave_e2e' }
options { skipDefaultCheckout() }
steps {
runE2eTests()
}
}
}
}
post {
always {
e2eAfterCypressRun(this, true)
}
}
}
Using the declarative pipeline syntax, I want to be able to define parameters based on an array of repos, so that when starting the build, the user can check/uncheck the repos that should not be included when the job runs.
final String[] repos = [
'one',
'two',
'three',
]
pipeline {
parameters {
booleanParam(name: ...) // static param
// now include a booleanParam for each item in the `repos` array
// like this but it's not allowed
script {
repos.each {
booleanParam(name: it, defaultValue: true, description: "Include the ${it} repo in the release?")
}
}
}
// later on, I'll loop through each repo and do stuff only if its value in `params` is `true`
}
Of course, you can't have a script within the parameters block, so this won't work. How can I achieve this?
Using the Active Choices Parameter plugin is probably the best choice, but if for some reason you can't (or don't want to) use a plugin, you can still achieve dynamic parameters in a Declarative Pipeline.
Here is a sample Jenkinsfile:
def list_wrap() {
sh(script: 'echo choice1 choice2 choice3 choice4 | sed -e "s/ /\\n/g"', , returnStdout: true)
}
pipeline {
agent any
stages {
stage ('Gather Parameters') {
steps {
timeout(time: 30, unit: 'SECONDS') {
script {
properties([
parameters([
choice(
description: 'List of arguments',
name: 'service_name',
choices: 'DEFAULT\n' + list_wrap()
),
booleanParam(
defaultValue: false,
description: 'Whether we should apply changes',
name: 'apply'
)
])
])
}
}
}
}
stage ('Run command') {
when { expression { params.apply == true } }
steps {
sh """
echo choice: ${params.service_name} ;
"""
}
}
}
}
This embeds a script {} in a stage, which calls a function, which runs a shell script on the agent/node of the Declarative Pipeline, and uses the script's output to set the choices for the parameters. The parameters are then available in the next stages.
The gotcha is that you must first run the job with no build parameters in order for Jenkins to populate the parameters, so they're always going to be one run out of date. That's why the Active Choices Parameter plugin is probably a better idea.
You could also combine this with an input command to cause the pipeline to prompt the user for a parameter:
script {
def INPUT_PARAMS = input message: 'Please Provide Parameters', ok: 'Next',
parameters: [
choice(name: 'ENVIRONMENT', choices: ['dev','qa'].join('\n'), description: 'Please select the Environment'),
choice(name: 'IMAGE_TAG', choices: getDockerImages(), description: 'Available Docker Images')]
env.ENVIRONMENT = INPUT_PARAMS.ENVIRONMENT
env.IMAGE_TAG = INPUT_PARAMS.IMAGE_TAG
}
Credit goes to Alex Lashford (https://medium.com/disney-streaming/jenkins-pipeline-with-dynamic-user-input-9f340fb8d9e2) for this method.
You can use CHOICE parameter of Jenkins in which user can select a repository.
pipeline {
agent any
parameters
{
choice(name: "REPOS", choices: ['REPO1', 'REPO2', 'REPO3'])
}
stages {
stage ('stage 1') {
steps {
// the repository selected by user will be printed
println("$params.REPOS")
}
}
}
}
You can also use the plugin Active Choices Parameter if you want to do multiple select : https://plugins.jenkins.io/uno-choice/#documentation
You can visit pipeline syntax and configure in below way to generate code snippet and you can put it in the jenkins file:
Copy the snippet code and paste it in jenkinsfile at the start.
I have multiple Jenkins worker nodes, and a declarative jenkins pipeline.
I would like to create a choice parameter at each stage in order to allow worker node selection. Is this possible ?
At the pipeline top level I have :
pipeline {
agent { label 'node1||node2' }
...
I know that it the agent can be also specified at the stage level:
stage("Test") {
agent {label "node1"}
...
}
But I would like something like this:
stage('Test') {
agent { label
parameters {
choice choices: ['node1', 'node2'], description: name: 'jenkins_worker'
}
}
}
Is this possible from the syntax point of view ?
