Here is my database entry structure, it has a nested document called friends, I want to compare two different _id's friends list in dart using mongo_dart
{
"_id" : ObjectId("60ae06074e162995281b4666"),
"email" : "one#one.com",
"emailverified" : false,
"username" : "one#one.com",
"displayName" : "complete n00b",
"phonenumber" : "",
"dob" : "",
"points" : 0,
"friends" : [
{
"username" : "three#one.com",
"sent" : ISODate("2021-05-26T10:01:30.616Z")
},
{
"username" : "six#one.com",
"sent" : ISODate("2021-05-26T10:43:16.822Z")
}
]
}
Here is my code, but I am not getting any returns
Future<Map> commonFriends(store, myObjectId, theirObjectId) async {
var commonList = await store.aggregate([
{
'\$project': {
'friends': 1,
'commonToBoth': {
'\$setIntersection': [
{'_id': myObjectId, 'friends': '\$username'},
{'_id': theirObjectId, 'friends': '\$username'}
]
},
}
}
]);
return commonList;
}
I am getting an error from db.dart which is apart of mongo_dart package. The error is "Exception has occurred.
Map (4 items)"
Related
I have a simple test database that I cant get to filter. I indexed the category in the rules:
"questions":{
".indexOn": ["category"]
},
My filter for the quiz app:
/questions.json?orderBy="category"&equalTo="Basics"&print=pretty
and my database:
"-MKoucSP33zm4jC43AnY" : {
"title" : {
"answers" : [ {
"score" : 30,
"text" : "Pineapple"
}, {
"score" : 5,
"text" : "Ham"
}, {
"score" : 20,
"text" : "Yogurt"
}, {
"score" : 10,
"text" : "Crab"
} ],
"category" : "Basics",
"questionId" : "101",
"questionImage" : "",
"questionLink" : "",
"questionText" : "What topping do you like the best on pizza?"
}
}
The category property is nested under the title node, so the property you need to order/filter on is title/category:
/questions.json?orderBy="title/category"&equalTo="Basics"&print=pretty
You'll also need to update your index definition for that path, so:
"questions": { ".indexOn": "title/category" }
Working example: https://stackoverflow.firebaseio.com/64596200/questions.json?orderBy="title/category"&equalTo="Basics"
How could I query this data in this way:
I would like to ignore the CurrentSubAdministrativeArea child and iterate every each sub child and find the right userKey
Actually I'm using this code, that isnt working:
self.ref.child("Ads").child("CurrentSubAdministrativeArea")
/*HERE I would like to ignore the childs*/
.queryOrdered(byChild: "userKey").queryEqual(toValue: uid).observeSingleEvent(of:.value, with: { (snapshot) in
--
{
"Ads" : {
"CurrentSubAdministrativeArea" : {
"Mantova" : {
"-L7ymBmmbHkNfhBRte9F" : {
"cost" : 200,
"date" : 1527256922000,
"info" : "Test",
"maxLimit" : 100,
"minLimit" : 10,
"personBadType" : [ "abitudinaria", "antipatica" ],
"personGoodType" : [ "simpatica", "felice" ],
"subAdministrativeArea" : "Mantova",
"title" : "Mantova Test",
"url" : "https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/team-34540.appspot.com/o/Mantova%20Test?alt=media&token=3a81ed1c-ecd6-4dc0-bd7c-45e093ce8188",
"userKey" : "OsJRc98sqxPx70iqxFtoqerMzHH2",
"via" : "viale dei test"
}
},
"Milano" : {
"-L6qywMC6nxi0fJNMHba" : {
"cost" : 454,
"date" : 1528298580000,
"info" : "Di pollo",
"maxLimit" : 100,
"minLimit" : 10,
"personBadType" : [ "abitudinaria", "antipatica" ],
"personGoodType" : [ "simpatica", "felice" ],
"subAdministrativeArea" : "Milano",
"title" : "Pollo 2",
"url" : "https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/team-34540.appspot.com/o/Pollo?alt=media&token=fc6a3ec8-5f9a-4347-bdad-2d9715af784d",
"userKey" : "OsJRc98sqxPx70iqxFtoqerMzHH2",
"via" : "viale test"
}
}
}
}
}
You could denormalize your data in such a way your query is easy to build and execute.
Together with the data structure you already have you would have another node (ie. another data structure) like
{
"AdsByUsers" : {
"OsJRc98sqxPx70iqxFtoqerMzHH2": {
"Mantova",
"Milano",
...
},
"abcde88qxPx70iqxFtoqerMzKh5": {
"Firenze",
...
}
With NoSQL database you should not hesitate to duplicate data in such a way your queries are easy and fast to execute.
