I have a table generated by a query with data drawn from another sheet. At the end of of the table, I am adding a total-row.
When the rows generated by the query is more, total-row restricts the table. Is there any way to detect the number of rows generated by the query and insert more rows above the total-row?
I have the number of rows generated by the query displayed in a cell and row number of total-row in another cell. Can a macro be triggered when the first is more than the second?
Regards,
Pravin Kumar.
It is not possible to append the total row, since it depends on the query result and it will generate a redundancy problem. Any solution to that?
add it into your query in array {}. lets say your QUERY outputs 3 columns and 3rd column holds the sum:
={QUERY(A:C, "select A,B,sum(C) where A = 'xx' group by A,B label sum(C)''", 0);
"Total", "", QUERY(A:C, "select sum(C) where A = 'xx' label sum(C)''")}
or to add row between:
Related
The data below pulls from another sheet in the same workbook. This data below will update over time and have more rows (so it is not static).
How can I "split" this data so each shipment ID has its own row?
For the first row, this would look like:
The implemented logic would need to work for each row in the first image which means row 2 (with Shipment IDs F,G,H,I) would be split into four separate rows. The logic would need to be dynamic to be able to split more rows as they are pulled in from the other sheet.
Ideally, I do not want to use a script.
try this out:
={A1:D1;INDEX(QUERY(SPLIT(FLATTEN(C2:C&"|"&D2:D&"|"&MAP(A2:A,B2:B,LAMBDA(ax,bx,IFNA(SPLIT(ax,",")&"|"&SPLIT(bx,","))))),"|",0,0),"SELECT Col3,Col4,Col1,Col2 Where Col3!=''"))}
if A and B column are independent use:
=INDEX(LAMBDA(x, QUERY(IFERROR(SPLIT(FLATTEN(TRANSPOSE(FLATTEN(ROW(x)&"×"&
SPLIT(x, ",")))&"×"&FLATTEN(ROW(x)&"×"&SPLIT(OFFSET(x,,1), ",")&"×"&
OFFSET(x,,2)&"×"&OFFSET(x,,3))), "×")),
"select Col2,Col4,Col5,Col6
where Col6 is not null
and Col1=Col3
order by Col2", ))
(A11:INDEX(A:A, MAX(ROW(A:A)*(A:A<>"")))))
Any help in figuring this out would be appreciated. I would like a forumla to calculate the number of times a code number appears more than once AND where type is A.
A sample set of data looks like the following:
In this case the forumla should return 1 as there is one case of a repeated code number (1) where type is (A) - first row and last row in this case.
Would the forumla be any different if I also had a third column and wanted that to be a certain value as well? Again with the test data below I would want this to return 1 in the case that I wanted to measure the number of times any code number appeared more than once where type=A and subtype=C:
.
Ihave started with the following which identifies the number of unique combinations in columns A and B, but I can't seem to add any way to only return where a particular combination appears more than once:
=COUNTUNIQUE(IFERROR(FILTER(A2:A,B2:B="A"),""))
I have tried the following but it doesn't return correctly:
=COUNTUNIQUE(IFERROR(FILTER(A2:A,B2:B="A",COUNTIF(A2:A,A2:A)>1)))
Been trying to figure this one out for a while with no success.
Thank you
You can try this (TABLE = the range corresponding to your dataset, including the header row):
=query(query(transpose(query(transpose(TABLE),,9^9)),"select Col1,count(Col1) where Col1 contains 'A' group by Col1",1),"select Col2-1 where Col2>1 label Col2-1 ''")
What we are doing is to concatenate the Code number & type columns into one using the TRANSPOSE/QUERY/TRANSPOSE...9^9 hack, querying it again to make a temporary table of each group against its count for those groups which meet the criteria, then finally subtracting one from each group count and only returning an answer if there were groups with count>1 to begin with. You will get multiple results if multiple groups satisfy the count>1 criteria.
To add the subtype column to the formula as per the second question, change TABLE to suit, then change the inner QUERY to:
"select Col1,count(Col1) where Col1 contains 'A' and Col1 contains 'c' group by Col1"
Note that the if your 'real' type & subtype categories share characters then the where/contains approach in the QUERY will fail and a different approach will be needed.
Assume that you place you data at A1:B10, what this function do is:
FILTER B1:B10 by type, which is "A" in this example, and return an array which is filtered A1:B10.
Use INDEX to extract only the 1st column, which is the code column of the filtered array, and name it 'DATA' with LAMBDA function.
Use BYROW to iterate 'DATA', and check each code with COUNTIF, if it counts more than one of this code in the filter result, return that code, else return "".
Use UNIQUE to get rid of duplicate results. (since we are looking for code which have more than 1 repeats, so the return array will sure have duplicates.)
Use query to get rid of the extry empty rows.
=QUERY(UNIQUE(
LAMBDA(DATA,
BYROW(DATA,LAMBDA(ROW,
IF(COUNTIF(DATA,ROW)>1,ROW,"")
))
)(INDEX(FILTER(A1:B10,B1:B10="A"),,1))
),"WHERE Col1 IS NOT NULL")
Just noticed that the INDEX function is not necessary, FLITER can directly returns A1:A10 according the compare results of B1:B10.
