Could anyone help me the relationship between rundeck, spinnaker and jenkins?
I have seen jenkins for build and spinnaker for pipeline. And how this run deck is integrated and the usage of them.
I got some info from the below image how spinnaker and jenkins are related. But Run deck also integrated.
Ref: https://www.opsmx.com/what-is-spinnaker/
Rundeck is focused on automation and operations, Jenkins on CI/CD, you can design workflows integrating Jenkins pipelines on automated Rundeck jobs, take a look at this.
Spinnaker: a multi-cloud continuous delivery platform for releasing software changes.
Rundeck: Enable anyone to safely execute self-service operations tasks. Spinnaker looks closer to Jenkins. With Rundeck you can automate everything, not only CI/CD pipelines.
In fact, you can integrate Rundeck with any other solution to deliver automated tasks and save time avoiding interruptions. This is a good example of that.
Related
I would like to create a declarative Jenkins pipeline setup for the continues integration and Deployment, My only confusion was how Jenkins and chef are going to communicate in this process, after the continue integration, I want the chef to take over and install the Jar or Zip packages and deploy them on the several nodes from Jfrog Repo. Here maven is my build tool. In Jenkins pipeline I can setup until the build is done , is there any thing that I can do in the Post section of the pipeline for the chef communication for deployment or it has to be done. Please share some suggestion.
You can achieve this by putting workstation in one of the jenkins node.
Check out the below image for the same, instead of Ansible use Chef. I suppose this might work, haven't use chef recently.
Link: https://thenucleargeeks.com/2020/06/07/jenkins-openshift-pipeline/
We are starting to develop CI workflow for our systems in my company.
Currently we just making few basic tasks like build, tests, and upload to Nexus.
The tech stack is a Java project which build in Gradle and Jenkins makes our build.
Currently i'm working with some basic Groovy script to make what we need, but each time i'm copy and paste my updated code to Jenkins and running the job from Jenkins UI to see the results, and to me it seems like not a very good approach for developing such automation code.
My question is, what is the best practice to build and run Jenkins jobs?
Is it possible to run it straight from Intellij ?
Do we need to create a Jenkins project which should be saved as a repository and then deploy it to Jenkins machine?
Do we need to use some Intellij plugins in order to work with Jenkins?
More best practices are welcome :)
Jenkins has an API - so you can do whatever you want!
But in general, for small to medium teams it's better to use Jenkinsfile and let Jenkins pull code changes (or pull-requests) from SCM and trigger builds. You can also configure hooks to trigger builds if your SCM supports this (Github & bitbucket supports this).
If you are eventually pushing your artifacts to a docker image, I would highly recommend docker multi-stage builds.
If you are completely new to CI/CD stuff - Atlassian has a lot of good resources https://www.atlassian.com/continuous-delivery/principles/continuous-integration-vs-delivery-vs-deployment
I am Implementing Jmeter/taurus for performance testing for microservices. We are using Openshift PaaS solution to run all microservices. I am able to deploy jmeter/taurus inside Openshift using jenkins pipeline and generated the taurus report using jmx report in the container. My requirement is to publish the taurus report to Jenkins, rather than storing it to cloud storage or nexus. Can someone advise me what should be best approach to publish performance report for developers on Jenkins or any other optimal way to publish.
I found something by googling where they Jenkins agent was deployed inside Openshift and checkout the test suite Git repo into the agent's workspace just want to make sure if this is the best approach for my scenario. Our Jenkins master is running on Google cloud platform VM's with some dynamic slaves.
Thanks in Advance!
According to Dump Summary for Jenkins Plugins Taurus User Manual Chapter, you just need to add reporting module definition to your YAML configuration file like:
reporting:
- module: final-stats
dump-xml: stats.xml
And "feed" this stats.xml file to Jenkins Performance Plugin
That's it, you should get Performance Report added to your build dashboard. Check out How to Run Taurus with the Jenkins Performance Plugin article for more information if needed.
