Related
Running the docker registry with below command always throws an error:
dev:tmp me$ docker run \
-d --name registry-v1 \
-e SETTINGS_FLAVOR=local \
-e STORAGE_PATH=/registry \
-e SEARCH_BACKEND=sqlalchemy \
-e LOGLEVEL=DEBUG \
-p 5000:5000 \
registry:0.9.1
Error response from daemon: Conflict. The name "registry-v1" is already in use by container f9e5798a82e0. You have to delete (or rename) that container to be able to reuse that name.
How can I prevent this error ?
I got confused by this also. There are two commands relevant here:
docker run # Run a command in a **new** container
docker start # Start one or more stopped containers
That means you have already started a container in the past with the parameter
docker run --name registry-v1 ...
You need to delete that first before you can re-create a container with the same name with
docker rm registry-v1
When that container is sill running you need to stop it first before you can delete it with
docker stop registry-v1
Or simply choose a different name for the new container.
To get a list of existing containers and their names simply invoke
docker ps -a
Here what i did, it works fine.
step 1:(it lists docker container with its name)
docker ps -a
step 2:
docker rm name_of_the_docker_container
When you are building a new image you often want to run a new container each time and with the same name. I found the easiest way was to start the container with the --rm option:
--rm Automatically remove the container when it exits
e.g.
docker run --name my-micro-service --rm <image>
Sadly it's used almost randomly in the examples from the docs
Edit: Read Lepe's comment below.
Just to explain what others are saying (it took me some time to understand) is that, simply put, when you see this error, it means you already have a container and what you have to do is run it. While intuitively docker run is supposed to run it, it doesn't. The command docker run is used to only START a container for the very first time. To run an existing container what you need is docker start $container-name. So much for asking developers to create meaningful/intuitive commands.
You have 2 options to fix this...
Remove previous container using that name, with the command docker rm $(docker ps -aq --filter name=myContainerName)
OR
Rename current container to a different name i.e change this portion --name registry-v1 to something like --name myAnotherContainerName
You are getting this error because that container name ( i.e registry-v1) was used by another container in the past...even though that container may have exited i.e (currently not in use).
Cause
A container with the same name is still existing.
Solution
To reuse the same container name, delete the existing container by:
docker rm <container name>
Explanation
Containers can exist in following states, during which the container name can't be used for another container:
created
restarting
running
paused
exited
dead
You can see containers in running state by using :
docker ps
To show containers in all states and find out if a container name is taken, use:
docker ps -a
Here is how I solved this on ubuntu 18:
$ sudo docker ps -a
copy the container ID
For each container do:
$ sudo docker stop container_ID
$ sudo docker rm container_ID
removing all the exited containers
docker rm $(docker ps -a -f status=exited -q)
The Problem: you trying to create new container while in background container with same name is running and this situation causes conflicts.
The error would be like:
Cannot create continer for service X :Conflict. The name X is already in use by container abc123xyz. You have to remove ot delete (or rename) that container to be able to reuse that name.
Solution rename the service name in docker-compose.yml or delete the running container and rebuild it again (this solution related to Unix/Linux/macOS systems):
get all running containers sudo docker ps -a
get the specific container id
stop and remove the duplicated container / force remove it
sudo docker stop <container_id>
sudo docker rm <container_id>
or
sudo docker rm --force <container_id>
You can remove it with command sudo docker rm YOUR_CONTAINER_ID, then run a new container with sudo docker run ...;
or restart an existing container with sudo docker start YOUR_CONTAINER_ID
I was running into this issue that when I run docker rm (which usually works) I would get:
Error: No such image
The easiest solution to this is removing all stopped containers by running:
docker container prune
I have solved the issue by doing following steps and I hope it helps.
Type docker ps -a to list all the containers in your system.
Check the NAMES part where you have initialized your docker container.
Then type docker rm --force name_of_container
Install the docker container as you wish.
I had problem using NIFI and I have removed and reinstalled using docker. Good luck.
