Suppose I have an ancestor class (TMyAncestorClass), an enumerated type (TMyType) and some descendants class (TDesc1, TDesc2, TDesc3...)
type TMytype = (ta, tb, tc);
TMyAncestorClass= class
procedure DoSomething;
end;
TDesc1 = class(TMyAncestorClass)
end;
TDesc2 = class(TMyAncestorClass)
end;
TDesc3 = class(TMyAncestorClass)
end;
function CreateMyClass(aMyType: TMyType): TMyAncestorClass;
begin
case aMyType of
ta: Result := TDesc1.Create;
tb: Result := TDesc2.Create;
tc: Result := TDesc3.Create;
else
Result := nil; // or throw an exception
end;
end;
I want to refactor it. What is the best design pattern or solution for it? Now every time a new type is added I have to modify a CreateMyClass function too.
You could get rid of the enum completely by simply having CreateMyClass() take an integer instead, eg:
unit MyClasses;
interface
type
TMyAncestorClass = class
procedure DoSomething; virtual; abstract;
end;
function CreateMyClass(aMyType: Integer): TMyAncestorClass;
implementation
type
TDesc1 = class(TMyAncestorClass)
procedure DoSomething; override;
end;
TDesc2 = class(TMyAncestorClass)
procedure DoSomething; override;
end;
TDesc3 = class(TMyAncestorClass)
procedure DoSomething; override;
end;
...
function CreateMyClass(aMyType: Integer): TMyAncestorClass;
begin
case aMyType of
1: Result := TDesc1.Create;
2: Result := TDesc2.Create;
3: Result := TDesc3.Create;
else
Result := nil; // or throw an exception
end;
end;
end.
var
Obj: TMyAncestorClass;
begin
Obj := CreateMyClass(1, 2, 3, ...);
try
Obj.DoSomething;
finally
Obj.Free;
end;
end;
You could simplify that a little by using an array of class types, eg:
unit MyClasses;
interface
type
TMyAncestorClass = class
constructor Create; virtual; // <-- add this
procedure DoSomething; virtual; abstract;
end;
TMyAncestorClassType = class of TMyAncestorClass;
function CreateMyClass(aMyType: Integer): TMyAncestorClass;
implementation
type
TDesc1 = class(TMyAncestorClass)
constructor Create; override; // if needed
procedure DoSomething; override;
end;
TDesc2 = class(TMyAncestorClass)
constructor Create; override; // if needed
procedure DoSomething; override;
end;
TDesc3 = class(TMyAncestorClass)
constructor Create; override; // if needed
procedure DoSomething; override;
end;
...
constructor TMyAncestorClass.Create;
begin
inherited;
end;
function CreateMyClass(aMyType: Integer): TMyAncestorClass;
const
Types: array[1..3] of TMyAncestorClassType = (
TDesc1,
TDesc2,
TDesc3
);
begin
if aMyType >= Low(Types) and aMyType <= High(Types) then
Result := Types[aMyType].Create
else
Result := nil; // or throw an exception
end;
end.
var
Obj: TMyAncestorClass;
begin
Obj := CreateMyClass(1, 2, 3, ...);
try
Obj.DoSomething;
finally
Obj.Free;
end;
end;
Of course, this does mean you are still having to edit CreteMyClass() each time a new class is introduced. So, if you want something more dynamic, you will need to add a registration system at runtime, for example by storing class types in a lookup table like TDictionary, eg:
unit MyClasses;
interface
type
TMyAncestorClass = class
constructor Create; virtual;
procedure DoSomething; virtual; abstract;
end;
TMyAncestorClassType = class of TMyAncestorClass;
function RegisterMyClass(aClass: TMyAncestorClassType): Integer;
function CreateMyClass(aMyType: Integer): TMyAncestorClass;
implementation
uses
System.Generics.Collections;
var
RegisteredClasses: TDictionary<Integer, TMyAncestorClassType>;
Counter: Integer = 0;
constructor TMyAncestorClass.Create;
begin
inherited;
end;
function RegisterMyClass(aClass: TMyAncestorClassType): Integer;
begin
Result := Counter;
Inc(Counter);
RegisteredClasses.Add(Result, aClass);
end;
function CreateMyClass(aMyType: Integer): TMyAncestorClass;
var
LClass: TMyAncestorClassType;
begin
if RegisteredClasses.TryGetValue(aMyType, LClass) then
Result := LClass.Create
else
Result := nil; // or throw an exception
end;
initialization
RegisteredClasses := TDictionary<Integer, TMyAncestorClassType>.Create;
finalization
RegisteredClasses.Free;
end.
uses
..., MyClasses;
type
TDesc1 = class(TMyAncestorClass)
constructor Create; override; // if needed
procedure DoSomething; override;
end;
TDesc2 = class(TMyAncestorClass)
constructor Create; override; // if needed
procedure DoSomething; override;
end;
TDesc3 = class(TMyAncestorClass)
constructor Create; override; // if needed
procedure DoSomething; override;
end;
...
...
var
Desc1Type: Integer;
Desc2Type: Integer;
Desc3Type: Integer;
...
...
var
Obj: TMyAncestorClass;
begin
Obj := CreateMyClass(Desc1Type, Desc2Type, Desc3Type, ...);
...
