Need to learn how WPS method exchanging Device password from M1 to M8. What each frame carries and how it is validating it
Related
I am debugging network calls of one of the client's application whom code I am not having. The steps I have gone thorough is as below.
1) Install fiddler in a windows system.
2) unable HTTPS decryption.
3) set the system proxy to match the client's country. (USA)
4) install the app on iOS to which is on same network.
5) Installed the Fiddler certificate in phone, added to trusted certificate
6) Applied the manual proxy matching the same internal IP of the windows system. (not the system proxy of USA)
Now when I open the app, I am able to trace the network calls till login page. Also able to detect network call which send the credentials.
But after loading for 5-8 seconds, the app shows "something went wrong, we are unable to serve you"
I am not able to see any trace of my machine IP (internal IP), in network calls being sent. I changed my phones Timezone in case that is the triggering point for stop serving.
Also randomly after 2-3 attempts the following popup comes. I have set the Client Certificate as asked, which was downloaded from http://ipv4.fiddler:8888 .
There are many other apps for which I am able to see the entire network calls but not for this specific one.
Is there any issue in my system settings or the app provider have mechanism to identify man in the middle proxies. Or certificate issues?
Update 1 : I checked the fiddler log and found the below error
HTTPS hand shake to TargetURL failed The exact error was "a call to SSPI failed, see inner Exception, the certificate chain was issued by an authority that is not trusted. is this case if SSL Pinning?
You are mixing up the certificates. Usually the problem is the server certificate, however in your case the problem arises from a client certificate. A SSL client certificate is a optional feature that allows to identify a user based on a certificate + private key instead of username+password. It is often used in companies where each user has a certificate+private key on a smart card.
There are now two possibilities:
The iOS app includes a client certificate+private key and the app developers use this to protect the communication API (a bit similar like an API key). In this case you have to extract the certificate and the private key and provide it to Fiddler. Most likely certificate and private key are the same for every device world-wide and can be found as static resource in the iOS app (potentially obfuscated or somehow protected).
The server asks for a client certificate but providing a certificate is optional. I don't know if Fiddler can handle this situation.
I'm new to ESP8266!
I'm using NodeMCU 0.9.
When putting the device in AP mode, is there any way to get whatever the user typed when logging in (the WPA2 password to the wifi, not a captive portal password) to the AP?
I think it ought to be possible, because the device is getting the input from whomever is trying to log in and it needs to check out if it maches the login password, so there should be a way to get whatever he typed right?
Or do I need to dig in the firmware and change it so it'll work?
The answer is no.
The way that WPA works is, the client never reveals the password to the AP, so no AP (including the ESP) can get the password just like that, unless he can find a way to break the protocol.
I have an interesting problem. Let's say we have a user, Bob, who logs in to some service. How can that service prove Bob's identity, assuming Bob actively wants others to try and impersonate him? i.e. How can we be sure that the user logging in is indeed Bob?
Using the MAC/IP address of Bob wouldn't work as these can be easily spoofed.
A username/password as means of authentication wouldn't work since Bob could just give these credentials to anyone.
A public-key system (e.g. using RSA for signing) wouldn't work as Bob could just share his private key with anyone.
What I essentially need is Bob to have some proof of ID that he cannot share (or is at least hard for someone else to replicate, given all information that Bob has).
Edit (in case this is useful): I'm working with an iOS app (Bob) and a Python web server (the service).
Alternatives:
Hardware token that the user must present during authentication like a usb token or a cryptographic smartcard
Biometrics can not be shared. For example fingerprint/voice/ear/iris recognition. In some cases you will need a reader (note fingerprint biometric data is not available in mobile devices), and you have to work with confidence ranges and huge databases for comparison. An ID is never 100% reliable.
public key cryptographic systems that manage non-extractable keys. The cryptographic provider in user side allow to generate or import keys that can be marked as non extractable, and can not be exported outside. e.g WebCryptographyApi, AndroidKeyStore, iOS KeyChain or Window Keystore. During user registration, is generated a cryptographic key pair, public and private. The public is sent to server associated with user account, and private is stored securely. Authentication is done with a digital signature using the private key.
See FIDO UAF (Universal authentication Framework) and FIDO U2F(Universal second factor)
https://fidoalliance.org/about/what-is-fido/
About iOS KeyChain, it allows to mark a key as non extractable. See Apple Documentation
Important
If you do not set the CSSM_KEYATTR_EXTRACTABLE bit, you cannot extract the imported key from the keychain in any form, including in wrapped form.
Take a look also to Store and retrieve private key from Mac keychain programatically
Is is possible to authorize users at a machine level. For example, only when using authorized computers (my personal laptop or other managers' pcs) can one get access to the admin page? Any other computers should either get a denial of access message or something else. Authorized computer may still provide their own admin username and password in case people could fake a machine's identity, maybe. I'm not a security expert though.
Correct me if I misunderstand, but you are asking to only allow visitors on specific machines to access your website?
Jumping right into a solution here. The first question is how do you know which machines are "manager's" machines? Do you have a list of their IP addresses? Do you have some other ID on them?
