I'm trying to run multiple instances of a linux executable on macOS via a docker container. The problem I face is that when I run multiple instances of the container, I/O to macOS is seriously slow. I suspect it is because of the way I run multiple instances of the container. How could I resolve this?
Details:
I have a centos-7 docker container to run a linux executable on macOS. The Docker file is:
FROM scratch
ADD centos-7-x86_64-docker.tar.xz /
LABEL \
org.label-schema.schema-version="1.0" \
org.label-schema.name="CentOS Base Image" \
org.label-schema.vendor="CentOS" \
org.label-schema.license="GPLv2" \
org.label-schema.build-date="20200504" \
org.opencontainers.image.title="CentOS Base Image" \
org.opencontainers.image.vendor="CentOS" \
org.opencontainers.image.licenses="GPL-2.0-only" \
org.opencontainers.image.created="2020-05-04 00:00:00+01:00"
ADD my_exec_folder /usr/local/my_exec_folder
RUN yum install -y openssl
RUN yum install -y neon
ENV LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/usr/lib64:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}"
COPY ./run_my_exec.sh /
RUN chmod +x /run_my_exec.sh
ENTRYPOINT ["/run_my_exec.sh"]
My run_my_exec.sh runs as so:
#!/bin/bash
export MYEXEC="/usr/local/my_exec_folder/bin/my_exec"
cd $1
cp $MYEXEC .
./my_exec $2
rm ./my_exec
I build the container with:
docker build -t my_exec_c .
And then, in my program I run the container in a bash terminal opened with std::thread. The command I run the container with is:
docker run -t -v /my/rundir_id/on/macos:/rundir_id my_exec_c rundir my_inputs
, where rundir_id is like rundir_thread0, rundir_thread1 etc.
Related
Mine is a bit of a peculiar situation, I created a dockerfile that "works" if not for some proiblems,
Here is a "working" version:
ARG IMGVERS=latest
FROM bensuperpc/tinycore:${IMGVERS}
LABEL maintainer "Vinnie Costante <****#gmail.com>"
ARG DOWNDIR=/tmp/download
ARG INSTDIR=/opt/vscodium
ARG REPOAPI="https://api.github.com/repos/VSCodium/vscodium/releases/latest"
ENV LANG=C.UTF-8 LC_ALL=C PATH="${PATH}:${INSTDIR}/bin/"
RUN tce-load -wic Xlibs nss gtk3 libasound libcups python3.9 tk8.6 \
&& rm -rf /tmp/tce/optional/*
RUN sudo ln -s /lib /lib64 \
&& sudo ln -s /usr/local/etc/fonts /etc/fonts \
&& sudo mkdir -p ${DOWNDIR} ${INSTDIR} \
&& sudo chown -R tc:staff ${DOWNDIR} ${INSTDIR}
#COPY VSCodium-linux-x64-1.57.1.tar.gz ${DOWNDIR}/
RUN wget http://192.168.43.6:8000/VSCodium-linux-x64-1.57.1.tar.gz -P ${DOWNDIR}
RUN tar xvf ${DOWNDIR}/VSCodium*.gz -C ${INSTDIR} \
&& rm -rf ${DOWNDIR}
CMD ["codium"]
The issues are these:
Starting the image with this command vscodium does not start, but entering the shell (adding /bin/ash to the end of the docker run) and then running codium instead vscodium starts. I tried many ways, even changing the entrypoint, the result is always the same. But if I try to add any other graphic program (like firefox) and replace the argument of the CMD instruction inside the dockerfile, everything works as it should.
docker run -it --rm \
--net=host \
--env="DISPLAY=unix${DISPLAY}" \
--workdir /home/tc \
--volume="$HOME/.Xauthority:/root/.Xauthority:rw" \
--name tc \
tinycodium
the last two versions of codium (1.58.0 and 1.58.1) don't work at all on docker but they start normally on the same distro not containerized. I tried installing other dependencies but nothing worked. Right now I don't know how to understand what's wrong with these two new versions.
I don't know how to set a volume to save codium data, I tried something like this --volume=/home/vinnie/docker:/home/tc but there are always problems with user/group permissions. I've also tried booting the container as user by adding it to the docker group but there's always a mess with permissions. If someone could explain me how to proceed, the directories I want to save are these:
/home/tc/.vscode-oss
/home/tc/.cache/mesa_shader_cache
/home/tc/.config/VSCodium
/home/tc/.config/glib-2.0/settings
/home/tc/.local/share
Try running codium --verbose and see if the container starts
I have set up a docker image and install ubuntu on it. Can you please tell me how can I install Openmodelica inside ubuntu to that docker image?
for example, if I want to install node.js on this docker image I could use this code:
apt install nodejs
so I need some codes like that to install open Modelica on my docker image.
p.s: my docker image is an ubuntu image.
