How to temporarily freeze a node in front of the camera using ARKit, SceneKit in Swift - ios

I built a complete structure as a node (with its child nodes) and the user will walk through it using ARKit.
At some point, if the user cannot continue because of some real obstacle in the real world, I added a "pause" button which should freeze whatever the user currently sees in front of the camera, the user could then move freely to some other open space and when the user will release the pause button he/she will be able to resume where they left off (only someplace else in the real world).
A while ago I asked about it in the Apple Developer forum and an Apple Frameworks Engineer gave the following reply:
For "freezing" the scene, you could transform the anchor's position (in world coordinates) to camera coordinates, and then anchor your content to the camera. This will give you the effect that the scene is "frozen", i.e., does not move relative to the camera.
I'm currently not using an anchor because I don't necessarily need to find a flat surface. Rather, my node is placed at a certain position relative to where we start at (0,0,0).
My question is how do I exactly do what the Apple engineer told me to do?
I have the following code which I'm still stuck with. When I add the node to the camera (pointOfView, last line of the code below), it does freeze in place, but I can't get it to freeze in the same position and orientation as it was before it was frozen.
#IBAction func pauseButtonClicked(_ sender: UIButton) {
let currentPosition = sceneView.pointOfView?.position
let currentEulerAngles = sceneView.pointOfView?.eulerAngles
var internalNodeTraversal = lastNodeRootPosition - currentPosition! // for now, lastNodeRootPosition is (0,0,0)
internalNodeTraversal.y = lastNodeRootPosition.y + 20 // just so it’s positioned a little higher in front of the camera
myNode?.removeFromParentNode() // remove the node from the Real World view. Looks like this line has no effect and just adding the node as a child to the camera (pointOfView) is enough, but it feels more right to do this anyway.
myNode?.position = internalNodeTraversal // the whole node is moved respectively in the opposite direction from the root to where I’m standing to reposition the camera in my current position inside the node
// myNode?.eulerAngles = (currentEulerAngles! * -1) — this code put the whole node in weird positions so I removed it
myNode?.eulerAngles.y = currentEulerAngles!.y * -1 // opposite orientation of the node so the camera will be oriented in the same direction
myNode?.eulerAngles.x = 0.3 // just tilting it up a little bit to have a better view, more similar to the view as before it was locked to the camera
// I don’t think I need to change the eulerAngles.z
myNode!.convertPosition(internalNodeTraversal, to: sceneView.pointOfView) // I’m not sure I wrote this correctly. Also, this line doesn’t seem tp change anything
sceneView.pointOfView?.addChildNode(myNode!) // attaching the node to the camera so it will remain stuck while the user moves around until the button is released
}
So I first calculate where in the node I'm currently standing and then I change the position of the node in the opposite direction so that the camera will now be in that position. That seems to be correct.
Now I need to change the orientation of the node so that it will point in the right direction and here things get funky. I've been trying so many things for days now.
I use the eulerAngles for the orientation. If I set the whole vector multiplied by -1, it would show weird orientations. I ended up only using the eulerAngles.y which is the left/right orientation and I hardcoded the x orientation (up/down).
Ultimately what I have in the code above is the closest that I was able to get. If I'm pointing straight, the freeze will be correct. If I turn just a little bit, the freeze will be pretty close as well. Almost the same as what the user saw before the freeze. But the more I turn, the more the frozen image is off and more slanted. At some point (say I turn 50 or 60 degrees to the side) the whole node is off the camera and cannot be seen.
Somehow I have a feeling that there must be an easier and more correct way to achieve the above.
The Apple engineer wrote to "transform the anchor's position (in world coordinates) to camera coordinates". For that reason I added the "convertPosition" function in my code, but a) I'm not sure I used it correctly and b) it doesn't seem to change anything in my code if I have that line or not.
What am I doing wrong?
Any help would be very much appreciated.
Thanks!

I found the solution!
Actually, the problem I had was not even described as I didn't think it was relevant. I built the AR nodes 2 meters in front of the origin (-2 for the z-coordinate) while the center of my node was still at the origin. So when I changed the rotation or eulerAngles, it rotated around the origin so my nodes moved in a large curve and in fact also changed their position as a result.
The solution was to use a simdPivot. Instead of changing the position and rotation of the node itself, I created a translation matrix and a rotation matrix which was at the point of the camera (where the user is standing) and I then multiplied both matrices. Now when I added the node as a child of the camera (pointOfView) this would freeze the image and in effect show exactly what the user was seeing before it was frozen as the position is the same and the rotation is exactly around the user's standing position.

Related

How to put an object in the air?

