Why are there multiple MessageSID permutations in the Twilio Message response? - twilio

This is a more general question for trying to understand why there are what appear to be 3 different permutations of essentially the same key-value in the vanilla Twilio api response back either when a message resource is returned or webhook'd to a third party application.
Here is the abridged JSON response returned to a requesting client:
//mock message id values
{ "SmsMessageSid": "MM2fb7744c9a752cb554b4a6371c6756d8",
//... abridged
"SmsSid": "MM2fb7744c9a752cb554b4a6371c6756d8",
//...abridged
"MessageSid": "MM2fb7744c9a752cb554b4a6371c6756d8"
}
Google surfaces a support doc on MessageSid, but nothing else is clear on the data dictionary for the other two properties.
My questions are:
Why are there 3 keys with the same value?
Are there any instances in which those values would be different for any of the keys?
Which key-value should I persist if I want to save the id for this specific message?

This may help:
SMS Request Parameters
MessageSid A 34 character unique identifier for the message. May be used to later retrieve this message from the REST API.
SmsSid Same value as MessageSid. Deprecated and included for backward compatibility.
Use MessageSid

Twilio Developer Evangelist here. Alan's answer is correct. We ended up writing a blog post based on this question! You can check it out here: https://www.twilio.com/blog/programmable-messaging-sids

Related

How to pass dynamic value to JSON as a API request in flutter flow?

I have two page
Login/Registration Page as of now
OTP Verification Page
API has been created and in api, we are passing phone number as request and gets otp as response. However i would like your help to know how should i able to pass the phoneNumber textfield data to APIcall json request in flutterflow?
If there is anyway or any documentation will be really helpful?
I have tried with variable method, however i was not able to pass it to json.
I have also tried jsonpath method, but no luck.
Define dynamic part of API url with brackets
https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/[postId]
https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/comments?postId=[postId]
then create the variable (postId) with the same name. When adding the API call, it is required to add these variables.
See API Calls 101 for details.

Use Annotation tool configuration / Automatic annotation service from brat

I'd like to use a personnal API for named entity recognition (NER), and use brat for visualisation. It seems brat offers an Automatic annotation tool, but documentation about its configuration is sparse.
Are there available working examples of this features ?
Could someone explain me what should be the format of the response of the API ?
I finally manage to understand how it works, thanks to this topic in the GoogleGroup diffusion list of BRAT
https://groups.google.com/g/brat-users/c/shX1T2hqzgI
The text is sent to the Automatic Annotator API as a byte string in the body of a POST request, and the format BRAT required in response from this API is in the form of a dictionary of dictionaries, namel(
{
"T1": {
"type": "WhatEverYouWantString", # must be defined in the annotation.conf file
"offsets": [(0, 2), (10, 12)], # list of tuples of integers that correspond to the start and end position of
"texts": ["to", "go"]
}
"T2" : {
"type": "SomeString",
"offsets":[(start1, stop1), (start2, stop2), ...]
"texts":["string[start1:stop1]", "string[start2:stop2]", ...
}
"T3" : ....
}
THEN, you put this dictionary in a JSON format and you send it back to BRAT.
Note :
"T1", "T2", ... are mandatory keys (and corresponds to the Term index in the .ann file that BRAT generates during manual annotation)
the keys "type", "offsets" and "texts" are mandatory, otherwise you get some error in the log of BRAT (you can consult these log as explained in the GoogleGroup thread linked above)
the format of the values are strict ("type" gets a string, "offsets" gets a list of tuple (or list) or integers, "texts" gets a list of strings), otherwise you get BRAT errors
I suppose that the strings in "texts" must corresponds to the "offsets", otherwise there should be an error, or at least a problem with the display of tags (this is already the case if you generate the .ann files from an automatic detection algorithm and have different start and stop than the associated text)
I hope it helps. I managed to make the API using Flask this morning, but I needed to construct a flask.Response object to get the correct output format. Also, the incoming format from BRAT to the Flask API could not be catch until I used a flask.request object with request.get_body() method.
Also, I have to mention that I was not able to use the examples given in the BRAT GitHub :
https://github.com/nlplab/brat/blob/master/tools/tokenservice.py
https://github.com/nlplab/brat/blob/master/tools/randomtaggerservice.py
I mean I could not make them working, but I'm not familiar at all with API and HTTP packages in Python. At least I figured out what was the correct format for the API response.
Finally, I have no idea how to make relations among entities (i.e. BRAT arrows) format from the API, though
https://github.com/nlplab/brat/blob/master/tools/restoataggerservice.py
seems to work with such thing.
The GoogleGroup discussion
https://groups.google.com/g/brat-users/c/lzmd2Nyyezw/m/CMe9FenZAAAJ
seems to mention that it is not possible to send relations between entities back from the Automatic Annotation API and make them work with BRAT.
I may try it later :-)

