I have a horizontal scroll view with a LazyHStack. How do I size the scroll view to automatically fit the content inside?
By default, ScrollView takes up all the vertical space possible.
struct ContentView: View {
var numbers = 1...100
var body: some View {
ScrollView(.horizontal) {
LazyHStack {
ForEach(numbers, id: \.self) {
Text("\($0)")
.font(.largeTitle)
}
}
}
}
}
This code can be MUCH better
I have show it as BASE for your final solution
But it works
struct ContentView1111: View {
var numbers = 1...100
var body: some View {
VStack {
FittedScrollView(){
AnyView(
LazyHStack {
ForEach(numbers, id: \.self) {
Text("\($0)")
.font(.largeTitle)
}
}
)
}
// you can see it on screenshot - scrollView size
.background(Color.purple)
Spacer()
}
// you can see it on screenshot - other background
.background(Color.green)
}
}
struct HeightPreferenceKey: PreferenceKey {
typealias Value = CGFloat
static var defaultValue: CGFloat = 40
static func reduce(value: inout CGFloat, nextValue: () -> CGFloat) {
value = nextValue()
}
}
struct FittedScrollView: View {
var content: () -> AnyView
#State private var contentHeight: CGFloat = 40
var body: some View {
VStack {
ScrollView(.horizontal) {
content()
.overlay(
GeometryReader { geo in
Color.clear
.preference(key: HeightPreferenceKey.self, value: geo.size.height)
})
}
.frame(height: contentHeight)
}
.onPreferenceChange(HeightPreferenceKey.self) {
contentHeight = $0
}
}
}
I'm making a simple task app and using ForEach to populate task rows with the task information from my model. I need a way to animate my task view to open up and reveal some description text and two buttons. I want to turn from A into B on tap, and then back again on tap:
Design Image
I've tried a couple things. I successfully got a proof-of-concept rectangle animating in a test project, but there are issues. The rectangle shrinks and grows from the centre point, vs. from the bottom only. When I place text inside it, the text doesn't get hidden and it looks really bad.
struct ContentView: View {
#State var animate = false
var animation: Animation = .spring()
var body: some View {
VStack {
Rectangle()
.frame(width: 200, height: animate ? 60 : 300)
.foregroundColor(.blue)
.onTapGesture {
withAnimation(animation) {
animate.toggle()
}
}
}
}
In my main app, I was able to replace my first task view (closed) with another view that's open. This works but it looks bad and it's not really doing what I want. It's effectively replacing the view with another one using a fade animation.
ForEach(taskArrayHigh) { task in
if animate == false {
TaskView(taskTitle: task.title, category: task.category?.rawValue ?? "", complete: task.complete?.rawValue ?? "", priorityColor: Color("HighPriority"), task: task, activeDate: activeDate)
.padding(.top, 10)
.padding(.horizontal)
.onTapGesture {
withAnimation(.easeIn) {
animate.toggle()
}
}
.transition(.move(edge: .bottom))
} else if animate == true {
TaskViewOpen(task: "Grocery Shopping", category: "Home", remaining: 204, completed: 4)
.padding(.top, 10)
.padding(.horizontal)
.onTapGesture {
withAnimation(.easeIn) {
animate.toggle()
}
}
}
Is there a way to animate my original closed view to open up and reveal the description text and buttons?
You are on the right track with your .transition line you have, but you want to make sure that the container stays the same and the contents change -- right now, you're replacing the entire view.
Here's a simple example illustrating the concept:
struct ContentView: View {
#State var isExpanded = false
var body: some View {
VStack {
Text("Headline")
if isExpanded {
Text("More Info")
Text("And more")
}
}
.padding()
.frame(maxWidth: .infinity)
.transition(.move(edge: .bottom))
.background(Color.gray.cornerRadius(10.0))
.onTapGesture {
withAnimation {
isExpanded.toggle()
}
}
}
}
Since you're using it inside a ForEach, you'll probably want to abstract this into its own component, as it'll need its own #State to keep track of the expanded state as I've shown here.
