I currently have the code below which produces the later output. I would like to generate the 10 points randomly as I already am. But instead of having blue dashed lines connecting to the the location (0,0), I want them to connect to the other dots if the distance is less than 4cm away.
I attempted things such as storing the data into arrays but updating and accessing the values was not working. I attempted nested for loops but handling the seed became difficult. What is a good way to do this?
\documentclass{standalone}
\usepackage{tikz}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[step=0.5cm,color=gray] (-2.5,-2.5) grid (2.5,2.5);
\pgfmathsetseed{2}
\foreach \x in {1,...,10}
{
\pgfmathrandominteger{\a}{-240}{240}
\pgfmathrandominteger{\b}{-240}{240}
\fill [color=red,anchor=center](\a*0.01,\b*0.01) circle (0.1);
% CHANGE HERE
\draw [color=blue,densely dotted] (\a*0.01,\b*0.01) -- (0.0,0.0);
};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
I seemed to have figured out a solution (not ideal but works for this case).
The key was to use the \pgfmathparse for performing the if statement to get a 0 or 1 to use in \ifnum.
\documentclass{standalone}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{math}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[step=0.5cm,color=gray] (-2.5,-2.5) grid (2.5,2.5);
\pgfmathsetseed{2}
\foreach \x in {1,...,10}
{
\pgfmathrandominteger{\a}{-240}{240}
\pgfmathrandominteger{\b}{-240}{240}
\fill [color=red,anchor=center](\a*0.01,\b*0.01) circle (0.1);
\pgfmathsetseed{2}
\foreach \y in {0,...,\x}
{
\pgfmathrandominteger{\c}{-240}{240}
\pgfmathrandominteger{\d}{-240}{240}
\tikzmath{\i=(\a*0.01-\c*0.01)^2;}
\tikzmath{\j=(\b*0.01-\d*0.01)^2;}
\tikzmath{\k=\i+\j;}
\pgfmathparse{\k < 4.0 ? 1 : 0}
\ifnum\pgfmathresult=1
\draw [color=blue,densely dotted] (\a*0.01,\b*0.01) -- (\c*0.01,\d*0.01);
\fi
};
};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
Related
I want the line on the left to end right at the y-coordinate of the SPDT input so I can connect them seamlessly with a straight line. As you can see, the line on the left ends a bit lower than the SPDT input which causes the connecting line to be tilted
Is there a way to automatically adjust the length? I'd rather avoid inching towards an acceptable result by adjusting the length over and over again manually.
Here is the code
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{circuitikz}
\begin{document}
\begin{figure}
\begin{circuitikz}
\node [spdt, rotate=90] (S) {};
\draw
(S.in) to [C] ++(0,-2)
to ++(-2,0)
to [V] ++(0,3)
to(S.out 1);
\end{circuitikz}
\end{figure}
\end{document}
Instead of adjusting the length on the left, I would just make sure that it is above the switch and then use -| to connect it with first an horizontal segment and then a vertical segment:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{circuitikz}
\begin{document}
\begin{figure}
\begin{circuitikz}
\node [spdt, rotate=90] (S) {};
\draw
(S.in) to [C] ++(0,-2)
to ++(-2,0)
to [V] ++(0,3.5)
-| (S.out 1)
;
\end{circuitikz}
\end{figure}
\end{document}
how can I move the current label closer to the current arrow. I.e. I want to move the i_1 closer to the arrow.
MWE:
\documentclass{standalone}
\usepackage[european,cuteinductors,fetbodydiode,straightvoltages]{circuitikz}
\begin{document}
\begin{figure}[htb]
\centering
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.65, arrowmos]
\coordinate (zero) at (0,0);
\draw (zero) to[R,-*,R=$R_1$,i>_=$i_1$] ++(2.75,2);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{figure}
\end{document}
I tried to put a \vspace in front of the label but it didn't work.
I propose two solutions here: the first one is using a fake label and then setting the label manually (with a lot of flexibility), or using the provided styling for labels. Details in comments; you need a quite recent circuitikz for using this solution (>=1.4.2).
