Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I am developing an Ionic application, I am using Firestore as a database, using offline mode.
import {AngularFirestoreModule} from '# angular / fire / Firestore';
AngularFirestoreModule.enablePersistence (),
When I open the application everything works very well, even on offline mode.
However, if the application stays open in the background mode on re-opening it always tells this error:
FIRESTORE (6.2.4) INTERNAL ASSERTION FAILED: AsyncQueue is already
failed: An internal error was encountered in the Indexed Database
server.
And I can no longer navigate anywhere in the application because I have the condition that the subscription is alive until the component is destroyed (that happens when I change the page)
takeUntil (componentDestroyed (this)):
I get the following error:
"1 errors occurred during unsubscription: 1) Error: FIRESTORE (6.2.4)
INTERNAL ASSERTION FAILED: AsyncQueue is already failed: An internal
error was encountered in the Indexed Database server"
And the full application stops working and it is very annoying to have to close it and reopen.
Is there any different way of doing? I already looked at StackOverflow, Github, all google and I can't find any solution.
What I have seen the other applications like Netflix, HBO, etc. do. is that when you reopen the application does not start exactly where it stayed, it warns you that it is loading, and when it finishes loading it leaves you very close to where you were before leaving the application without activity. I imagine it has a background and foreground change detector and a function for each event.
I was thinking that with ionic cycles I could solve that problem, like:
-detect the change to the background and unsubscribe and re-subscribe if any change to the foreground.
Do you know in any other way of doing?
That error I solved with:
window.onerror = function(error) {
if (error.indexOf("An internal error was encountered in the Indexed Database server") >= 0) {
// Refresh the page to restore IndexedDb to a working state.
window.location.reload();
}
};
and about how to observe the state changes of background and foreground:
import { Platform } from 'ionic-angular';
#Component({
template: `OK`
})
constructor(public platform: Platform) {
platform.ready().then(() => {
if (platform.is('cordova')){
//Subscribe on pause
this.platform.pause.subscribe(() => {
//Hello pause
});
//Subscribe on resume
this.platform.resume.subscribe(() => {
window['paused'] = 0;
});
}
});
}
I hope they serve you greetings.
After upgrading to Chrome 64, I realized that this error appears when I load my page on a new tab.
I can't identify where it is on the service worker. Here is my code to run the fetch:
self.addEventListener('fetch', function(event) {
if (event.request.url.startsWith(self.location.origin)) {
event.respondWith(
caches.match(event.request).then(function(response) {
return response || fetch(event.request).then(function(fetch_resp){
return fetch_resp;
});
})
);
}
});
Could anyone here, who has more knowledge about service worker, help me to solve this error?
I believe this is a Chromium bug that has been reported here. Hopefully it will be fixed soon or some more information about the issue will be published.
Paul Irish implemented a temporary work around, which is as follows:
if (e.request.cache === 'only-if-cached' && e.request.mode !== 'same-origin') {
return;
}
I ran it inside the callback for the service worker install and fetch listeners and it prevented the error.
You can see the full commit of Paul's code here.
For those searching for this again, seems like it popped up after a while again when someone opens the devtools you can still see the error mentioned in the question.
See (new) bug report here: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1098389
So let's hope this will be fixed again soon!
perhaps the cache name is not unique from other applications, seems to fix the issue for me.
I am using C++ Builder XE7 VCL.
Around August 11 2016 2:00pm UTC, I started receiving multiple complaints from my user base about printing problems. Most of these printing modules have proven stable for many years, and there were no updates to my project within the past 24 hours. I was able to reproduce similar problems on my development/test environment.
Without going into many details of my project, let me present a very simple printing program that is failing:
void __fastcall TForm1::PrintButtonClick(TObject *Sender)
{
// Test Print:
TPrinter *Prntr = Printer();
Prntr->Title = "Test_";
Prntr->BeginDoc();
Prntr->Canvas->Font->Size = 10;
Prntr->Canvas->TextOut(300,1050,"* * * Printing Test * * *");
if (Prntr->Printing) {
Prntr->EndDoc();
}
}
On the first attempt to print, everything works perfectly as expected. If I click the button a second time, TPrinter produces a small PDF, but the PDF file is actually corrupted and appears to have a file handle stuck to it.
If I click the button a third time, I get no printing and the following error message appears:
Printer is not currently printing.
My own test was done using a PDF printer driver, but the complaints I am receiving from users include a variety of local printers, network printers, PDF printers, etc.
In my actual project, I have try/catch exception handling, so the actual results are slightly different, but substantially similar to this result. The results show the hallmarks of instability and/or memory leaks without much in terms of error messages.
I suspect there may have been some Microsoft Windows updates that are tangling with Embarcadero DLLs, but I have not been able to verify this so far.
Is anyone else having similar problems?
