I have a question. I watched a really detailed tutorial on implementing an artificial neural network in C++. And now I have more than a basic understanding of how a neural network works and how to actually program and train one.
So in the tutorial a hyperbolic tangent was used for calculating outputs, and obviously its derivative for calculating gradients. However I wanted to move on to a different function. Specifically Leaky RELU (to avoid dying neurons).
My question is, it specifies that this activation function should be used for the hidden layers only. For the output layers a different function should be used (either a softmax or a linear regression function). In the tutorial the guy taught the neural network to be an XOR processor. So is this a classification problem or a regression problem?
I tried to google the difference between the two, but I can't quite grasp the category for the XOR processor. Is it a classification or a regression problem?
So I implemented the Leaky RELU function and its derivative but I don't know whether I should use a softmax or a regression function for the output layer.
Also for recalculating the output gradients I use the Leaky RELU's derivative(for now) but in this case should I use the softmax's/regression derivative as well?
Thanks in advance.
I tried to google the difference between the two, but I can't quite grasp the category for the XOR processor. Is it a classification or a regression problem?
In short, classification is for discrete target, regression is for continuous target. If it were a floating point operation, you had a regression problem. But here the result of XOR is 0 or 1, so it's a binary classification (already suggested by Sid). You should use a softmax layer (or a sigmoid function, which works particularly for 2 classes). Note that the output will be a vector of probabilities, i.e. real valued, which is used to choose the discrete target class.
Also for recalculating the output gradients I use the Leaky RELU's derivative(for now) but in this case should I use the softmax's/regression derivative as well?
Correct. For the output layer you'll need a cross-entropy loss function, which corresponds to the softmax layer, and it's derivative for the backward pass.
If there will be hidden layers that still use Leaky ReLu, you'll also need Leaky ReLu's derivative accordingly, for these particular layers.
Highly recommend this post on backpropagation details.
I understand all the computational steps of training a neural network with gradient descent using forwardprop and backprop, but I'm trying to wrap my head around why they work so much better than logistic regression.
For now all I can think of is:
A) the neural network can learn it's own parameters
B) there are many more weights than simple logistic regression thus allowing for more complex hypotheses
Can someone explain why a neural network works so well in general? I am a relative beginner.
Neural Networks can have a large number of free parameters (the weights and biases between interconnected units) and this gives them the flexibility to fit highly complex data (when trained correctly) that other models are too simple to fit. This model complexity brings with it the problems of training such a complex network and ensuring the resultant model generalises to the examples it’s trained on (typically neural networks require large volumes of training data, that other models don't).
Classically logistic regression has been limited to binary classification using a linear classifier (although multi-class classification can easily be achieved with one-vs-all, one-vs-one approaches etc. and there are kernalised variants of logistic regression that allow for non-linear classification tasks). In general therefore, logistic regression is typically applied to more simple, linearly-separable classification tasks, where small amounts of training data are available.
Models such as logistic regression and linear regression can be thought of as simple multi-layer perceptrons (check out this site for one explanation of how).
To conclude, it’s the model complexity that allows neural nets to solve more complex classification tasks, and to have a broader application (particularly when applied to raw data such as image pixel intensities etc.), but their complexity means that large volumes of training data are required and training them can be a difficult task.
Recently Dr. Naftali Tishby's idea of Information Bottleneck to explain the effectiveness of deep neural networks is making the rounds in the academic circles.
His video explaining the idea (link below) can be rather dense so I'll try to give the distilled/general form of the core idea to help build intuition
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XL07WEc2TRI
To ground your thinking, vizualize the MNIST task of classifying the digit in the image. For this, I am only talking about simple fully-connected neural networks (not Convolutional NN as is typically used for MNIST)
The input to a NN contains information about the output hidden inside of it. Some function is needed to transform the input to the output form. Pretty obvious.
The key difference in thinking needed to build better intuition is to think of the input as a signal with "information" in it (I won't go into information theory here). Some of this information is relevant for the task at hand (predicting the output). Think of the output as also a signal with a certain amount of "information". The neural network tries to "successively refine" and compress the input signal's information to match the desired output signal. Think of each layer as cutting away at the unneccessary parts of the input information, and
keeping and/or transforming the output information along the way through the network.
The fully-connected neural network will transform the input information into a form in the final hidden layer, such that it is linearly separable by the output layer.
This is a very high-level and fundamental interpretation of the NN, and I hope it will help you see it clearer. If there are parts you'd like me to clarify, let me know.
There are other essential pieces in Dr.Tishby's work, such as how minibatch noise helps training, and how the weights of a neural network layer can be seen as doing a random walk within the constraints of the problem.
These parts are a little more detailed, and I'd recommend first toying with neural networks and taking a course on Information Theory to help build your understanding.
Consider you have a large dataset and you want to build a binary classification model for that, Now you have two options that you have pointed out
Logistic Regression
Neural Networks ( Consider FFN for now )
Each node in a neural network will be associated with an activation function for example let's choose Sigmoid since Logistic regression also uses sigmoid internally to make decision.