Obj.Free;
end;
...
initialization
Desc1Type := RegisterMyClass(TDesc1);
Desc2Type := RegisterMyClass(TDesc2);
Desc3Type := RegisterMyClass(TDesc3);
Instead of an enumerated type, simply use the class type:
TMyType = class of TMyAncestorClass;
Then your function becomes trivial:
function CreateMyClass(aMyType: TMyType): TMyAncestorClass;
begin
Result := TMyType.Create;
end;
You call it like this:
var
X : TMyAncestroClass;
begin
X := CreateMyClass(TDesc1);
end;
Of course this is somewhat useless as is. But I guess you have a lot of other code in CreateMyClass(). BTW: I would have named it MyClassFactory.
Edit:
If you really need an enumerated type, then use the following additional code:
type
TMyTypeEnum = (ta, tb, tc);
const
MyTypes : array [TMyTypeEnum] of TMyType = (TDesc1, TDesc2, TDesc3);
The class factory is then:
function MyClassFactory(aMyType : TMyTypeEnum) : TMyAncestorClass;
begin
Result := MyTypes[aMyType].Create;
end;
And call it like this:
var
X : TMyAncestroClass;
begin
X := MyClassFactory(tb);
end;
Related
I am using Delphi Pro 10.2.3 Tokyo. I want to create a TDataset wrapper class which I can use to enumerate through a list of IData descendants with a for-in loop. When I try to compile the code below, I get the following error message.
[dcc32 Error] Core.Data.DatasetAdapter.pas(25): E2291 Missing implementation of interface method IEnumerator.GetCurrent
Clearly, GetCurrent is implemented. Any idea how to fix this?
unit Core.Data.DatasetAdapter;
interface
uses
Data.Db
;
type
IData = interface
['{15D1CF4F-B9E1-4525-B035-24B9A6584325}']
end;
IDataList<T: IData> = interface
['{9FEE9BB1-A983-4FEA-AEBF-4D3AF5219444}']
function GetCount: Integer;
function GetCurrent: T;
procedure Load;
procedure Unload;
property Count: Integer read GetCount;
property Current: T read GetCurrent;
end;
TDatasetAdapter<T: IData> = class(
TInterfacedObject
, IData, IDataList<T>
, IEnumerator<T>
)
private
FBof: Boolean;
FDataset: TDataset;
FIntf: T;
function GetCount: Integer;
function GetCurrent: T;
function GetEof: Boolean;
function GetInterface: T;
function MoveNext: Boolean;
procedure Reset;
protected
function FieldByName(const FieldName: string): TField;
procedure MapFields; virtual;
property Dataset: TDataset read FDataset;
public
constructor Create(ADataset: TDataset); virtual;
function GetEnumerator: IEnumerator<T>;
procedure Cancel;
procedure Close;
procedure Delete;
procedure Edit;
procedure First;
procedure Insert;
procedure Load;
procedure Next;
procedure Open;
procedure Post;
procedure UnLoad;
property Count: Integer read GetCount;
property Eof: Boolean read GetEof;
end;
implementation
uses
System.SysUtils
, System.TypInfo
;
{ TDatasetAdapter<T> }
{
****************************** TDatasetAdapter<T> ******************************
}
constructor TDatasetAdapter<T>.Create(ADataset: TDataset);
begin
FDataset := ADataset;
FIntf := GetInterface;
end;
procedure TDatasetAdapter<T>.Cancel;
begin
FDataset.Cancel;
end;
procedure TDatasetAdapter<T>.Close;
begin
FDataset.Close;
end;
procedure TDatasetAdapter<T>.Delete;
begin
FDataset.Delete;
end;
procedure TDatasetAdapter<T>.Edit;
begin
FDataset.Edit;
end;
function TDatasetAdapter<T>.FieldByName(const FieldName: string): TField;
begin
Result := FDataset.FieldByName(FieldName);
end;
procedure TDatasetAdapter<T>.First;
begin
FDataset.First;
end;
function TDatasetAdapter<T>.GetCount: Integer;
begin
Result := FDataset.RecordCount;
end;
function TDatasetAdapter<T>.GetCurrent: T;
begin
Result := FIntf;
end;
function TDatasetAdapter<T>.GetEnumerator: IEnumerator<T>;
begin
Reset;
Result := Self;
end;
function TDatasetAdapter<T>.GetEof: Boolean;
begin
Result := FDataset.Eof;
end;
function TDatasetAdapter<T>.GetInterface: T;
var
LGuid: TGuid;
begin
LGuid := GetTypeData(TypeInfo(T))^.Guid;
if not Supports(Self, LGuid, Result) then
Result := nil;
end;
procedure TDatasetAdapter<T>.Insert;
begin
FDataset.Insert;
end;
procedure TDatasetAdapter<T>.Load;
begin
Open;
MapFields;
end;
procedure TDatasetAdapter<T>.MapFields;
begin
//Stub procedure
end;
function TDatasetAdapter<T>.MoveNext: Boolean;
begin
if FBof then FBof := False
else Next;
Result := not Eof;
end;
procedure TDatasetAdapter<T>.Next;
begin
FDataset.Next;
end;
procedure TDatasetAdapter<T>.Open;
begin
FDataset.Open;
end;
procedure TDatasetAdapter<T>.Post;
begin
FDataset.Post;
end;
procedure TDatasetAdapter<T>.Reset;
begin
FBof := True;
First;
end;
procedure TDatasetAdapter<T>.UnLoad;
begin
Close;
end;
end.
