Neo4j has two different clauses to find value in an array, ANY and IN. Please explain, how they are different as both are used to filter the data by checking if, the specified value is present in the array or not.
Query#1 : MATCH (n) WHERE any(color IN n.liked_colors WHERE color = 'yellow') RETURN n
Result#1: Node with name Eskil
Query#2 : Match (n) where 'yellow' in n.liked_colors return n
Result#2: Node with name Eskil
If both query return same results then where is the diffrence.
In your simple example case the results are the same.
However any() allows more complex means of filtering, especially when we aren't using this to simply detect membership of a known value in a list:
MATCH (n:Person)
WHERE any(color in n.liked_colors WHERE (n)<-[:KNOWS|MARRIED*]-(other:Person {eyes:color}))
Find a person where for any of their liked colors, we can traverse the given pattern to find another person with eyes of that color.
Related
I want to create a map projection with node properties and some additional information.
Also I want to collect some ids in a collection and use this later in the query to filter out nodes (where ID(n) in ids...).
The map projection is created in an apoc call which includes several union matches.
call apoc.cypher.run('MATCH (n)-[:IS_A]->({name: "User"}) MATCH (add)-[:IS_A]->({name: "AdditionalInformationForUser"}) RETURN n{.*, info: collect(add.name), id: ID(n)} as nodeWithInfo UNION MATCH (n)-[:IS_A]->({Department}) MATCH (add)-[:IS_A]->({"AdditionalInformationForDepartment"}) RETURN n{.*, info: collect(add.name), id: ID(n)} as nodeWithInfo', NULL) YIELD value
WITH (value.nodeWithInfo) AS nodeWithInfo
WITH collect(nodeWithInfo.id) as nodesWithAdditionalInfosIds, nodeWithInfo
MATCH (n)-[:has]->({"Vacation"})
MATCH (u)-[:is]->({"Out of Order"})
WHERE ID(n) in nodesWithAdditionalInfosIds and ID(u) in nodesWithAdditionalInfosIds
return n, u, nodeWithInfo
This does not return anything because, when the where part is evaluated it doesn´t check "nodesWithAdditionalInfosIds" as a flat list but instead only gets one id per row.
The problem only exists because I am passing the ids (nodesWithAdditionalInfosIds) AND the nodeProjection (nodeWithInfo) on in the WITH clause.
If I instead only use the id collection and don´t use the nodeWithInfo projection the following adjustement works and returns my only the nodes which ids are in the id collection:
...
WITH collect(nodeWithInfo.id) as nodesWithAdditionalInfosIds
MATCH (n)-[:has]->({"Urlaub"})
MATCH (u)-[:is]->({"Out of Order"})
WHERE ID(n) in nodesWithAdditionalInfosIds and ID(u) in nodesWithAdditionalInfosIds
return n, u
If I just return the collection "nodesWithAdditionalInfosIds" directly after the WITH clause in both examples this gets obvious. Since the first one generates a flat list in one result row and the second one gives me one id per row.
I have the feeling that I am missing a crucial knowledge about neo4js With clause.
Is there a way I can pass on my listOfIds and use it as a flat list without the need to have an exclusive WITH clause for the collection?
edit:
Right now I am using the following workaround:
After I do the check on the ID of "n" and "u" I don´t return but instead keep the filtered "n" and "u" nodes and start a second apoc call that returns "nodeWithInfo" like before.
WITH n, u
call apoc.cypher.run('MATCH (n)-[:IS_A]->({name: "User"}) MATCH (add)-[:IS_A]->({name: "AdditionalInformationForUser"}) RETURN n{.*, info: collect(add.name), id: ID(n)} as nodeWithInfo UNION MATCH (n)-[:IS_A]->({Department}) MATCH (add)-[:IS_A]->({"AdditionalInformationForDepartment"}) RETURN n{.*, info: collect(add.name), id: ID(n)} as nodeWithInfo', NULL) YIELD value
WITH (value.nodeWithInfo) AS nodeWithInfo, n, u
WHERE nodeWithInfo.id = ID(n) OR nodeWithInfo.id = ID(u)
RETURN nodeWithInfo, n, u
This way I can return the nodes n, u and the additional information (to one of the nodes) per row. But I am sure there must be a better way.
I know ids in neo4j have to be used with care, if at all. In this case I only need them to be valid inside this query, so it doesn´t matter if the next time the same node has another id.
The problem is stripped down to the core problem (in my opinion), the original query is a little bigger with several UNION MATCH inside apoc and the actual match on nodes which ids are contained in my collection is checking for some more restrictions instead of asking for any node.