The reason using a TPrintDialog or TPrinterSetupDialog "works" to fix the error is because they force the singleton TPrinter object (returned by the Vcl.Printers.Printer() function) to release its current handle to a printer if it has one, thus causing TPrinter.BeginDoc() to create a new handle. TPrinter releases its printer handle when:
it is being destroyed.
its NumCopies, Orientation, or PrinterIndex property is set.
its SetPrinter() method is called (internally by the PrinterIndex property setter and SetToDefaultPrinter() method, and by TPrintDialog and TPrinterSetupDialog).
Without doing that, calling TPrinter.BeginDoc() multiple times will just keep re-using the same printer handle. And apparently something about the recent Microsoft security update has now affected that handle reuse.
So, in short, (without uninstalling the Microsoft update) in between calls to BeginDoc() you need to do something that causes TPrinter to release and recreate its printer handle, and then the problem should go away. At least until Embarcadero can release a patch to TPrinter to address this issue. Maybe they could update TPrinter.EndDoc() or TPrinter.Refresh() to release the current printer handle (they currently do not).
Therefore, the following workaround resolves the printing issue without requiring any changes to the user interface:
void __fastcall TForm1::PrintButtonClick(TObject *Sender)
{
// Test Print:
TPrinter *Prntr = Printer();
Prntr->Title = "Test_";
Prntr->Copies = 1; // Here is the workaround
Prntr->BeginDoc();
if (Prntr->Printing) {
Prntr->Canvas->Font->Size = 10;
Prntr->Canvas->TextOut(300,1050,"* * * Printing Test * * *");
Prntr->EndDoc();
}
}
There are no Embarcadero DLLs involved in printing. TPrinter simply calls Win32 API GDI-based print functions directly.
The "Printer is not currently printing" error occurs when one of the following operations is performed on a TPrinter when its Printing property is false:
TPrinter::NewPage()
TPrinter::EndDoc()
TPrinter::Abort()
a TPrinter::Canvas subproperty is being changed.
the TPrinter::Canvas is being drawn on.
You are performing half of these operations in the test code you have shown, but you did not specify which line of code is actually throwing the error.
The Printing property simply returns the current value of the TPrinter::FPrinting data member, which is set to false only when:
the TPrinter object is initially created (the Printer() function returns a singleton object that is reused for the lifetime of the executable).
the Win32 API StartDoc() function fails inside of TPrinter::BeginDoc() (FPrinting is set to true before StartDoc() is called).
TPrinter::EndDoc() is called when Printing is true.
So, given the test code you have shown, there are two possibilities:
StartDoc() fails and you are not checking for that condition. BeginDoc() will not throw an error (VCL bug?!?), it will simply exit normally but Printing will be false. Add a check for that:
Prntr->BeginDoc();
if (Prntr->Printing) { // <-- here
Prntr->Canvas->Font->Size = 10;
Prntr->Canvas->TextOut(300,1050,"* * * Printing Test * * *");
Prntr->EndDoc();
}
the Printing property is getting set to false prematurely while you are in the process of printing something. The only ways that could happen in the code shown are if:
random memory is being corrupted, and TPrinter happens to be the victim.
multiple threads are manipulating the same TPrinter object at the same time. TPrinter is not thread-safe.
Since you can reproduce the problem in your development system, I suggest you enable Debug DCUs in the project options, then run your app in the debugger, and put a data breakpoint on the TPrinter::FPrinting data member. The breakpoint will be hit when FPrinting changes value, and you will be able to look at the call stack to see exactly which code is making that change.
Based on this information, I am going to go out on a limb and guess that the cause of your error is StartDoc() failing. Unfortunately, StartDoc() is not documented as returning why it fails. You certainly cannot use GetLastError() for that (most GDI errors are not reported by GetLastError()). You might be able to use the Win32 API Escape() or ExtEscape() function to retrieve an error code from the print driver itself (use TPrinter::Canvas::Handle as the HDC to query). But if that does not work, you won't be able to determine the reason of the failure, unless Windows is reporting an error message in its Event Log.
If StartDoc() really is failing, it is because of an Win32 API failure, not a VCL failure. Most likely the printer driver itself is failing internally (especially if a PDF print driver is leaving an open file handle to its PDF file), or Windows is failing to communicate with the driver correctly. Either way, it is outside of the VCL. This is consistent with the fact that the error started happening without you making any changes to your app. A Windows Update likely caused a breaking change in the print driver.
Try removing the following Windows update:
Security Update for Microsoft Windows (KB3177725)
MS16-098: Description of the security update for Windows kernel-mode drivers: August 9, 2016
This appears to resolve the issue for several test cases so far.
It started happening here today too. On my Windows 10 setup this would happen after calling TForm's Print() 3 times. I tried both the Microsoft Print to PDF and the Microsoft XPS Document Writer and both gave the same error.