PHP Twilio RequestValidator returning false on all endpoints

So I really don't know what the problem is here, I've tried many things, but I can't get the Twilio request hashes to match up. Let me explain.
I decided to implement an instance of Twilio's RequestValidator to ensure the requests were coming from Twilio. But after following the tutorial here: https://www.twilio.com/docs/usage/security?code-sample=code-validate-signature-of-request-1&code-language=PHP&code-sdk-version=5.x
The validator is only returning false. Here is the code that I used:
$url = 'https://example.com/api/endpoint/to/endpoint/';
$request_params = $_REQUEST;
$twilio_validator = new RequestValidator('myauthtoken');
if (!$twilio_validator->validate($_SERVER['HTTP_X_TWILIO_SIGNATURE'], $url, $request_params)) {
throw new CallException('Not from Twilio');
}
Even though the URL is an example, that is exactly how I have the actual URL formatted...no port, basic auth, or fragment. Just the protocol, domain, and path with a trailing "/". In addition, the URL is the exact VoiceURL I set when I set up this Twilio App (this is calling the VoiceURL to one of my Twilio Apps).
My auth token is the auth token for my whole account
The request params is where I'm sure I'm messing something up. Twilio is making a GET request to this endpoint, and I tried using the $_GET superglobal as well, to no avail. I'm using $_REQUEST here because of this issue: https://github.com/twilio/twilio-php/issues/510 and because I thought it would be the best choice. I have also tried using file_get_contents('php://input') to the exact same problem (the hashes not matching, ultimately).
I even forked and opened a PR on the PHP SDK to update the class a little bit, just to see if I could learn any more...so I know the class and it's methods pretty well...I just don't see my issue.
What am I doing wrong here to make it so that the RequestValidator isn't validating that the requests from Twilio are coming from Twilio?
So after a lot of research and working with Twilio help, I figured out the answer to my question.
When Twilio is making a GET request to my server, you aren't supposed to pass the GET parameters as the third parameter to the validate method on the RequestValidator class. When Twilio is making a GET request to your server, validating actually needs to look like this:
// this is the interesting part...you don't even set the pathname on the domain...
// EVEN IF YOU THE PATHNAME IS SET IN YOUR VOICE URL.
// This is because of the different way the RequestValidator handles GET and POST params
$domain = 'https://example.com'; // make sure to add no trailing '/'
// setting up the RequestValidator
$twilio_validator = new RequestValidator('myauthtoken');
// figuring out if the request is from twilio
$is_from_twilio = $twilio_validator->validate(
// the signature header that Twilio sends
$_SERVER['HTTP_X_TWILIO_SIGNATURE'],
// The domain name CONCATENATED to the Request URI. $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'] holds everything that comes after the domain name in a URL (pathname, query parameters, and fragment)
$domain.$_SERVER['REQUEST_URI']
// if the request is a get request, as mine are, there is no need for the third parameter
);
// resolving the response
if (!$is_from_twilio) {
echo 'Not from Twilio';
exit;
}
Refer to the comments in the code for a more in depth discussion on the code at work here..

twilio api - HTTP Request Split in Studio

How would I 'Split Based On' parsed JSON values from a HTTP Request ?
I know it's in the format 'widgets.MY_WIDGET_NAME.parsed.[parsed variable name]', but there is no way I can get to enter this in the Split condition.
I know that they are being returned because I can add them to a SMS Message Body.
Twilio developer evangelist here.
It's not obvious, and we're looking at redesigning to help with this, but if you start typing in the "Split Based On" widget's drop down box you can enter the format of the variable you want.
Let me know if this helps at all.

URL length limit for google reader api

I am using "/reader/api/0/stream/items/ids" API to get the item ids for sources that I want.
I have quite a number of sources, so I repeated "s=" parameter to include in the api url.
However, google has given me an error of "URL is too long".
So the question is that How can I solve it so that I just use one time api call to get item ids for that many sources?
Thanks
It seems that /reader/api/0/stream/items/ids path supports a POST method. This means the amount of data you could pass by using POST verb is much more than by using a query string and a GET method.
So use https://www.google.com/reader/api/0/stream/items/ids URL for the post, and pass your query string as a post data. Don't forget to include an action token(T) which is required for POST requests.

Resources