=QUERY(UNIQUE(
LAMBDA(DATA,
BYROW(DATA,LAMBDA(ROW,
IF(COUNTIF(DATA,ROW)>1,ROW,"")
))
)(FILTER(A1:A10,B1:B10="A"))
),"WHERE Col1 IS NOT NULL")
edit: must work with blank rows
I have a list of users in Column F and in Row 1 a list of dates.
I want to use ARRAYFORMULA to sum the values from relevant columns per each user. As an example, this sums 4 columns (F,G,H,I) per user:
=ARRAYFORMULA(IF(LEN(F1:F),G1:G+H1:H+I1:I+J1:J,""))
My question is, if it possible to sum for a dynamic number of columns. For example, I'll choose a number (e.g 7, 30...) and it will sum the relevant number of columns.
Can this be done?
Here's a spreadsheet with the above data:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17hyBEF1va4GMYZUFkDxxjJ0pXH2oCccgIaBT79GIsGc/edit#gid=0
In A2 I choose how many columns, and it will sum the relevant number of columns. In C1 I use such a formula to sum 4 columns using ARRAYFORMULA as an example (which is static, not dynamic).
Note that there was a nice solution, but because there is a blank row (#3) it causes the suggested solution to leave the sum for the final row (#7) empty. I'm looking for a solution that will work with blank rows.
There are 3 parameters:
A2: no of cols
G2: top left cell of values
F:F: col of row field (to count number of rows)
=ArrayFormula(MMULT(N(INDIRECT(CELL("address",G2)&":"&ADDRESS(COUNTA(F:F),COLUMN(G2)+A2-1,4))),N(TRANSPOSE(COLUMN(INDIRECT(CELL("address",G2)&":"&ADDRESS(COUNTA(F:F),COLUMN(G2)+A2-1,4)))^0))))
(Note: Please simply look at the Google sheet for the quickest understanding of what I'm describing in the below bulletpoints)
My data has rows which each represent an order
Each order (row) can consist of multiple products
For each product in an order (row) there is another set of columns in the same row
I need this data to convert into only one set of columns per row (i.e. one product per row)
The products (new rows) need to remain next to eachother so the columns can't just be added to the bottom of the array (which is more simple)
Can you please take a look at the example below and help me achieve this?
Example Sheet
Screenshot of linked sheet
Try this in another sheet
=SORT({query({Reference!$A5:$A,Reference!B5:F},"select * where Col2 is not null ");query({Reference!$A5:$A,Reference!G5:K},"select * where Col2 is not null ");query({Reference!$A5:$A,Reference!L5:P},"select * where Col2 is not null ")})
Testing Sheet:
Wondering if there is a witty way to add a Total to the last row +1 of
a Query result.
See Sheet 'Lookup' for a static example of what I am asking for.
I don't know if there is a way to have a hidden column that calculates
transposed only under the last row of a query, or if there is a smart
way to work Query for this answer.
All great answers. Each on very useful in its use case.
Макс Махров gets the answer with using a query statement.
Now I was not keen on having an extra sheet to hold the totals so I added a row at the top which I can simply hide and used this formula:
query({Orders!A:E;A1:E1},"select Col1, Col3, Col4 where Col2 = '"&C3&"' order by Col4",1)
Only problem I have is trying to figure out how to add TEXT to the bottom row, it seems to only want numerical input.
How do I fix this? What am I glitching?
Thanks !
Mars
The trick is to make second query and count totals for selected product.
Plan of actions:
add new sheet with query on it, something like this: =QUERY(Orders!A:E,"select B, 0, sum(D) where B like '"&Lookup!C2&"' Group by B",0)
Prepare arrayformula which combines data in Lookup sheet: = ArrayFormula({Importrange(1),Importrange(2)}) Note that number of columns must retain the same.
Edit query so it takes Col1, Col2, Col3... instead of A, B, C...
Make word 'total' visible instead of zero. Set number format: 0;0;total Set it for range B9:B on Lookup sheet
Make Conditional Formatting with formula =and($B4 =0,isnumber($B4)) for range A4:C on Lookup sheet.
That's seems have to complete the task.
Hope it Helps!
Your Example
Working example.
Here is one way:
Put TOTAL way down in row 1000
Select the range A3:C999. Select data > filter to create filters
Select C3, set the filter to hide all blanks
A second way is to limit the query result to show only the top 8 results:
Change your query to =query(Orders!A:E, "select A, C, D where B = '"&C2&"' order by D desc limit 8",1) It will reverse-order column D (largest first), and set row limit to 8.
Change the formula of your TOTAL to =sumif(Orders!B:B,C2,Orders!D:D)
Try this formula in the column adjacent to your query:
=ArrayFormula({$C$4:offset($C$4,count($C$4:$C),0,1,1);sum($C$4:offset($C$4,count($C$4:$C),0,1,1))})
It duplicates your column of values (I haven't figured out a way around that yet) and then adds a total to the bottom of that column, and changes dynamically with the range from your query.
Here's a working version.
Interesting challenge! It got the old grey matter turning... ;)
Thanks,
Ben