I have current function
public static ICacheManager GetCacheManager(string cacheManagerName, TimeSpan? expiration)
{
var cacheManager = CacheManagers.GetOrAdd(cacheManagerName, keyName =>
{
var ret = ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<ICacheManager>();
if (expiration.HasValue)
{
ret.Configure(keyName, expiration.Value);
}
else
{
ret.Configure(keyName);
}
return ret;
});
return cacheManager;
}
JetBrains Rider says there is
Closure allocation: 'keyName' parameter + (outer closure of 'expiration' parameter)
Well, I know there is override
GetOrAdd<TArg>(TKey, Func<TKey,TArg,TValue>, TArg)
but how to use it?
How to rewrite this function to avoid closure and pass another parameters to lambda function? What if I need to pass multiple parameters (db query etc.)
This is how you use TArg overload:
concurrentDictionary.GetOrAdd(key, (k, v) => {
//do your thing, "v" will be "someVariable"
}, someVariable);
So in your case it will be
CacheManagers.GetOrAdd(cacheManagerName, (keyName, v) =>
{
var ret = ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<ICacheManager>();
if (v.HasValue)
{
ret.Configure(keyName, v.Value);
}
else
{
ret.Configure(keyName);
}
return ret;
}, expiration);
This overload - GetOrAdd<TArg>(TKey, Func<TKey,TArg,TValue>, TArg) - simply allows to pass stuff to the factory.
Related
Lets say you are trying to access deeply nested children in a map and you are not able to expect their parents to be there. Example:
Map awesomeMap = {
"this":{
"is":{
"sometimes":"not here"
}
}
}
Map notAwesomeMap = {
"this":{
"haha":{
"we":"switched"
}
}
}
When I go to access notAwesomeMap['this']['is']['sometimes'] it will return an error because ['this']['is'] is null, and you cannot look for the value ['sometimes'] of null.
So that's fine, but I was hoping to be able to use conditional member access operators...
notAwesomeMap['this']?.['is']?.['sometimes']
but that doesn't work...
Short of wrapping everything in a try block, is there a good way to handle these situations?
Edit: I tried playing around with this and I didn't find anything really illuminating, but maybe this gives someone an idea
void main() {
Map nestedMap = {
'this':{
'is':{
'sometimes':'here'
}
}
};
final mapResult = nestedMap['this'];
print(mapResult); //returns {is: {sometimes: here}}
final nullResult = nestedMap['this']['is an'];
print(nullResult); // returns null
final nullifiedResult = nullify(nestedMap['this']['is an']['error']);
print(nullifiedResult); // returns error, but is this possible another way?
final errorResult = nestedMap['this']['is an']['error'];
print(errorResult); // returns error
}
nullify(object){
try {
final result = object;
return result;
}
catch (e) {
return null;
}
}
One way would be
final result = (((nestedMap ?? const {})['this'] ?? const {})['is an'] ?? const {})['error'];
See also Null-aware operator with Maps
You could write a simple function to help do what you want:
R lookup<R, K>(Map<K, dynamic> map, Iterable<K> keys, [R defaultTo]);
Example usage:
final result = lookup(inputMap, ['this', 'is', 'something']);
Example implementation:
https://dartpad.dartlang.org/1a937b2d8cdde68e6d6f14d216e4c291
void main() {
var nestedMap = {
'this':{
'is':{
'sometimes':'here'
}
}
};
print(lookup(nestedMap, ['this']));
print(lookup(nestedMap, ['this', 'is']));
print(lookup(nestedMap, ['this', 'is', 'sometimes']));
print(lookup(nestedMap, ['this', 'is', 'error']));
// Bail out on null:
print(lookup(nestedMap, ['error'], 'Default Value'));
}
R lookup<R, K>(Map<K, dynamic> map, Iterable<K> keys, [R defaultTo]) {
dynamic current = map;
for (final key in keys) {
if (current is Map<K, dynamic>) {
current = current[key];
} else {
return defaultTo;
}
}
return current as R;
}
I like #matanlurey's approach, but have made two changes:
Drop the defaultTo since you can still use ?? which is more readable.
Swallow type-cast errors.