I happened to create a Docker image for OpenModelica to debug something, so I might add it here as well. We got this questions in the OpenModelica forum as well.
While the answer of #sjoelund.se will stay up to date this one is a bit more explaining.
Dockerfile
FROM ubuntu:18.04
# Export DISPLAY, so a XServer can display OMEdit
ARG DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
ENV DISPLAY=host.docker.internal:0.0
# Install wget, gnupg, lsb-release
RUN apt-get update \
&& apt install -y wget gnupg lsb-release
# Get the OpenModelica stable version
RUN for deb in deb deb-src; do echo "$deb http://build.openmodelica.org/apt `lsb_release -cs` stable"; done | tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/openmodelica.list
RUN wget -q http://build.openmodelica.org/apt/openmodelica.asc -O- | apt-key add -
# Install OpenModelica
RUN apt-get update \
&& apt install -y openmodelica
# Install OpenModelica libraries (like all of them)
RUN for PKG in `apt-cache search "omlib-.*" | cut -d" " -f1`; do apt-get install -y "$PKG"; done
# Add non-root user for security
RUN useradd -m -s /bin/bash openmodelicausers
USER openmodelicausers
ENV HOME /home/openmodelicausers
ENV USER openmodelicausers
WORKDIR $HOME
# Return omc version
CMD ["omc", "--version"]
Let's build and tag it:
docker build --tag openmodelica:ubuntubionic .
How to use omc from the docker image
Let's create a small helloWorld.mo Modelica model:
model helloWorld
Real x(start=1.0, fixed=true);
equations
der(x) = 2.5*x;
end helloWorld;
and a MOS script which will simulate it, called runHelloWorld.mos
loadFile("helloWorld.mo"); getErrorString();
simulate(helloWorld); getErrorString();
Now we can make our files accessible to the docker container with the -v flag and run our small example with:
docker run \
--rm \
-v $(pwd):/home/openmodelicausers \
openmodelica:ubuntubionic \
omc runHelloWorld.mos
Note that -v needs an absolute path. I added --rm to clean up.
Using OMEdit with a GUI
I'm using Windows + Docker with WSL2. So in order to get OMEdit running I need to have a XServer installed on my Windows host system. They are not trivial to set up, but I'm using VcXsrv and so far it is working for me. On Linux this is of course much simpler.
I'm using this config to start XLaunch:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XLaunch WindowMode="MultiWindow" ClientMode="NoClient" LocalClient="False" Display="-1" LocalProgram="xcalc" RemoteProgram="xterm" RemotePassword="" PrivateKey="" RemoteHost="" RemoteUser="" XDMCPHost="" XDMCPBroadcast="False" XDMCPIndirect="False" Clipboard="True" ClipboardPrimary="True" ExtraParams="" Wgl="True" DisableAC="True" XDMCPTerminate="False"/>
But when the XServer is running you can use OMEdit in nearly the same fashion you would from a Linux OS, just mount some directory with your files and that's it:
docker run \
--rm \
-v $(pwd):/home/openmodelicausers \
openmodelica:ubuntubionic \
OMEdit
You could get some inspiration from the Dockerfiles that are used to generate the OpenModelica docker images. For example: https://github.com/OpenModelica/OpenModelicaDockerImages/tree/v1.16.2
I'm trying to build a docker image that uses nvidia hardware decoding in gstreamer and have encountered a strange problem with making the image.
The build process does not find the nvidia cuda related stuff while running docker build (or nvidia-docker build), but when I spin up the failed image as a container and do those very same steps from within the container everything works. I even saved the container as image which gave me a persistent image that works as intended.
Has anyone experienced similar problem and can shed some light on it?