I did some quick debugging and found that it's the call to StartDoc() that returns a value <= 0.
A temp fix until I can figure out what is really causing this is to re-create the Printer object in Printers by calling
Vcl.Printers.SetPrinter(TPrinter.Create).Free;
after calling anything that is using the Printer object. Might not be advisable to do that, but it solved my issue for now.
Looks like something is not released properly when calling EndDoc()
It seems that this is really a Microsoft problem and they should fix this buggy update. You can find more info at this on the company site.
Using a Printer Setup Dialog is only a workaround, not real solution, for this Microsoft bug. After confirmation, the printer setup dialog always creates a new handle for the printer. The next one or two print jobs will then succeed.
The patch should come from Microsoft, not from Embracadero. Thousands of programs are affected and it would be a massive waste of time and money to implement a workaround in all of them, if there is a bug in MS update.
I started experiencing the same weird behavior at more or less the same time, when running 32 bit Delphi applications built in XE7 on a Windows 10 64 bit system.
After uninstalling the latest security upgrade for Windows 10 (KB3176493), printing from these applications works normally again.
A rather surprising side effect of uninstalling this update seems to be that the file associations - which are the default programs for handling specific file types - are being reverted to Microsoft Windows default values...
The following variation of the code in the question will resolve the problem, but requires a TPrinterSetupDialog component added to the form:
void __fastcall TForm1::PrintButtonClick(TObject *Sender)
{
// Test Print:
TPrinter *Prntr = Printer();
Prntr->Title = "Test_";
PrinterSetupDialog1->Execute();
Prntr->BeginDoc();
if (Prntr->Printing) {
Prntr->Canvas->Font->Size = 10;
Prntr->Canvas->TextOut(300,1050,"* * * Printing Test * * *");
Prntr->EndDoc();
}
}
For program usage, the user will be presented with the printer setup dialog before proceeding to printing.
As to "why", my best guess at this point is that TPrinter used alone does not have all necessary permissions to access all necessary resources from Windows after the Security Update for Microsoft Windows (KB3177725) was implemented on Aug 10, 2016. Somehow a call to TPrinterSetupDialog (or TPrintDialog) before calling BeginDoc() sets up the necessary conditions for TPrinter to perform successfully.
I've used Notifications working on a JavaScript app and It's very useful when you don't have to be all the time looking at the app when something important needs to be acknowledged. I tried to replicate some work on Dart but a reference error is shown on compiled to JS Chrome.
Do you know if It's going to be implemented for Chrome soon? or is It going to remain experimental?
Thanks in advance
This is the function which tries to call Notification API. Without Notification line, everything works, when I add Notification line I get this error "Uncaught ReferenceError: requestPermission is not defined" running the code as JavaScript. (I am importing 'dart:html')
void revisarInput() {
if ( valorLogin != '' ) {
indicador = true;
_ws.send( Util.formatearJsonSocket( 'loginPwd', { 'pwd': int.parse( valorLogin )}));
}
Notification.requestPermission();
}
This was a bug in dart2js, https://code.google.com/p/dart/issues/detail?id=22483 and is fixed for Dart 1.9.
This page says
https://developer.chrome.com/apps/notifications
Stable since Chrome 28
In my company we´ve installed the app GuiXT Liquid UI on Ipad mini to access to our SAP-Systems.
The login works fine and we can open transactions (those which were delivered by SAP and also self-written), but as soon as we want to change variant, display a list or anything else, an Runtime Error occurs.
While opening the same transactions with the “normal” gui on windows-pcs everything works.
Following informations I get from the error message:
Runtime Errors MESSAGE_TYPE_X
Error analysis
Short text of error message:
Control Frame Work : Error in data stream <DATAMANAGER><TABLES><DATACHAN
GES HANDLE="2"><IT I; current tag PROPERTY,
Long text of error message:
Technical information about the message:
Message class....... "CNDP"
Number.............. 008
Variable 1.......... "<DATAMANAGER><TABLES><DATACHANGES HANDLE="2"><IT I"
Variable 2.......... "PROPERTY"
Variable 3.......... " "
Variable 4.......... " "
Information on where terminated
Termination occurred in the ABAP program "CL_GUI_DATAMANAGER============CP" -
in "TRACE_XML".
The main program was "RAZUGA_ALV01 ".
In the source code you have the termination point in line 2136
of the (Include) program "CL_GUI_DATAMANAGER============CL".
This is a really old question and I hope you found a solution.
I stumbled upon it while searching for help on a similar (but not exactly the same) error.
I found this note which doesn't apply to my system/error, but might apply to yours, so I'll leave it here for reference:
2318244 - Shortdump occurs in /IDXGC/PDOCMON01 when click some Process Step No. to display step additional data
Regards,
tao