R lookup <R, K>(Map<K, dynamic> map, Iterable<K> keys) {
dynamic current = map;
for (final key in keys) {
if (current is Map<K, dynamic>) {
current = current[key];
}
}
try{
return current as R;
} catch(e){
// do nothing
}
}
Usage is similar
String someValue = lookup(nestedMap, ['some', 'value']) ?? 'Default Value';
Following code gives me below error -
'System.Threading.Tasks.TaskFactory.StartNew(System.Func)' has some
invalid arguments
public Task<string[]> SayHelloAsync()
{
Task<string> t1 = Task.Factory.StartNew<string>(GreetUser());
Task<string> t2 = Task.Factory.StartNew<string>(GreetCustomer());
Task.WhenAll(t1, t2);
}
private string GreetUser()
{
return "Hello";
}
private string GreetCustomer()
{
return "Namaste";
}
Whats wrong with this.
I am using ASP.Net MVC
'System.Threading.Tasks.TaskFactory.StartNew(System.Func)'
has some invalid arguments
You should state a new task in following way -
Task.Factory.StartNew<string>(() => GreetUser());
overall the method should be like -
public Task<string[]> SayHelloAsync()
{
Task<string> t1 = Task.Factory.StartNew<string>(() => GreetUser());
Task<string> t2 = Task.Factory.StartNew<string>(() => GreetCustomer());
return Task.WhenAll(t1, t2);
}
private string GreetUser()
{
return "Hi";
}
private string GreetCustomer()
{
return "Hi";
}
To expand on ramiramilu's answers, if your DoWork method is parameterless you can just pass it and it will also work (note that you just need to pass the method, not CALL the method).
void StartWork()
{
var task = System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Factory.StartNew<string>(DoWork); //note, you're using "DoWork", not "DoWork()"!!!
}
string DoWork()
{
//do stuff
return "stuff";
}
Using the lambda expressions is only needed when your DoWork methods require input parameters which you want to pass from the calling method. In this case you NEED to use the lambda expression.
void StartWork()
{
var task = System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Factory.StartNew<string>(() => DoWork("my param"));
}
string DoWork(string myParams)
{
//do stuff
return myParams;
}
Otherwise, you can just pass the name of the method and call it a day.
I'm trying to create a server-side Dart class that performs various data-related tasks. All of these tasks rely on the database having been first initialized. The problem is that the init of the database happens asynchronously (returns a Future). I first tried to put the init code into the constructor, but have given up on this approach as it seems to not be viable.
I am now attempting to figure out how to force the DB initialization as a first step in any method call that accesses data. So in other words, when attemptLogin() is called below, I'd like to first check if the DB has been initialized and initialize it if necessary.
However, there are two obstacles. If the database hasn't been initialized, the code is straightforward - initialize the db, then use the then() method of the returned future to do the rest of the function. If the db is not yet initialized, what do I attach my then() method to?
Second related question is what happens when a database is currently being initialized but this process is not yet complete? How can I pull in and return this "in-progress" Future?
This is the basic gist of the code I'm trying to wrangle:
class DataManager {
bool DbIsReady = false;
bool InitializingDb = false;
Db _db;
Future InitMongoDB() {
print("Initializing MongoDB");
InitializingDb = true;
_db = new Db("mongodb://127.0.0.1/test");
return _db.open().then((_) {
DbIsReady = true;
InitializingDb = false;
});
}
Future<List> attemptLogin(String username, String password) {
Future firstStep;
if ((!DbIsReady) && (!InitializingDb) {
Future firstStep = InitMongoDB()
}
else if (InitializingDb) {
// Need to return the InitMongoDB() Future that's currently running, but how?
}
else {
// How do I create a blank firstStep here?
}
return firstStep.then((_) {
users = _db.collection("users");
return // ... rest of code cut out for clarity
});
}
}
Thanks in advance for your help,
Greg
Just return
return new Future<bool>.value(true);
// or any other value instead of `true` you want to return.
// or none
// return new Future.value();
Just keep the future alive:
class DataManager {
Future _initializedDb;
Future initMongoDb() { ... }
Future<List> attemptLogin(String username, String password) {
if (_initializedDb == null) {
_initializedDb = initMongoDB();
}
return _initializedDb.then((db) {
users = db.collection("users");
return // ... rest of code cut out for clarity
});
}
}
You might need to pay attention for the error-case. It's up to you if you want to deal with errors in the initMongoDB or after it.