Dockerfile:
FROM nvcr.io/nvidia/deepstream:3.0-18.11 AS base
ENV DEBIAN_FRONTEND noninteractive
#install some dependencies. NOTE - not removing apt cache for the MWE
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \
build-essential \
libdc1394-22 \
tmux \
vim \
libjpeg-dev \
libpng-dev \
libpng12-dev \
cuda-toolkit-10-0 \
python3-setuptools \
python3-pip ninja-build pkg-config gobject-introspection gnome-devel bison flex libgirepository1.0-dev liborc-0.4-dev
RUN pip3 install meson && ldconfig
FROM base
#pull and make gstreamer:
RUN cd /tmp && mkdir gstreamer
RUN git clone https://github.com/GStreamer/gst-build.git /tmp/gstreamer \
&& cd /tmp/gstreamer \
&& git checkout tags/1.16.0 \
&& ./setup.py -Dgtk_doc=disabled -Dgst-plugins-bad:nvdec=enabled -Dgst-plugins-bad:nvenc=enabled -Dgst-plugins-bad:iqa=disabled -Dgst-plugins-bad:bluez=disabled --reconfigure \
&& ninja -C build \
&& ninja install -C build
Testing:
build and run the container. Inside the container:
$ gst-inspect-1.0 nvdec
No such element or plugin 'nvdec'
$ cd /tmp/gstreamer
$ ./setup.py -Dgtk_doc=disabled -Dgst-plugins-bad:nvdec=enabled -Dgst-plugins-bad:nvenc=enabled -Dgst-plugins-bad:iqa=disabled -Dgst-plugins-bad:bluez=disabled --reconfigure
$ ninja -C build
$ ninja install -C build
$ gst-inspect-1.0 nvdec
Factory Details:
Rank primary (256)
[... all plugin parameters show up]
GObject
+----GInitiallyUnowned
+----GstObject
+----GstElement
+----GstVideoDecoder
+----GstNvDec
EDIT1
The image builds with no errors, only when I try to call gstreamer it is built with no acceleration. I noticed that in the build process the major difference is
meson.build:109:2: Exception: Problem encountered: The nvdec plugin was enabled explicitly, but required CUDA dependencies were not found.
which does not happen when building from within the container.
Lack of error is related, most likely, to the ninja+meson build system which looks for compatible packages, reports the exception, but doesn't throw it and continues as if nothing wrong happened
EDIT2
Answering comment:
To build it and get the error, just build the attached docker image:
sudo docker build -t gst16:latest . > build.log
This will dump all the output into the build.log file.
I don't have a docker registry that I could use for this and the docker image gets quite big by docker standards (~8 Gigs), but to produce successfully, it's fairly simple:
sudo docker run --runtime="nvidia" -ti gst16:latest /bin/bash
or
sudo nvidia-docker run -ti gst16:latest /bin/bash
which seems to work the same for me. Notice no --rm flag! From within the container:
#check if nvidia decoder plugin is there:
gst-inspect-1.0 nvdec
#fail!
#now build it from within:
cd /opt/gstreamer
./setup.py -Dgtk_doc=disabled -Dgst-plugins-bad:nvdec=enabled -Dgst-plugins-bad:nvenc=enabled -Dgst-plugins-bad:iqa=disabled -Dgst-plugins-bad:bluez=disabled --reconfigure
ninja -C build
ninja install -C build
gst-inspect-1.0 nvdec
#success reported
Now to get the image, exit the container (ctrl+d) and in the host shell:
sudo docker container ls -a to view all containers including stopped ones
from gst16:latest get the CONTAINER_ID and copy it
sudo docker commit <CONTAINER_ID> gst16:manual and after a few seconds you should have the container saved as an image. Verify with sudo docker images
run the new image with sudo docker run --runtime=`nvidia` --rm -ti gst16:manual /bin/bash
from within the container try again the gst-inspect-1.0 nvdec to verify it's working
EDIT3
$ nvidia-docker --version
Docker version 18.09.0, build 4d60db4
I think I found the solution/reason
Writing it here in case someone finds themselves in similar situation, plus I hate finding old threads with similar problem and no answer or "nevermind, I solved it" as the only follow up
Docker build does not have any ties to nvidia runtime and gstreamer requires access to the full nvidia toolchain in order to build the plugins that need it. This is to be resolved with gstreamer 1.18 but until then, there is no way to build gstreamer with nvidia codecs in docker build.
The workaround:
Build image with all dependencies.
Run a container of said image using runtime="nvidia" but don't use --rm flag
In the container, build gstreamer and install it as normally.
Verify with gst-inspect-1.0
Commit the container as new image: docker commit <container_name> <temporary_image_name>
Tag the temporary image properly.
I want to isolate a testing environment in docker, I did that on CentOS 6 How to let syslog workable in docker?
