This is a part of my code:
def lstm_model_structure(training_data,batch_size, num_neurons):
train, test = training_data[:, :8], training_data[:, 8:14]
train = train.reshape(train.shape[0], 1, train.shape[1])
model = Sequential()
model.add(LSTM(units=num_neurons,activation="tanh", kernel_regularizer=l2(0.01), recurrent_regularizer=l2(0.01), bias_regularizer=l2(0.01), name='input',return_sequences=True, batch_input_shape=(batch_size, X.shape[1], X.shape[2])))
model.add(Dropout(0.2))
model.add(LSTM(units=50, name='lstm1',return_sequences=True))
model.add(Dropout(0.2))
model.add(LSTM(units=50, name='lstm2'))
model.add(Dropout(0.2))
model.add(Dense(6))
# Compile the model
adaDelta = optimizers.Adadelta(learning_rate=0.001, decay=1e-6)
model.compile(loss='mean_squared_error', optimizer="adaDelta")
model.fit(trainX, trainy,validation_data=(testX, testy), epochs=350, batch_size=7, verbose=1, shuffle=False)
return model
Where the shape of training_data is (9,16), batch size is 9, num_neurons is 52.
The previous model works fine(Without validation data) but when i split the data in order to have validation data as following:
def lstm_model_structure(training_data,batch_size, num_neurons):
train, test = training_data[:, :8], training_data[:, 8:14]
trainX, testX = train[:7, :], train[7:, :]
trainy, testy = test[:7], test[7:]
trainX = trainX.reshape(trainX.shape[0], 1, trainX.shape[1])
testX = testX.reshape(testX.shape[0], 1, testX.shape[1])
model = Sequential()
model.add(LSTM(units=num_neurons, activation="tanh", kernel_regularizer=l2(0.01), recurrent_regularizer=l2(0.01), bias_regularizer=l2(0.01), name='input',return_sequences=True, batch_input_shape=(batch_size, trainX.shape[1], trainX.shape[2])))
model.add(Dropout(0.2))
model.add(LSTM(units=50, name='lstm1',return_sequences=True))
model.add(Dropout(0.2))
model.add(LSTM(units=50, name='lstm2'))
model.add(Dropout(0.2))
model.add(Dense(6))
# Compile the model
adaDelta = optimizers.Adadelta(learning_rate=0.001, decay=1e-6)
model.compile(loss='mean_squared_error', optimizer="adaDelta")
model.fit(trainX, trainy,validation_data=(testX, testy), epochs=350, batch_size=7, verbose=1, shuffle=False)
return model
Where:
print(trainX.shape) >> (7, 1, 8)
print(trainy.shape) >> (7, 6)
print(testX.shape) >> (2, 1, 8)
print(testy.shape) >> (2, 6)
I got the following error when i fit the model (Incompatible shapes):
InvalidArgumentError: Incompatible shapes: [7] vs. [9]
[[{{node training_2/Adadelta/gradients/loss_2/dense_3_loss/mean_squared_error/weighted_loss/mul_grad/Mul_1}}]]
How can i determine the correct batch input shape?
Related
I am new to deep learning and neural network so I need help understanding why this is happening and how i can fix it.
I have a training size of 7500 images
This is my model
img_size = 50
model = models.Sequential()
model.add(layers.Conv2D(32, (3, 3), activation='relu',
input_shape=(img_size, img_size, 3)))
model.add(layers.MaxPooling2D((2, 2)))
model.add(layers.Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(layers.MaxPooling2D((2, 2)))
model.add(layers.Conv2D(128, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(layers.MaxPooling2D((2, 2)))
model.add(layers.Conv2D(128, (3, 3), activation='relu'))
model.add(layers.MaxPooling2D((2, 2)))
model.add(layers.Flatten())
model.add(layers.Dropout(0.5))
model.add(layers.Dense(512, activation='relu'))
model.add(layers.Dense(1, activation='sigmoid'))
model.summary()
model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy',
optimizer=optimizers.RMSprop(learning_rate=2*1e-4),
metrics=['acc'])
# Date processing
# All images will be rescaled by 1./255
train_datagen = ImageDataGenerator(
rescale=1./255,
rotation_range=40,
width_shift_range=0.2,
height_shift_range=0.2,
shear_range=0.2,
zoom_range=0.2,
horizontal_flip=True,)
test_datagen = ImageDataGenerator(rescale=1./255)
train_generator = train_datagen.flow_from_directory(
# This is the target directory
train_dir,
target_size=(img_size, img_size),
batch_size=20,
class_mode='binary')
validation_generator = test_datagen.flow_from_directory(
validation_dir,
target_size=(img_size, img_size),
batch_size=20,
class_mode='binary')
# Train the Model
history = model.fit(
train_generator,
steps_per_epoch=375, #train_sample_size/data_batch_size
epochs=100,
validation_data=validation_generator,
validation_steps=50)
I have tried changing the parameters, such as adding dropout, changing batch size etc.. but still get a really high loss. The loss would be in the negative 20million and just keep increases.