One of the possible solutions:
import "dart:async";
void main() {
var dm = new DataManager();
var selectOne = dm.execute("SELECT 1");
var selectUsers = dm.execute("SELECT * FROM users");
var users = selectOne.then((result) {
print(result);
return selectUsers.then((result) {
print(result);
});
});
users.then((result) {
print("Goodbye");
});
}
class Event {
List<Function> _actions = new List<Function>();
bool _raised = false;
void add(Function action) {
if (_raised) {
action();
} else {
_actions.add(action);
}
}
void raise() {
_raised = true;
_notify();
}
void _notify() {
if (_actions.isEmpty) {
return;
}
var actions = _actions.toList();
_actions.clear();
for (var action in actions) {
action();
}
}
}
class DataManager {
static const int _STATE_NOT_INITIALIZED = 1;
static const int _STATE_INITIALIZING = 2;
static const int _STATE_READY = 3;
Event _initEvent = new Event();
int _state = _STATE_NOT_INITIALIZED;
Future _init() {
if (_state == _STATE_NOT_INITIALIZED) {
_state = _STATE_INITIALIZING;
print("Initializing...");
return new Future(() {
print("Initialized");
_state = _STATE_READY;
_initEvent.raise();
});
} else if (_state == _STATE_INITIALIZING) {
print("Waiting until initialized");
var completer = new Completer();
_initEvent.add(() => completer.complete());
return completer.future;
}
return new Future.value();
}
Future execute(String query, [Map arguments]) {
return _init().then((result) {
return _execute(query, arguments);
});
}
Future _execute(String query, Map arguments) {
return new Future.value("query: $query");
}
}
Output:
Initializing...
Waiting until initialized
Initialized
query: SELECT 1
query: SELECT * FROM users
Goodbye
I think that exist better solution but this just an attempt to answer on your question (if I correctly understand you).
P.S. EDITED at 11 July 2014
Slightly modified (with error handling) example.
import "dart:async";
void main() {
var dm = new DataManager();
var selectOne = dm.execute("SELECT 1");
var selectUsers = dm.execute("SELECT * FROM users");
var users = selectOne.then((result) {
print(result);
return selectUsers.then((result) {
print(result);
});
});
users.then((result) {
print("Goodbye");
});
}
class DataManager {
static const int _STATE_NOT_INITIALIZED = 1;
static const int _STATE_INITIALIZING = 2;
static const int _STATE_READY = 3;
static const int _STATE_FAILURE = 4;
Completer _initEvent = new Completer();
int _state = _STATE_NOT_INITIALIZED;
Future _ensureInitialized() {
switch (_state) {
case _STATE_NOT_INITIALIZED:
_state = _STATE_INITIALIZING;
print("Initializing...");
new Future(() {
print("Initialized");
_state = _STATE_READY;
// throw null;
_initEvent.complete();
}).catchError((e, s) {
print("Failure");
_initEvent.completeError(e, s);
});
break;
case _STATE_INITIALIZING:
print("Waiting until initialized");
break;
case _STATE_FAILURE:
print("Failure detected");
break;
default:
print("Aleady intialized");
break;
}
return _initEvent.future;
}
Future execute(String query, [Map arguments]) {
return _ensureInitialized().then((result) {
return _execute(query, arguments);
});
}
Future _execute(String query, Map arguments) {
return new Future.value("query: $query");
}
}
For those that are still wondering how to create a blank Future in Dart and later complete them, you should use the Completer class like in the next example.
class AsyncOperation {
final Completer _completer = new Completer();
Future<T> doOperation() {
_startOperation();
return _completer.future; // Send future object back to client.
}
// Something calls this when the value is ready.
void finishOperation(T result) {
_completer.complete(result);
}
// If something goes wrong, call this.
void _errorHappened(error) {
_completer.completeError(error);
}
}
Future<Type> is non nullable in Dart, meaning that you have to initialize it to a value. If you don't, Dart throws the following error:
Error: Field should be initialized because its type 'Future<Type>' doesn't allow null.
To initialize a Future<Type>, see the following example:
Future<String> myFutureString = Future(() => "Future String");
Here "Future String" is a String and so the code above returns an instance of Future<String>.
So coming to the question of how to create a blank/empty Future, I used the following code for initializing an empty Future List.
Future<List> myFutureList = Future(() => []);
I found this link to be quite useful in understanding Futures in Flutter and Dart: https://meysam-mahfouzi.medium.com/understanding-future-in-dart-3c3eea5a22fb
I want to implement call cache(memoization) in non-intrusive way with the metadata annotations.
Hopefully, it will work like this:
class A{
#Cached
foo(msg) {
return msg;
}
}
void main() {
#Cached
var foo = ()=>"hello";
}
Can it be achieved with only dart:mirrors ?
