The use-case is as follows: When user adds a reaction to a message within a thread the Slack bot needs to reply in the same thread.
The problem is that reaction_added event type does not contain the thread_ts which would allow to identify the thread (nor the ts of the root message, which is the same AFAIU).
Is there a way to resolve the thread of the message to which reaction_added was sent to?
The test payloads I tried for that event had
.event.item.ts
and
.event.item.channel
in them.
https://api.slack.com/events/reaction_added
Related
I want to send a message to all Participant nodes of my Helix cluster from Controller node. I tried following piece of code to send message to all registered participants of my cluster but their registered Participant message listeners are not receiving the message notification from Helix.
Message msg = new Message(factory.getMessageTypes().get(0), msgId);
msg.setMsgId(msgId);
msg.setSrcName(hostSrc);
msg.setTgtSessionId("*");
msg.setMsgState(MessageState.NEW);
msg.getRecord().setSimpleField("TestMessage", "Message from controller");
Criteria recipientCriteria = new Criteria();
recipientCriteria.setRecipientInstanceType(InstanceType.PARTICIPANT);
recipientCriteria.setInstanceName("%"); // To all recipients
recipientCriteria.setSessionSpecific(true); // To deliver only live participants
recipientCriteria.setSessionSpecific("DEV_CLUSTER"); // To only participants of this cluster
messagingService.send(recipientCriteria,msg);
Note that, when I am sending this message there is no resource exists in the cluster.
After debugging further what I have observed is CriteriaEvaluator.evaluateCriteria(....) operation is returning an empty list which further results into 0 messages to be sent to Participants nodes.
Kindly let me know if I am missing anything here while defining my criteria for Participants.
Thanks !
Update-1: our observation on this issue is as follows:
The received message at the participant side is read by both the Participant message listener(Say L1) and the handler created through MessageHandlerFactory(Which internally creating a listener HelixtaskExecutor (Say L2)).
In case if the message is read by HelixTaskExecutor(L2) first, it then immediately deletes the Znode in Zookeeper and the additionally configured message listener(L1) doesn't receive this message.
In case if the message is first read my additional message listener i.e. L1 then in such scenarios we don't face this problem as this additionally added listener doesn't delete the Znode from ZooKeeper.
We are still not sure how can we handle this problem as we want to use both the listener and MessageHandlers but facing the same problem I stated above.
Any inputs are appreciated.
In .NET Framework Microsoft.ServiceBus.Messaging had a class used to receive messages from Service Bus, BrokeredMessage. However, in .NET Standard 2.0, in order to receive messages from a Service Bus, class Message is used, from Microsoft.Azure.ServiceBus.Core.
BrokeredMessage has a method, CompleteAsync(), used to complete the receive operation of a message and indicates that the message should be marked as processed and deleted. I can't find a method for the Message class that does the same thing. Do you guys know any solution in order to mark a message as processed and deleted for the Message class?
To complete the message in the Queue using Microsoft.Azure.ServiceBus.Core, there is a method CompleteAsync available in the QueueClient, through which the messages will be received.
The lock token of the message should be passed as the parameter for the CompleteAsync method.
Example: queueClient.CompleteAsync(message.SystemProperties.LockToken)
I have created on replyQ and done biniding with one direct exchange.
Created the message by setting replyto property to "replyQ"
And sending the message on rabbit to the other service.
The service at other end getting the message and sending reply on given replyTo queue.
and now I am trying to read from a replyQ queue using
template.receiveAndConvert(replyQueue));
But getting null response and i can see the message in the replyQ.
That is the service is able to send the reply but am not able to read it from the given queue
Please help what is going wrong.
template.receiveAndConvert() is sync, blocked for some time one time function, where default timeout is:
private static final long DEFAULT_REPLY_TIMEOUT = 5000;
Maybe this one is your problem.
Consider to switch to ListenerContainer for continuous queue polling.
Another option is RabbitTemplate.sendAndReceive(), but yeah, with fixed reply queue you still get deal with ListenerContainer. See Spring AMQP Reference Manual for more info.
I don't know if this could help anyone, but I found out that declaring the expected Object as a parameter of a method listener did the work
#RabbitListener(queues = QUEUE_PRODUCT_NEW)
public void onNewProductListener(ProductDTO productDTO) {
// messagingTemplate.receiveAndConvert(QUEUE_PRODUCT_NEW) this returns null
log.info("A new product was created {}", productDTO);
}
To developers/users of LMAX Disruptor http://code.google.com/p/disruptor/ :
My question:
Can anyone suggest an approach to how apply a timeout function to Disruptor e.g. using EventHandler?
Here is one scenario that came up in my line of work:
Outbox - messages sent to the Server over a network
Inbox - ACK messages received from the Server
ACK Handler - marks outbox messages as ACKed
Timeout Handler - marks outbox message as NACKed (much needed, but where can it fit into the Disruptor design?)
Is there anyone who share the same opinion?
Or can anyone point out why it is unnecessary.
I hope the ensuing debate would be brief.
Thank you.
To clarify the timeout-handler would "fire" after a certain period of time when a message could not be delivered?
The way it works with disruptor is you have a ringbuffer for inbound and a ringbuffer for outbound messges... so email comes in, place it into the inbound ring buffer using an appropriate event. then process the message (i.e. decode, analye, log, store) and send it along to another sytem by placing it into the outbound ringbuffer... another handler takes the message and stores it into a database or sends it to another server using smtp... if a error / timeout etc. occurs, your create an event in the inbound ringbuffer signaling the error (NACK) and process this message. does that make sense?!?
Need to implement sync call from proces which receives many incoming messages from other processes. Problem in distinguish - when msg in return to call arrived. Do i need to spawn additional process for extracting msgs from queue into buffer while return msg not encountered and then send it to main process and after it every else accepted.
The trick is to use a reference as a token for replication:
replicate() ->
{ok, Token} = db:ask_replicate(...),
receive
{replication_completed, Token} ->
ok
end
where Token is created with a call to make_ref(). Since no other message will match Token, you are safe. Other messages will be placed in the mailbox for later scrutiny.
However, the above solution does not take process crashes into account. You need a monitor on the DB server as well. The simplest way to get the pattern right is to let the mediator be a gen_server. Alternatively, you can read a chapter in LearnYouSomeErlang: http://learnyousomeerlang.com/what-is-otp#the-basic-server look at the synchronous call in the kitty_server.