You need to resolve function GetCurrent: T twice: for IDataList<T> and for Enumerator<T>. But you also need one for the non-generic ancestor of IEnumerator<T>: IEnumerator. Apparently that is not hidden by the GetCurrent method of IEnumerator<T>.
Try method resolution clauses:
function GetGenericCurrent: T; // implement this
function IDataList<T>.GetCurrent = GetGenericCurrent;
function IEnumerator<T>.GetCurrent = GetGenericCurrent;
function GetCurrent: TObject; // implement this -- can return nil.
The implementation of both can be the same, but you will have to make two methods. The one for the non-generic IEnumerator can return nil.
Update
I had to modify the code above. Now it should work. It is not necessary to have two implementations for GetCurrent returning T, but you must have one returning TObject.
So, I am getting Access Violation error when try to Mock 2-nd composite interface, below examples of code with using Delphi-Mocks and Spring4D frameworks
unit u_DB;
type
TDBObject = class
public
property ID: TGUID;
end;
TDBCRM = class(TDBObject)
public
property SOME_FIELD: TSomeType;
end;
unit i_dmServer;
type
{$M+}
IdmServer = interface
['{A4475441-9651-4956-8310-16FB710EAE5E}']
function GetServiceConnection: TServiceConnection;
function GetCurrentUser(): TUser;
end;
unit d_ServerWrapper;
type
TdmServerWrapper = class(TInterfacedObject, IdmServer)
private
function GetServiceConnection: TServiceConnection;
function GetCurrentUser(): TUser;
protected
FdmServer: TdmServer;
end;
implementation
constructor TdmServerWrapper.Create();
begin
inherited Create();
FdmServer := TdmServer.Create(nil);
end;
end.
unit i_BaseDAL;
type
{$M+}
IBaseDAL<T: TDBObject, constructor> = interface
['{56D48844-BD7F-4FF8-A4AE-30DA1A82AD67}']
procedure RefreshData(); ....
end;
unit u_BaseDAL;
type
TBaseDAL<T: TDBObject, constructor> = class(TInterfacedObject, IBaseDAL<TDBObject>)
protected
FdmServer: IdmServer;
public
procedure RefreshData();
end;
implementation
procedure TBaseDAL<T>.Create;
begin
FdmServer := GlobalContainer.Resolve<IdmServer>;
end;
end.
unit ChildFrame;
interface
type
TChildFrame = class(TFrame)
private
fDM: IBaseDAL<TDBObject>;
function GetDM: IBaseDAL<TDBObject>;
procedure SetDM(const Value: IBaseDAL<TDBObject>);
public
constructor Create(AOwner: TComponent); override;
property DM: IBaseDAL<TDBObject> read GetDM write SetDM;
end;
implementation
constructor TChildFrame.Create(AOwner: TComponent);
begin
inherited Create(AOwner);
DM := nil;
end;
function TChildFrame.GetDM: IBaseDAL<TDBObject>;
begin
if not Assigned(fDM) then
fDM := GlobalContainer.Resolve<IBaseDAL<TDBObject>>;
Result := fDM;
end;
procedure TfrmCustomChildFrame.SetDM(const Value: IBaseDAL<TDBObject>);
begin
if Assigned(fDM) then
fDM := nil;
fDM := Value;
end;
end.
TCRMFrame = class(TChildFrame)
....
end;
procedure TCRMFrame.Create
begin
DM := GlobalContainer.Resolve('i_BaseDAL.IBaseDAL<u_DB.TDBObject>#TBaseDAL<u_DB.TDBCRM>').AsInterface as IBaseDAL<TDBObject>;
// DM := GlobalContainer.Resolve(IBaseDAL<TomDBObject>); {Not compiled et all: "E2250 There is no overloaded version of 'Resolve' that can be called with these arguments"}
end;
REGISTERING TYPES
unit RegisteringTypes.pas
procedure RegTypes;
implementation
procedure RegTypes;
begin
GlobalContainer.RegisterType<TdmServerWrapper>;
GlobalContainer.RegisterType<TBaseDAL<TDBObject>, IBaseDAL<TDBObject>>;
GlobalContainer.RegisterType<TBaseDAL<TDBCRM>, IBaseDAL<TDBCRM>>;
GlobalContainer.Build;
end;
initialization
RegTypes
end.
