How to directly fetch permalink data (URL) from font-matter in 11ty? - eleventy

I need some help with changing the URL/ permalink of my blog posts in 11ty. Currently, it's making the slug with the title of the post. However, I want it to make a slug that I want. For example: for this post named "Alphabets start from A B C", 11ty is creating url(slug) as "/alphabets-start-from-a-b-c". I want it to be as "/alphabets-start-a-b-c".
Here's my posts.11tydata.js file:
module.exports = {
layout: 'post',
title: 'Untitled',
eleventyComputed: {
permalink: "/{{ page.fileSlug }}/",
featured_image: (data) => {
if (data.featured_image) {
if (data.featured_image.search(/^https?:\/\//) !== -1) {
return data.featured_image;
}
return `/assets/img/${data.featured_image}`;
} else {
return false;
}
}
}
};
Please tell me a way so that I can directly fetch customized url of post from font-matter.
title: Alphabets start from A B C
body_class: blog
featured_image: lumberg.jpg
description: The first blog post in the new site.
permalink: alphabets-start-a-b-c

After reading through 11ty Docs, I got a workaround by using variable {{ page.filePathStem }}.
So now my posts.11tydata.js file look like:
module.exports = {
layout: 'post',
title: 'Untitled',
eleventyComputed: {
permalink: (data) => "/{{ page.filePathStem }}/",
featured_image: (data) => {
if (data.featured_image) {
if (data.featured_image.search(/^https?:\/\//) !== -1) {
return data.featured_image;
}
return `/assets/img/${data.featured_image}`;
} else {
return false;
}
}
}
};
And Front Matter for my example looks like:
title: Alphabets start from A B C
body_class: blog
featured_image: lumberg.jpg
description: The first blog post in the new site.
permalink: "{{ page.filePathStem }}"