Update, based on comments:
Example of using a PreferenceKey to get the height of the expandable view so that the frame can be animated and nothing fades in and out:
struct ContentView: View {
#State var isExpanded = false
#State var subviewHeight : CGFloat = 0
var body: some View {
VStack {
Text("Headline")
VStack {
Text("More Info")
Text("And more")
Text("And more")
Text("And more")
Text("And more")
Text("And more")
}
}
.background(GeometryReader {
Color.clear.preference(key: ViewHeightKey.self,
value: $0.frame(in: .local).size.height)
})
.onPreferenceChange(ViewHeightKey.self) { subviewHeight = $0 }
.frame(height: isExpanded ? subviewHeight : 50, alignment: .top)
.padding()
.clipped()
.frame(maxWidth: .infinity)
.transition(.move(edge: .bottom))
.background(Color.gray.cornerRadius(10.0))
.onTapGesture {
withAnimation(.easeIn(duration: 2.0)) {
isExpanded.toggle()
}
}
}
}
struct ViewHeightKey: PreferenceKey {
static var defaultValue: CGFloat { 0 }
static func reduce(value: inout Value, nextValue: () -> Value) {
value = value + nextValue()
}
}
Using Swift 5 you can use withAnimation and have the view hidden based on state.
ExpandViewer
Has a button to show and hide the inner view
Takes in a content view
struct ExpandViewer <Content: View>: View {
#State private var isExpanded = false
#ViewBuilder let expandableView : Content
var body: some View {
VStack {
Button(action: {
withAnimation(.easeIn(duration: 0.5)) {
self.isExpanded.toggle()
}
}){
Text(self.isExpanded ? "Hide" : "View")
.foregroundColor(.white)
.frame(maxWidth: .infinity, minHeight: 40, alignment: .center)
.background(.blue)
.cornerRadius(5.0)
}
if self.isExpanded {
self.expandableView
}
}
}
}
Using the viewer
ExpandViewer {
Text("Hidden Text")
Text("Hidden Text")
}
I have a header that is fixed in place using an offset relative to the scroll position. Strangely enough though, when the contents of the scroll view has a dynamic opacity to the buttons, the offset is very jumpy:
This is the scroll view code, the HeaderView is "fixed" in place by pinning the offset to the scroll view's offset. The opacity seems to be causing the performance issue is on the MyButtonStyle style on the last line of code:
struct ContentView: View {
#State private var isPresented = false
#State private var offsetY: CGFloat = 0
#State private var headerHeight: CGFloat = 200
var body: some View {
GeometryReader { screenGeometry in
ZStack {
Color(.label)
.ignoresSafeArea()
ScrollView {
VStack(spacing: 0.0) {
Color.clear
.frame(height: headerHeight)
.overlay(
HeaderView(isPresented: $isPresented)
.offset(y: offsetY != 0 ? headerHeight + screenGeometry.safeAreaInsets.top - offsetY : 0)
)
VStack(spacing: 16) {
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
ForEach(0...10, id: \.self) { index in
Button("Button \(index)") {}
.buttonStyle(MyButtonStyle(icon: Image(systemName: "alarm")))
}
}
Spacer()
}
.frame(maxWidth: .infinity, minHeight: screenGeometry.size.height)
.padding()
.background(
GeometryReader { geometry in
Color.white
.cornerRadius(32)
.onChange(of: geometry.frame(in: .global).minY) { newValue in
offsetY = newValue
}
}
)
}
}
}
.alert(isPresented: $isPresented) { Alert(title: Text("Button tapped")) }
}
}
}
struct HeaderView: View {
#Binding var isPresented: Bool
var body: some View {
VStack {
Image(systemName: "bell")
.resizable()
.frame(width: 100, height: 100)
.foregroundColor(Color(.systemBackground))
Button(action: { isPresented = false }) {
Text("Press")
.padding()
.frame(maxWidth: .infinity)
.background(Color.blue)
.foregroundColor(.white)
.cornerRadius(16)
}
}
.padding()
}
}
struct MyButtonStyle: ButtonStyle {
let icon: Image
func makeBody(configuration: Configuration) -> some View {
Content(
configuration: configuration,
icon: icon
)
}
struct Content: View {
let configuration: Configuration
let icon: Image
var body: some View {
HStack(spacing: 18) {
Label(
title: { configuration.label },
icon: { icon.padding(.trailing, 8) }
)
Spacer()
Image(systemName: "chevron.right")
.accessibilityHidden(true)
}
.padding(18)
.foregroundColor(.white)
.background(Color.green)
.cornerRadius(8)
.opacity(configuration.isPressed ? 0.5 : 1) // <-- Comment this out and jumpiness goes away!!