DUNIT TEST
type
TestTCRM = class(TTestCase)
private
FFrame: TCRMFrame;
FBaseDALMock: TMock<TBaseDAL<TDBObject>>;
procedure Init;
protected
procedure SetUp; override;
published
end;
implementation
procedure TestTCRM.Init;
begin
inherited;
GlobalContainer.RegisterType<IdmServer>.DelegateTo(
function: IdmServer
begin
Result := TMock<IdmServer>.Create;
end
);
GlobalContainer.RegisterType<IBaseDAL<TDBCRM>>.DelegateTo(
function: IBaseDAL<TDBCRM>
begin
Result := TMock<IBaseDAL<TDBCRM>>.Create;
end
);
GlobalContainer.RegisterType<IBaseDAL<TDBObject>>.DelegateTo(
function: IBaseDAL<TDBObject>
begin
Result := TMock<IBaseDAL<TDBObject>>.Create;
end
);
GlobalContainer.Build;
end;
procedure TestTfrCRMAccountClasses.SetUp;
begin
inherited;
Init;
FFrame := TCRMFrame.Create(nil); // and I got ACCESS VIOLATION HERE
end;
Full sources of test project here - https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6KvjsGVp4ONeXBNenlMc2J0R2M.
Colleagues, please advise me where I am wrong. Thank you in advance!
The AV is raised from Delphi.Mocks.
Here is a minimal test case to reproduce it:
procedure DelphiMocksTest;
var
func: TFunc<IdmServer>;
dm: IdmServer;
i: IInitializable;
begin
func :=
function: IdmServer
begin
Result := TMock<IdmServer>.Create;
Supports(dm, IInitializable, i); // works
end; // TMock record goes out of scope and something happens
dm := func();
Supports(dm, IInitializable, i); // fails
end;
You need to have a reference to the TMock somewhere, because the mocks are records which will get cleaned up when they go out of scope.
This should work :
procedure DelphiMocksTest;
var
func: TFunc<IdmServer>;
dm: IdmServer;
i: IInitializable;
mock : TMock<IdmServer>;
begin
func := function: IdmServer
begin
mock := TMock<IdmServer>.Create;
Supports(dm, IInitializable, i); // works
result := mock;
end;
dm := func();
Supports(dm, IInitializable, i); // fails
end;
I have two binary files that contain a similar type of data so I want to create a unified viewer (TViewer) for both files.
Some, methods are common for these two file types, some are not. So I created a base class
TShape, and the from it TCircle and TTriangle.
Pseudo code:
TShape = class(TObject)
function NoOfItems: integer; virtual; abstract;
end;
TCircle = class(TShape)
function NoOfItems: integer; override; <---- The real implementation
end;
TTriangle = class(TShape)
function NoOfItems: integer; override; <---- The real implementation
end;
TViewer = class(TStringGrid)
Container: TShape;
end;
And I use it like this:
Procedure Main;
begin
if FileType= Circle
then (Viewer.Container as TCircle).Load(FileName)
else (Viewer.Container as TTriangle).Load(FileName);
Caption:= Viewer.Container.NoOfItems; <---- it calls TShape which is abstract
end;
When I do this it works:
if Viewer.Container is TTriangle
then Caption:= (Viewer.Container as TTriangle).NoOfItems
else ...
but I want to do it directly like this:
Caption:= Viewer.Container.NoOfItems;
Obviously there is nothing wrong in using is except that I will have to use it in many many places (close to everywhere). There is a nicer way to achieve this unified viewer?
Update:
Actually, it may be also a performance problem. My file has a really big number of items (up to billions) so doing so many 'is/as' tests may actually have a real impact on speed.
You're doing it wrong.
You need to change your code so that the container is not created until you know what type it needs to be, and then create the proper type:
Procedure Main;
begin
if FileType= Circle then
Viewer.Container := TCircle.Create
else
Viewer.Container := TTriangle.Create;
Viewer.Container.Load(FileName);
Caption := IntToStr(Viewer.Container.NoOfItems); <---- it calls proper code
end;
Here's a working example of using inheritance and polymorphism for you:
program InheritancePolymorphismTest;
uses
System.SysUtils;
type
TAnimal=class
public
procedure Sit; virtual;
procedure Speak; virtual;
end;
TDog=class(TAnimal)
public
procedure Sit; override;
procedure Speak; override;
end;
TCat=class(TAnimal)
public
procedure Speak; override;
end;
TAnimalArray = array of TAnimal;
{ TCat }
procedure TCat.Speak;
begin
inherited;
WriteLn('Bah! No way cats speak when told.');
end;
{ TDog }
procedure TDog.Sit;
begin
inherited;
WriteLn('Sitting down.');
end;
procedure TDog.Speak;
begin
inherited;
Writeln('Woof! Woof!');
end;
procedure TAnimal.Sit;
begin
end;
procedure TAnimal.Speak;
begin
end;
var
Animals: TAnimalArray;
i: Integer;
Pet: TAnimal;
{ TAnimal }
const
NumAnimals = 5;
begin
SetLength(Animals, NumAnimals);
for i := 0 to High(Animals) do
begin
if Odd(i) then
Animals[i] := TDog.Create
else
Animals[i] := TCat.Create;
end;
for Pet in Animals do
begin
Pet.Speak;
Pet.Sit;
end;
Writeln('');
Readln;
end.
Real code and real output. Polymorphism still works!