If you have their IP addresses, then IP Whitelist them, and block all other ip addresses.
If you do not have their IP address, then you are limited. There is no machine ID that can be accessed through a web browser, so you'll need to create your own ID by setting a long lived cookie and a registration process.
Since you already have a login process, this next part is fairly easy. You've used this solution before. When you sign in to google mail and click "remember me" and don't need to sign in the next time your computer restarts, google has basically marked (set a cookie) your machine as yours.
Now, if you want to get super fancy, enterprises have NAC setup. Every system is identified before being allowed to connect to the network. Certain systems are given more access than others. For example, at a software development company, engineers may be given access to a production network while sales staff is not. When they connect, sales staff are move to a restricted vlan after identifying who they are and who the machine belongs to. If that were the case for your company, then you would whitelist an entire subnet block.
Last point. Chase bank uses the machine cookie concept like so: The first time you login they ask your username and password. Then the send a code to your phone or some third-party channel. After you enter the code, the set a machine cookie (same old cookie). The next time you login, they ask for username and password, then look for the machine cookie. If the machine cookie is there, then they don't make you enter the code again.
You could make that your registration process, except you provide the manager with a code they can enter. I don't think you want to get much more complex than a static password to register the machine, but if you did, you can generate one time tokens following the spec in rfc 4226.
You can't restrict access to specific computing device (as there are many types of devices used and there's no universal thing to bind to) but depending on your application design you still can solve your problem. You need to bind not to computer, but to other hardware device which is not possible to duplicate.
One of such devices is a hardware cryptotoken or cryptocard with the certificate and a private key in it. The user plugs the device to USB or to card reader respectively, then he authenticates on the server using the certificate and private key stored on this device). Client-side authentication using certificates is a large but well-known topic so I don't discuss it here.
While it's possible to move the cryptographic device to another computer system, it's not possible to duplicate it or extract the private key from it. So you can (with certain high level of reliability) assume that there exists only one copy of the private key and it's stored on certain particular device.
Of course you would need to create another certificate for each device, but this is not a problem - the only purpose of these certificates is to be accepted by the server, so the server can issue new certificates when needed.
I need to establish a HTTPS 2-way SSL connection from my iPhone application to the customer's server.
However I don't see any secure way to deliver the client side certificates to the application (it's an e-banking app, so security is really an issue).
From what I have found so far the only way that the app would be able to access the certificate is to provide it pre-bundeled with the application itself, or expose an URL from which it could be fetched (IPhone app with SSL client certs).
The thing is that neither of this two ways prevent some third party to get the certificate, which if accepted as a risk eliminates the need for 2-way SSL (since anyone can have the client certificate).
The whole security protocol should look like this:
- HTTPS 2-way SSL to authenticate the application
- OTP (token) based user registration (client side key pair generated at this step)
- SOAP / WSS XML-Signature (requests signed by the keys generated earlier)
Any idea on how to establish the first layer of security (HTTPS) ?
Ok, so to answer my own question...
It turned out that the security has no fixed scale of measurement.
The security requirements are satisfied as long as the price for braking the system is significantly above the prize that one would get for doing so.
In my situation we are talking about e-banking system, but with somewhat low monthly limits (couple of thousands USD).
As I mentioned in my question there would be another layer of security above the HTTPS which will feature WSS XML-Signatures. The process of registering the user and accepting the his public key is also done in several steps. In the first step the user sends his telephone number together with a cod retrieved somehow from my client. Then an SMS is sent to the user with a confirmation code. The user enters the confirmation code into a OTP calculator that would produce OTP code which will identify the user. Then the public key is sent to the server together with the OTP code. From here on every request would be signed by the private counterpart of the public key sent to the server earlier.
So the biggest weakness for the whole process is that of someone reverse engineers the application and retrieves the client certificate used for the SLL. The only problem arising from this is that someone might observe users' transactions. However in order for someone to make a transaction he would need the user's private key, which is generated, encrypted and stored into the keychain. And the price for braking this security level is VERY HIGH.
We will additionally think on how to protect the users' data on a higher level (e.g. using WSS Encryption), but for the start I thing we are good with the current solution.
any opinion ?
regards
https doesn't really work this way. In a nutshell, you attach to a secure server where the certificates are signed by a well known authority.
If you use Apples (iPhone) classes for this, they will only accept 'good' certificates. By good, I mean what Apple deems as acceptable. If you don't use them (there are alternatives in the SDK), you won't be able to connect (except, maybe, in the case where you have an 'Enterprise' developers license - but I can't say that with 100% certainty as I haven't looked enough at this license to be sure)
To continue, use your https connection to your correctly signed website and then institute some sort of login with a built in username/password, or challenge/response based upon the unique ID of the iPhone (for example) and exchange keys using that connection.
Note that this means that your application will have to query for new certificates at (each connection/every X connections/every month/application specified intervals) to keep them up to date. You can then use these certificates to connect to the more secure server.
[edit]
Check this post - may have more information about what you're asking to do
[/edit]
[edit2]
Please note that the request is iphone, not OSX - app store approval is an issue
[/edit2]