It seems HitResult only gives us intersection with a surface (plane) or a point cloud. How can I get a point in the middle of air with my click, and thus put an object floating in the air?
It really depends on what you mean by "in the air". Two possibilities I see:
"Above a detected surface" Do a normal hit test against a plane, and offset the returned pose by some Y distance to get the hovering location. For example:
Pose.makeTranslation(0, 0.5f, 0).compose(hitResult.getHitPose())
returns a pose that is 50cm above the hit location. Create an anchor from this and you're good to go. You also could just create the anchor at the hit location and compose with the y translation each frame to allow for animating the hover height.
"Floating in front of the current device position" For this you probably want to compose a translation on the right hand side of the camera pose:
frame.getPose().compose(Pose.makeTranslation(0, 0, -1.0f)).extractTranslation()
gives you a translation-only pose that is 1m in front of the center of the display. If you want to be in front of a particular screen location, I put some code in this answer to do screen point to world ray conversion.
Apologies if you're in Unity/Unreal, your question didn't specify so I assumed Java.
The reason why you see so often a hit result being interpreted as the desired position by the user is that actually there is no closed-form solution for this user interaction. Which of the infinite possible positions along the ray starting from the camera pointing towards the scene was desired by the User? 2D coordinates from a click still leave the third dimension undefined.
As you said "middle of the air", why not take the centre between the camera position and the hitresult?
You can extract the current position using pose.getTranslation https://developers.google.com/ar/reference/java/com/google/ar/core/Pose.html#getTranslation(float[],%20int)

Creating the effect of sprites jumping in and out of objects

I was trying to achieve the following functionality and wanted to ask for some help:
There are n barrels on the screen.
Randomly, a monster will pop up out of the barrel, and then go back down. I got this working, but I want to make a revision where sometimes instead of going up/down, a monster will jump out of the barrel along an arc, and land somewhere on the ground nearby. After some time, he will jump back and follow the path in reverse back into the barrel.
My original code workedby simply created a barrel i.e. addChild(barrel) to the scene, added a cropping node over it i.e. addChild(croppingNode) where croppingNode's position is over the barrel, and then add the monster to the cropping node as a child (croppingNode.addchild(monster))
This worked perfectly - the monsters come up, and then slide back down and the node hides their lower half so they appear to have went back inside the barrel.
My revision was to have a monster randomly jump out of the barrel on an angle and land on the ground, but the problem is because the monster is added to the cropping node, it is clipped if I try to move it outside the bounds of a cropping node.
If I add the monster outside of the cropping node, I believe he will no longer be cropped, correct?
What would be a way to achieve something like this? Use a larger cropping node image that is larger than the barrel and accounts for his arc onto the ground?
Thanks!

SceneKit: Rotate a node according to device motion data while making it accelerate in its direction

I've been fiddling with SceneKit recently and I wanted to make the following thing:
When creating a Game template from Xcode, you get a scene with a ship.
I wanted to animate this ship and orient it according to the relative position of my iPhone after I tap the screen. So for instance, if I hold my iPhone horizontally, tap the screen, this takes the reference attitude of my horizontal iPhone. Then, when I lift it (changing the pitch), I want the ship to orient itself as such.
I've been trying to change my ship node eulerAngles with the attitude pitch yaw and roll as in the following:
CMAttitude * attitude = deviceMotion.attitude
_ship.eulerAngles = SCNVector3Make(-attitude.pitch, attitude.yaw, attitude.roll);
Whenever I do that, the ship goes back to its original position in the scene. I can't seem to understand how to give it a speed in the direction it's facing without making it reset to its original position when I change its eulerAngles.
Ideally, the ship would have some sort of engine power accelerating it in the direction it's facing, while it would still be affected by gravity. How should I do that? Thanks!

