<div class="row row-cols-1 row-cols-md-3 g-4">
.I want to remove the left and right margin of this div container using bootstrap.
For removing it I have used the class mx-0.
Like This
<div class="row row-cols-1 row-cols-md-3 g-4 mx-0">
But its Not Working .
How to solve this issue ? . Thanks
There is no margin set for any of those classes. Your margin is coming from parent class ... e.g. <body> sets a margin of 8px.
You need to set the mx-0 in the parent. Or override your div with some custom css, e.g.,
margin-left: -8px;
margin-right: -8px;
(This is not exactly what you need, but I don't have your parent code so showing you an arb. example.)
Related
So, on my web app's home page I have a birthday (mm/dd/yy) select fields however the drop down is being cut off by the next section of the homepage's background.
Here's the relevant CSS styling for the select:
.selectify .option {
background: none repeat scroll 0 0 #FFFFFF;
border-top: 0 none;
color: #999999;
cursor: pointer;
padding: 5px 20px;
}
And an image:
How can I get the drop down to go over the secondary background section?
Cheers!
After being given the link:
.banner has a style of overflow:hidden;. This is what is causing it to hide.
Delete it from the styles of banner.
Then, you have a class called container middel-class. Change this to just middel-class.
Then put container INSIDE middel-class. eg:
<div class='middel-class'>
<div class='container'>
.. <!-- rest of code as normal -->
</div> <!-- end of container -->
</div> <!-- end of middel-class -->
Also, it's middle, not middel, but it doesn't really matter :P
I cant say for sure without any code example of full place. This bug can be for few reasons
1.) Somewhere on a parent div (where located dropdown) you are using overflow:hidden - try delete it and see what happens
2.) also there is can be wrong z-index directly on the dropdown
I have a page on a project I'm creating for class where I wanted to align an image in the left side, with the text to the right aligned in the middle of the image. Instead of using html elements, I decided to try an internal CSS div elements within my external CSS. My problem is that I can't get them to align correctly vertically. I have the horizontal alignment, but the text either appears one line above or one line below the image. I tried the techniques included in this posting, but they didn't fix my problem. Align <div> elements side by side
Here is my internal CSS.
<style type="text/css">
/* left div holding the image */
#left {
width:170px;
align:left; }
/* right div to hold the text */
#right {
margin-left: 200px;
text-align:left; }
</style>
Here's the HTML
<div id="content">
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote>
<div id="right">Check back soon. Click here to receive an email when the site becomes available.</div><div id="left"><img src="images/construction-clipart.jpg" border="1" alt="Page under construction" /></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
Can you help me figure out how to make these align? To view how it is rendering, please visit my student project site at http://www.student.nvcc.edu/home/ligomes/TwoWiredChicks/Browse.html.
Thanks!
Finally, I hope this helps now. All you have for the right css is:
#right {
position: absolute;
margin-left: 200px
}
can you please tell me how to how header label left side with button on right side .
i found like this
<div data-role="header">
Cancel
<h1>Edit Contact</h1>
Save
But i need like this
My case label on left side and button on right side
You can do like that, DEMO http://jsfiddle.net/yeyene/5kfnT/3/
JQM DOC: http://view.jquerymobile.com/1.3.1/dist/demos/widgets/headers/
Custom header configurations
If you need to create a header that doesn't follow the default configuration, simply wrap your custom styled markup in any container, such as div. The plugin won't apply the automatic button logic to the wrapped content inside the header container so you can write custom styles for laying out the content in your header.
It's also possible to create custom bars without using the header data-role at all. For example, start with any container and add the ui-bar class to apply standard bar padding and add the ui-bar-b class to assign the bar swatch styles from your theme. (The "b" can be any swatch letter.)
<div data-role="header" data-position="fixed">
<div class="ui-block-a"><h3>Header</h3></div>
<div class="ui-block-b"> </div>
<div class="ui-block-c"> </div>
<div class="ui-block-d">
A
B
C
</div>
</div>
You can do it this way, override ui-title and ui-btn-right styles. However, for the second button, give it a custom class in order not to override both button with ui-btn-right. I used custom class .second for the second button.
Demo
CSS - I used .ui-header in order not to change footer style.