Related

Convert API Gateway Cloudformation template to Swagger file

There is an existing API described in a Coludformation template. Now I want to document the API using Swagger. Is there a way to parse the Cloudformation template to create the swagger.yaml specification file? I would like to avoid writing the API a second time, if possible.
Note: I am aware that you can define your API using Swagger, then import the API configuration in your Cloudformation template. This is not what I need. The Cloudformation already exists and will not be changed. Hence, I need the opposite: a Swagger configuration file based on an existing Cloudformation template.
There is no way to convert the template to a swagger file that I know about. But if you are looking for a way to keep service-spec in one place only (template) and you have it deployed, you can take swagger or OAS file from the stage (so to do it you must have a stage as well) in two ways at least:
By Web console. Use Amazon API Gateway->
APIs->Your API->Stages>Your Stage -> Export tab. See the picture: exporting Swagger or OAS as a file by Web console
aws apigateway get-export ... Here is an example:
aws apigateway get-export --rest-api-id ${API_ID} --stage-name ${STAGE_NAME} --export-type swagger swagger.json
I just made this, it is not setup for perfect plug/play, but will give you an idea what you need to adjust to get it working (also need to make sure you CF template is setup so it has the needed info, on mine I had to add some missing requestParams I was missing, also use this site to test your results from this code to see it works with swagger):
const yaml = require('js-yaml');
const fs = require('fs');
// Get document, or throw exception on error
try {
// loads file from local
const inputStr = fs.readFileSync('../template.yaml', { encoding: 'UTF-8' });
// creating a schema to handle custom tags (cloud formation) which then js-yaml can handle when parsing
const CF_SCHEMA = yaml.DEFAULT_SCHEMA.extend([
new yaml.Type('!ImportValue', {
kind: 'scalar',
construct: function (data) {
return { 'Fn::ImportValue': data };
},
}),
new yaml.Type('!Ref', {
kind: 'scalar',
construct: function (data) {
return { Ref: data };
},
}),
new yaml.Type('!Equals', {
kind: 'sequence',
construct: function (data) {
return { 'Fn::Equals': data };
},
}),
new yaml.Type('!Not', {
kind: 'sequence',
construct: function (data) {
return { 'Fn::Not': data };
},
}),
new yaml.Type('!Sub', {
kind: 'scalar',
construct: function (data) {
return { 'Fn::Sub': data };
},
}),
new yaml.Type('!If', {
kind: 'sequence',
construct: function (data) {
return { 'Fn::If': data };
},
}),
new yaml.Type('!Join', {
kind: 'sequence',
construct: function (data) {
return { 'Fn::Join': data };
},
}),
new yaml.Type('!Select', {
kind: 'sequence',
construct: function (data) {
return { 'Fn::Select': data };
},
}),
new yaml.Type('!FindInMap', {
kind: 'sequence',
construct: function (data) {
return { 'Fn::FindInMap': data };
},
}),
new yaml.Type('!GetAtt', {
kind: 'scalar',
construct: function (data) {
return { 'Fn::GetAtt': data };
},
}),
new yaml.Type('!GetAZs', {
kind: 'scalar',
construct: function (data) {
return { 'Fn::GetAZs': data };
},
}),
new yaml.Type('!Base64', {
kind: 'mapping',
construct: function (data) {
return { 'Fn::Base64': data };
},
}),
]);
const input = yaml.load(inputStr, { schema: CF_SCHEMA });
// now that we have our AWS yaml copied and formatted into an object, lets pluck what we need to match up with the swagger.yaml format
const rawResources = input.Resources;
let guts = [];
// if an object does not contain a properties.path object then we need to remove it as a possible api to map for swagger
for (let i in rawResources) {
if (rawResources[i].Properties.Events) {
for (let key in rawResources[i].Properties.Events) {
// console.log(i, rawResources[i]);
if (rawResources[i].Properties.Events[key].Properties.Path) {
let tempResource = rawResources[i].Properties.Events[key].Properties;
tempResource.Name = key;
guts.push(tempResource);
}
}
}
} // console.log(guts);
const defaultResponses = {
'200': {
description: 'successful operation',
},
'400': {
description: 'Invalid ID supplied',
},
};
const formattedGuts = guts.map(function (x) {
if (x.RequestParameters) {
if (
Object.keys(x.RequestParameters[0])[0].includes('path') &&
x.RequestParameters.length > 1
) {
return {
[x.Path]: {
[x.Method]: {
tags: [x.RestApiId.Ref],
summary: x.Name,
parameters: [
{
name: Object.keys(x.RequestParameters[0])[0].split('method.request.path.')[1],
in: 'path',
type: 'string',
required: Object.values(x.RequestParameters[0])[0].Required,
},
{
name: Object.keys(x.RequestParameters[1])[0].split('method.request.path.')[1],
in: 'path',
type: 'string',
required: Object.values(x.RequestParameters[1])[0].Required,
},
],
responses: defaultResponses,
},
},
};
} else if (Object.keys(x.RequestParameters[0])[0].includes('path')) {
return {
[x.Path]: {
[x.Method]: {
tags: [x.RestApiId.Ref],
summary: x.Name,
parameters: [
{
name: Object.keys(x.RequestParameters[0])[0].split('method.request.path.')[1],
in: 'path',
type: 'string',
required: Object.values(x.RequestParameters[0])[0].Required,
},
],
responses: defaultResponses,
},
},
};
} else if (Object.keys(x.RequestParameters[0])[0].includes('querystring')) {
return {
[x.Path]: {
[x.Method]: {
tags: [x.RestApiId.Ref],
summary: x.Name,
parameters: [
{
name: Object.keys(x.RequestParameters[0])[0].split(
'method.request.querystring.'
)[1],
in: 'query',
type: 'string',
required: Object.values(x.RequestParameters[0])[0].Required,
},
],
responses: defaultResponses,
},
},
};
}
}
return {
[x.Path]: {
[x.Method]: {
tags: [x.RestApiId.Ref],
summary: x.Name,
responses: defaultResponses,
},
},
};
});
const swaggerYaml = yaml.dump(
{
swagger: '2.0',
info: {
description: '',
version: '1.0.0',
title: '',
},
paths: Object.assign({}, ...formattedGuts),
},
{ noRefs: true }
); // need to keep noRefs as true, otherwise you will see "*ref_0" instead of the response obj
// console.log(swaggerYaml);
fs.writeFile('../swagger.yaml', swaggerYaml, 'utf8', function (err) {
if (err) return console.log(err);
});
} catch (e) {
console.log(e);
console.log('error above');
}