Declare agent as parameter:
pipeline {
agent { label parameters.AGENT }
...
Overwrite it in stage:
stage('Test') {
AGENT="node1"
}
I have a job with multiple parameters, but one is a choice parameter and it contains 10 choices, i need to build this job with all these choices one by one.
is that possible?
You can achieve this by using Jenkins Declarative Pipelines.
Here is an example pipeline which iterates through selected multi-choice parameter:
pipeline {
agent any
parameters {
choice(name: 'CHOICE', choices: ['One', 'Two', 'Three'], description: 'Please select one/multiple options.')
}
stages {
stage('Build') {
steps {
script {
for (String selectedChoice : params.CHOICE) {
// do something
}
}
}
}
}
}
My jenkinsfile has several paremeters, every time I make an update in the parameters (e.g. remove or add a new input) and commit the change to my SCM, I do not see the job input screen updated accordingly in jenkins, I have to run an execution, cancel it and then see my updated fields in
properties([
parameters([
string(name: 'a', defaultValue: 'aa', description: '*', ),
string(name: 'b', description: '*', ),
string(name: 'c', description: '*', ),
])
])
any clues?
One of the ugliest things I've done to get around this is create a Refresh parameter which basically exits the pipeline right away. This way I can run the pipeline just to update the properties.
pipeline {
agent any
parameters {
booleanParam(name: 'Refresh',
defaultValue: false,
description: 'Read Jenkinsfile and exit.')
}
stages {
stage('Read Jenkinsfile') {
when {
expression { return parameters.Refresh == true }
}
steps {
echo("Ended pipeline early.")
}
}
stage('Run Jenkinsfile') {
when {
expression { return parameters.Refresh == false }
}
stage('Build') {
// steps
}
stage('Test') {
// steps
}
stage('Deploy') {
// steps
}
}
}
}
There really must be a better way, but I'm yet to find it :(
Unfortunately the answer of TomDotTom was not working for me - I had the same issue and my jenkins required another stages unter 'Run Jenkinsfile' because of the following error:
Unknown stage section "stage". Starting with version 0.5, steps in a stage must be in a ‘steps’ block.
Also I am using params instead of parameters as variable to check the condition (as described in Jenkins Syntax).
pipeline {
agent any
parameters {
booleanParam(name: 'Refresh',
defaultValue: false,
description: 'Read Jenkinsfile and exit.')
}
stages {
stage('Read Jenkinsfile') {
when {
expression { return params.Refresh == true }
}
steps {
echo("stop")
}
}
stage('Run Jenkinsfile') {
when {
expression { return params.Refresh == false }
}
stages {
stage('Build') {
steps {
echo("build")
}
}
stage('Test') {
steps {
echo("test")
}
}
stage('Deploy') {
steps {
echo("deploy")
}
}
}
}
}
}
applied to Jenkins 2.233
The Jenkinsfile needs to be executed in order to update the job properties, so you need to start a build with the new file.
Apparently it is known Jenkins "issue" or "hidden secret" https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-41929.
I overcome this automatically using Jenkins Job DSL plugin.
I have Job DSL's seed job for my pipelines checking for changes in git repository with my pipeline.
pipelineJob('myJobName') {
// sets RELOAD=true for when the job is 'queued' below
parameters {
booleanParam('RELOAD', true)
}
definition {
cps {
script(readFileFromWorkspace('Jenkinsfile'))
sandbox()
}
}
// queue the job to run so it re-downloads its Jenkinsfile
queue('myJobName')
}
Upon changes seed job runs and re-generate pipeline's configuration including params. After pipeline is created/updated Job DSL will queue pipeline with special param RELOAD.
Pipeline than reacts to it in first stage and abort early. (Apparently there is no way in Jenkins to abort pipeline stop without error at the end of stage causing "red" pipeline.)