.ui-header .ui-title {
margin-left: 2px !important;
text-align: left !important;
width: 150px !important;
}
.second.ui-btn-right {
right: 80px !important
}
HTML
<div data-role="header">
Cancel
<h1>Edit Contact</h1>
Save
</div>
In my html the content should be centered on screen and his width should never be greater then 950px.
Since I want this same html to show on mobile and desktop I am using twitter bootstrap to make the layout responsive.
The problem is: I cant seem to make the content div to be centered AND have the max width of 950px.
When I open on a browser the css has this media query:
#media (min-width: 1200px)
that makes my div always fit the entire screen.
How can I fix this?
Basically what I want to do is something like this:
The orange line is the container (or body) and the blues are the rows
Thanks for any help.
EDIT
Just something I found that maybe help someone to help me
If I comment out this line:
#import "twitter/bootstrap/responsive";
my div.content keeps the 950px width but my html loses its responsive behavior, which I don't want
EDIT 2
The html markup:
<html>
<body>
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="span12">
<%= Content goes here %>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
but on the browser it creates this things:
body = 100% width, on chrome 1280px
.container = width 1170px
.row = width 1200px
.span12 = width 1170px
Just to clarify, this is not a problem on twitter bootstrap, this is a problem on twitter-bootstrap-rails
The way I found to fix it on development is open the twitter-bootstrap-rails gem with gem-open and change the file: /vendor/toolkit/twitter/bootstrap/responsive.less commenting out these lines:
// LARGE DESKTOP & UP
// ------------------
#media (min-width: 1200px) {
// Fixed grid
#grid > .core(70px, 30px);
// Fluid grid
#grid > .fluid(5.982905983%, 2.564102564%);
// Input grid
#grid > .input(70px, 30px);
// Thumbnails
.thumbnails {
margin-left: -30px;
}
.thumbnails > li {
margin-left: 30px;
}
}
You could use the wrapper this will give you a default size of 940px.
<body>
<div class="container">
...
</div>
</body>
But if you are looking to a custom width, you should add some css in your application.css like this:
body .container{
width:980px;
}
Check it out here: Bootstrap - Layout
A nice tutorial for layout: Filling layout with bootstrap
Be sure to wrap your layout with <div class="container">, which will create a fixed layout that is centered. If this doesn't work, then perhaps something else is wrong with your layout. Please update your question with your layout HTML if this is the case.
Documentation: http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/scaffolding.html#layouts
At the start of your responsive media queries (before ANY of them), set your element to have a "max-width"
body{max-width:1200px;margin:0px auto;}
Your site will still be responsive when you decrease browser width, but if you open up larger than 1200px (many decent widescreen displays) then it will stay as a 1200px container.
To keep it centred as it goes over 1200px add the following to the same container
body{max-width:1200px;margin:0px auto;}
The above adds "auto" margin to the left and right hand side of the element, which means means it becomes centred... (the 0px just means top and bottom are no margin, you could add some if you wanted/needed.
Note you don't have to add all that to body, but it just means it gets it out of the way at a high level....
Apparently it was a bug in the version of twitter-bootstrap gem i was using.
I dropped that project so i cant test in that environment anymore, and in some new project that i tried twitter-bootstrap again and didn't see this error again.
So i guess it is closed.
thanks for everyone
I was seeing a strange phenomena when using Scriptaculous BlindDown and SlideDown effects, where they would smoothly slide, and then at the very end, they would jump an additional amount, maybe 10% of the slide distance.
I already saw the note on the BlindDown page that you have to be sure not to use padding, which I'd already done.
I was still thinking that this must be my mistake somehow, when I noticed that I see the exact same thing happening on their demo page for Toggle when clicking on either the Blind or Slide demos:
http://wiki.github.com/madrobby/scriptaculous/effect-toggle
Firefox 3.6.7, Chrome 6, and Internet Explorer 8 all display this effect on my computer.
So I was thinking about just writing it off and either living with it or cutting the effect out, when I noticed that the page for BlindDown does not display this effect:
http://wiki.github.com/madrobby/scriptaculous/effect-blinddown
So there must be a way to make this work. On my page, the jump is occurring whether I directly use BlindDown/Slide or whether I use Toggle.
Has anyone out there used these and managed to do so without this problem? Any ideas on what the secret is?
It's usually due to margin or padding.