So I think you have missed some important details while declaring and implementing your class hierarchy.
type
TShape = class(TObject)
function IAm: string; virtual; abstract;
end;
TCircle = class(TShape)
function IAm: string; override;
end;
TTriangle = class(TShape)
function IAm: string; override;
end;
{ TCircle }
function TCircle.IAm: string;
begin
Result := 'I am circle'
end;
{ TTriangle }
function TTriangle.IAm: string;
begin
Result := 'I am triangle'
end;
procedure TForm1.Button6Click(Sender: TObject);
var
Shape: TShape;
begin
Shape := TCircle.Create;
Memo1.Lines.Add(Shape.IAm);
Shape.Free;
Shape := TTriangle.Create;
Memo1.Lines.Add(Shape.IAm);
Shape.Free;
end;
output
I am circle
I am triangle
I am using Delphi XE to implement an enumerator that allows filtering the elements of the list by type. I have quickly assembled a test unit as follows:
unit uTestList;
interface
uses Generics.Collections;
type
TListItemBase = class(TObject)
end; { TListItemBase }
TListItemChild1 = class(TListItemBase)
end;
TListItemChild2 = class(TListItemBase)
end;
TTestList<T : TListItemBase> = class;
TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter> = class(TInterfacedObject, IEnumerator<TFilter>)
private
FTestList : TList<T>;
FIndex : Integer;
protected
constructor Create(Owner : TList<T>); overload;
function GetCurrent : TFilter;
function MoveNext : Boolean;
procedure Reset;
function IEnumerator<TFilter>.GetCurrent = GetCurrent;
function IEnumerator<TFilter>.MoveNext = MoveNext;
procedure IEnumerator<TFilter>.Reset = Reset;
end;
TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T, TFilter> = class(TInterfacedObject, IEnumerable)
private
FTestList : TList<T>;
public
constructor Create(Owner : TList<T>); overload;
function GetEnumerator : TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>;
end;
TTestList<T : TListItemBase> = class(TList<T>)
public
function OfType<TFilter : TListItemBase>() : IEnumerable;
end; { TTestList }
implementation
{ TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter> }
constructor TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>.Create(Owner: TList<T>);
begin
inherited;
FTestList := Owner;
FIndex := -1;
end;
function TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>.GetCurrent: TFilter;
begin
Result := TFilter(FTestList[FIndex]);
end;
function TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>.MoveNext: Boolean;
begin
Inc(FIndex);
while ((FIndex < FTestList.Count)
and (not FTestList[FIndex].InheritsFrom(TFilter))) do
begin
Inc(FIndex);
end; { while }
end;
{ TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T, TFilter> }
constructor TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T, TFilter>.Create(Owner: TList<T>);
begin
inherited;
FTestList := Owner;
end;
function TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T, TFilter>.GetEnumerator: TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>;
begin
Result := TOfTypeEnumerator<T,TFilter>.Create(FTestList);
end;
{ TTestList<T> }
function TTestList<T>.OfType<TFilter>: IEnumerable;
begin
Result := TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T,TFilter>.Create(self);
end;
end.
Compiling this unit fails with the dreaded F2084 Internal Error: D7837. I can certainly do this without an enumerator, but I'd rather have one available to make the code consistent. I had a similar compiler problem when trying to implement this on top of Spring4D, but figured I would put out a plain, vanilla Delphi issue here.
Does anyone have an alternate implementation that actually compiles?
Thanks.
You don't want to use the IEnumerator<T> from System.pas, trust me. That thing brings along so much trouble because it inherits from IEnumerator and so has that GetCurrent method with different results (TObject for IEnumerator and T for IEnumerator<T>).
Better define your own IEnumerator<T>:
IEnumerator<T> = interface
function GetCurrent: T;
function MoveNext: Boolean;
procedure Reset;
property Current: T read GetCurrent;
end;
Same with IEnumerable. I would say define your own IEnumerable<T>:
IEnumerable<T> = interface
function GetEnumerator: IEnumerator<T>;
end;
If you use that in your TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter> you can remove the method resolution clauses causing the ICE.
When you do that you will start seeing other compiler errors E2008, E2089 and some more.
calling just inherited in your constructor tries to call the constructor with the same signature in your ancestor class which does not exist. So change it to inherited Create.
don't use IEnumerable but use IEnumerable<TFilter> because that is what your want to enumerator over
don't use methods and casts that are only allowed for objects or specify the class constraint on T and TFilter
MoveNext needs a Result
Here is the compiling unit. Did a quick test and it seems to work:
unit uTestList;
interface
uses
Generics.Collections;
type
IEnumerator<T> = interface
function GetCurrent: T;
function MoveNext: Boolean;
property Current: T read GetCurrent;
end;
IEnumerable<T> = interface
function GetEnumerator: IEnumerator<T>;
end;
TOfTypeEnumerator<T: class; TFilter: class> = class(TInterfacedObject, IEnumerator<TFilter>)
private
FTestList: TList<T>;
FIndex: Integer;
protected
constructor Create(Owner: TList<T>); overload;
function GetCurrent: TFilter;
function MoveNext: Boolean;
end;
TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T: class; TFilter: class> = class(TInterfacedObject, IEnumerable<TFilter>)
private
FTestList: TList<T>;
public
constructor Create(Owner: TList<T>); overload;
function GetEnumerator: IEnumerator<TFilter>;
end;
TTestList<T: class> = class(TList<T>)
public
function OfType<TFilter: class>: IEnumerable<TFilter>;
end;
implementation
{ TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter> }
constructor TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>.Create(Owner: TList<T>);
begin
inherited Create;
FTestList := Owner;
FIndex := -1;
end;
function TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>.GetCurrent: TFilter;
begin
Result := TFilter(TObject(FTestList[FIndex]));
end;
function TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>.MoveNext: Boolean;
begin
repeat
Inc(FIndex);
until (FIndex >= FTestList.Count) or FTestList[FIndex].InheritsFrom(TFilter);
Result := FIndex < FTestList.Count;
end;
{ TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T, TFilter> }
constructor TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T, TFilter>.Create(Owner: TList<T>);
begin
inherited Create;
FTestList := Owner;
end;
function TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T, TFilter>.GetEnumerator: IEnumerator<TFilter>;
begin
Result := TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>.Create(FTestList);
end;
{ TTestList<T> }
function TTestList<T>.OfType<TFilter>: IEnumerable<TFilter>;
begin
Result := TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T,TFilter>.Create(self);
end;
end.
