I just want to run the simple test
class Exa {
#get:Rule
val composeTestRule = createAndroidComposeRule<MainActivity>()
// createComposeRule() if you don't need access to the activityTestRule
#Test
fun MyTest() {
// Start the app
composeTestRule.setContent {
Greeting2("Nurs")
}
composeTestRule.onNodeWithText("Hello Nurs!").assertIsDisplayed()
}
}
#Composable
fun Greeting2(name: String) {
Text(text = "Hello $name!")
}
but it gives me the following error:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: pending composition has not been applied
the strange thing that if I run it in another project it works
Wanted to add some detail for anyone who comes here from Google. The exception listed in the title:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: pending composition has not been applied
is thrown if a Composable throws an exception while composing or recomposing the view. In the case that the original poster was noticing, the exception was likely thrown because the activity itself was not able to host the composition, but other code may cause this if an exception is thrown within a composable method.
This happend to me when I put images to my drawable folder from the outside. In a release variant of app I had the same exception, but not in debug one. I just cleaned project(Build -> Clean Project) and everything worked fine.
If you are using Canvas Composable then give it some size. I was facing the same issue which was resolved after setting a fixed size.
Canvas(modifier = Modifier.size(400.dp)) {
...
}
You may use fillMaxWidth() or something similar.
From Documentation :
Canvas Composable is a component that allow you to specify an area on the screen and perform canvas drawing on this area. You MUST specify size with modifier, whether with exact sizes via Modifier.size modifier, or relative to parent, via Modifier.fillMaxSize, ColumnScope.weight, etc. If parent wraps this child, only exact sizes must be specified.
the problem was in MainActivity:
class MainActivity3 :
ComponentActivity() {
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
setContent {
// A surface container using the 'background' color from the theme
Surface(color = MaterialTheme.colors.background) {
Greeting("Android")
}
}
}
}
#Composable
fun Greeting(name: String)
you have to use clear activity without any dependency
Related
I am following the codelab Advanced State and Side Effects in Jetpack Compose. It says that if we use rememberCoroutineScope instead of LaunchEffect in this case, it seems to work, but it is not correct. "As explained in the Thinking in Compose documentation, composables can be called by Compose at any moment. LaunchedEffect guarantees that the side-effect will be executed when the call to that composable makes it into the Composition. If you use rememberCoroutineScope and scope.launch in the body of the LandingScreen, the coroutine will be executed every time LandingScreen is called by Compose regardless of whether that call makes it into the Composition or not. Therefore, you'll waste resources and you won't be executing this side-effect in a controlled environment."
#Composable
private fun MainScreen(onExploreItemClicked: OnExploreItemClicked) {
Surface(color = MaterialTheme.colors.primary) {
var showLandingScreen by remember { mutableStateOf(true) }
if (showLandingScreen) {
LandingScreen(onTimeout = { showLandingScreen = false })
} else {
CraneHome(onExploreItemClicked = onExploreItemClicked)
}
}
}
#Composable
fun LandingScreen(modifier: Modifier = Modifier, onTimeout: () -> Unit) {
Box(modifier = modifier.fillMaxSize(), contentAlignment = Alignment.Center) {
// TODO Codelab: LaunchedEffect and rememberUpdatedState step
// TODO: Make LandingScreen disappear after loading data
val onCurrentTimeout by rememberUpdatedState(newValue = onTimeout)
LaunchedEffect(Unit) {
delay(SplashWaitTime)
onCurrentTimeout()
}
Image(painterResource(id = R.drawable.ic_crane_drawer), contentDescription = null)
}
}
I do not understand the explanation. The phrases "when the call to that composable makes it into the Composition" and "regardless of whether that call makes it into the Composition or not" make me confused. I think when a composable is called by Compose, it will be in the Composition. How can it be not in the Composition after being called? Please show me what I miss here.
When a Composable enters composition LaunchedEffect() gets triggered. If LaunchedEffect has key or keys it can be triggered on recompositions when key values change.
#Composable
private fun MyTestComposable() {
var counter by remember { mutableStateOf(0) }
Column(modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize()) {
LaunchedEffect(key1 = counter>4) {
println("counter: $counter")
}
Button(onClick = { counter++ }) {
Text("counter: $counter")
}
}
}
For instance, LaunchedEffect block gets triggered when key change. First when MyTestComposable enters composition with false flag and when counter is 5 with true flag.
rememberCoroutineScope on the other hand launches every time your function is run. It's very very likely to enter composition but there might be times state that triggers composition change fast so current composition gets canceled and new one is scheduled
Recomposition starts whenever Compose thinks that the parameters of a
composable might have changed. Recomposition is optimistic, which
means Compose expects to finish recomposition before the parameters
change again. If a parameter does change before recomposition
finishes, Compose might cancel the recomposition and restart it with
the new parameter.