TL:DR;
List all containers:
docker ps -a
Remove the concerned container by id:
docker container rm <container_id>
I'm just learning docker and this got me as well. I stopped the container with that name already and therefore I thought I could run a new container with that name.
Not the case. Just because the container is stopped, doesn't mean it can't be started again, and it keeps all the same parameters that it was created with (including the name).
when I ran docker ps -a that's when I saw all the dummy test containers I created while I was playing around.
No problem, since I don't want those any more I just did docker rm containername at which point my new container was allowed to run with the old name.
Ah, and now that I finish writing this answer, I see Slawosz's comment on Walt Howard's answer above suggesting the use of docker ps -a
The OP's problem is the error. Deleting state isn't the only solution - or even a good one. The problem is docker run isn't re-entrant, and docker start is impotent w/o run. So we have to combine them.
For example to run Postgres w/o destroying previous state, try this:
docker start postgres || docker run -d -p 5432:5432 --name postgres -e POSTGRES_PASSWORD=password postgres:13-alpine
Ok, so I didn't understand either, then I left my pc, went to do other things, and upon my return, it clicked :D
You download a docker image file. docker pull *image-name* will just pull the image from docker hub without running it.
Now, you use docker run, and give it a name (e.g. newWebServer).
docker run -d -p 8080:8080 -v volume --name newWebServer image-name/version
You perhaps only need docker run --name *name* *image*, but the other stuff will become useful quickly.
-d (detached) - means the container will exit when the root process used to run the container exits.
-p (port) - specify the container port and the host port. Kind of the internal and external port. The internal one being the port the container uses, and the external one is the port you use outside of it and probably the one you need to put in your web browser if that's how you access your app.
--name (what you want to call this instance of the container) - you could have several instances of the same container all with different names, which is useful when you're trying to test something.
image-name/version is the actual image you want to create the container from. You can see a list of all the images on your system with docker images -a. You may have more than one version, so make sure you choose the correct one/tag.
-v (volume) - perhaps not needed initially, but soon you'll want to persist data after your container exits.
OK. So now, docker run just created a container from your image. If it isn't running, you can now start it with it's name:
docker start newWebServer
You can check all your containers (they may or may not be running) with
docker ps -a
You can stop and start them (or pause them) with their name or the container id (or just the first few characters of it) from the CONTAINER ID column e.g:
docker stop newWebServer
docker start c3028a89462c
And list all your images, with
docker images -a
In a nutshell, download an image; docker run creates a container from it; start it with docker start (name or container id); stop it with docker stop (name or container id).
I had this issue because I had two or more containers with the same container_name in the docker-compose.yml file.
Simple Solution: Goto your docker folder in the system and delete .raw file or docker archive with large size.
For me, the issue was that I used an image name more than once in the dockerfile.
This happened to me on the docker tutorial! The port I tried to use was taken, but docker still created.. an image? A process to run docker? I'll find out soon. Anyways, to choose a different port, I had to remove the older image, and then docker run again.
Sometimes a tutorial can be too terse. What you want is concise, not terse, or even succinct.
I need to run more than 70 docker containers at once. Later, these containers need to be stopped.
At the moment I can docker stop all of them with the shell command docker stop $(docker ps -f since=<last docker before>). It works OK, but if there are any containers started after mine, I have a problem as the above code will stop them too.
Is there any way I can close all of running containers with some kind of specific search?
I know there is an docker ps -f label=<some label>, but I just haven't figured out on how to use it yet.
If you're launching many containers at the same time, launch them all with
docker run --label=anyname other-docker-args-of-yours image:tag
And when you want to delete all your containers just do
docker stop $(docker ps -f label=anyname | awk 'NR>1 {print$1}')
where anyname is the label name you provide during the docker run command and
awk 'NR>1 {print$1}' ignores the column header CONTAINER_ID and just prints the values alone.
