It's been weeks since I published my MVC application to my local IIS as testing environment. So happens that after the publish it gives the 403.14 Forbidden Error
I tried enabling the directory browsing but then it just shows a list of the files from the server.
This is the current features that I have turned on:
This is the reference/resources used by the project:
Is there anything that I have completely forgot to install? This project was handed to me earlier this year and I dont have any idea on how to publish an mvc application.
Hoping that you could give me light to this question.
Thank you all!
Related
This is my first ASP.NET MVC project. It had been speedy development. However, when I deploy to the server, I just can't get the site to see the controller.
I did a test project. I just create an ASP.NET MVC project with no changes; published on to local IIS and it works. Same project on the server, didn't work. I have an index.html on the root to see if the site is up. Indeed, it's up. I can see index.html. When I go www.test.com/home/index (which is my test site), I get HTTP error 404.0 - not found. The resource you are looking for has been removed had it's name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.
bin folder does have project dll.
App_start/routeconfig.cs default url is point to home controller and the index action.
Project is straight out of the box. It should work.
Can someone point me in the right direction?
Sincerely appreciated.
In case someone is having the same issue.
There are so many reasons for error 404.
In my case, the network guy didn't install ASP.net framework. See there's a fine line between developer and network guy.
It's not exactly what I was searching for, but it solved my problem.
aspnet_regiis.exe -ir does not work on windows 8
I'm deploying a new Umbraco 6 installation to Azure, and I've run into a problem I can't seem to diagnose.
Here are the steps I took to get the site deployed:
Created new MVC 4 project in VS2012
Installed UmbracoCms 6.0.0 via NuGet
Tested locally: SUCCESS
Set up correct connection string for Azure in Web.config (via transform)
Deployed to Azure using Web Deploy
Unfortunately, when I navigated to the Azure instance, I get a blank page with "The service is unavailable." I enabled detailed logging in Azure, and looked at the log files. There wasn't much that suggested a solution to me. This is what the detailed error says:
Module: UmbracoModule
Notification: ResolveRequestCache
Handler: PageHandlerFactory-Integrated-4.0
Error Code: 0x00000000
I'm out of ideas at this point...any ideas?
I've just gone through the steps of what you describe. I created a MVC4 project and downloaded Umbraco 6 via Nuget. What I did notice was that I had to 'include' a fair number of file into the project structure in the VS solution explorer.
I ran the website locally and ran an install just using SQL CE.
I created a website on Azure and I downloaded the .PublishSettings file and imported this into the Web Deploy options in VS. I then published the site 'as is' just to see what happened. I didn't expect the database to work but I just wanted to make sure that the application ran ok and I could at least access the Umbraco login screen.
When I accessed the site, it worked as expected and I could access the login screen at /umbraco/
Given the problems you are having, although this sounds simple, did you 'include' all the files in the solution explorer before deploying?
If you are still having issues, I would doing what I have done and just setting up another very simple site to test your deployment process. I have to be honest, I was surprised how easy it is.
I've just been through the same steps with the simple blog and it was quite hard. I didn't include anything into Visual Studio (except it's 2010 and I downloaded the publish profile) and the site ran fine locally.
On uploading Umbraco 6 to azure I got 'Could not load file or assembly MySql.Data, ' etc. .net error. Of course, it was there.
On repeating my deployment steps, swapping between Visual Studio, Web Matrix and Sql Azure Migration Wizard, checking it was release config on build etc. (not that it should need building) I got various 'The page cannot be displayed because an internal server error has occurred' on a blank white screen, and 'Could not load My.Sql' errors.
Coming back to it the next day, I deployed again, and my user had lost its role membership in the database. I ran the EXEC sp_addrolemembers again, and lo, the site now works. I wish I could be more specific on what went wrong and what got fixed, but it's all a bit voodoo.
I second what Digby said - make sure all your includes are, well, included and keep on deploying. I think azure is having a bit of a do lately, there was an outage last week on 23rd Feb.
I want to get away from developing in PHP but doing that is proving to be a massive headache.
I am trying to set up a website with MVC 4, ASP.NET 4.0, on Win7 Professional (64-bit). The website is just the basic site that is set up with Visual Web Developer 2010 Express selecting New Project > C# > Website > ASP.NET MVC 4 Application.
After setting up the application in IIS7.5 I am getting an HTTP Error 403.14 - Forbidden. I've done a ton of research and tried multiple different suggestions on how to solve the problem but NOTHING is working. Here are some things I tried:
Install/Register v4 of ASP.NET. This has been the most annoying
thing because everyone else's issue is fixed when they do this but
mine is not.
Changing the application pool settings:
Set to classic/integrated mode
Change the user/permissions used by the application pool
Made sure 32-bit applications were enabled
Added security permissions to folders related to the website (on multiple accounts)
I can get a regular html document to show up if I add it to the websites root directory. It seems that the MVC stack is not being called at all. The server wants to display the directory, which I can enable/disable, but the website is not being displayed.
Please can I have more potential fixes before I resort to my last desperate act? A baseball bat.
p.s. I'm more than willing to do a skype conversation or a share screen kind of thing if someone wants to dig in deep. I am beyond frustrated with this.