}
}
}
Is there a performance improvement that can be done to use the opacity on the button press and make the jumpiness go away? Or a different way to approach this sticky offset because not sure if this is actually the source of the issue and I use opacity in a lot of places in my app (not just button presses)? The purpose of doing it this way is so the button can be tapped instead of putting it in the background of the scroll view. Thanks for any help or insight!
I'm trying to build a view where the header is fixed at the top of the view and it changes it's size according to the scroll offset, when the offset is 0 the header is bigger and when the user scrolls the header becomes smaller
struct ContentView : View {
#State var largeHeader = true
var body: some View {
VStack {
Text("HEADER").padding(.vertical, largeHeader ? 30 : 10)
Divider()
ScrollView {
VStack {
Text("Content0")
.padding()
Text("Content1")
.padding()
Text("Content2")
.padding()
}
.background(GeometryReader { geometryProxy -> Color in
DispatchQueue.main.async {
largeHeader = geometryProxy.frame(in: .named("myspace")).minY >= 0
}
return Color.clear
})
}
.coordinateSpace(name: "myspace")
}.animation(.default)
}
}
It works fine when the scroll content is longer, but when there is a little content, as in the code above I get this flickering (It's even worse on the device, but the gif quality is low)
Any idea how to fix it?
Looks like there is some interference going on.
I have found two workaround-solutions, it depends on what your desired effect is.
Solution 1
Idea: Using ZStack so that ScrollView and your header don't interfere.
struct ContentView: View {
#State var largeHeader = true
var body: some View {
ZStack {
ScrollView {
VStack {
ForEach(0..<3) { i in
Text("Content\(i)")
.padding()
}
}
.background(GeometryReader { geometryProxy -> Color in
DispatchQueue.main.async {
largeHeader = geometryProxy.frame(in: .named("1")).minY >= 0
}
return Color.clear
})
}
.coordinateSpace(name: "1")
.offset(y: largeHeader ? 100 : 60)
VStack {
VStack {
Spacer()
Text("HEADER")
.padding()
Divider()
}
.frame(maxWidth: .infinity)
.frame(height: largeHeader ? 140 : 100)
.background(Color.white)
Spacer()
}
.edgesIgnoringSafeArea(.all)
}
.animation(.default)
}
}
The header of this one would always change the height, no matter how large the content-height is.
Solution 2
Idea: Only change header height when there is enough content to scroll.
Solution:
Finding out the height of the scrollview-content.
struct ContentView: View {
#State var largeHeader = true
#State var scrollViewScrollable = false
var body: some View {
VStack {
Text("HEADER").padding(.vertical, largeHeader ? 30 : 10)
Divider()
ScrollView {
VStack {
ForEach(0..<3) { i in
Text("Content\(i)")
.padding()
}
}
.background(GeometryReader { geometryProxy -> Color in
if scrollViewScrollable {
DispatchQueue.main.async {
largeHeader = geometryProxy.frame(in: .named("1")).minY >= 0
}
}
return Color.clear
})
.background(
GeometryReader { proxy in
Color.clear.onAppear {
scrollViewScrollable = proxy.frame(in: .named("1")).size.height >= UIScreen.main.bounds.size.height - 100
}
}
)
}
.coordinateSpace(name: "1")
}
.animation(.default)
}
}
I have a simple list view that contains two rows.