I have this database on Firebase:
{
"issues" : {
"-L04771_EjrLlv5u1-GU" : {
"issue" : "Test insert 1",
"last_edit" : "d8QICgTG5xR20RBzAXfzfu8gLgw2",
"owner" : "d8QICgTG5xR20RBzAXfzfu8gLgw2",
"owner_email" : "example1#gmail.com",
"status" : 1,
"url" : "http://www.example.com/example.html"
},
"-L047pIoqxkj4saaTYyQ" : {
"issue" : "Test insert 2",
"last_edit" : "d8QICgTG5xR20RBzAXfzfu8gLgw2",
"owner" : "d8QICgTG5xR20RBzAXfzfu8gLgw2",
"owner_email" : "example2#gmail.com",
"status" : 1,
"url" : "http://www.example.com/example.html"
}
}
}
I have to extract only those who have owner_email "example1#gmail.com".
Is possible?
You're probably looking for Firebase Queries and especially the equalTo-Query.
Your code would be something like this:
// Find all issues with owner_email = example1#gmail.com
var ref = firebase.database().ref("issues");
ref.orderByChild("owner_email").equalTo("example1#gmail.com").on("value", function(snapshot) {
// Loops through the matching issues
snapshot.forEach(function(child) {
console.log(child.key);
});
});
Is it possible to create Salesreceipt without product/service value through QBO API? I have tried through API but it's not reflecting rate value and storing description value only.
If I remove ItemRef attribute(in request body) then it's reflecting rate and amount values and it's assigning some default and random product/service.
It is possible directly in QBO UI.
Request body where only description value storing:
{
"TxnDate" : "2016-05-27",
"Line" : [ {
"Amount" : 2222.00,
"Description" : "hi chk",
"DetailType" : "ItemReceiptLineDetail",
"ItemReceiptLineDetail" : {
"ItemRef" : { },
"Qty" : 1,
"UnitPrice" : 2222
} }
],
"CustomerRef" : {
"value" : "67"
},
"CustomerMemo" : {
"value" : "Thanks for your business! We appreciate referrals!"
},
"TotalAmt": 2222.00,
"PrivateNote" : "",
"CustomField" : [ {
"DefinitionId" : "1",
"Type" : "StringType",
"StringValue" : ""
} ]
}
Request body where default product/service assigning:
{
"TxnDate" : "2016-05-27",
"Line" : [ {
"Amount" : 2222.00,
"Description" : "hi chk",
"DetailType" : "ItemReceiptLineDetail",
"ItemReceiptLineDetail" : {
"Qty" : 1,
"UnitPrice" : 2222
} }
],
"CustomerRef" : {
"value" : "67"
},
"CustomerMemo" : {
"value" : "Thanks for your business! We appreciate referrals!"
},
"TotalAmt": 2222.00,
"PrivateNote" : "",
"CustomField" : [ {
"DefinitionId" : "1",
"Type" : "StringType",
"StringValue" : ""
} ]
}
No.
QuickBooks Online does not support this.
I have the following code in the custom ES 'where' wrapper method
filter: { term: params }
Then we have a sample ES document that contains:
"emails" => { "email" => "johndoe#email.com" }
It is returned when my search is:
query.where("emails.email" => "johndoe")
but I get no results when:
query.where("emails.email" => "johndoe#email.com")
It seems like I have to escape at symbol somehow when using ES gem?
It's probably because your field is analyzed using the default standard analyzer and is thus tokenized at the # sign.
You can see what ES has indexed by running the command below:
curl -XGET 'localhost:9200/_analyze?analyzer=standard&pretty' -d 'johndoe#email.com'
And the result is
{
"tokens" : [ {
"token" : "johndoe",
"start_offset" : 0,
"end_offset" : 7,
"type" : "<ALPHANUM>",
"position" : 1
}, {
"token" : "email.com",
"start_offset" : 8,
"end_offset" : 17,
"type" : "<ALPHANUM>",
"position" : 2
} ]
}
As you can see, your email field has been tokenized as two different tokens and that's probably why searching for johndoe works, while searching for the full email address doesn't.
There are a few ways out from here, but one way that would work is to create your own analyzer based on a pattern_capture token filter and use it as index_analyzer for your emails.email field.
{
"settings" : {
"analysis" : {
"filter" : {
"email" : {
"type" : "pattern_capture",
"preserve_original" : 1,
"patterns" : [ "([^#]+)", "(\\p{L}+)", "(\\d+)", "#(.+)" ]
}
},
"analyzer" : {
"email" : {
"tokenizer" : "uax_url_email",
"filter" : [ "email", "lowercase", "unique" ]
}
}
}
},
"mappings": {
"emails": {
"properties": {
"email": {
"type": "string",
"analyzer": "email" <-- use the analyzer here
}
}
}
}
}
At indexing time, that analyzer will produce all of the following tokens, which will allow you to search for any parts of your email address:
johndoe#email.com
johndoe
email.com
email
com