Aggregating functions, like COLLECT(), aggregate over a set of "grouping keys".
In the following clause:
WITH collect(nodeWithInfo.id) as nodesWithAdditionalInfosIds, nodeWithInfo
the grouping key is nodeWithInfo. Therefore, each nodesWithAdditionalInfosIds would always be a list containing one value.
And in the following clause:
WITH collect(nodeWithInfo.id) as nodesWithAdditionalInfosIds
there is no grouping key. Therefore, in this situation, nodesWithAdditionalInfosIds will contain all the nodeWithInfo.id values.
In each of my nodes I have a selection of properties like education_id , work_id, locale etc etc. All these properties can have one or more than one values of the sort of education_id:112 or education_id:165 i.e. Node A might have education_id:112 and Node B might have education_id:165 and again Node C might have education_id:112 and so on.
I want a cypher query that return all nodes for a particular value of the property and I don't care about the value of the property beforehand.
To put it into perspective, in the example I have provided, it must return Node A and Node C under education_id:112 and Node B under education_id:165
Note: I am not providing multiple cypher queries specifying the values of properties each time. The whole output must be dynamic.
The output to the query should be something like
education_id:112 Node A, Node C
education_id:165 Node B
These are the results of a single query statement.
Not quite sure I understand your question, but based on the expected output:
MATCH (n) RETURN n.education_id,collect(n)
will group nodes by distinct values of education_id
You should probably take a look at the cypher refcard. What you are looking for is the WHEREclause:
Match (a) WHERE a.education_id = 112 return a
You can also specify property directly in the MATCH clause.
Match (a{education_id: 112}) RETURN a
I have a graph database where there are user and interest nodes which are connected by IS_INTERESTED relationship. I want to find interests which are not selected by a user. I wrote this query and it is not working
OPTIONAL MATCH (u:User{userId : 1})-[r:IS_INTERESTED] -(i:Interest)
WHERE r is NULL
Return i.name as interest
According to answers to similar questions on SO (like this one), the above query is supposed to work.However,in this case it returns null. But when running the following query it works as expected:
MATCH (u:User{userId : 1}), (i:Interest)
WHERE NOT (u) -[:IS_INTERESTED] -(i)
return i.name as interest
The reason I don't want to run the above query is because Neo4j gives a warning:
This query builds a cartesian product between disconnected patterns.
If a part of a query contains multiple disconnected patterns, this
will build a cartesian product between all those parts. This may
produce a large amount of data and slow down query processing. While
occasionally intended, it may often be possible to reformulate the
query that avoids the use of this cross product, perhaps by adding a
relationship between the different parts or by using OPTIONAL MATCH
(identifier is: (i))
What am I doing wrong in the first query where I use OPTIONAL MATCH to find nonexistent relationships?
1) MATCH is looking for the pattern as a whole, and if can not find it in its entirety - does not return anything.
2) I think that this query will be effective:
// Take all user interests
MATCH (u:User{userId: 1})-[r:IS_INTERESTED]-(i:Interest)
WITH collect(i) as interests
// Check what interests are not included
MATCH (ni:Interest) WHERE NOT ni IN interests
RETURN ni.name
When your OPTIONAL MATCH query does not find a match, then both r AND i must be NULL. After all, since there is no relationship, there is no way get the nodes that it points to.
A WHERE directly after the OPTIONAL MATCH is pulled into the evaluation.
If you want to post-filter you have to use a WITH in between.
MATCH (u:User{userId : 1})
OPTIONAL MATCH (u)-[r:IS_INTERESTED] -(i:Interest)
WITH r,i
WHERE r is NULL
Return i.name as interest
Anyone know of a fast way to query multiple paths in Neo4j ?
Lets say I have movie nodes that can have a type that I want to match (this is psuedo-code)
MATCH
(m:Movie)<-[:TYPE]-(g:Genre { name:'action' })
OR
(m:Movie)<-[:TYPE]-(x:Genre)<-[:G_TYPE*1..3]-(g:Genre { name:'action' })
(m)-[:SUBGENRE]->(sg:SubGenre {name: 'comedy'})
OR
(m)-[:SUBGENRE]->(x)<-[:SUB_TYPE*1..3]-(sg:SubGenre {name: 'comedy'})
The problem is, the first "m:Movie" nodes to be matched must match one of the paths specified, and the second SubGenre is depenedent on the first match.
I can make a query that works using MATCH and WHERE, but its really slow (30 seconds with a small 20MB dataset).