Each row contains two text views. View one and View two.
I would like to align the last label (View two) in each row so that the name labels are leading aligned and keep being aligned regardless of font size.
The first label (View one) also needs to be leading aligned.
I've tried setting a min frame width on the first label (View One) but it doesn't work. It also seems impossible to set the min width and also to get a text view to be leading aligned in View One.
Any ideas? This is fairly straight forward in UIKit.
I've found a way to fix this that supports dynamic type and isn't hacky. The answer is using PreferenceKeys and GeometryReader!
The essence of this solution is that each number Text will have a width that it will be drawn with depending on its text size. GeometryReader can detect this width and then we can use PreferenceKey to bubble it up to the List itself, where the max width can be kept track of and then assigned to each number Text's frame width.
A PreferenceKey is a type you create with an associated type (can be any struct conforming to Equatable, this is where you store the data about the preference) that is attached to any View and when it is attached, it bubbles up through the view tree and can be listened to in an ancestor view by using .onPreferenceChange(PreferenceKeyType.self).
To start, we'll create our PreferenceKey type and the data it contains:
struct WidthPreferenceKey: PreferenceKey {
typealias Value = [WidthPreference]
static var defaultValue: [WidthPreference] = []
static func reduce(value: inout [WidthPreference], nextValue: () -> [WidthPreference]) {
value.append(contentsOf: nextValue())
}
}
struct WidthPreference: Equatable {
let width: CGFloat
}
Next, we'll create a View called WidthPreferenceSettingView that will be attached to the background of whatever we want to size (in this case, the number labels). This will take care of setting the preference which will pass up this number label's preferred width with PreferenceKeys.
struct WidthPreferenceSettingView: View {
var body: some View {
GeometryReader { geometry in
Rectangle()
.fill(Color.clear)
.preference(
key: WidthPreferenceKey.self,
value: [WidthPreference(width: geometry.frame(in: CoordinateSpace.global).width)]
)
}
}
}
Lastly, the list itself! We have an #State variable which is the width of the numbers "column" (not really a column in the sense that the numbers don't directly affect other numbers in code). Through .onPreferenceChange(WidthPreference.self) we listen to changes in the preference we created and store the max width in our width state. After all of the number labels have been drawn and their width read by the GeometryReader, the widths propagate back up and the max width is assigned by .frame(width: width)
struct ContentView: View {
#State private var width: CGFloat? = nil
var body: some View {
List {
HStack {
Text("1. ")
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
.lineLimit(1)
.background(WidthPreferenceSettingView())
Text("John Smith")
}
HStack {
Text("20. ")
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
.lineLimit(1)
.background(WidthPreferenceSettingView())
Text("Jane Done")
}
HStack {
Text("2000. ")
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
.lineLimit(1)
.background(WidthPreferenceSettingView())
Text("Jax Dax")
}
}.onPreferenceChange(WidthPreferenceKey.self) { preferences in
for p in preferences {
let oldWidth = self.width ?? CGFloat.zero
if p.width > oldWidth {
self.width = p.width
}
}
}
}
}
If you have multiple columns of data, one way to scale this is to make an enum of your columns or to index them, and the #State for width would become a dictionary where each key is a column and .onPreferenceChange compares against the key-value for the max width of a column.
To show results, this is what it looks like with larger text turned on, works like a charm :).
This article on PreferenceKey and inspecting the view tree helped tremendously: https://swiftui-lab.com/communicating-with-the-view-tree-part-1/
From iOS16 you can do:
struct ContentView: View {
var rowData: [RowData] = RowData.sample
var body: some View {
Grid(alignment: .leading) {
Text("Some sort of title")
ForEach(RowData.sample) { row in
GridRow {
Text(row.id)
Text(row.name)
}
}
}
.padding()
}
}
struct RowData: Identifiable {
var id: String
var name: String
static var sample: [Self] = [.init(id: "1", name: "Joe"), .init(id: "1000", name: "Diana")]
}
Previous answer
Here are three options to do it statically.