A worked version using system.IEnumerable<T> and system.IEnumerator<T>
unit uTestList;
interface
uses Generics.Collections;
type
TListItemBase = class(TObject)
end; { TListItemBase }
TListItemChild1 = class(TListItemBase)
end;
TListItemChild2 = class(TListItemBase)
end;
TTestList<T : TListItemBase> = class;
TOfTypeEnumerator<T : class; TFilter : class> = class(TInterfacedObject, IEnumerator<TFilter>, IEnumerator)
private
FTestList : TList<T>;
FIndex : Integer;
protected
constructor Create(Owner : TList<T>); overload;
function GetCurrent: TObject;
function GenericGetCurrent : TFilter;
function MoveNext : Boolean;
procedure Reset;
function IEnumerator<TFilter>.GetCurrent = GenericGetCurrent;
end;
TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T : class; TFilter : class> = class(TInterfacedObject, IEnumerable<TFilter>, IEnumerable)
private
FTestList : TList<T>;
public
constructor Create(Owner : TList<T>); overload;
function GetEnumerator : IEnumerator;
function GenericGetEnumerator : IEnumerator<TFilter>;
function IEnumerable<TFilter>.GetEnumerator = GenericGetEnumerator;
end;
TTestList<T : TListItemBase> = class(TList<T>)
public
function OfType<TFilter : TListItemBase>() : IEnumerable<TFilter>;
end; { TTestList }
implementation
{ TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter> }
constructor TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>.Create(Owner: TList<T>);
begin
inherited Create;
FTestList := Owner;
FIndex := -1;
end;
function TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>.GenericGetCurrent: TFilter;
begin
Result := TFilter(TObject(FTestList[FIndex]));
end;
function TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>.GetCurrent: TObject;
begin
Result := TObject( FTestList[FIndex] );
end;
function TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>.MoveNext: Boolean;
begin
repeat
Inc(FIndex);
until (FIndex >= FTestList.Count) or FTestList[FIndex].InheritsFrom(TFilter);
Result := FIndex < FTestList.Count;
end;
procedure TOfTypeEnumerator<T, TFilter>.Reset;
begin
FIndex := -1;
end;
{ TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T, TFilter> }
constructor TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T, TFilter>.Create(Owner: TList<T>);
begin
inherited Create;
FTestList := Owner;
end;
function TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T, TFilter>.GetEnumerator: IEnumerator;
begin
Result := GenericGetEnumerator;
end;
function TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T, TFilter>.GenericGetEnumerator: IEnumerator<TFilter>;
begin
Result := TOfTypeEnumerator<T,TFilter>.Create(FTestList);
end;
{ TTestList<T> }
function TTestList<T>.OfType<TFilter>: IEnumerable<TFilter>;
begin
Result := TOfTypeEnumeratorFactory<T,TFilter>.Create(self);
end;
end.
A test procedure:
var
MyElem: TListItemBase;
MyElem1: TListItemChild1;
MyElem2: TListItemChild2;
begin
Memo1.Clear;
for MyElem in FTestList.OfType<TListItemBase>() do
begin
Memo1.Lines.Add('----------');
end;
for MyElem1 in FTestList.OfType<TListItemChild1>() do
begin
Memo1.Lines.Add('==========');
end;
for MyElem2 in FTestList.OfType<TListItemChild2>() do
begin
Memo1.Lines.Add('++++++++++');
end;
When working with lists of items where the lists just serve as a temporary container - which list types would you recommend me to use?
I
don't want to destroy the list manually
would like to use a built-in list type (no frameworks, libraries, ...)
want generics
Something which would make this possible without causing leaks:
function GetListWithItems: ISomeList;
begin
Result := TSomeList.Create;
// add items to list
end;
var
Item: TSomeType;
begin
for Item in GetListWithItems do
begin
// do something
end;
end;
What options do I have? This is about Delphi 2009 but for the sake of knowledge please also mention if there is something new in this regard in 2010+.