Let's see how the decision of logistic regression looks when applied on the data
See some of the green spots present in the red boundary?
Now let's see the decision boundary of neural network (Forgive me for using a different color)
Why this happens? Why does the decision boundary of neural network is so flexible which gives more accurate results than Logistic regression?
or the question you asked is "Why neural networks works so well ?" is because of it's hidden units or hidden layers and their representation power.
Let me put it this way.
You have a logistic regression model and a Neural network which has say 100 neurons each of Sigmoid activation. Now each neuron will be equivalent to one logistic regression.
Now assume a hundred logistic units trained together to solve one problem versus one logistic regression model. Because of these hidden layers the decision boundary expands and yields better results.
While you are experimenting you can add more number of neurons and see how the decision boundary is changing. A logistic regression is same as a neural network with single neuron.
The above given is just an example. Neural networks can be trained to get very complex decision boundaries
Neural networks allow the person training them to algorithmically discover features, as you pointed out. However, they also allow for very general nonlinearity. If you wish, you can use polynomial terms in logistic regression to achieve some degree of nonlinearity, however, you must decide which terms you will use. That is you must decide a priori which model will work. Neural networks can discover the nonlinear model that is needed.
'Work so well' depends on the concrete scenario. Both of them do essentially the same thing: predicting.
The main difference here is neural network can have hidden nodes for concepts, if it's propperly set up (not easy), using these inputs to make the final decission.
Whereas linear regression is based on more obvious facts, and not side effects. A neural network should de able to make more accurate predictions than linear regression.
Neural networks excel at a variety of tasks, but to get an understanding of exactly why, it may be easier to take a particular task like classification and dive deeper.
In simple terms, machine learning techniques learn a function to predict which class a particular input belongs to, depending on past examples. What sets neural nets apart is their ability to construct these functions that can explain even complex patterns in the data. The heart of a neural network is an activation function like Relu, which allows it to draw some basic classification boundaries like:
Example classification boundaries of Relus
By composing hundreds of such Relus together, neural networks can create arbitrarily complex classification boundaries, for example:
Composing classification boundaries
The following article tries to explain the intuition behind how neural networks work: https://medium.com/machine-intelligence-report/how-do-neural-networks-work-57d1ab5337ce
Before you step into neural network see if you have assessed all aspects of normal regression.
Use this as a guide
and even before you discard normal regression - for curved type of dependencies - you should strongly consider kernels with SVM
Neural networks are defined with an objective and loss function. The only process that happens within a neural net is to optimize for the objective function by reducing the loss function or error. The back propagation helps in finding the optimized objective function and reach our output with an output condition.
I am using feed forward, gradient descent backpropagation neural networks.
Currently I have only worked with non-linear networks where tanh is activation function.
I was wondering.
What kind of tasks would you give to a neural networks with non-linear activation function and what kind of tasks for linear?
I know that network with linear activation function are used to solve linear problems.
What are those linear problems?
Any examples?
Thanks!
I'd say never, since composition of linear functions is still linear using a neural network with linear activations is just a way to complicate linear regression.
Whether to choose a linear model or something more complicated is up to you and depends on the data you have; this is (one of the reasons) why it is customary hold out some data during training and use it to validate the model. Other ways of testing models are residuals analysis, hypothesis testing, and so on
What is the difference between training a RNN and a simple neural networks? Can RNN be trained using feed forward and backward method?
Thanks ahead!
The difference is recurrence. Thus RNN cannot be easily trained as if you try to compute gradient - you will soon figure out that in order to get a gradient on n'th step - you need to actually "unroll" your network history for n-1 previous steps. This technique, known as BPTT (backpropagation through time) is exactly this - direct application of backpropagation to RNN. Unfortunately this is both computationaly expensive as well as mathematically challenging (due to vanishing/exploding gradients). People are creating workaround on many levels, by for example introduction of specific types of RNN which can be efficiently trained (LSTM, GRU), or by modification of training procedure (such as gradient clamping). To sum up - theoreticaly you can do "typical" backprop in the mathematical sense, from programming perspective - this requires more work as you need to "unroll" your network through history. This is computationaly expensive, and hard to optimize in the mathematical sense.
Correct me if I am wrong here, but it is possible to implement the XOR function with a minimum of 3 gates (NAND, OR)->(AND) using a 1-layer network. But is it possible to train the network correctly, having each perceptron use only a threshold activation function and a perceptron training rule? i.e. use the perceptron learning rule and not the delta learning rule.
So far my only solution in theory would be to train each perceptron individually for their specific task (i.e. NAND OR and AND) before forming the actual network, but that defeats the point of a network that learns.
No, you cannot use the perceptron algorithm to train a multilayer network. You need gradient-based learning, and the perceptron algorithm does not produce gradients; it optimizes for the non-differentiable zero-one loss.
The answer is simple as we remember that perceptron law deal with single layer(one gate,or,and,either nand gate)but xor gate contains more than one combination of (and,or and nand )gates that is why perceptron law not satisfy XOR GAT