Adding a media field when creating a new entry

I've searched around and looked at all the SDK docs and on Contentful's API docs I am having difficulty understanding how to add a media field with a link to an asset when creating a new entry. I can successfully create the other fields, but a media field should be an object but I am not sure exactly how to format that so Contentful will accept it.
const videoAsset = yield client.getAsset(assetID)
fields = {
title: {
"en-US": 'Title' //works
},
description: {
"en-US": 'Description' //works
},
video: {
"en-US": //contenful api wants an object, what does this object look like?
//i have a published asset in videoAsset returned by client.getAsset()
},
team: {
"en-US": 'Community' //works
},
}
const entryCreated = yield space.createEntry(action.payload.contentType, {
fields: fields
})
When I I say "works" I mean that I can successfully create an entry that appears in Contentful space.
I got it!
This person wasn't doing exactly the same thing but the answer in terms of formatting was here:
https://github.com/contentful/contentful-management.js/issues/57
Basically the field should look like this:
const videoAsset = yield client.getAsset(assetID)
fields = {
title: {
"en-US": 'Title' //works
},
description: {
"en-US": 'Description' //works
},
video: {
"en-US": {
sys: {
type: "Link", linkType: "Asset", id: assetID
}
}
}, //this formatting works!
team: {
"en-US": 'Community' //works
},
}
const entryCreated = yield space.createEntry(action.payload.contentType, {
fields: fields
})

Vue-Resource, can't get this.$http.post working in Vue instance

I am trying to post some data usng this.$http.post and I could not figure out how to pass in the data through the route api..
new Vue({
el: '#root',
data: {
newName: '',
nameList: []
},
methods: {
addName(){
this.nameList = this.nameList.concat(this.newName);
var name = this.newName;
this.newName = '';
this.$http.post('/api/name', {name: name}).then((response) => {
console.log(response.message);
});
}
},
mounted(){
this.$http.get('/api/name').then((response) => {
this.nameList= this.nameList.concat(JSON.parse(response.body));
console.log(this.nameList);
});
}
});
It is not very clear, what is the exact issue, here, what exact API you are trying to hit.
If you are trying to hit: /api/name/:someName, you can do following
this.$http.post('/api/name/'+name ).then((response) => {
console.log(response.message);
});
If you are trying to hit: /api/:someName with payload, you can do following
this.$http.post('/api/' + name, {name: name}).then((response) => {
console.log(response.message);
});
Let me know if it helps.

how to implement mutation responses on a local falcor Model dataset

Given that I have an example Model:
var model = new falcor.Model({
cache: {
userById: {
"1": {
name: "User",
email: "user#email.com"
}
},
users: {
current: null
}
}
});
This is a local model that I'm using for testing purposes, and I would like to implement it on a call to users.login so the user so that I can call:
model.call(['users', 'login'], ['user', 'password'])
I realized that if I do this:
var model = new falcor.Model({
cache: {
userById: {
"1": {
name: "User",
email: "user#email.com"
}
},
users: {
current: null,
login: function(user, password) {
console.log('this code is reached', user, password);
// what to return in order to mutate model?
}
},
}
});
When I do the call it gets there, but I can't figure out how to mutate the model as part of the response; on the server side we return the paths with values and invalidates, and it just works, but here I tried:
// trying returning as a jsonGraph response, don't work
login: function() {
return {
jsonGraph: {
users: {
current: {$type: "ref", value: ['userById', '1']}
}
},
paths: [['users', 'current']]
}
}
// trying returning as a path set mutation list, don't work
login: function() {
return [{path: ['users', 'current'], value: {$type: "ref", value: ['userById', '1']}}]
}
// trying force call to set on the model, don't work
login: function() {
this.set([
{path: ['users', 'current'], value: {$type: "ref", value: ['userById', '1']}}
])
}
// trying using ModelResponse, got an example on some external sources, don't work
login: funtion() {
return new ModelResponse((observer) => {
observer.onNext({
jsonGraph: {
users: {
current: {$type: "ref", value: ['userById', '1']}
}
},
paths: [['users', 'current']]
});
observer.onCompleted();
});
}
Now I don't know what else to try; I need a simple way to declare mutations after a call into a local model, if you know how to solve this, please let me know here.
Thanks.
The client model cache only supports JSONGraph, which b/c it is essentially just JSON with some conventions, doesn't support functions. So, when working with a falcor model cache and no dataSource/middle tier router, it is not possible to implement calls.
This can be kind of annoying when prototyping/testing, as a router is conceptually more difficult than a simple JSON cache object. I ran into this a while ago, so I wrote a dataSource module to support it: falcor-local-datasource. The dataSource is initialized with a graph object that does support function nodes, and as with your above examples, will mutate the graph based on the function's returned JSONGraphEnvelope or an array of PathValues.

Select2 dropdown but allow new values by user?

