I'm trying to set up a Firebase A/B test with a conversion event logged from my server, in combination with events fired from my mobile application.
From the diagram below (retrieved here), I would expect that if I properly pass along my App Instance Id and Event Data to my server, and then pass that data along when logging to GA4, the event should be properly attributable to a Firebase A/B test, but that has yet to work.
I have confirmed that A/B tests with events fired from the mobile app directly work as expected, and confirmed that App Instance Id is being passed to my server before being forwarded to GA4 (which is where Firebase is getting my mobile app data).
The reason I am attempting to do this from my server is this event can be logged from either my Apple Watch app, or the iOS app, and has a heavy amount of processing that occurs on the server before being "complete" - I am therefore looking to log that conversion at the end of that server processing, but this processing is hidden from my mobile clients (I just send a 200 back shortly after receiving the payload and spawn child processes to handle the rest of the work on the server).
Is this simply a limitation of the Firebase A/B testing framework?
Thanks!
Related
I have an iOS app which displays some information fetched from the server.
The app communicates with the server using REST API, and makes GET requests periodically (or when user pulls-to-refresh). However, we need better synchronization. As soon as data changed on server, we want to reflect it in the mobile app.
How can I get notifications from the server when data changed and update needed? I thought about silent push notifications, but they do not look a right choice here.
Are there alternatives? May socket programming help? I have no an experience in it, but I it is relevant, I will start digging.
I am currently in the process of writing an iOS app and it's now been decided that there will no longer be an in-built real time messaging service. This was the main reason around using Socket.io on the server. So basically when the app is loaded it logged in in the background by sending the login credentials with the connection request. Now that I don't need the messaging service, most of the app is just information requests and the server responds with the relevant information. I could still utilize the real time aspect by sending updated information to the device if it gets updated on the server and some in-app notifications could utilize this too. However I'm pretty sure it can be all done using http requests and I'm not sure how likely I would need real time functionality in a future update.
Ignoring time and money, should I fundamentally re-write the way the server and the app communicate or would it be okay to continue using Socket.io and websockets?
I'm just starting to get into app development and have just been learning the uses of Xcode and Objective-C language. Just wondering how an app like snapchat or any other app can send data from one user to another. General answers would suffice just to better my understanding.
How do they test this functionality?
How can they connect peer to peer and send data from one phone to another? Is it all accessed in one database that the app connects to everytime that it pulls down?
When you sign up for an app like this with a registered account is that information stored on the iphone?
Well there are two ways data can be sent to a device. One is the device polls the main server periodically. This can be seen in a pull to refresh scenario. The other is the server can send a push notification to the specific phone and app which causes the data to be received by the device and displayed however the programmer wants. So device to device is essentially one person sending something through a web service call to your server. Your server them packages that information into a Json payload and sends a push notification to the recipient. It seems like its device to device because its so quick, but it requires that you have a server in the middle and of course your server is really sending the push notification to Apple's push server, so there really are two servers involved.
How do they test this functionality?
I would try to do this with real devices, and/or using a network sniffer tool to inspect the send packets.
How can they connect peer to peer and send data from one phone to another? Is it all accessed in one database that the app connects to everytime that it pulls down?
Someones sends you a snap
your app will ask the database every ...min or when you reload if there's something new to load, and gets it from the database if there is something new
When you sign up for an app like this with a registered account is that information stored on the iphone?
Connect to snapchat
get a snap from someone and wait till you can view it
start airplane mode and see if it loads, if it does there are files (temporarily) stored on your iPhone.
i'm writing an app that manage a sqlite database, and i have write a web server, i want the user register in my web server with username and password, i already know how make a request from ios app to server and receive the response, but i want enable also the synchronization of the sqlite database to other device, i now that with core data i can use iCloud synchronization, but for now i prefer use sqlite, and find a way to synchronize it, for example i want create this:
make a change in the sqlite in the iPhone app;
the app send this change to the server for that user;
then the server have to send this update to other device connected at that user;
and now i can't go over, how the server can send this change to the other device? the device has to be always listen to the server? or there is a way to send this update directly to some device and handle it? like an apple push notification?
EDIT: if it's possible use an apple push notification to do this, i doesn't want alert with text sound and badge the user, but send a "silent notification" it's possible?
As a high-level there are a few different ways to approach this, all of which have pros and cons. Two name two examples you can do a polling method, active push or a hybrid approach.
Polling: at some pre-determined interval the app tries to "phone home" and send the delta db changes up to the server. Here you know that your server will be expecting X number of responses in any given interval so you can appropriately gauge your load.
Active Push: The user decides when they want those changes to be transmitted to the server by hitting a "Sync" button. This allows the user to only push data back up to the server when they know there's a change but an over zealous user may make a change, upload, make a change, upload, etc instead of queueing up a bunch of changes and sending them all at once. This may create frequently unneeded server calls.
Hybrid: You setup a polling schedule within the app AND give the user the ability to Sync at-will in the event there is a critical change that needs to be made ASAP.
Regarding the listener side of the equation you face a similar challenge conceptually. If the original user makes 20 changes and presses Sync 20 times do you bombard the second user's device 20 times as well or do you queue those changes up and send them down every 5 minutes (as an example)? Unless you have both devices paired to each other or are connected to the same network AND visible to each other via your app you're going to need to leverage that back-end server. Push notifications can be very useful in this manner but there is extra development and setup overhead to take into account to properly implement them.
To boil this all down I would recommend laying out what YOU want your syncing model to look like before you start marching down a path.
We are building an enterprise class Work Order application where the users will often be in areas with no network coverage. We want to be sure that when they come back into coverage, any work that they have done on locally stored work orders is sent back to the server ASAP. This is easy to do if the user keeps the app running, but in our situation it is very likely that they will switch between apps, and the Work Order app may not be running when they come back into coverage.
We have thought of having the app fire an email to a server side listener when it senses that it is out of coverage. When the device comes back into coverage, the email should get delivered, and the server can send a push notification to the user to open the app. This feels like a bit of a hack... is there a better way to handle this situation?
As you already noticed, push notifications is the way to go, but even with them its not guaranteed that the user will send the data or even open the app.
I would suggest that you make the data itself expire after a limited time and alert the users when they minimize or even close the application.
You can also use local notification to alert about expiration.
So long as this is an enterprise application that doesn't have to be distributed through the App Store, you can abuse the audio background processing mode to keep your application running at all times. All you have to do is play a silent audio file on a loop as if you were a media player. This will keep your application running in the background, where you can retry connections to the server as you'd like.