In CentOS 7, the syslog-ng's configuration is different, when I run
/usr/sbin/syslog-ng -F -p /var/run/syslogd.pid
It appears the following error message, but there is no proc/kmsg in config files.
syslog-ng: Error setting capabilities, capability management disabled; error='Operation not permitted'
Error opening file for reading; filename='/proc/kmsg', error='Operation not permitted (1)'
The Dockerfile
FROM centos
RUN yum update --exclude=systemd -y \
&& yum install -y yum-plugin-ovl \
&& yum install -y epel-release
RUN yum install -y syslog-ng syslog-ng-libdbi
The test process:
docker build -t t1 .
docker run --rm -i -t t1 /bin/bash
In container, run following commands
# check config, no keyword like proc/kmsg
cd /etc/syslog-ng
grep -r -E 'proc|kmsg'
/usr/sbin/syslog-ng -F -p /var/run/syslogd.pid
Change /etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf from
source s_sys {
system();
internal();
};
to
source s_sys {
unix-stream("/dev/log");
internal();
};
It still show error message, but running instead of exit
syslog-ng: Error setting capabilities, capability management disabled; error='Operation not permitted'
To solve this, just run with --no-caps option
/usr/sbin/syslog-ng --no-caps -F -p /var/run/syslogd.pid
The question is most clear,
How to start complete desktop environment (KDE, XFCE, Gnome doesn't matter) in the Docker remote container.
I were digging over the internet and there are lots of questions about the related topic, but not the same, they all about how to run GUI application not the full desktop.
What I found out:
Necessary run Xvfb
Somehow run e.g. Xfce in that FrameBuffer
Allow x11vnc to share that running X environment
But I'm stuck here actually, always getting whatever errors:
... (EE) Invalid screen configuration 1024x768 for -screen 0
... Cannot open /dev/tty0 (No such file or directory)
Could you give some Dockerfile lines in order reach the goal?
That is I was looking for, the simplest form of the desktop in Docker:
FROM ubuntu
RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-get install xfce4 -y
RUN apt-get install xfce4-goodies -y
RUN apt-get purge -y pm-utils xscreensaver*
RUN apt-get install wget -y
EXPOSE 5901
RUN wget -qO- https://dl.bintray.com/tigervnc/stable/tigervnc-1.8.0.x86_64.tar.gz | tar xz --strip 1 -C /
RUN mkdir ~/.vnc
RUN echo "123456" | vncpasswd -f >> ~/.vnc/passwd
RUN chmod 600 ~/.vnc/passwd
CMD ["/usr/bin/vncserver", "-fg"]
Unfortunately I could not sort out with x11vnc and xvfb. But TigerVNC turned out much better.
This sample generate container with xfce gui and run vncserver with 123456 password. There is no need to overwrite ~/.vnc/xstartup manually because TigerVNC starts up X server by default!
To run the server:
sudo docker run --rm -dti -p 5901:5901 3ab3e0e7cb
To connect there with vncviewer:
vncviewer -AutoSelect 0 -QualityLevel 9 -CompressLevel 0 192.168.1.100:5901
Also you could not care about screen resolution because by default it will resize to fit your screen:
You may also encounter the issue with ipc_channel_posix (chrome and other browsers will not work properly) to eliminate this run container with memory sharing:
docker run -d --shm-size=2g --privileged -p 5901:5901 image-name
x11docker allows to run desktop environments as well as single GUI applications in docker.
Could you give some Dockerfile lines in order reach the goal?
Example desktop images on docker hub.
x11docker does a lot of setup to keep container isolation and provides some additional options like hardware acceleration or pulseaudio sound. Example:
x11docker --desktop x11docker/lxde
x11docker also supports network setups with SSH, VNC and HTML5
Example for SSH setup with xpra:
read Xenv < <(x11docker --xdummy --display=30 x11docker/lxde pcmanfm)
echo $Xenv && export $Xenv
# replace "start" with "start-desktop" to forward a desktop environment
xpra start :30 --use-display --start-via-proxy=no
From client system, connect with
xpra attach ssh:HOSTNAME:30 # replace HOSTNAME with IP or host name of ssh server
Without x11docker:
A quite short setup using Xephyr as nested X server on host is:
Xephyr :1
docker run -v /tmp/.X11-unix/X1:/tmp/.X11-unix/X1:rw \
-e DISPLAY=:1 \
x11docker/xfce
A short Dockerfile with Xfce desktop:
FROM debian:stretch
ENV DEBIAN_FRONTEND noninteractive
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends xfce4 dbus-x11
CMD startxfce4