An (somehow ugly) workaround for this is to create an 'autodestroy' interface along with the list. It must have the same scope so that when the interface is released, your list is destroyed too.
type
IAutoDestroyObject = interface
end;
TAutoDestroyObject = class(TInterfacedObject, IAutoDestroyObject)
strict private
FValue: TObject;
public
constructor Create(obj: TObject);
destructor Destroy; override;
end;
constructor TAutoDestroyObject.Create(obj: TObject);
begin
inherited Create;
FValue := obj;
end;
destructor TAutoDestroyObject.Destroy;
begin
FreeAndNil(FValue);
inherited;
end;
function CreateAutoDestroyObject(obj: TObject): IAutoDestroyObject;
begin
Result := TAutoDestroyObject.Create(obj);
end;
FList := TObjectList.Create;
FListAutoDestroy := CreateAutoDestroyObject(FList);
Your usage example gets more complicated, too.
type
TSomeListWrap = record
List: TSomeList;
AutoDestroy: IAutoDestroyObject;
end;
function GetListWithItems: TSomeListWrap;
begin
Result.List := TSomeList.Create;
Result.AutoDestroy := CreateAutoDestroyObject(Result.List);
// add items to list
end;
var
Item: TSomeItem;
begin
for Item in GetListWithItems.List do
begin
// do something
end;
end;
Inspired by Barry Kelly's blog post here you could implement smart pointers for your purpose like this :
unit Unit80;
interface
uses
Windows, Messages, SysUtils, Variants, Classes, Graphics, Controls, Forms,
Dialogs, StdCtrls, Generics.Collections;
type
TMyList =class( TList<Integer>)
public
destructor Destroy; override;
end;
TLifetimeWatcher = class(TInterfacedObject)
private
FWhenDone: TProc;
public
constructor Create(const AWhenDone: TProc);
destructor Destroy; override;
end;
TSmartPointer<T: class> = record
strict private
FValue: T;
FLifetime: IInterface;
public
constructor Create(const AValue: T); overload;
class operator Implicit(const AValue: T): TSmartPointer<T>;
property Value: T read FValue;
end;
TForm80 = class(TForm)
Button1: TButton;
Memo1: TMemo;
procedure Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
private
{ Private declarations }
public
function getList : TSmartPointer<TMyList>;
{ Public declarations }
end;
var
Form80: TForm80;
implementation
{$R *.dfm}
{ TLifetimeWatcher }
constructor TLifetimeWatcher.Create(const AWhenDone: TProc);
begin
FWhenDone := AWhenDone;
end;
destructor TLifetimeWatcher.Destroy;
begin
if Assigned(FWhenDone) then
FWhenDone;
inherited;
end;
{ TSmartPointer<T> }
constructor TSmartPointer<T>.Create(const AValue: T);
begin
FValue := AValue;
FLifetime := TLifetimeWatcher.Create(procedure
begin
AValue.Free;
end);
end;
class operator TSmartPointer<T>.Implicit(const AValue: T): TSmartPointer<T>;
begin
Result := TSmartPointer<T>.Create(AValue);
end;
procedure TForm80.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
var i: Integer;
begin
for I in getList.Value do
Memo1.Lines.Add(IntToStr(i));
end;
{ TMyList }
destructor TMyList.Destroy;
begin
ShowMessage('Kaputt');
inherited;
end;
function TForm80.getList: TSmartPointer<TMyList>;
var
x: TSmartPointer<TMyList>;
begin
x := TMyList.Create;
Result := x;
with Result.Value do
begin
Add(1);
Add(2);
Add(3);
end;
end;
end.
Look at getList and Button1click to see its usage.
To fully support what you're after the language would need to support 2 things:
Garbage collector. That's the only thing that gives you the freedom to USE something without bothering with freeing it. I'd welcome a change in Delphi that gave us even partial support for this.
The possibility to define local, initialized variables. Again, I'd really love to see something along those lines.
Meanwhile, the closest you can get is to use Interfaces in place of garbage collection (because interfaces are reference-counted, once they go out of scope they'll be released). As for initialized local variables, you could use a trick similar to what I'm describing here: Declaring block level variables for branches in delphi
And for the sake of fun, here's a Console application that demonstrates the use of "fake" local variables and Interfaces to obtain temporary lists that are readily initialized will be automatically freed:
program Project1;
{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}
uses
SysUtils, Generics.Collections;
type
ITemporaryLocalVar<T:constructor> = interface
function GetL:T;
property L:T read GetL;
end;
TTemporaryLocalVar<T:constructor> = class(TInterfacedObject, ITemporaryLocalVar<T>)
public
FL: T;
constructor Create;
destructor Destroy;override;
function GetL:T;
end;
TTempUse = class
public
class function L<T:constructor>: ITemporaryLocalVar<T>;
end;
{ TTemporaryLocalVar<T> }
constructor TTemporaryLocalVar<T>.Create;
begin
FL := T.Create;
end;
destructor TTemporaryLocalVar<T>.Destroy;
begin
TObject(FL).Free;
inherited;
end;
function TTemporaryLocalVar<T>.GetL: T;
begin
Result := FL;
end;
{ TTempUse }
class function TTempUse.L<T>: ITemporaryLocalVar<T>;
begin
Result := TTemporaryLocalVar<T>.Create;
end;
var i:Integer;
begin
try
with TTempUse.L<TList<Integer>> do
begin
L.Add(1);
L.Add(2);
L.Add(3);
for i in L do
WriteLn(i);
end;
ReadLn;
except
on E: Exception do
Writeln(E.ClassName, ': ', E.Message);
end;
end.