X and Y is of shape (89362, 5) and (89362,) repectively.
x_train, x_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, Y,
test_size = 0.3,
random_state = 1)
x_train.shape, y_train.shape = ((62553, 5), (62553,))
x_test.shape, y_test.shape = ((26809, 5), (26809,))
Reshaped the vectors to:
torch.Size([1, 62553, 5]), torch.Size([1, 62553])
torch.Size([1, 26809, 5]), torch.Size([1, 26809])
The model is defined as
n_steps = 62553
n_features = 5
model = Sequential()
model.add(Conv1D(filters=64, kernel_size=2, activation='relu', input_shape=(n_steps, n_features)))
model.add(MaxPooling1D(pool_size=2))
model.add(Flatten())
model.add(Dense(50, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(62553))
model.compile(optimizer='adam', loss='mse')
model.fit(x_train, y_train, epochs=10, verbose=0)
While predicting with x_test, it throws value error
yhat = model.predict(x_test, verbose=0)
print(yhat)
ValueError: Error when checking input: expected conv1d_4_input to have shape (62553, 5) but got array with shape torch.Size([26809, 5])
This is happening because you are specifying a fixed size here:
model.add(Conv1D(filters=64, kernel_size=2, activation='relu', input_shape=(n_steps, n_features)))
Once you pass something else to the model, the model is still expecting that fixed size with dimensions:
n_steps = 62553
n_features = 5
Removing the input_shape parameter should correct this issue:
model.add(Conv1D(filters=64, kernel_size=2, activation='relu'))
I hope that this helps you.
I have a pandas dataframe containing filenames of positive and negative examples as below
img1 img2 y
001.jpg 002.jpg 1
003.jpg 004.jpg 0
003.jpg 002.jpg 1
I want to train my Siamese network using Keras ImageDataGenerator and flow_from_dataframe. How do I set up my training so that the code inputs 2 images with 1 label simultaneously.
Below is the code for my model
def siamese_model(input_shape) :
left = Input(input_shape)
right = Input(input_shape)
model = Sequential()
model.add(Conv2D(32, (3,3), activation='relu', input_shape=input_shape))
model.add(BatchNormalization())
model.add(Conv2D(64, (3,3), activation='relu'))
model.add(BatchNormalization())
model.add(Conv2D(128, (3,3), activation='relu'))
model.add(BatchNormalization())
model.add(Conv2D(256, (3,3), activation='relu')
model.add(BatchNormalization())
model.add(Conv2D(256, (3,3), activation='relu')
model.add(MaxPooling2D())
model.add(BatchNormalization())
model.add(Flatten())
model.add(Dense(512, activation='sigmoid'))
left_encoded = model(left)
right_encoded = model(right)
L1_layer = Lambda(lambda tensors:K.abs(tensors[0] - tensors[1]))
L1_distance = L1_layer([left_encoded, right_encoded])
prediction = Dense(1,activation='sigmoid')(L1_distance)
siamese_net = Model(inputs=[left,right],outputs=prediction)
return siamese_net
model = siamese_model((224,224,3))
model.compile(loss="binary_crossentropy",optimizer="adam", metrics=['accuracy'])
datagen_left = ImageDataGenerator(rotation_range=10,
width_shift_range=0.2,
height_shift_range=0.2,
shear_range=0.2,
zoom_range=0.2,
vertical_flip = True)
datagen_right = ImageDataGenerator(rotation_range=10,
width_shift_range=0.2,
height_shift_range=0.2,
shear_range=0.2,
zoom_range=0.2,
vertical_flip = True)
Join the generators in a custom generator.
Make one of them output the desired labels, discard the label of the other.
class DoubleGenerator(Sequence):
def __init__(self, gen1, gen2):
self.gen1 = gen1
self.gen2 = gen2
def __len__(self):
return len(self.gen1)
def __getitem__(self, i):
x1,y = self.gen1[i]
x2,y2 = self.gen2[i]
return (x1,x2), y
Use it:
double_gen = DoubleGenerator(datagen_left.flow_from_directory(...),
datagen_right.flow_from_directory(...))
I have xtrain.shape as
(60000, 28, 28)
It means 60000 channels with image size 28 * 28
I want to make a keras Sequential model.
specifying the model shape
model = Sequential()
model.add(Convolution2D(32,3,activation='relu',input_shape=(????)))
model.add(Dense(10, activation='relu'))
model.summary()
what input_shape should looks like?
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(64,input_shape=(1,28,28)))
when I put this I got an following error
Error when checking input: expected dense_31_input to have 4 dimensions, but got array with shape (60000, 28, 28)
why this required 4 dimensions? and how to fix it form code?
I have xtrain.shape as
(60000, 28, 28)
It means 60000 channels with image size 28 * 28
Well, it certainly does not mean that; it means 60000 samples, not channels (MNIST is a single-channel dataset).