\documentclass{standalone}
\usepackage[european,cuteinductors,fetbodydiode,straightvoltages]{circuitikz}
\begin{document}
\centering
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.65, arrowmos]
\coordinate (zero) at (0,0);
% First option
% use a blank label for the current, and name the component
\draw (zero) to[R,-*,R=$R_1$,i>_=~,name=myI] ++(2.75,2);
% manually place the label where you like
% myIcurrent is the normal position where the blank label is set
\node[below=1mm, anchor=center, red] at (myIcurrent) {$i_1$};
% you can also use bipole current style to change inner sep;
\draw (2,0) to[bipole current style={inner sep=0pt}, R,-*,R=$R_1$,i>_=$i_1$] ++(2.75,2);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
See circuitikz manual, https://texdoc.org/serve/circuitikz/0#subsection.5.6 .
I'm trying to draw this in latex.
Anyone know how?
Use the calc-library and do the following:
\usetikzlibrary{calc}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node[draw=black, circle, fill=green] (A) at (0,0) {A};
\draw let \p1=(A) in (A) -- (\x1+40,\y1+10);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
Using the let-statement it allows you to specify a reference point (or even more) to use it's coordinates for further calculation.
Is there a simple way to increase the size of an arrow tip using something like:
\tikzset{myptr/.style=->, ????}
without designing a new arrow style from scratch?
One solution, very quick, to just scale the arrow head is number %2 in the following:
\documentclass[multi=false,tikz,border=2mm]{standalone}
\usetikzlibrary{arrows,decorations.markings}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
%1
\draw [->,>=stealth] (0,.5) -- (2,.5);
%2
\draw [decoration={markings,mark=at position 1 with
{\arrow[scale=3,>=stealth]{>}}},postaction={decorate}] (0,0) -- (2,0);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
This produces:
(sorry for excessive zoom).
Much more in the answers to this question and in this answer, that I used as a source.
Addendum
\tikzset approach. This code:
\documentclass[multi=false,tikz,border=2mm]{standalone}
\usetikzlibrary{arrows,decorations.markings}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\tikzset{myptr/.style={decoration={markings,mark=at position 1 with %
{\arrow[scale=3,>=stealth]{>}}},postaction={decorate}}}
%1
\draw [->,>=stealth] (0,.5) -- (2,.5);
%2
\draw [myptr] (0,0) -- (2,0);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
produces the same output as the above one (source: PGF Manual, section 2.8).
Obviously you can use -Latex instead of stealth.
There is a new solution, see https://latexdraw.com/exploring-tikz-arrows/#t-1610685307397. It allows changing both the length and width of arrows:
\documentclass[border=1mm]{standalone}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,arrows}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw [-{Stealth[length=3mm, width=2mm]}] (0,0.5) -- (1,0.5);
\draw [-stealth] (0,0) -- (1,0);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
Say I want to construct a circulant graph in TikZ, with a variable number of nodes, labelled v0, v1, ..., v_n-1 for some n of my choice (say, 5).
I'd like to be able to use the \foreach command in TikZ to iteratively (1) define the nodes, and (2) connect the nodes. I'd like to be able to connect v_i to v_(i+1) and v_i to v_{i+2}, say.
\foreach \i in {0, ..., 4}
{\path (\i*72:3) node (v\i) {};}
constructs the nodes perfectly. But then when I want to draw some lines,
\foreach \i \in {0, ..., 3}
{ \draw (v\i) -- (v{\i+1}); } ????
doesn't work. Nor does
\foreach \i / \j in {0/1, ..., 3/4}
{ \draw (v\i) -- (v{\j}); }
I get an error "no such shape v0" or something like that.
I know this must be totally easy to do, but I can't figure out how. Any suggestions?
As a followup, it would be nice to be able to connect v_i and v_{i+4} or something, with a single \foreach command, and have TikZ/pgf do the modular arithmetic for me without having to worry about spilling over.
This worked for me:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{shapes,fit,arrows,positioning}
\tikzstyle{vertex} = [circle, draw, thick, text centered]
\tikzstyle{edge} = [draw, thick,->]
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1]
\foreach \x in {0,...,6}
\node[vertex] (\x) at (\x*360/7:3) {v\x};
\foreach \x/\y in {0/1,1/2,2/3,3/4,4/5,5/6,6/0}
\draw[edge] (\x) to (\y);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
The syntax {0/1,...,5/6} did not work for me. But I admit, I spent a bit of time trying to find a good solution, and I'm still not totally satisfied.
Another solution, achieved editing the code by Steve Tjoa:
\documentclass[tikz,border=1mm]{standalone}
\usetikzlibrary{arrows}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}[thick]
\foreach \x in {0,...,4}{%
\node [circle, draw] at (\x*72:3) {$v_{\x}$};
\draw [->] (\x*72+10:3) arc (\x*72+10:\x*72+62:3);
}
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}