I have docker desktop on C drive also as WSL. I started ubuntu terminal on F drive in specific folder by making it starting location. After executing docker run -d -p 80:80 docker/getting-started it says me ```unable to find image <image_name> and starts container.
After that when container is created I can see it in docker.
It also creates image but the problem is I can't find it and where image and container are stored.
How can I find files of docker and so on and create, run container with its image on F drive in wsl folder (in this example)?
well i can't understand your problem well, but here an answer for your question
It also creates image but the problem is I can't find it and where image and container are stored.
to find images downloaded locally
run
docker images
to find the metadata which include path of stored image
docker inspect <image_name>
Related
I'm fairly new to using Docker and Docker Compose (using Docker Compose for this particular problem). Here is what I know so far about the problem I am facing: When using volumes when there are contents available in the host folder as well as the container's folder, the files inside the container's folder are hidden and the host's files are then made available to the container.
I want to use it the other way round. I would like to make available the container's files (that were copied into the image in the Dockerfile) to the host folder.
Is there a way to do that?
Here are a bunch of screenshots of my Dockerfile and Docker Compose to show my setup.
Dockerfile Screenshot
DockerCompose Screenshot
Thanks in advance! :)
I've come across the same thing many times and the way I go about it is as follows.
As the host volume will always take priority over the container filesystem, you have to copy the files out of the container to the host first, then volume mount them back - this way you get what was there originally, and also what might change in the future (by the container).
The following is all pseudo code, but should hopefully simulate the concept:
First run the main container:
docker run --rm -d --name my-container registry/image-name
Then copy the files you want from it to the local filesystem
docker cp my-container:/files/i/want ./files
Then stop the original container
docker stop my-container
Then mount them back into the container on the next run
docker run --rm -d --name my-container -v ./files:/files/i/want registry/image-name
Obviously you've mentioned compose there also, so just reflect the volume mapping into the compose format - the copy stuff will need to be done via standard docker however in line with the above.
Note: I wrote the above commands blind, but will check them over at lunch and correct any mistypes - but the concept is correct
Similar question: mac image path
In mac, when I run docker inspect containerID
I see most of the stuff is coming from /var/lib/docker/
however, this path neither exists in the host (mac) nor the docker container.
where is this path refer to?
you can find your files in container:path and use the docker commands to copy them to your local machine and vice versa (I'm assuming you are trying to move files e.g. from your local machine to your container). I had the same exact issue you mentioned but I manage to move files with
docker cp local_path containerID:target_path
to see your container_ID simply run docker ps -a, it should show it even if unmounted.
See https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/cp/
The use case is that I want to download and image that contains python code files. Assume the image does not have any text editor installed. So i want to mount a drive on host, so that files in the container show up in this host mount and i can use different editors installed on my host to update the code. Saving the changes are to be reflected in the image.
if i run the following >
docker run -v /host/empty/dir:/container/folder/with/code/files -it myimage
the /host/empty/dir is still empty, and browsing the container dir also shows it as empty. What I want is the file contents of /container/folder/with/code/files to show up in /host/empty/dir
Sébastien Helbert answer is correct. But there is still a way to do this in 2 steps.
First run the container to extract the files:
docker run --rm -it myimage
In another terminal, type this command to copy what you want from the container.
docker cp <container_id>:/container/folder/with/code/files /host/empty/dir
Now stop the container. It will be deleted (--rm) when stopped.
Now if you run your original command, it will work as expected.
docker run -v /host/empty/dir:/container/folder/with/code/files -it myimage
There is another way to access the files from within the container without copying it but it's very cumbersome.
Your /host/empty/dir is always empty because the volume binding replaces (overrides) the container folder with your empty host folder. But you can not do the opposite, that is, you take a container folder to replace your host folder.
However, there is a workaround by manually copying the files from your container folder to your host folder. before using them as you have suggested.
For exemple :
run your docker image with a volume maaping between you host folder and a temp folder : docker run -v /host/empty/dir:/some-temp-folder -it myimage
copy your /container/folder/with/code/files content into /some-temp-folder to fill you host folder with you container folder
run you container with a volum mapping on /host/empty/dir but now this folder is no longer empty : run -v /host/empty/dir:/container/folder/with/code/files -it myimage
Note that steps 1 & 2 may be replaced by : Copying files from Docker container to host
I've been trying the whole day to accomplish a simplistic example of sharing a Windows directory to Linux container running on Windows Docker host.
Have read all the guidelines and run the following:
docker run -it --rm -p 5002:80 --name mount-test --mount type=bind,source=D:\DockerArea\PortScanner,target=/app/PortScannerWorkingDirectory barebonewebapi:latest
The origin PortScanner directory on host machine has got some text file in it. The container is created successfully.
The issue is that when I'm trying to
docker exec -it mount-test /bin/bash
and then list the mounted directory in the container PortScannerWorkingDirectory - it just shows that it's empty. Nor the C# code can read the contents of the host file in the mapped directory.
Am I missing something simple here? I feel like I got stuck and can't share files on the host Windows machine to Linux container.
After several days of dealing with the issue I've found quite apparent answer. Although I had had C and D drives already shared to Docker in Docker settings I did an experiment and re-shared both drives (there's a special button Reset Credentials for that purpose in Docker agent settings for Windows). After that the issue is resolved. So saving it here with the hope that it may help someone else since this seems to be a glitch with permissions or similar.
The issue is quite hard to diagnose - when there's an issue the Docker container just silently writes into its writable layer and no error pops up.
Go to the docker settings -> shared drives -> reset credentials.
and then click the drive and click apply button.
then execute following command as suggested by docker
docker run --rm -v c:/Users:/data alpine ls /data
I am new to docker containers and I and am trying to solve a problem I am facing right now.
These are my understanding based on limited knowledge.
When we create a docker container, Docker creates a local mount and use it as the root file system for the docker container.
Now, if I run any commands in the container from the host server using docker exec the docker is not using the mounted partition as the / file system for the container. I mean, it still pics up the binaries and env variables from the host server. Is there any option/alternate solution for making the docker use the original mounted directory for docker exec too ?
If I access/start the container with docker attach or docker run -i -t /bin/bash, I get the mounted directory as my / file system, which gives me an entirely independent environment from my host system. But this doesn't happen with the docker exec command.
Please help !!
You are operating under a misconception. The docker image only contains what was installed in it. This is usually a very cut down version of an operating system for efficiency reasons.
The docker container is started from an image - and that's a running version, which can change and store state - but may be discarded.
docker run starts a container from an image. You can run the same image multiple times to create completely different containers (which happen to have the same starting point for their content).
docker exec attaches to one of those containers to run a command. So you will only see the things inside it that ... were inside the image, or added post start (like log files). It has no vision of the host filesystem, and may not be the same OS - the only requirement is that it shares elements of the kernel ... although it usually has a selection of the commonly used binaries.
And when you run an image to create a container, you can specify a mount. One of the options when you do this is passing through a host filesystem, with e.g. -v /path/on/host:/path_in/container. But you don't have to, you can use data containers or use a docker volume mount instead. e.g. docker run -v /mount creates a mount point within the container, using the docker filesystem, which isn't part of the parent host. This can be used to make a data container with: docker create -v /path/to/data --name data_for_acontainer some_basic_image
And then mount volumes from that data container on a new one:
docker run -d --volumes-from data_for_acontainer some_app_image
Which will attach that data container onto the /path/to/data mount. But in neither case is the 'host' filesystem touched directly - this is the whole point of dockerising things.