struct ContentView: View {
#State private var width: CGFloat? = 100
var body: some View {
List {
HStack {
Text("1. ")
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
.lineLimit(1)
.background(Color.blue)
// Option 1
Text("John Smith")
.multilineTextAlignment(.leading)
//.frame(minWidth: 0, maxWidth: .infinity, alignment: .leading)
.background(Color.green)
}
HStack {
Text("20. ")
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
.lineLimit(1)
.background(Color.blue)
// Option 2 (works mostly like option 1)
Text("Jane Done")
.background(Color.green)
Spacer()
}
HStack {
Text("2000. ")
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
.lineLimit(1)
.background(Color.blue)
// Option 3 - takes all the rest space to the right
Text("Jax Dax")
.frame(minWidth: 0, maxWidth: .infinity, alignment: .leading)
.background(Color.green)
}
}
}
}
Here is how it looks:
We may calculate the width based on the longenst entry as suggested in this answer.
There is couple of options to dynamically calculate width.
Option 1
import SwiftUI
import Combine
struct WidthGetter: View {
let widthChanged: PassthroughSubject<CGFloat, Never>
var body: some View {
GeometryReader { (g) -> Path in
print("width: \(g.size.width), height: \(g.size.height)")
self.widthChanged.send(g.frame(in: .global).width)
return Path() // could be some other dummy view
}
}
}
struct ContentView: View {
let event = PassthroughSubject<CGFloat, Never>()
#State private var width: CGFloat?
var body: some View {
List {
HStack {
Text("1. ")
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
.lineLimit(1)
.background(Color.blue)
.background(WidthGetter(widthChanged: event))
// Option 1
Text("John Smith")
.multilineTextAlignment(.leading)
//.frame(minWidth: 0, maxWidth: .infinity, alignment: .leading)
.background(Color.green)
}
HStack {
Text("20. ")
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
.lineLimit(1)
.background(Color.blue)
.background(WidthGetter(widthChanged: event))
// Option 2 (works mostly like option 1)
Text("Jane Done")
.background(Color.green)
Spacer()
}
HStack {
Text("2000. ")
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
.lineLimit(1)
.background(Color.blue)
.background(WidthGetter(widthChanged: event))
// Option 3 - takes all the rest space to the right
Text("Jax Dax")
.frame(minWidth: 0, maxWidth: .infinity, alignment: .leading)
.background(Color.green)
}
}.onReceive(event) { (w) in
print("event ", w)
if w > (self.width ?? .zero) {
self.width = w
}
}
}
}
Option 2
import SwiftUI
struct ContentView: View {
#State private var width: CGFloat?
var body: some View {
List {
HStack {
Text("1. ")
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
.lineLimit(1)
.background(Color.blue)
.alignmentGuide(.leading, computeValue: { dimension in
self.width = max(self.width ?? 0, dimension.width)
return dimension[.leading]
})
// Option 1
Text("John Smith")
.multilineTextAlignment(.leading)
//.frame(minWidth: 0, maxWidth: .infinity, alignment: .leading)
.background(Color.green)
}
HStack {
Text("20. ")
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
.lineLimit(1)
.background(Color.blue)
.alignmentGuide(.leading, computeValue: { dimension in
self.width = max(self.width ?? 0, dimension.width)
return dimension[.leading]
})
// Option 2 (works mostly like option 1)
Text("Jane Done")
.background(Color.green)
Spacer()
}
HStack {
Text("2000. ")
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
.lineLimit(1)
.background(Color.blue)
.alignmentGuide(.leading, computeValue: { dimension in
self.width = max(self.width ?? 0, dimension.width)
return dimension[.leading]
})
// Option 3 - takes all the rest space to the right
Text("Jax Dax")
.frame(minWidth: 0, maxWidth: .infinity, alignment: .leading)
.background(Color.green)
}
}
}
}
The result looks like this:
With Swift 5.2 and iOS 13, you can use PreferenceKey protocol, preference(key:value:) method and onPreferenceChange(_:perform:) method to solve this problem.