My development setup is such that for every svn checkin code is built,unit tested, packaged and published in Artifactory. Now I want to automate my deployment process & run integration(Selenium) test as part of this process. I am thinking of using Puppet to managed the deployment
Is puppet the correct tool for this
What is the process I should use to trigger puppet master to initiate a fresh installation on agents, I couldn't find any Jenkins plugin that would actually trigger puppet. One option is to call
puppet apply ...
as a Jenkins post build task
Any suggestions welcome, thank you.
Have a look at this Selenium Jenkins article from Saucelabs, a service that automates cross-browser testing. Though they are a vendor with a service to sell, the article covers how to do Selenium testing yourself with Jenkins. It also exposes common pain points you are likely to run into with this approach.
A Puppet master doesn't serve the function of orchestrating client convergences. Take a look at Mcollective. This is a tool that will allow you to trigger puppet runs on target systems from a Jenkins agent via script commands.
Some Mcollective getting started material:
http://www.slideshare.net/PuppetLabs/presentation-16281121
http://puppetlabs.com/mcollective
Recently, in our company, we decided to use Ansible for deployment and continuous integration. But when I started using Ansible I didn't find modules for building Java projects with Maven, or modules for running JUnit tests, or JMeter tests.
So, I'm in a doubtful state: it may be I'm using Ansible in a wrong way.
When I looked at Jenkins, it can do things like build, run tests, deploy. The missing thing in Hudson is creating/deleting an instance in cloud environments like AWS.
So, in general, for what purposes do we need to use Ansible/Jenkins? For CI do I need to use a combination of Ansible and Jenkins?
Please throw some light on correct usage of Ansible.
First, Jenkins and Hudson are basically the same project. I'll refer to it as Jenkins below. See How to choose between Hudson and Jenkins?, Hudson vs Jenkins in 2012, and What is the most notable difference between Jenkins and Hudson from a user perpective? for more.
Second, Ansible isn't meant to be a continuous integration engine. It (generally) doesn't poll git repos and run builds that fail in a sane way.
When can I simply use Jenkins?
If your machine environment and deployment process is very straightforward (such as Heroku or iron that is configured outside of your team), Jenkins may be enough. You can write a custom script that does a deploy as the final build step (or a chained step).
When can I simply use Ansible?
If you only need to "deploy" without needing to build/test, Ansible might be enough. For instance, you can run a deploy from the commandline or using Ansible Tower. This is great for small projects, static sites, etc.
How do they work together?
A good combination is to use Jenkins to build, test, and save artifacts. Add a step to call Ansible or Ansible Tower to handle the actual deployment process. That allows Ansible to handle machine configuration and lets Jenkins handle the CI process.
What are the alternatives to Jenkins?
I strongly recommend Thoughtworks Go (not to be confused with Go the language) instead of Jenkins. Others include CruiseControl, TravisCI, and Integrity.
Ansible is just a "glorified SSH loop".
CI is not only the software running, but the whole process of how success and failure is handled, who gets notification, and how the change is merged into the target version control.
If we only focus on the software, CI is a reactive scheduler triggered by code changes, and triggering typical build-validate-release-deploy sequence of "steps".
So in respect of software, Ansible without additional "sugaring" is just a toolkit to run things, which can be those very steps, but it is not CI.
The Ansible (without tower) totally lacks this reactive nature.
If you want to marry Ansible with CI, you can.
Ansible tower is a very Ansible oriented scheduler, but if you need CI software, I think you not necessarily need it. Any CI app capable of running shell script would be capable to launch Ansible playbooks.
Yet unlike Ansible tower - CI tools know to display test reports of all test frameworks, trigger notifications, etc.
Ansible tower can make sense in a complex environment with lots of groups touching Ansible code... The truth is I haven't seen a single real reason to pay for it. But if a manager liked the web interface nothing can stand "but others use it" logic.
I suspect the concept of Ansible tower was in response to puppet enterprise.
:)