So it seems, in my indefinite well of stupidity, I was pointing the webserver to the incorrect folder. I needed to point the webserver to the folder with actual files of the application rather than the folder containing the .SLN file. Sorry to waste your time!
try running the aspnet_regiis
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/k6h9cz8h.aspx
open the command line in %windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319 and run
aspnet_regiis -ir
other possible solutions:
quit skype, or any other similar applications
I've a site that I'd like to publish to a co-located live server. I'm finding this simple task quite hard.
My problems begin with the Web Deploy tool (1.1) giving me a 401 Unauthorized as the adminstrator because port :8172 comes up in the errors and this port is blocked - but the documentation says "The default ListenURL is http://+:80/MsDeployAgentService"!
I'm loathe to open another port and I've little patience these days so I thought bu66er it, I'll create a Web Deploy package and import it into IIS on the server over RDP.
I notice first that Visual Studio doesn't use a dialog box to gather settings, or use my Publish profiles but seems to use a tab in the project properties, although I think these are ignored when importing the package anyway?
I'm now sitting in the import wizard with Application Path and Connection String. I've cleared the conn string as I think this is for some ASP stuff I don't use but when I enter nothing in the Application Path, the wizard barks at me saying that basically I'm a weirdo because most people publish to folders beneath the root site.
Now, I want my site to be site.com/Home/About and not site.com/subfolder/Home/About and I think being an MVC routed site that a subfolder will introduce other headaches. Should I go ahead and use the root?
Finally, I also want to publish a web service to www.site.com/services/soap which I think IIS can handle.
While typing this question, Amazon have delivered my IIS 7 Resource Kit, and I've been scouring the internet but actually I'm getting more confused.
Comment here seems to show consensus opinion that Publish isn't for production sites and that real men roll their own.
ASP.NET website 'Publish' vs Web Deployment Project
...I guess this was pre- Web Deployment Tool era?
I'm going to experiment on a spare box for now but any assistance is welcome.
Luke
UPDATE
The site was imported (to the root) manually with Web Deploy and it worked. If you get the error "There is a duplicate 'system.web.extensions/scripting/scriptResourceHandler' " its because your app pool is 4.0 and should be 2.0.
If you are using VS 2010, may I recommend Scott Hanselman's Web Debloyment Made Awesome?
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/WebDeploymentMadeAwesomeIfYoureUsingXCopyYoureDoingItWrong.aspx
Even if you are using VS2008, there are nice concepts there that will probably help.
I've experienced the same frustration and trouble with this as well. Coming from a Java web background where we can package everything as a single WAR and toss it on the server, the deployment process with ASP.NET seems archaic.
I currently have a python script that uses FTP to transfer the needed files to my test instance on the remote server. I have another python script that transfers those files to my live site. These scripts are smart enough to take care of differences between some of the configuration files etc..
I've found it much easier than trying to setup permissions or using the Microsoft deploy tools.
Hi you can use filezilla software to upload
I have reading posts all night looking for an answer to my issue and haven't found anything that works for me yet. I am sure there is a simple way to do this but I haven't been able to discover it yet.
Details:
MVC 2 Preview
Asp.net 3.5 sp1 framework
VS 2008 C# web application
Windows Server 2008
IIS 7
I have the application running well through VS 2008 no problem. When I hit the play to run in debug mode it starts the ASP.NET Development Server the application loads fine and works as expected, great!
When I publish the application locally or to my web server both on IIS 7 the application doesn't run correctly. Some of the icons are missing and the google maps map is missing. When I view the source it appears correct at first glance, but I can see the paths to the images are looking for the MVC paths and it isn't finding them. It appears the app is running as a regular asp.net app and not an mvc app, maybe?
I also tried to just hit the full source code locally on localhost and the exact same issue is present.
So, I guess my question is how do I deploy a MVC application to run the same in IIS as it does through the development server.
PS The environments are clean and pretty much out of the box.
#user68137 is correct in saying that you need to use relative paths for the images.
I got caught out on this one too, and here's my previous SO question about it...
In short, you need to do something like this...
<img src='<%= Url.Content( "~/Content/Images/banner.jpg" ) %>' alt="Banner" />
Hope this helps!
I had the relative paths set, but what I didn't realize is when I deployed it to the server it went to wwwroot\subsite... I had the relative paths set to src="....\image.jpg" to get back to the root of the site. My error was that if the site is not in the root then the subsite drills back to the root to find the images and of course doesn't find them. Same thing was happening with the JS files. I used the Url.Content and it worked great! problem solved!
The interesting this is when running through the VS dev server with a subsite it still worked well and found the paths even though it shouldn't have. VS dev server <> IIS
Thanks for your help on this!
Simon.
Once you know the virtual path to the location you are deploying the project to, you should go into the project configuration in Visual Studio and add it to your project. This way the visual studio development server will use the same path structure as the deployment server. This will save you countless hours of work when deploying.
When you run your website through Visual Studio, every single request gets processed through the ASP.NET pipeline, including images, CSS and other resources. IIS by default only processes specific extensions (e.g., aspx) unless you tell it otherwise through configuration. Paths like '/content/images/yourimage.jpg' should work just fine...I suspect it's something amiss in your IIS configuration.
Another possibility which I've run into is any custom ISAPI filters you may have installed on the IIS server (e.g., ISAPI_rewrite). It's easy to set up rules in its configuration that lead to some very unexpected results.