When recomposition is canceled, Compose discards the UI tree from the
recomposition. If you have any side-effects that depend on the UI
being displayed, the side-effect will be applied even if composition
is canceled. This can lead to inconsistent app state.
Ensure that all composable functions and lambdas are idempotent and
side-effect free to handle optimistic recomposition.
https://developer.android.com/jetpack/compose/mental-model#optimistic
I have a problem that I still can't solve and it just doesn't want to work. Basically I have to convert a function into a composable.
In the old function I launched a Coroutine and at the result, I changed context and then continued with my processes. In compose I don't understand how I have to "change context" in order to continue.
Old code:
fun getMyView( activity: Activity
) {
backgroundCoroutineScope.launch {
//some stuff here
withContext(coroutineContext) {
startSearchView(
activity
)
}
}
}
New not working code:
#Composable
fun getMyView( content: #Composable() () -> Unit) {
LaunchedEffect(key1 = Unit) {
//some stuff here like old funciont
//here I don't know how to change context, wait the end and go ahead. startSearchViewis a composable function too
// i want to use it to populate my screen
startSearchView(
content
)
}
}
How can I solve it? Thanks
Seems like you are trying to asynchronously "create" composable function, but UI emitting doesn't work this way. Like #PylypDukhov suggested, you should keep a mutable state holding nullable result of your async action. After loading the data set this state. Then in composable just do something like:
if (data != null) {
SearchComposable(data)
}
This way the composable will be emitted after the data is loaded
Say in a composable I have two states:
var stateA by remember { mutableStateOf(varA) }
var stateB by remember { mutableStateOf(varB) }
varA and varB are class variables of type Int and are set elsewhere in the code.
Then somewhere in the composable, in the same scope, I have
processA(stateA)
processB(stateB)
processA and processB are not composable functions.
So after initial rendering, if neither state changes, then nothing is further processed, that is cool.
Then if say stateB is changed, then both process statements get called. But I hope only to call processB in the case and not processA. How can I detect which of the states has changed?
You should not run heavy processing directly from Composable functions. More information can be found in side effects documentation.
In this case, you can use LaunchedEffect. Using snapshotFlow, you can create a flow that emits values every time a state changes, so you can process it. You can have a flow for each state, so they will be processed independently.
LaunchedEffect(Unit) {
launch {
snapshotFlow { stateA }
.collect(::processA)
}
launch {
snapshotFlow { stateB }
.collect(::processB)
}
}
I'm building a Kotlin library to use in my iOS app using Kotlin/Native. After I call some methods in the library from Swift, which works, I also want to call methods in Swift from the library. To accomplish this I implemented an interface in the library:
class Outbound {
interface HostInterfaceForTracking {
fun calcFeatureVector(bitmap: Any?): Array<Array<FloatArray>>?
}
var hostInterface: HostInterfaceForTracking? = null
fun registerInterface(hostInterface: HostInterfaceForTracking) {
this.hostInterface = hostInterface
instance.hostInterface = hostInterface
}
}
This is implemented on the Swift side like this:
class HostInterfaceForTracking : OutboundHostInterfaceForTracking {
var t : Outbound? = nil
init() {
TrackingWrapper.instance?.runOnMatchingLibraryThread {
self.t = Outbound()
self.t!.registerInterface(hostInterface: self)
}
}
func calcFeatureVector(bitmap: Any?) -> KotlinArray<KotlinArray<KotlinFloatArray>>? {
do {
var test : Any? = (bitmap as! Bitmap).bitmap
return nil
} catch {
return nil
}
}
}
The TrackingWrapper looks like this:
class TrackingWrapper : NSObject {
static var instance: TrackingWrapper? = nil
var inbound: Inbound? = nil
var worker: Worker
override init() {
self.worker = Worker()
super.init()
initInboundInterface()
}
func initInboundInterface() {
runOnMatchingLibraryThread {
TrackingWrapper.instance = self
self.inbound = Inbound()
HostInterfaceForTracking()
}
}
func runOnMatchingLibraryThread(block: #escaping() -> Void) {
worker.enqueue {
block()
}
}
}
The function runOnMatchingLibraryThread is needed because every call to the TrackingLibrary needs to be called from the exact same thread, so the Worker class initializes a thread and enqueues every method to that thread.
The Bitmap in this case is simply a wrapper for an UIImage, which I already accessed with the .bitmap call, so I've tried to access the wrapped UIImage and save it in the test variable. The library gets the current camera frame from the Swift side every few frames and sends the current image wrapped as a Bitmap to the method calcFeatureVector depicted here.