Edit-1:
I later realized that you can achieve the list of Container_ID without awk as well. I'd consider using the below line.
docker stop `docker ps -qaf label=anyname`
If you want to remove all stoppped containers also, then include a within the options, like instead of -qf use -qaf.
-q to print container IDs alone.
-a for all containers including stopped.
I can view the list of running containers with docker ps or equivalently docker container ls (added in Docker 1.13). However, it doesn't display the user who launched each Docker container. How can I see which user launched a Docker container? Ideally I would prefer to have the list of running containers along with the user for launched each of them.
You can try this;
docker inspect $(docker ps -q) --format '{{.Config.User}} {{.Name}}'
Edit: Container name added to output
There's no built in way to do this.
You can check the user that the application inside the container is configured to run as by inspecting the container for the .Config.User field, and if it's blank the default is uid 0 (root). But this doesn't tell you who ran the docker command that started the container. User bob with access to docker can run a container as any uid (this is the docker run -u 1234 some-image option to run as uid 1234). Most images that haven't been hardened will default to running as root no matter the user that starts the container.
To understand why, realize that docker is a client/server app, and the server can receive connections in different ways. By default, this server is running as root, and users can submit requests with any configuration. These requests may be over a unix socket, you could sudo to root to connect to that socket, you could expose the API to the network (not recommended), or you may have another layer of tooling on top of docker (e.g. Kubernetes with the docker-shim). The big issue in that list is the difference between the network requests vs a unix socket, because network requests don't tell you who's running on the remote host, and if it did, you'd be trusting that remote client to provide accurate information. And since the API is documented, anyone with a curl command could submit a request claiming to be a different user.
In short, every user with access to the docker API is an anonymized root user on your host.
The closest you can get is to either place something in front of docker that authenticates users and populates something like a label. Or trust users to populate that label and be honest (because there's nothing in docker validating these settings).
$ docker run -l "user=$(id -u)" -d --rm --name test-label busybox tail -f /dev/null
...
$ docker container inspect test-label --format '{{ .Config.Labels.user }}'
1000
Beyond that, if you have a deployed container, sometimes you can infer the user by looking through the configuration and finding volume mappings back to that user's home directory. That gives you a strong likelihood, but again, not a guarantee since any user can set any volume.
I found a solution. It is not perfect, but it works for me.
I start all my containers with an environment variable ($CONTAINER_OWNER in my case) which includes the user. Then, I can list the containers with the environment variable.
Start container with environment variable
docker run -e CONTAINER_OWNER=$(whoami) MY_CONTAINER
Start docker compose with environment variable
echo "CONTAINER_OWNER=$(whoami)" > deployment.env # Create env file
docker-compose --env-file deployment.env up
List containers with the environment variable
for container_id in $(docker container ls -q); do
echo $container_id $(docker exec $container_id bash -c 'echo "$CONTAINER_OWNER"')
done
As far as I know, docker inspect will show only the configuration that
the container started with.
Because of the fact that commands like entrypoint (or any init script) might change the user, those changes will not be reflected on the docker inspect output.
In order to work around this, you can to overwrite the default entrypoint set by the image with --entrypoint="" and specify a command like whoami or id after it.
You asked specifically to see all the containers running and the launched user, so this solution is only partial and gives you the user in case it doesn't appear with the docker inspect command:
docker run --entrypoint "" <image-name> whoami
Maybe somebody will proceed from this point to a full solution (:
Read more about entrypoint "" in here.
If you are used to ps command, running ps on the Docker host and grep with parts of the process your process is running. For example, if you have a Tomcat container running, you may run the following command to get details on which user would have started the container.
ps -u | grep tomcat
This is possible because containers are nothing but processes managed by docker. However, this will only work on single host. Docker provides alternatives to get container details as mentioned in other answer.
this command will print the uid and gid
docker exec <CONTAINER_ID> id
ps -aux | less
Find the process's name (the one running inside the container) in the list (last column) and you will see the user ran it in the first column
Playing with ELK and docker, I needed to restart every services.
docker ps told me that I haven't any containers up.
docker run -it --rm [...] --name es elasticsearch -> Error response from daemon. The name "es" is already use by container [...]