SpriteKit and combining multiple drags for a single rotation

What I'm attempting to recreate is the draggable arrow that's used in the popular iOS game called "Fragger", complete with both adjusting the rotation AND the strength of the pull all at the same time based on a finger drag but using SpriteKit - I believe they did it in Cocos2D.
I'll start by saying that I've honestly spent many weeks relearning trigonometry (http://www.mathsisfun.com/ is a great resource) and combing through Ray Wenderlich's tutorials (http://www.raywenderlich.com/35866/trigonometry-for-game-programming-part-1) but I can't find a solution for executing a "collective" drag rotation AND strength on a SpriteKit object.
Yes, it's relatively easy to set an anchor point and rotate that object (I'm using an arrow) so that it's pointing at your finger and thanks to Ray, I've got a really smooth action utilizing the following:
float angleRadians = atan2f(firstFingerTouchY - _arrow.position.y, firstFingerTouchX - _arrow.position.x);
float angleDegrees = RADIANS_TO_DEGREES(angleRadians);
float rotateDegreesPerSecond = 180 / 0.5; // Would take 0.5 seconds to rotate 180 degrees, or half a circle
float degreesDiff = (angleCurrent - angleDegrees) * 1.0;
float rotateDuration = fabs(degreesDiff / rotateDegreesPerSecond);
however, that's only part of the equation ...
Again, the first drag is fine as the angle of rotation is derived from the fulcrum of the arrow (it's anchor point) and where ever my finger ends up. However, let's say due to the limit of the screen size I can't get the angle I desire in a single drag, so I lift up my finger and then place it back down to continue the drag? Well I can't use the above mentioned code because as soon as I place my finger down for the second time, the arrow's rotation jumps over to where my finger now starts - again ending the same way.
So I thought the solution would be to not use the anchor point of the arrow at all, but instead use the initial finger touchpoint (as the new anchor) and calculate the arrow's angle based on that touchpoint and where ever my finger moves to? That works in theory, however when you then try to factor in the "strength draw" aspect that's represented in "Fragger" (where pulling the finger closer or farther away from the arrow adjusts the strength of the grenade throw), then you're not moving your finger towards the arrow to weaken the pull, but instead towards where ever you initially touched - which is not only visually difficult but as a bonus creates a lot of rotational jerky-ness as you get your finger closer to the origin.
I've been working on it for about a month now (did I mention that I hate math) trying to create a homogenized method (SIN ... COS ... TAN ... I hate you all!) to do the following:
First pull will rotate the arrow based on the direction of the pull but NOT automatically point to your finger (initial angle)
The ability to lift my finger up, place it back down and drag to ADD TO or SUBTRACT FROM the current rotation of the arrow. (delta angle)
The drag of my finger towards or away from the anchor of the arrow (relative to the current angle of the arrow) will adjust the strength of the "pull" accordingly. For example, if the arrow is already pointing straight up, then continuing the drag straight up would increase the strength and down would decrease the strength respectively. (hypotenuse derived from arrow anchor point).
I also need to be able to use another finger (2 finger touch) to assist in the rotation/strength calculation, so that adds even more chaos into my cluster ...
If you've ever played the 'Fragger' game, you'll recognize the complexity of this single finger action which is also it's functional beauty. I can get pieces of it working - I can rotate it, I can adjust a color mask to indicate strength - but not all of it working together. Perhaps I'm going about it completely wrong, however every example I find online stops at simply rotating an object to point to your finger with every new touch drag ending with the same results.

CC3Node rotation - Cocos3d

I am developing an iPhone application that uses Cocos3d. I have drawn a scene in the XZ plane ( y = 0 ). Now, I want to rotate the scene around a specified point in the XZ plane, whenever the user touches the screen with two fingers; the rotation point will be the center of the two touch points.
I started by projecting the two touch points to the 3D scene, by finding the intersecting between the CC3Ray (issued from the camera and passing by the touch point) and the XZ plane.
Now that I have the two points in the XZ plane, I can calculate the rotation point (that will be the middle point between these two points).
In order to rotate the scene around this point, I have added it to a parent node. Now all I have to do is to translate it by the negation of the coordinates of the middle point, rotate its parent by the angle, and translate it back by the coordinates of middle point.
Here is the code that I am using (in the ccTouchesMoved method):
// Assuming that the root is a CC3Node and it is the scene that I need to rotate
// and middle refers to the center of rotation
[root translateBy:cc3v(-middle.x, 0, -middle.z)];
[root.parent rotateByAngle:30 aroundAxis:cc3v(0, 1, 0)];
[root translateBy:cc3v(middle.x, 0, middle.z)];
However, I am not able to rotate the scene around the middle point.
Can anyone help me to resolve this problem?
Thank you!
Edit:
I also tried to add these lines of codes in the ccTouchesBegan method:
[root translateBy:CC3VectorNegate(middle)];
[self.cc3Scene.activeCamera translateBy:CC3VectorNegate(middle)];
And in the ccTouchesMoved:
[root rotateByAngle:angle aroundAxis:cc3v(0, 1, 0)];
It works only for the first time the user touches the screen, and then, whenever he/she touches it again, a unwanted translation is happening!
I think the problem is with the ccTouchesBegan method.
On any one node, rotation, translation, and scale transforms are independent of each other. They are each applied to the rest pose of the node, and are not accummulative with each other. This is so that interaction appears natural and expected by the developer controlling the node. In other words, during gameplay, rotating a character after it has been moved, rotates the character in place, not around a translated location. Similarly, translating a node translates it regardless of how the node has previously been rotated.
This is different control than taking a single matrix and accumulating transforms into it, which is how the matrix-based rotate-around-a-distant-point technique works.
However, you can effectively rotate a node around a location that is not its origin by:
Transforming the local rotation location to the global coordinate space.
Rotating the node as normal.
Transforming the (now rotated) local rotation location to the global coordinate space.
Align the rotation locations found in steps 1 & 3 by translating the node by the difference between the two locations.
You can perform steps 1 & 3 using the node's globalTransformMatrix. Code for the steps above is as follows:
CC3Vector gblRotLocBefore = [aNode.globalTransformMatrix transformLocation: rotationLoc];
[aNode rotateByAngle: angle aroundAxis: kCC3VectorUnitYPositive];
CC3Vector gblRotLocAfter = [aNode.globalTransformMatrix transformLocation: rotationLoc];
[aNode translateBy: CC3VectorDifference(gblRotLocBefore, gblRotLocAfter)];
Using this technique, you do not need to involve the node's parent.

Resources