The problem is, I don't know how to OR match in Neo4j with other OR matches hanging off of the first results.
If I use WHERE, then I have to declare all the nodes used in any of the statements, in the initial MATCH which makes the query slow (since you cannot introduce new nodes in a WHERE)
Anyone know an elegant way to solve this ?? Thanks !
You can try a variable length path with a minimal length of 0:
MATCH
(m:Movie)<-[:TYPE|:SUBGENRE*0..4]-(g)
WHERE g:Genre and g.name = 'action' OR g:SubGenre and g.name='comedy'
For the query to use an index to find your genre / subgenre I recommend a UNION query though.
MATCH
(m:Movie)<-[:TYPE*0..4]-(g:Genre { name:'action' })
RETURN distinct m
UNION
(m:Movie)-[:SUBGENRE]->(x)<-[:SUB_TYPE*1..3]-(sg:SubGenre {name: 'comedy'})
RETURN distinct m
Perhaps the OPTIONAL MATCH clause might help here. OPTIONAL MATCH beavior is similar to the MATCH statement, except that instead of an all-or-none pattern matching approach, any elements of the pattern that do not match the pattern specific in the statement are bound to null.
For example, to match on a movie, its genre and a possible sub-genre:
OPTIONAL MATCH (m:Movie)-[:IS_GENRE]->(g:Genre)<-[:IS_SUBGENRE]-(sub:Genre)
WHERE m.title = "The Matrix"
RETURN m, g, sub
This will return the movie node, the genre node and if it exists, the sub-genre. If there is no sub-genre then it will return null for sub. You can use variable length paths as you have above as well with OPTIONAL MATCH.
[EDITED]
The following MATCH clause should be equivalent to your pseudocode. There is also a USING INDEX clause that assumes you have first created an index on :SubGenre(name), for efficiency. (You could use an index on :Genre(name) instead, if Genre nodes are more numerous than SubGenre nodes.)
MATCH
(m:Movie)<-[:TYPE*0..4]-(g:Genre { name:'action' }),
(m)-[:SUBGENRE]->()<-[:SUB_TYPE*0..3]-(sg:SubGenre { name: 'comedy' })
USING INDEX sg:SubGenre(name)
Here is a console that shows the results for some sample data.
Initial setup of the sample database is provided link to console
There are various cases and within each case, there are performers(with properties id and name). This is the continuation of problems defined problem statement and solution to unique node creation
The solution in the second link is (credits to Christophe Willemsen
)
MATCH (n:Performer)
WITH collect(DISTINCT (n.name)) AS names
UNWIND names as name
MERGE (nn:NewUniqueNode {name:name})
WITH names
MATCH (c:Case)
MATCH (p1)-[r:RELATES_TO]->(p2)<-[:RELATES]-(c)-[:RELATES]->(p1)
WITH r
ORDER BY r.length
MATCH (nn1:NewUniqueNode {name:startNode(r).name})
MATCH (nn2:NewUniqueNode {name:endNode(r).name})
MERGE (nn1)-[rf:FINAL_RESULT]->(nn2)
SET rf.strength = CASE WHEN rf.strength IS NULL THEN r.value ELSE rf.strength + r.value END
This solution achieved what was asked for.
But I need to achieve something like this.
foreach (Case.id in the database)
{
foreach(distinct value of r.Length)
{
//update value property of node normal
normal.value=normal.value+0.5^(r.Length-2)
//create new nodes and add the result as their relationship or merge it to existing one
MATCH (nn1:NewUniqueNode {name:startNode(r).name})
MATCH (nn2:NewUniqueNode {name:endNode(r).name})
MERGE (nn1)-[rf:FINAL_RESULT]->(nn2)
//
rf.strength=rf.strength + r.value*0.5^(r.Length-2);
}
}
The problem is to track the change in the case and then the r.Length property. How can it be achieved in Cypher?
I will not redo the last part, where setting strengths.
One thing though, in your console link, there is only one Normal node, so why do you need to iterate over each case, you can just match distinct relationships lengths.
By the way for the first part :
MATCH (n:Case)
MATCH (n)-[:RELATES]->()-[r:RELATES_TO]->()<-[:RELATES]-(n)
WITH collect(DISTINCT (r.length)) AS lengths
MATCH (normal:Normal)
UNWIND lengths AS l
SET normal.value = normal.value +(0.5^l)
RETURN normal.value
Explanations :
Match the cases
Foreach case, match the RELATES_TO relationships of Performers for that Case
collect distinct lengths
Match the Normal node, iterate the the distinct lengths collection and setting the proper value on the normal node