The standard list classes, like TList, TObjectList, TInterfaceList, etc, do not implement automated lifecycles, so you have to free them manually when you are done using them. If you want a list class that is accessible via an interface, you have to implement that yourself, eg:
type
IListIntf = interface
...
end;
TListImpl = class(TInterfacedObject, IListIntf)
private
FList: TList;
...
public
constructor Create; override;
destructor Destroy; override;
...
end;
constructor TListImpl.Create;
begin
inherited;
FList := TList.Create;
end;
destructor TListImpl.Destroy;
begin
FList.Free;
inherited;
end;
function GetListWithItems: IListIntf;
begin
Result := TListImpl.Create;
// add items to list
end;
Another option is to implement a generic IEnumerable adapter (as one of the ways to satisfy the for .. in compiler requirement) and rely on reference counting of the interface. I don't know if the following works in Delphi 2009, it seems to work in Delphi XE:
program Project1;
{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}
uses
SysUtils, Classes,
Generics.Collections;
type
// IEnumerator adapter for TEnumerator
TInterfacedEnumerator<T> = class(TInterfacedObject, IEnumerator<T>)
private
FEnumerator: TEnumerator<T>;
public
constructor Create(AEnumerator: TEnumerator<T>);
destructor Destroy; override;
function IEnumerator<T>.GetCurrent = GetCurrent2;
{ IEnumerator }
function GetCurrent: TObject;
function MoveNext: Boolean;
procedure Reset;
{ IEnumerator<T> }
function GetCurrent2: T;
end;
// procedure used to fill the list
TListInitProc<T> = reference to procedure(List: TList<T>);
// IEnumerable adapter for TEnumerable
TInterfacedEnumerable<T> = class(TInterfacedObject, IEnumerable<T>)
private
FEnumerable: TEnumerable<T>;
public
constructor Create(AEnumerable: TEnumerable<T>);
destructor Destroy; override;
class function Construct(InitProc: TListInitProc<T>): IEnumerable<T>;
function IEnumerable<T>.GetEnumerator = GetEnumerator2;
{ IEnumerable }
function GetEnumerator: IEnumerator; overload;
{ IEnumerable<T> }
function GetEnumerator2: IEnumerator<T>; overload;
end;
{ TInterfacedEnumerator<T> }
constructor TInterfacedEnumerator<T>.Create(AEnumerator: TEnumerator<T>);
begin
inherited Create;
FEnumerator := AEnumerator;
end;
destructor TInterfacedEnumerator<T>.Destroy;
begin
FEnumerator.Free;
inherited Destroy;
end;
function TInterfacedEnumerator<T>.GetCurrent: TObject;
begin
Result := TObject(GetCurrent2);
end;
function TInterfacedEnumerator<T>.GetCurrent2: T;
begin
Result := FEnumerator.Current;
end;
function TInterfacedEnumerator<T>.MoveNext: Boolean;
begin
Result := FEnumerator.MoveNext;
end;
procedure TInterfacedEnumerator<T>.Reset;
begin
// ?
end;
{ TInterfacedEnumerable<T> }
class function TInterfacedEnumerable<T>.Construct(InitProc: TListInitProc<T>): IEnumerable<T>;
var
List: TList<T>;
begin
List := TList<T>.Create;
try
if Assigned(InitProc) then
InitProc(List);
Result := Create(List);
except
List.Free;
raise;
end;
end;
constructor TInterfacedEnumerable<T>.Create(AEnumerable: TEnumerable<T>);
begin
inherited Create;
FEnumerable := AEnumerable;
end;
destructor TInterfacedEnumerable<T>.Destroy;
begin
FEnumerable.Free;
inherited Destroy;
end;
function TInterfacedEnumerable<T>.GetEnumerator: IEnumerator;
begin
Result := GetEnumerator2;
end;
function TInterfacedEnumerable<T>.GetEnumerator2: IEnumerator<T>;
begin
Result := TInterfacedEnumerator<T>.Create(FEnumerable.GetEnumerator);
end;
type
TSomeType = record
X, Y: Integer;
end;
function GetList(InitProc: TListInitProc<TSomeType>): IEnumerable<TSomeType>;
begin
Result := TInterfacedEnumerable<TSomeType>.Construct(InitProc);
end;
procedure MyInitList(List: TList<TSomeType>);
var
NewItem: TSomeType;
I: Integer;
begin
for I := 0 to 9 do
begin
NewItem.X := I;
NewItem.Y := 9 - I;
List.Add(NewItem);
end;
end;
procedure Main;
var
Item: TSomeType;
begin
for Item in GetList(MyInitList) do // you could also use an anonymous procedure here
Writeln(Format('X = %d, Y = %d', [Item.X, Item.Y]));
Readln;
end;
begin
try
ReportMemoryLeaksOnShutdown := True;
Main;
except
on E: Exception do
begin
ExitCode := 1;
Writeln(Format('[%s] %s', [E.ClassName, E.Message]));
end;
end;
end.
No, not 'out of the box' in Delphi.
I know that you don't need a library but you may be interessed by the principle of TDynArray.
In Jedi Code Library, exist the Guard function that already implements what
Gabr's code does.