You can implement the code for the View proposed by OP in 3 major steps, as shown below.
#1. Initial implementation
import SwiftUI
struct ContentView: View {
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List {
HStack {
Text("5.")
Text("John Smith")
}
HStack {
Text("20.")
Text("Jane Doe")
}
}
.listStyle(GroupedListStyle())
.navigationBarTitle("Challenge")
}
}
}
#2. Intermediate implementation (set equal width)
The idea here is to collect all the widths for the Texts that represent a rank and assign the widest among them to the width property of ContentView.
import SwiftUI
struct WidthPreferenceKey: PreferenceKey {
static var defaultValue: [CGFloat] = []
static func reduce(value: inout [CGFloat], nextValue: () -> [CGFloat]) {
value.append(contentsOf: nextValue())
}
}
struct ContentView: View {
#State private var width: CGFloat? = nil
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List {
HStack {
Text("5.")
.overlay(
GeometryReader { proxy in
Color.clear
.preference(
key: WidthPreferenceKey.self,
value: [proxy.size.width]
)
}
)
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
Text("John Smith")
}
HStack {
Text("20.")
.overlay(
GeometryReader { proxy in
Color.clear
.preference(
key: WidthPreferenceKey.self,
value: [proxy.size.width]
)
}
)
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
Text("Jane Doe")
}
}
.onPreferenceChange(WidthPreferenceKey.self) { widths in
if let width = widths.max() {
self.width = width
}
}
.listStyle(GroupedListStyle())
.navigationBarTitle("Challenge")
}
}
}
#3. Final implementation (with some refactoring)
To make our code reusable, we can refactor our preference logic into a ViewModifier.
import SwiftUI
struct WidthPreferenceKey: PreferenceKey {
static var defaultValue: [CGFloat] = []
static func reduce(value: inout [CGFloat], nextValue: () -> [CGFloat]) {
value.append(contentsOf: nextValue())
}
}
struct EqualWidth: ViewModifier {
func body(content: Content) -> some View {
content
.overlay(
GeometryReader { proxy in
Color.clear
.preference(
key: WidthPreferenceKey.self,
value: [proxy.size.width]
)
}
)
}
}
extension View {
func equalWidth() -> some View {
modifier(EqualWidth())
}
}
struct ContentView: View {
#State private var width: CGFloat? = nil
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List {
HStack {
Text("5.")
.equalWidth()
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
Text("John Smith")
}
HStack {
Text("20.")
.equalWidth()
.frame(width: width, alignment: .leading)
Text("Jane Doe")
}
}
.onPreferenceChange(WidthPreferenceKey.self) { widths in
if let width = widths.max() {
self.width = width
}
}
.listStyle(GroupedListStyle())
.navigationBarTitle("Challenge")
}
}
}
The result looks like this:
I just had to deal with this. The solutions that rely on a fixed width frame won't work for dynamic type, so I couldn't use them. The way I got around it was by putting the flexible item (the left number in this case) in a ZStack with a placeholder containing the widest allowable content, and then setting the placeholder's opacity to 0:
ZStack {
Text("9999")
.opacity(0)
.accessibility(visibility: .hidden)
Text(id)
}
It's pretty hacky, but at least it supports dynamic type 🤷♂️
Full example below! 📜
import SwiftUI
struct Person: Identifiable {
var name: String
var id: Int
}
struct IDBadge : View {
var id: Int
var body: some View {
ZStack(alignment: .trailing) {
Text("9999.") // The maximum width dummy value
.font(.headline)
.opacity(0)
.accessibility(visibility: .hidden)
Text(String(id) + ".")