I want to have a dropdown with a set of values but also allow the user to "select" a new value not listed there.
I see that select2 supports this if you are using it in tags mode, but is there a way to do it without using tags?
The excellent answer provided by #fmpwizard works for Select2 3.5.2 and below, but it will not work in 4.0.0.
Since very early on (but perhaps not as early as this question), Select2 has supported "tagging": where users can add in their own value if you allow them to. This can be enabled through the tags option, and you can play around with an example in the documentation.
$("select").select2({
tags: true
});
By default, this will create an option that has the same text as the search term that they have entered. You can modify the object that is used if you are looking to mark it in a special way, or create the object remotely once it is selected.
$("select").select2({
tags: true,
createTag: function (params) {
return {
id: params.term,
text: params.term,
newOption: true
}
}
});
In addition to serving as an easy to spot flag on the object passed in through the select2:select event, the extra property also allows you to render the option slightly differently in the result. So if you wanted to visually signal the fact that it is a new option by putting "(new)" next to it, you could do something like this.
$("select").select2({
tags: true,
createTag: function (params) {
return {
id: params.term,
text: params.term,
newOption: true
}
},
templateResult: function (data) {
var $result = $("<span></span>");
$result.text(data.text);
if (data.newOption) {
$result.append(" <em>(new)</em>");
}
return $result;
}
});
For version 4+ check this answer below by Kevin Brown
In Select2 3.5.2 and below, you can use something like:
$(selector).select2({
minimumInputLength:1,
"ajax": {
data:function (term, page) {
return { term:term, page:page };
},
dataType:"json",
quietMillis:100,
results: function (data, page) {
return {results: data.results};
},
"url": url
},
id: function(object) {
return object.text;
},
//Allow manually entered text in drop down.
createSearchChoice:function(term, data) {
if ( $(data).filter( function() {
return this.text.localeCompare(term)===0;
}).length===0) {
return {id:term, text:term};
}
},
});
(taken from an answer on the select2 mailing list, but cannot find the link now)
Just for the sake of keep the code alive, I'm posting #rrauenza Fiddle's code from his comment.
HTML
<input type='hidden' id='tags' style='width:300px'/>
jQuery
$("#tags").select2({
createSearchChoice:function(term, data) {
if ($(data).filter(function() {
return this.text.localeCompare(term)===0;
}).length===0)
{return {id:term, text:term};}
},
multiple: false,
data: [{id: 0, text: 'story'},{id: 1, text: 'bug'},{id: 2, text: 'task'}]
});
Since many of these answers don't work in 4.0+, if you are using ajax, you could have the server add the new value as an option. So it would work like this:
User searches for value (which makes ajax request to server)
If value found great, return the option. If not just have the server append that option like this: [{"text":" my NEW option)","id":"0"}]
When the form is submitted just check to see if that option is in the db and if not create it before saving.
There is a better solution I think now
simply set tagging to true on the select options ?
tags: true
from https://select2.org/tagging
Improvent on #fmpwizard answer:
//Allow manually entered text in drop down.
createSearchChoice:function(term, data) {
if ( $(data).filter( function() {
return term.localeCompare(this.text)===0; //even if the this.text is undefined it works
}).length===0) {
return {id:term, text:term};
}
},
//solution to this error: Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'localeCompare' of undefined
Thanks for the help guys, I used the code below within Codeigniter I I am using version: 3.5.2 of select2.
var results = [];
var location_url = <?php echo json_encode(site_url('job/location')); ?>;
$('.location_select').select2({
ajax: {
url: location_url,
dataType: 'json',
quietMillis: 100,
data: function (term) {
return {
term: term
};
},
results: function (data) {
results = [];
$.each(data, function(index, item){
results.push({
id: item.location_id,
text: item.location_name
});
});
return {
results: results
};
}
},
//Allow manually entered text in drop down.
createSearchChoice:function(term, results) {
if ($(results).filter( function() {
return term.localeCompare(this.text)===0;
}).length===0) {
return {id:term, text:term + ' [New]'};
}
},
});
I just stumbled upon this from Kevin Brown.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/30019966/112680
All you have to do for v4.0.6 is use tags: true parameter.
var text = 'New York Mills';
var term = 'new york mills';
return text.localeCompare(term)===0;
In most cases we need to compare values with insensitive register. And this code will return false, which will lead to the creation of duplicate records in the database. Moreover String.prototype.localeCompare () is not supported by browser Safary and this code will not work in this browser;
return this.text.localeCompare(term)===0;
will better replace to
return this.text.toLowerCase() === term.toLowerCase();

Resources