So I try to remove all container :
docker ps -a -q | xargs docker rm -> Cannot connect to the Docker daemon. Is the docker daemon running on this host?
The container is not up but still here.
Of course I can simply change my container's name but it's not right. That mean I have container running. Even if I restart my server.
Any idea ?
When you stop your container it's not getting removed by default, unless you're providing --rm flag. So, it could be so, like you have started and stopped some container with es name before and it's stopped now. But it's not possible to create a new container with the existing name, even if the existing one is not running. Try to use a -a flag to show all containers you have as:
docker ps -a
If you have some with the name es, just remove it manually with:
docker rm es
You also able to provide -f flag, to force removing the es container even if it's running.
docker rm es should do the trick. Furthermore, if you want to remove a running container, you can add the -f parameter(docker rm -f 'container_name')
Running the docker registry with below command always throws an error:
dev:tmp me$ docker run \
-d --name registry-v1 \
-e SETTINGS_FLAVOR=local \
-e STORAGE_PATH=/registry \
-e SEARCH_BACKEND=sqlalchemy \
-e LOGLEVEL=DEBUG \
-p 5000:5000 \
registry:0.9.1
Error response from daemon: Conflict. The name "registry-v1" is already in use by container f9e5798a82e0. You have to delete (or rename) that container to be able to reuse that name.
How can I prevent this error ?
I got confused by this also. There are two commands relevant here:
docker run # Run a command in a **new** container
docker start # Start one or more stopped containers
That means you have already started a container in the past with the parameter
docker run --name registry-v1 ...
You need to delete that first before you can re-create a container with the same name with
docker rm registry-v1
When that container is sill running you need to stop it first before you can delete it with
docker stop registry-v1
Or simply choose a different name for the new container.
To get a list of existing containers and their names simply invoke
docker ps -a
Here what i did, it works fine.
step 1:(it lists docker container with its name)
docker ps -a
step 2:
docker rm name_of_the_docker_container
When you are building a new image you often want to run a new container each time and with the same name. I found the easiest way was to start the container with the --rm option:
--rm Automatically remove the container when it exits
e.g.
docker run --name my-micro-service --rm <image>
Sadly it's used almost randomly in the examples from the docs
Edit: Read Lepe's comment below.
Just to explain what others are saying (it took me some time to understand) is that, simply put, when you see this error, it means you already have a container and what you have to do is run it. While intuitively docker run is supposed to run it, it doesn't. The command docker run is used to only START a container for the very first time. To run an existing container what you need is docker start $container-name. So much for asking developers to create meaningful/intuitive commands.
You have 2 options to fix this...
Remove previous container using that name, with the command docker rm $(docker ps -aq --filter name=myContainerName)
OR
Rename current container to a different name i.e change this portion --name registry-v1 to something like --name myAnotherContainerName
You are getting this error because that container name ( i.e registry-v1) was used by another container in the past...even though that container may have exited i.e (currently not in use).
Cause
A container with the same name is still existing.
Solution
To reuse the same container name, delete the existing container by:
docker rm <container name>
Explanation
Containers can exist in following states, during which the container name can't be used for another container:
created
restarting
running
paused
exited
dead
You can see containers in running state by using :
docker ps
To show containers in all states and find out if a container name is taken, use:
docker ps -a
Here is how I solved this on ubuntu 18:
$ sudo docker ps -a
copy the container ID
For each container do:
$ sudo docker stop container_ID
$ sudo docker rm container_ID
removing all the exited containers
docker rm $(docker ps -a -f status=exited -q)
The Problem: you trying to create new container while in background container with same name is running and this situation causes conflicts.
The error would be like:
Cannot create continer for service X :Conflict. The name X is already in use by container abc123xyz. You have to remove ot delete (or rename) that container to be able to reuse that name.