.font(.headline)
}
}
}
struct ContentView : View {
var people: [Person]
var body: some View {
List(people) { person in
HStack(alignment: .top) {
IDBadge(id: person.id)
Text(person.name)
.lineLimit(nil)
}
}
}
}
#if DEBUG
struct ContentView_Previews : PreviewProvider {
static let people = [Person(name: "John Doe", id: 1), Person(name: "Alexander Jones", id: 2000), Person(name: "Tom Lee", id: 45)]
static var previews: some View {
Group {
ContentView(people: people)
.previewLayout(.fixed(width: 320.0, height: 150.0))
ContentView(people: people)
.environment(\.sizeCategory, .accessibilityMedium)
.previewLayout(.fixed(width: 320.0, height: 200.0))
}
}
}
#endif
You can just have your two Texts and then a Spacer in an HStack. The Spacer will push your Texts to the left, and everything will self-adjust if either Texts change size due to the length of their content:
HStack {
Text("1.")
Text("John Doe")
Spacer()
}
.padding()
The Texts are technically center-aligned, but since the views automatically resize and only take up as much space as the text inside of it (since we did not explicitly set a frame size), and are pushed to the left by the Spacer, they appear left-aligned. The benefit of this over setting a fixed width is that you don't have to worry about text being truncated.
Also, I added padding to the HStack to make it look nicer, but if you want to adjust how close the Texts are to each other, you can manually set the padding on any of its sides. (You can even set negative padding to push items closer to each other than their natural spacing).
Edit
Didn't realize OP needed the second Text to be vertically aligned as well. I have a way to do it, but its "hacky" and wouldn't work for larger font sizes without more work:
These are the data objects:
class Person {
var name: String
var id: Int
init(name: String, id: Int) {
self.name = name
self.id = id
}
}
class People {
var people: [Person]
init(people: [Person]) {
self.people = people
}
func maxIDDigits() -> Int {
let maxPerson = people.max { (p1, p2) -> Bool in
p1.id < p2.id
}
print(maxPerson!.id)
let digits = log10(Float(maxPerson!.id)) + 1
return Int(digits)
}
func minTextWidth(fontSize: Int) -> Length {
print(maxIDDigits())
print(maxIDDigits() * 30)
return Length(maxIDDigits() * fontSize)
}
}
This is the View:
var people = People(people: [Person(name: "John Doe", id: 1), Person(name: "Alexander Jones", id: 2000), Person(name: "Tom Lee", id: 45)])
var body: some View {
List {
ForEach(people.people.identified(by: \.id)) { person in
HStack {
Text("\(person.id).")
.frame(minWidth: self.people.minTextWidth(fontSize: 12), alignment: .leading)
Text("\(person.name)")
}
}
}
}
To make it work for multiple font sizes, you would have to get the font size and pass it into the minTextWidth(fontSize:).
Again, I'd like to emphasize that this is "hacky" and probably goes against SwiftUI principles, but I could not find a built in way to do the layout you asked for (probably because the Texts in different rows do not interact with each other, so they have no way of knowing how to stay vertically aligned with each other).
Edit 2
The above code generates this:
You can set a fixed width to a number Text view. It makes this Text component with a fixed size.
HStack {
Text(item.number)
.multilineTextAlignment(.leading)
.frame(width: 30)
Text(item.name)
}
The drawback of this solution is that, if you will have a longer text there, it will be wrapped and ended with "...", but in that case I think you can roughly estimate which width will be enough.
If 1 line limit is ok with you:
Group {
HStack {
VStack(alignment: .trailing) {
Text("Vehicle:")
Text("Lot:")
Text("Zone:")
Text("Location:")
Text("Price:")
}
VStack(alignment: .leading) {
Text("vehicle")
Text("lot")
Text("zone")
Text("location")
Text("price")
}
}
.lineLimit(1)
.font(.footnote)
.foregroundColor(.secondary)
}
.frame(maxWidth: .infinity)
HStack {
HStack {
Spacer()
Text("5.")
}
.frame(width: 40)
Text("Jon Smith")
}
But this will only work with fix width.
.frame(minWidth: 40) will fill the entire View because of Space()
.multilineTextAlignment(.leading) don't have any effect in my tests.