The element you're blind-downing mustn't have any margin or padding, or should have margin:0.1% so that contained margins don't collapse through the bounds of the element either. If you do this it'll be smooth as silk.
also - ensure you've set overflow:hidden
Enjoy.
(the other place it'll fall down is if you don't define height. If you do this little incantation before you animate it'll get and set you height without bothering anything else.
elem.setStyle({position:'absolute',visiblity:'invisible'});
elem.setStyle({'height':elem.getDimensions().height+'px'});
elem.setStyle({position:'relative',visibility:'visible'}); //or position:'static'
In my experience, the jumping is just a performance issue, which is effected by the system specs, browser, and complexity of the html content you are toggling. Some browsers like safari and chrome have a pretty good javascript engine making them more efficient.
I see this is happening for you even when using chrome though? Is the html content particularly complex, or your computer overloaded with applications running?
There is definitely a little very well known secret... Have you tried wrapping your content in an extra div container? You should consider this best practice and almost a requirement specifically when using Scriptaculous effects.
For example... Say you want to slideDown or Toggle a login form - and you have::
<div id="login-panel">
<input type="text" name="username" />
<button type="submit" name="send">Login</button>
</div>
All you have to do is add an extra inner div tag::
<div id="login-panel">
<div><!-- extra div here -->
<input type="text" name="username" />
<button type="submit" name="send">Login</button>
</div><!-- close it here -->
</div>
Now when you do something like Effect.toggle("login-panel", 'slide'); the transition should be much smoother and less jumpy. It may seem a little sloppy but it almost always helps. Hope this helps you!!
Keep in mind that when Scriptaculous begins an animation, the container that is being modified will be absolutely positioned and then a record of the height will be taken, similar to what danielsherson mentions. If however the container does not exist within a relatively positioned parent container, then the dimensions of the animating container may change quite drastically. The easiest way to test this is to modify your container using firebug to set the position to absolute. What happens? Did the height change? For the best results, there should be no change in the dimensions of your animating container when switching to absolute positioning. What happens to the rest of your document, such as content moving underneath, will not matter.
The padding/margin issue is a tricky one too since there really isn't a way to prevent the margins from overlapping and creating issues. Best way I found to address this is to set your animating container to float and then use the clearfix hack on a parent container to make sure nothing overlaps.
<body style="margin: 0 auto; width: 300px; position: relative; background: black;">
<div class="parent nonanimating clearfix">
<div class="animating" style="float: left; width: 100%; background: white;">
<div class="apply-your-margins-and-padding-here">
...content...
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="parent nonanimating clearfix">
<div class="animating" style="float: left; width: 100%; background: white;">
<div class="apply-your-margins-and-padding-here">
...content...
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Note that the classes are not functional and just for reference to my comments with the exception of clearfix, which is the float clear hack. The backgrounds and widths are only specified to give a better example of what is happening. Add whatever animation you'd like to $$('.animating')
I use this one (there are many), all though it is old and I don't even design for many of the browsers this hack supports..
.clearfix:after {
content: ".";
display: block;
clear: both;
visibility: hidden;
height: 0;
}
.clearfix {
display: inline-block;
}
/* Hides from IE-mac \*/
* html .clearfix {height: 1%;}
.clearfix {display: block;}
/* End hide from IE-mac */
I don't think it's a performance issue at all. I'm having the same issue. The ONLY way I've been able to make it not jump is to define a height for the div I'm sliding. I realize that this is NOT a good solution but it's the only one I've been able to find. I've also tried adding the additional div and it had no effect on how the Effect.toggle slide worked.
If anyone else has any more info on this, I'm all ears.
To prevent a Scriptaculous effect from jumping or jerking, remove the 'style' attribute from the element which you are applying the Effect to.
This:
<div id="mydiv" style="padding:10px;margin:10px;">
<button onClick="new Effect.BlindUp('mydiv');" />
</div>
Becomes:
<div id="mydiv">
<button onClick="new Effect.BlindUp('mydiv');" />
</div>
The styling can be placed in a enclosed div like this:
<div id="mydiv">
<div style="padding:10px;margin:10px;">
<button onClick="new Effect.BlindUp('mydiv');" />
</div>
</div>
The problem is caused by Scriptaculous reapplying the element's (mydiv) inline style declarations after the effect has been performed.
I have found success with using position: relative; on the block element using the slide/blind animation. Make sure padding/margins are placed on the child elements and not the slide block element.