Solution rename the service name in docker-compose.yml or delete the running container and rebuild it again (this solution related to Unix/Linux/macOS systems):
get all running containers sudo docker ps -a
get the specific container id
stop and remove the duplicated container / force remove it
sudo docker stop <container_id>
sudo docker rm <container_id>
or
sudo docker rm --force <container_id>
You can remove it with command sudo docker rm YOUR_CONTAINER_ID, then run a new container with sudo docker run ...;
or restart an existing container with sudo docker start YOUR_CONTAINER_ID
I was running into this issue that when I run docker rm (which usually works) I would get:
Error: No such image
The easiest solution to this is removing all stopped containers by running:
docker container prune
I have solved the issue by doing following steps and I hope it helps.
Type docker ps -a to list all the containers in your system.
Check the NAMES part where you have initialized your docker container.
Then type docker rm --force name_of_container
Install the docker container as you wish.
I had problem using NIFI and I have removed and reinstalled using docker. Good luck.
TL:DR;
List all containers:
docker ps -a
Remove the concerned container by id:
docker container rm <container_id>
The OP's problem is the error. Deleting state isn't the only solution - or even a good one. The problem is docker run isn't re-entrant, and docker start is impotent w/o run. So we have to combine them.
For example to run Postgres w/o destroying previous state, try this:
docker start postgres || docker run -d -p 5432:5432 --name postgres -e POSTGRES_PASSWORD=password postgres:13-alpine
I'm just learning docker and this got me as well. I stopped the container with that name already and therefore I thought I could run a new container with that name.
Not the case. Just because the container is stopped, doesn't mean it can't be started again, and it keeps all the same parameters that it was created with (including the name).
when I ran docker ps -a that's when I saw all the dummy test containers I created while I was playing around.
No problem, since I don't want those any more I just did docker rm containername at which point my new container was allowed to run with the old name.
Ah, and now that I finish writing this answer, I see Slawosz's comment on Walt Howard's answer above suggesting the use of docker ps -a
Ok, so I didn't understand either, then I left my pc, went to do other things, and upon my return, it clicked :D
You download a docker image file. docker pull *image-name* will just pull the image from docker hub without running it.
Now, you use docker run, and give it a name (e.g. newWebServer).
docker run -d -p 8080:8080 -v volume --name newWebServer image-name/version
You perhaps only need docker run --name *name* *image*, but the other stuff will become useful quickly.
-d (detached) - means the container will exit when the root process used to run the container exits.
-p (port) - specify the container port and the host port. Kind of the internal and external port. The internal one being the port the container uses, and the external one is the port you use outside of it and probably the one you need to put in your web browser if that's how you access your app.
--name (what you want to call this instance of the container) - you could have several instances of the same container all with different names, which is useful when you're trying to test something.
image-name/version is the actual image you want to create the container from. You can see a list of all the images on your system with docker images -a. You may have more than one version, so make sure you choose the correct one/tag.
-v (volume) - perhaps not needed initially, but soon you'll want to persist data after your container exits.
OK. So now, docker run just created a container from your image. If it isn't running, you can now start it with it's name:
docker start newWebServer
You can check all your containers (they may or may not be running) with
docker ps -a
You can stop and start them (or pause them) with their name or the container id (or just the first few characters of it) from the CONTAINER ID column e.g:
docker stop newWebServer
docker start c3028a89462c
And list all your images, with
docker images -a
In a nutshell, download an image; docker run creates a container from it; start it with docker start (name or container id); stop it with docker stop (name or container id).
I had this issue because I had two or more containers with the same container_name in the docker-compose.yml file.
Simple Solution: Goto your docker folder in the system and delete .raw file or docker archive with large size.
For me, the issue was that I used an image name more than once in the dockerfile.
This happened to me on the docker tutorial! The port I tried to use was taken, but docker still created.. an image? A process to run docker? I'll find out soon. Anyways, to choose a different port, I had to remove the older image, and then docker run again.
Sometimes a tutorial can be too terse. What you want is concise, not terse, or even succinct.