No need to re-invent the wheel in such cases - have a look at the MNIST CNN example in Keras:
from keras import backend as K
# input image dimensions
img_rows, img_cols = 28, 28
# the data, shuffled and split between train and test sets
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = mnist.load_data()
if K.image_data_format() == 'channels_first': # Theano backend
x_train = x_train.reshape(x_train.shape[0], 1, img_rows, img_cols)
x_test = x_test.reshape(x_test.shape[0], 1, img_rows, img_cols)
input_shape = (1, img_rows, img_cols)
else: # Tensorflow backend
x_train = x_train.reshape(x_train.shape[0], img_rows, img_cols, 1)
x_test = x_test.reshape(x_test.shape[0], img_rows, img_cols, 1)
input_shape = (img_rows, img_cols, 1)
# normalise:
x_train = x_train.astype('float32')
x_test = x_test.astype('float32')
x_train /= 255
x_test /= 255
# convert class vectors to binary class matrices
y_train = keras.utils.to_categorical(y_train, num_classes)
y_test = keras.utils.to_categorical(y_test, num_classes)
# your model:
model = Sequential()
model.add(Convolution2D(32,3,activation='relu',input_shape=input_shape))
model.add(Dense(10, activation='softmax')) # change to softmax in the final layer
where you should also change the activation of the final layer to softmax (and most probably add some pooling and flatten layers before the final dense one).
Try to reshape data to (60000, 28, 28, 1) or (60000, 1, 28, 28).
First one,
model = Sequential()
model.add(Convolution2D(32,3,activation='relu',input_shape=(60000,28,28)))
model.add(Dense(10, activation='relu'))
model.summary()
Second one,
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(64,input_shape=(None,60000,28,28)))
I am trying to rewrite a Sequential model of Network In Network CNN using Functional API. I use it with CIFAR-10 dataset. The Sequential model trains without a problem, but Functional API model gets stuck. I probably missed something when rewriting the model.
Here's a reproducible example:
Dependencies:
from keras.models import Model, Input, Sequential
from keras.layers import Conv2D, MaxPooling2D, GlobalAveragePooling2D, Dropout, Activation
from keras.utils import to_categorical
from keras.losses import categorical_crossentropy
from keras.optimizers import Adam
from keras.datasets import cifar10
Loading the dataset:
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = cifar10.load_data()
x_train = x_train / 255.
x_test = x_test / 255.
y_train = to_categorical(y_train, num_classes=10)
y_test = to_categorical(y_test, num_classes=10)
input_shape = x_train[0,:,:,:].shape
Here's the working Sequential model:
model = Sequential()
#mlpconv block1
model.add(Conv2D(32, (5, 5), activation='relu',padding='valid',input_shape=input_shape))
model.add(Conv2D(32, (1, 1), activation='relu'))
model.add(Conv2D(32, (1, 1), activation='relu'))
model.add(MaxPooling2D((2,2)))
model.add(Dropout(0.5))
#mlpconv block2
model.add(Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu',padding='valid'))
model.add(Conv2D(64, (1, 1), activation='relu'))
model.add(Conv2D(64, (1, 1), activation='relu'))
model.add(MaxPooling2D((2,2)))
model.add(Dropout(0.5))
#mlpconv block3
model.add(Conv2D(128, (3, 3), activation='relu',padding='valid'))
model.add(Conv2D(32, (1, 1), activation='relu'))
model.add(Conv2D(10, (1, 1), activation='relu'))
model.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D())
model.add(Activation('softmax'))
Compile and train:
model.compile(loss=categorical_crossentropy, optimizer=Adam(), metrics=['acc'])
_ = model.fit(x=x_train, y=y_train, batch_size=32,
epochs=200, verbose=1,validation_split=0.2)
In three epochs the model gets close to 50% validation accuracy.
Here's the same model rewritten using Functional API:
model_input = Input(shape=input_shape)
#mlpconv block1
x = Conv2D(32, (5, 5), activation='relu',padding='valid')(model_input)
x = Conv2D(32, (1, 1), activation='relu')(x)
x = Conv2D(32, (1, 1), activation='relu')(x)
x = MaxPooling2D((2,2))(x)
x = Dropout(0.5)(x)
#mlpconv block2
x = Conv2D(64, (3, 3), activation='relu',padding='valid')(x)
x = Conv2D(64, (1, 1), activation='relu')(x)
x = Conv2D(64, (1, 1), activation='relu')(x)
x = MaxPooling2D((2,2))(x)
x = Dropout(0.5)(x)
#mlpconv block3
x = Conv2D(128, (3, 3), activation='relu',padding='valid')(x)
x = Conv2D(32, (1, 1), activation='relu')(x)
x = Conv2D(10, (1, 1), activation='relu')(x)
x = GlobalAveragePooling2D()(x)
x = Activation(activation='softmax')(x)
model = Model(model_input, x, name='nin_cnn')
This model is then compiled using the same parameters as the Sequential model. When trained, the training accuracy gets stuck at 0.10, meaning the model doesn't get better and randomly chooses one of 10 classes.
What did I miss when rewriting the model? When calling model.summary() the models look identical except for the explicit Input layer in the Functional API model.
Removing activation in the final conv layer solves the problem:
x = Conv2D(10, (1, 1))(x)
Still not sure why the Sequential model works fine with activation in that layer.