After trying to get this to work for a full day I came up with this solution:
EDIT: Link to Swift Package
import SwiftUI
fileprivate extension Color {
func exec(block: #escaping ()->Void) -> Self {
block()
return self
}
}
fileprivate class Deiniter {
let block: ()->Void
init(block: #escaping ()->Void) {
self.block = block
}
deinit {
block()
}
}
struct SameWidthContainer<Content: View>: View {
private var id: UUID
private let deiniter: Deiniter
#ObservedObject private var group: WidthGroup
private var content: () -> Content
init(group: WidthGroup, content: #escaping ()-> Content) {
self.group = group
self.content = content
let id = UUID()
self.id = id
WidthGroup.widths[group.id]?[id] = 100.0
self.deiniter = Deiniter() {
WidthGroup.widths[group.id]?.removeValue(forKey: id)
}
}
var body: some View {
ZStack(alignment: .leading) {
Rectangle()
.frame(width: self.group.width, height: 1)
.foregroundColor(.clear)
content()
.overlay(
GeometryReader { proxy in
Color.clear
.exec {
WidthGroup.widths[self.group.id]?[self.id] = proxy.size.width
let newWidth = WidthGroup.widths[group.id]?.values.max() ?? 0
if newWidth != self.group.width {
self.group.width = newWidth
}
}
}
)
}
}
}
class WidthGroup: ObservableObject {
static var widths: [UUID: [UUID: CGFloat]] = [:]
#Published var width: CGFloat = 0.0
let id: UUID
init() {
let id = UUID()
self.id = id
WidthGroup.widths[id] = [:]
}
deinit {
WidthGroup.widths.removeValue(forKey: id)
}
}
struct SameWidthText_Previews: PreviewProvider {
private static let GROUP = WidthGroup()
static var previews: some View {
Group {
SameWidthContainer(group: Self.GROUP) {
Text("One")
}
SameWidthContainer(group: Self.GROUP) {
Text("Two")
}
SameWidthContainer(group: Self.GROUP) {
Text("Three")
}
}
}
}
It is then used like this:
struct SomeView: View {
#State private var group1 = WidthGroup()
#State private var group2 = WidthGroup()
var body: some View {
VStack() {
ForEach(9..<12) { index in
HStack {
SameWidthContainer(group: group1) {
Text("All these will have same width in group 1 \(index)")
}
Text("Some other text")
SameWidthContainer(group: group2) {
Text("All these will have same width in group 2 \(index)")
}
}
}
}
}
}
If one of the views grows or shrinks all the views in the same group will grow/shrink with it. I just got it to work so I haven't tried it that much.
It's a bit of a hack but, hey, it doesn't seem to be another way than hacking.
Xcode 12.5
If you know the amount you want to offset the second view by, then you can place both views in a leading aligned ZStack and use the .padding(.horizontal, amount) modifier on the second view to offset it.
var body: some View {
NavigationView {
List {
ForEach(persons) { person in
ZStack(alignment: .leading) {
Text(person.number)
Text(person.name)
.padding(.horizontal, 30)
}
}
}
.navigationTitle("Challenge")
}
}
I think the correct way to do this would be using HorizontalAlignment. Something like:
extension HorizontalAlignment {
private enum LeadingName : AlignmentID {
static func defaultValue(in d: ViewDimensions) -> Length { d[.leading] }
}
static let leadingName = HorizontalAlignment(LeadingName.self)
}
List (people.identified(by: \.id)) {person in
HStack {
Text("\(person.id)")
Text("\(person.name)").alignmentGuide(.leadingName) {d in d[.leading]}
}
}
But I can't get it to work.
I can't find any examples of this with a List. It seems that List doesn't support alignment (yet?)
I can sort of get it to work with a VStack, and hard coded values like:
VStack (alignment: .leadingName ) {
HStack {
Text("1.")
Text("John Doe").alignmentGuide(.leadingName) {d in d[.leading]}
Spacer()
}
HStack {
Text("2000.")
Text("Alexander Jones").alignmentGuide(.leadingName) {d in d[.leading]}
Spacer()
}
HStack {
Text("45.")
Text("Tom Lee").alignmentGuide(.leadingName) {d in d[.leading]}
Spacer()
}
}
I'm hoping this will be fixed in a later beta...