I wrote a whole blog post on this topic a while ago. It's too long to copy here, so here's the link:
http://dartery.blogspot.com/2012/09/memoizing-functions-in-dart.html
The upshot is that you can write higher-order memoizing functions, but they're limited in generality by Dart's lack of flexible args functions. Also, if you want to use dynamic programming with recursive functions, you need to write your function with memoization in mind - it needs to take itself as an argument, so you can pass in the memoized version.
My current solution allows:
class B {
#CachedCallName(#cachedBaz)
baz() => print("first call to baz");
}
class A extends B with CacheableCalls {
#CachedCallName(#foo)
_foo(msg) {
print("first call with: $msg");
return msg + msg;
}
}
void main() {
A a = new A();
print(a.foo(21));
print(a.foo(21));
a.cachedBaz();
print(a.foo(22));
a.cachedBaz();
}
Output:
first call with: 21
42
42
first call to baz
first call with: 22
44
Flaws:
- can't cache methods with their actual names.
- can extend collection view but can't cache existing operators like operator []
- can't cache functions.
Full source:
#MirrorsUsed(metaTargets: CachedCallName)
import 'dart:mirrors';
class CachedCallName {
final Symbol name;
const CachedCallName(this.name);
}
#proxy
class CacheableCalls {
Map _cache = new Map();
dynamic _chacheInvoke(InstanceMirror thisMirror, Symbol
methodName, Invocation invocation) {
String key = "$methodName${invocation.positionalArguments}"
"${invocation.namedArguments}";
if (_cache.containsKey(key)) {
return _cache[key];
} else {
InstanceMirror resultMirror = thisMirror.invoke(methodName,
invocation.positionalArguments, invocation.namedArguments);
_cache[key] = resultMirror.reflectee;
return resultMirror.reflectee;
}
}
dynamic noSuchMethod(Invocation invocation) {
bool isFound = false;
var result;
Symbol called = invocation.memberName;
InstanceMirror instanceMirror = reflect(this);
ClassMirror classMirror = instanceMirror.type;
classMirror.instanceMembers.forEach((Symbol name, MethodMirror mm) {
mm.metadata.forEach((InstanceMirror im) {
if (im.reflectee is CachedCallName) {
if (im.reflectee.name == called) {
isFound = true;
result = _chacheInvoke(instanceMirror, name, invocation);
}
}
});
});
if (isFound) {
return result;
} else {
throw new NoSuchMethodError(this, called,
invocation.positionalArguments, invocation.namedArguments);
}
}
}
class B {
#CachedCallName(#cachedBaz)
baz() => print("first call to baz");
}
class A extends B with CacheableCalls {
#CachedCallName(#foo)
_foo(msg) {
print("first call with: $msg");
return msg + msg;
}
}
void main() {
A a = new A();
print(a.foo(21));
print(a.foo(21));
a.cachedBaz();
print(a.foo(22));
a.cachedBaz();
}
Does Dart support the concept of variable functions/methods? So to call a method by its name stored in a variable.
For example in PHP this can be done not only for methods:
// With functions...
function foo()
{
echo 'Running foo...';
}
$function = 'foo';
$function();
// With classes...
public static function factory($view)
{
$class = 'View_' . ucfirst($view);
return new $class();
}
I did not found it in the language tour or API. Are others ways to do something like this?
To store the name of a function in variable and call it later you will have to wait until reflection arrives in Dart (or get creative with noSuchMethod). You can however store functions directly in variables like in JavaScript
main() {
var f = (String s) => print(s);
f("hello world");
}
and even inline them, which come in handy if you are doing recusion:
main() {
g(int i) {
if(i > 0) {
print("$i is larger than zero");
g(i-1);
} else {
print("zero or negative");
}
}
g(10);
}
The functions stored can then be passed around to other functions
main() {
var function;
function = (String s) => print(s);
doWork(function);
}
doWork(f(String s)) {
f("hello world");
}
I may not be the best explainer but you may consider this example to have a wider scope of the assigning functions to a variable and also using a closure function as a parameter of a function.
void main() {
// a closure function assigned to a variable.
var fun = (int) => (int * 2);
// a variable which is assigned with the function which is written below
var newFuncResult = newFunc(9, fun);
print(x); // Output: 27
}
//Below is a function with two parameter (1st one as int) (2nd as a closure function)
int newFunc(int a, fun) {
int x = a;
int y = fun(x);
return x + y;
}