All possible combinations (subsets) in swift - ios

Question

I'm having this issue of trying to trying to recursively print out all subsets of the giving array of String(characters) using swift. The value is ("a1b2"). The output should have 4 subsets.
Currently stuck here:
func overall(string: String) {
helper(string: string, i: 0, slate: "")
}
func helper(string: String, i: Int, slate: String) {
var result = [Any]()
let word = Array(string)
var counter = i
if string.count == counter {
result.append(slate)
} else {
if word[i].isNumber {
counter += 1
helper(string: string, i: counter, slate: slate + String(word[i]))
} else if word[i].isLowercase {
counter += 1
helper(string: string, i: counter, slate: slate + String(word[i]).uppercased())
} else {
counter += 1
helper(string: string, i: counter, slate: slate + String(word[i]).lowercased())
}
}
}
overall(string: "a1b2")
I'm having issues creating a base case in the helper functions. Also I'm unsure if I'm using recursion properly. Could you please help with an explanation, it will be greatly appreciated.

Answer 1

I'm sure this is totally useless in general, but just for fun, here's an amusing recursion-free solution for the particular problem given, where we know the string is exactly four characters and we know that either uppercased or lowercased must be applied to each character:
let s = "a1b2"
let arr = Array(s).map(String.init)
var result : Set<String> = []
for i in 0b0000...0b1111 {
var tog = [Bool]()
for sh in 0...3 { tog.append(i & 1<<sh == 0) }
var word = ""
for ix in 0...3 {
let f = tog[ix] ? arr[ix].lowercased : arr[ix].uppercased
word = word + f()
}
result.insert(word)
}
print(result)

Answer 2

The OP clarified in comments that he wanted the case-variants of the original string, not "subsets" as originally stated
[Edit] I originally had a paragraph here about String.count, however, my memory must have been in error, because Apple's documentation does state that String.count is in fact the number of Characters, which is what we would all want it to be anyway. I hope my error didn't throw anyone too far off.
You don't need any counters. All you need is the first character, and recurse on the rest of the string.
The thing is, when you have a letter as your first you need to preprend both the upper and lower case variants to all of the strings returned by the recursive call.
The base case is at the end of the string, in which case you return an an array containing just the empty string.
Here's my implementation:
func caseVariants(of s: String) -> [String]
{
func caseVariants(of s: Substring) -> [String]
{
guard let c = s.first else { return [""] } // base case
let remainder = s[s.index(after: s.startIndex)...]
let remainderVariants = caseVariants(of: remainder)
var results: [String] = []
if c.isLetter
{
results.append(
contentsOf: remainderVariants.map {
"\(c.uppercased())" + $0
}
)
results.append(
contentsOf: remainderVariants.map {
"\(c.lowercased())" + $0
}
)
}
else
{
results.append(
contentsOf: remainderVariants.map { "\(c)" + $0 }
)
}
return results
}
return caseVariants(of: s[...]).sorted()
}
print("Case variants:")
for s in caseVariants(of: "a1b2") { print("\"\(s)\"") }
The output is:
Case variants:
"A1B2"
"A1b2"
"a1B2"
"a1b2"
[EDIT] in comments, OP asked what if .startIndex were disallowed (such as in an interview). While I think such a restriction is insane, there is an easy solution, and it's a one-line, quite reasonable change to my previous code. Change this line:
let remainder = s[s.index(after: s.startIndex)...]
to use .dropFirst()
let remainder = s.dropFirst()
If we look at the implementation of dropFirst in the Collection protocol in the standard library:
#inlinable
public __consuming func dropFirst(_ k: Int = 1) -> SubSequence {
_precondition(k >= 0, "Can't drop a negative number of elements from a collection")
let start = index(startIndex, offsetBy: k, limitedBy: endIndex) ?? endIndex
return self[start..<endIndex]
}
We see that the use of dropFirst will use the default value of 1 for k. In that case, when we've already checked that we're not at the end of the string, the line
let start = index(startIndex, offsetBy: k, limitedBy: endIndex) ?? endIndex
is equivalent to
let start = index(after: startIndex)
which means that the returned substring is
return self[index(after: startIndex)..<endIndex]
which is just the canonical way of saying:
return self[index(after: startIndex)...]
So a version using dropFirst() is identical to the original solution once inlining has done its thing.