As parameters in Jenkinsfile are in properties, they will be set over anything set by seed job like RELOAD. At this stage pipeline is ready with actual params without any sign of RELOAD to confuse users.
properties([
parameters([
string(name: 'PARAM1', description: 'my Param1'),
string(name: 'PARAM2', description: 'my Param2'),
])
])
pipeline {
agent any
stages {
stage('Preparations') {
when { expression { return params.RELOAD == true } }
// Because this: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-41929
steps {
script {
if (currentBuild.getBuildCauses('hudson.model.Cause') != null) {
currentBuild.displayName = 'Parameter Initialization'
currentBuild.description = 'On first build we just load the parameters as they are not available of first run on new branches. A second run has been triggered automatically.'
currentBuild.result = 'ABORTED'
error('Stopping initial build as we only want to get the parameters')
}
}
}
}
stage('Parameters') {
steps {
echo 'Running real job steps...'
}
}
}
End result is as such that every time I update anything in Pipeline repository, all jobs generated by seed are updated and run to get updated params list. There will be message "Parameters initialization" to indicate such a job.
There is potentially way how to improve and only update affected pipelines but I haven't explore that as all my pipelines are in one repository and I'm happy with always updating them.
Another upgrade could be that if someone doesn't like "abort" with "error", you could have while condition in every other stage to skip it if parameter is RELOAD but I find adding when to every other stage cumbersome.
I initially tried #TomDotTom's answer but than I didn't liked manual effort.
Scripted pipeline workaround - can probably make it work in declarative as well.
Since you are using SCM, you can check which files have changed since last build (see here), and then decide what to do base on it.
Note that poll SCM on the job must be enabled to detect the Jenkinsfile changes automatically.
node('master') {
checkout scm
if (checkJenkinsfileChanges()) {
return // exit the build immediately
}
echo "build" // build stuff
}
private Boolean checkJenkinsfileChanges() {
filesChanged = getChangedFilesList()
jenkinsfileChanged = filesChanged.contains("Jenkinsfile")
if (jenkinsfileChanged) {
if (filesChanged.size() == 1) {
echo "Only Jenkinsfile changed, quitting"
} else {
echo "Rescheduling job with updated Jenkinsfile"
build job: env.JOB_NAME
}
}
return jenkinsfileChanged
}
// returns a list of changed files
private String[] getChangedFilesList() {
changedFiles = []
for (changeLogSet in currentBuild.changeSets) {
for (entry in changeLogSet.getItems()) { // for each commit in the detected changes
for (file in entry.getAffectedFiles()) {
changedFiles.add(file.getPath()) // add changed file to list
}
}
}
return changedFiles
}
I solve this by using Jenkins Job Builder python package. The main goal of this package is to achieve Jenkins Job as Code
To solve your problem I could simply use like below and keep that on SCM with a Jenkins pipeline which will listen to any changes for jobs.yaml file change and build the job for me so that whenever I trigger my job all the needed parameters will be ready for me.
jobs.yaml
- job:
name: 'job-name'
description: 'deploy template'
concurrent: true
properties:
- build-discarder:
days-to-keep: 7
- rebuild:
rebuild-disabled: false
parameters:
- choice:
name: debug
choices:
- Y
- N
description: 'debug flag'
- string:
name: deploy_tag
description: "tag to deploy, default to latest"
- choice:
name: deploy_env
choices:
- dev
- test
- preprod
- prod
description: "Environment"
project-type: pipeline
# you can use either DSL or pipeline SCM
dsl: |
node() {
stage('info') {
print params
}
}
# pipeline-scm:
# script-path: Jenkinsfile
# scm:
# - git:
# branches:
# - master
# url: 'https://repository.url.net/x.git'
# credentials-id: 'jenkinsautomation'
# skip-tag: true
# wipe-workspace: false
# lightweight-checkout: true
config.ini
[job_builder]
allow_duplicates = False
keep_descriptions = False
ignore_cache = True
recursive = False
update = all
[jenkins]
query_plugins_info = False
url = http://localhost:8080
command to load / update the job
jenkins-jobs --conf conf.ini -u $JENKINS_USER -p $JENKINS_PASSWORD update jobs.yaml
Note - To use jenkins-jobs command, make sure you need install this jenkins-job-builder python package.
This package has a lot of features like create (free-style, pipeline, multibranch) , update, delete , validate jenkins job configuration. It supports Templates - meaning with one generic template, you can build an 'n' number of similar jobs, dynamically generate parameters and etc..