I have a process that currently uses Dapper to return some data in a DataReader that then gets converted to a DataTable which then gets converted to json and returned to the caller. The schema can change, so I have absolutely zero desire to stuff the data into a strongly typed object that I would just have to constantly update for no good reason since it's never used server side. The data is just pulled from the server and then returned to the client which is a web browser that needs json to work with.
My problem is that the project I'm working in uses Entity Framework for everything else and my boss would prefer not to add another dependency (Dapper) to the project. Unless there is a way to get the DataReader or otherwise get a DataTable w/o having a strongly typed object for EF to work with, my next conversation will have to be about whether it's okay for me to just get the data the traditional way with just ADO.net. I assume that's what I will end up having to do, but before I have that conversation I just wanted to verify for certain whether there is a way to get the DataReader or a DataTable with EF because if there is then that's the way I should do it.
Note we're using sql server 2014, so getting a scalar value with for json path is not an option. :(
Related
My application deserializes XML that is stored in a CLOB column in Oracle database to dynamically create forms. This approach allows relatively easy update deployment, but is too slow when a user connects through a VPN using e.g. 3G network.
I wonder is there a way to store those objects (forms) on the users's file system so that no parsing is needed?
I don't have any code to show but I hope this question is scoped narrowly enough to be acceptable.
My suggestion:
Make sure your form(s) is saved to the database in binary form, not as a text representation.
In your client app, request the CLOB column data from the DB and save it to a TMemoryStream. Then, you can instantiate the form by loading it from the TMemoryStream and it doesn't need to go near the file system on the client side. That way, no parsing of the Form data from the db is necessary.
The accepted answer to this q shows how to read a form from a memory stream - see the call to MemStream.ReadComponent et seq. Obviously, using tje method in that q, the CLOB data should have been created using the memorystream steps of its SaveComponentToFile.
I am new to Dynamics FnO, and recently followed the articles to access data through oData, and was successful.
What I see missing in the data objects that I normally receive in integrations out of the Microsoft World is the created/updated timestamps.
I am trying to put a synchronous data flow from FnO to my NodeJs application, so that my app keeps polling data from FnO whenever there is a change. This can be achieved easily if there were timestamps with the data that flows in.
Is there a way to setup those timestamps somewhere?
You have to make sure that the underlying table that you are querying has the fields added on it, and also that the data entity you are accessing through odata has the fields setup up on it as well.
Make sure this is setup on the table:
And then you have to drag and drop the field(s) from the datasource field list to the exposed field list in the data entity:
After this, you will have these fields
Currently we are using Breeze.js and Angular to develop our applications. Due to some persistent legacy issues, we have two databases ('Kenya' and 'Rwanda') that cannot be merged at this time, but have the same schema and metadata. Most of the time, the client knows which database to hit and passes the request through the .withParameters() function or the .saveOptions() function. Sometimes we want to request the same query from both databases (for example, if we are requesting a list of all available countries), and we use a EntityManager wrapper on the client to manage this and request the same query from each database. This is implemented through a custom EFContextProvider which uses the data returned to determine the appropriate database and creates the appropriate context in CreateContext().
To further complicate things, in some instances one or the other database won't exist (these are local deployments created through filtered replication), but the client won't know this. Therefore, when querying for a list of all countries, it issues two requests and one will cause failures because the context cannot be instantiated properly.
This is easy enough to detect on the Server. What I would like to do is to detect whether the requested context is available and, if not, return a 200 response and an empty set.
I can detect this in the Breeze DBContextProvider CreateContext() method, but cannot figure out how to cause the request to fallback gracefully to a empty-set response.
Thanks
Not exactly what I was looking for, but it probably makes more sense since most of the work is being done on the client-side:
Instead of trying to change the controller, I added a getAvailableDatabases to the C# controller actions and use that to determine which of the databases I will query from the client.
I'm supposed to make an old sqlite database editable trough a Sketchup Plugin in its WebDialog. Sketchups Ruby is not able to install the sqlite3 gem and since I already need to display the table in a WebDialog, I opted for a micro service with the help of Nancy. The existing Plugin already uses the dhtmlxSuite and its Grid Component is exactly what I need. They even offer a Connector that can send requests based on the actions of the user in the grid.
They also offer a connector for the server side, but that too does not work with sqlite. I already managed to connect to my database, used Dapper to bin the result of an SQL query to an object and return that data with a manually crafted JSON object. Very hacky, but it populates the data successful.
Now the client-Connector sends data manipulated by the user (delete and insert is forbidden) back with an url encoded POST request that looks quite weird:
4_gr_id=4&4_c0=0701.041&4_c1=Diagonale%20f%3Fr%202.07%20X%201.50%20m&4_c2=AR&4_c3=8.3&4_c4=380&4_c5=38.53&4_c6=0&4_c7=0&4_!nativeeditor_status=updated&ids=4
I'm not sure exactly why the hell they would use the row index inside the key for the key-value pairs, but this just makes my life that much harder. The only thing that comes to my mind is extracting the data I'm interested in with a regex, but that sounds even worse than what I did before.
Any suggestions for me how I could map that POST request to something usable?
i would like to set an entity sent from the server to "added". it looks like entityaspect has methods setdeleted, setmodified, etc... but i can't seem to find one called setadded... what is the cleanest way to set an entity to "added"? i was thinking perhaps i would need to detach and then attach as "added". i have a server method called "newdeal" which creates a new entity ready for data entry... this method has business logic which i would prefer to keep on the server... when it gets to the client the entity is marked as "unmodified" which makes sense... but i would then like to change it to "added"...
thank you
#giancarloa, I'm assuming that, by the time the entity is sent from server to client, it has been persisted in the database. If that's the case, it wouldn't make sense to have its entityState set to Added as it would cause a duplicate error. If that's not how it works, please explain in detail what you are doing as I'm trying to get an idea of all the steps you're taking.
I'm also confused as to why create an entity in the server, send it to the client, update it, and then send it back to the server to save it in the DB - this just appear to cause more traffic and possibly reduce performance. Also, what it the user decides not to save? - then the work in the server would've been wasted.
Why not create the entity in the client and if it turns out to be saved, then the business logic would kick in the server during the beforeSaveEntity/beforeSaveEntities?
I had a similar problem. The breeze expect that entities returned from the server already exists in your database. This is not the case if your server fetched the entities from some other sources (not the database), returned them to client and then user can decide to the client if those entities should really be inserted in the database.
As you indicated, what you must do is skip the code that adds the entities into client's entity manager. later, you can add the detached entities to Entitymanager.
See the following answer for more details.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/18596070/174638