Problem: My memory load starts increasing as soon as the app starts until the point it crashes. This is not the case if I don't access the wrapped UIImage (var test : Any? = (bitmap as! Bitmap)). So there is a huge memory leak, just by accessing the wrapped variable on the Swift side. Is there anything I've missed or is there any way to release the memory?
Looks like you have a circular dependency here:
TrackingWrapper.instance?.runOnMatchingLibraryThread {
self.t = Outbound()
self.t!.registerInterface(hostInterface: self)
}
You are asking a property inside HostInterfaceForTracking to maintain a strong reference to the same instance of HostInterfaceForTracking. You should be using [weak self] to avoid the circular reference.
EDIT:
Ok after seeing the rest of you code theres a lot to unpack. There is a lot of unnecessary bouncing back and forth between classes, functions and threads.
There is no need to use runOnMatchingLibraryThread to just create an instance of something. You only need to use that for the code processing the image itself (I would assume, I haven't seen anything so far that requires being split off into another thread). Inside TrackingWrapper, you can create a singleton more easily, and matching the swift pattern by simply doing this as the first line:
static let shared = TrackingWrapper()
And everywhere you want to use it, you can just call TrackingWrapper.shared. This is more common and will avoid one of the levels of indirection in the code.
I'm not sure what Worker or Inbound are, but again these can and should be created inside the TrackingWrapper init, rather than branching Inbound's init, to use another thread.
Inside initInboundInterface you are creating an instance of HostInterfaceForTracking() which doesn't get stored anywhere. The only reason HostInterfaceForTracking is continuing to stay in memory after its creation, is because of the internal circular dependency inside it. This is 100% causing some form of a memory issue for you. This should probably also be a property on TrackingWrapper, and again, its Init should not be called inside runOnMatchingLibraryThread.
Having HostInterfaceForTracking's init, also using runOnMatchingLibraryThread is problematic. If we inline all the code whats happening is this:
TrackingWrapper
init() {
self.runOnMatchingLibraryThread {
TrackingWrapper.instance = self
self.inbound = Inbound()
TrackingWrapper.instance?.runOnMatchingLibraryThread {
self.t = Outbound()
self.t!.registerInterface(hostInterface: self)
}
}
}
Having all these classes unnecessarily keep coming back to TrackingWrapper is going to cause issues.
Inside HostInterfaceForTracking 's init, no need to be creating Outbound on a separate thread. First line in this class can simply be:
var t : Outbound = OutBound()
Or do it in the init if you prefer. Either way will also remove the issue of needing to unwrap Outbound before using it.
Inside Outbound you are storing 2 references to the hostInterface instance:
this.hostInterface = hostInterface
instance.hostInterface = hostInterface
I would have imagined there should only be 1. If there are now multiple copies of a class that has a circular dependency, which has multiple calls to separate threads. This again will cause issues.
I'm still not sure on the differences between Swift and Kotlin. In Swift when passing self into a function to be stored, the class storing it would mark the property as weak, like so:
weak var hostInterface: ......
Which will avoid any circular dependency from forming. A quick google says this isn't how things work in Kotlin. It might be better to look into the swift side passing in a closure (lambda on kotlin) and the kotlin side executing that. This might avoid the need to store a strong reference. Otherwise you need to be looking into some part of your code setting hostInterface back to null. Again its a bit hard to say only seeing some of the code and not knowing how its working.
In short, it looks like the code is very over complicated, and needs to be simplified, so that all these moving pieces can be tracked easier.
I think I'm lacking in a fundamental understanding of dart, but basically what I want to do is something like this:
void main() {
new MyClass();
}
class MyClass {
MyClass() {
CanvasElement canvas = querySelector("#myCanvas");
CanvasRenderingContext2D context = canvas.context2D;
}
}
However, canvas is a null object by the time I try to get the context. How can I do this from within the class. Also, I don't want to do this:
void main() {
CanvasElement canvas = querySelector("#myCanvas");
new MyClass(canvas);
}
class MyClass {
CanvasElement canvas
MyClass(this.canvas) {
canvas = this.canvas;
CanvasRenderingContext2D context = canvas.context2D;
}
}
Because I need to be able to do this completely from within the class. Is this just not how dart works, or am I missing something?
Did you try your second example? It doesn't make a difference if you call querySelector from main() or from within a class.
Do you use Angular or Polymer?
Angular or Polymer components introduce shadowDOM. querySelector() doesn't cross shadowDOM boundaries and it therefore doesn't find elements inside an elements shadowDOM.
To query for elements inside a shadowDOM you query for the component and then you can continue the search.
querySelector("somecomponent").shadowRoot.querySelector("someothercomponent").shadowRoot.querySelector("#myCanvas");
You have to ensure that the DOM including all shadowDOMs is fully built before you can query them.
If you run your code from within a component pub your code into the onShadowRoot method (see NgComponent ready event for more details)