A User can submit a form to create a Scheduling from more than one place and should subsequently be returned to the original place of form submission.
My Schedulings Controller, therefore relies on request.referrer. It works as intended in development and looks something like this:
class SchedulingsController < ApplicationController
#stuff not relevant to the question removed
def create
#scheduling = current_user.schedulings.build(scheduling_params)
if #scheduling.save
redirect_to request.referrer
flash[:success] = "scheduled!"
else
# do something not relevant to the question
end
end
end
I wish to run a Rails integration test to test this. request.referrer however appears to always be nil in the Test environment, so with help from an answer here I have worked around this by including a headers hash in the Post request like this:
class SchedulingsCreateTest < ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest
test "valid input for new scheduling" do
assert_difference 'Scheduling.count', 1 do
post schedulings_path, params: { scheduling: { start_time: Time.now },
headers: { "HTTP_REFERER" => "http://example.com/workouts" }
end
follow_redirect!
assert_template 'workouts/index'
assert_not flash.empty?
end
This test fails at assert_not flash.empty?
What is happening, why is the flash assessed as empty?
I note that if, in the controller, I change redirect_to request.referrer to redirect_to workouts_path (or workouts_url), the test passes.
Thanks for your interest and any help.
Daniel
I have broadly solved my own question by changing the value in the headers hash from:
"http://example.com/workouts" to "http://www.example.com/workouts"
the former is shown in an answer here and is sourced directly from the Rails Guide, however working in Rails 5, I found the “www” is necessary.
I got to the bottom of this with an extra line in my test:
assert_redirected_to workouts_url before the follow_redirect!, which failed and identified the url discrepancy.
Daniel
Related
I'm really stuck here. I have a Language model, that gets updated in this method:
def update
#language = Language.find(params[:id])
if #language.update_attributes(language_params)
flash[:success] = 'Language information updated.'
redirect_to #language
else
#skill_errors = #language.errors
render 'edit'
end
end
The intended behaviour for a successful update reproduces when I run it on my local server, object gets updated, flash appears and redirect to #language happens.
In the test, however, I only get the 200: Success response, and the object doesn't get updated. Here's the test code:
test 'should allow update when logged in as admin user' do
sign_in(#admin)
patch language_path(#ruby_language), params: { language: { name: 'Test'} }
assert_not flash.empty?
assert_redirected_to #ruby_language
#ruby_language.reload
assert_equal 'Test', #ruby_language.name
end
#admin and #ruby_language are defined in fixtures. All the asserts in this test fail, including the last one, with reload. My guess is that there might be some routing glitch caused by my usage of Devise and/or Kaminari gems? On the other hand, my Language routes are very simple:
resources :languages, concerns: :paginatable (the concern is here for human-readable URL formatting). Please, keep in mind that everything works as intended, only tests fail for some reason... Thanks in advance!
It turned out I was simply missing a required parameter in my update hash. Used Arun Kumar's tip of adding puts #response.body after patch.
Right now I have a subscriber controller that creates a subscriber but that is not what I want to test. I also have a method in the controller that add 1 to the visit attribute on the Subscriber(I'll post the code) that is the method I want to test but I'm not sure how? I'm new to rails and Rspec so I'm having trouble grasping the concepts. I'll post my test and controller for clarity.
CONTROLLER:
def search
#subscriber = Subscriber.new
end
def visit
#subscriber = Subscriber.find_by_phone_number(params[:phone_number])
if #subscriber
#subscriber.visit =+ 1
#subscriber.save
flash[:notice] = "thanks"
redirect_to subscribers_search_path(:subscriber)
else
render "search"
end
end
TEST
it "adds 1 to the visit attribute" do
sign_in(user)
subscriber = FactoryGirl.create(:subscriber)
visits_before = subscriber.visit
post :create, phone_number: subscriber.phone_number
subscriber.reload
expect(subscriber.visit).to eq(visits_before)
end
ERROR MESSAGE:
As you can see that is the method I want to test. The current test in place does not work but I thought it might help to show what I'm thinking. Hopefully this is enough info, let me know if you want to see anything else?
I think you could do something like this:
it 'adds 1 to the visit attribute' do
# I'm assuming you need this, and you are creating the user before
sign_in(user)
# I'm assuming your factory is correct
subscriber = FactoryGirl.create(:subscriber)
visits_before = subscriber.visit
post :create, subscriber: { phone_number: subscriber.phone_number }
subscriber.reload
expect(subscriber.visit).to eq(visits_before)
end
Since you are checking subscriber.visits you should change Subscriber to subscriber:
expect { post :create, :subscriber => subscriber }.to change(subscriber, :visit).by(1)
visits is a method of an instance, not a class method.
I think you're testing the wrong method. You've already stated that your create action works, so no need to test it here. Unit tests are all about isolating the method under test.
Your test as it is written is testing that post :create does something. If you want to test that your visit method does something, you'd need to do something like this:
describe "#GET visit" do
before { allow(Subscriber).to receive(:find).and_return(subscriber) }
let(:subscriber) { FactoryGirl.create(:subscriber) }
it "adds one to the visit attribute" do
sign_in(user)
expect { get :visit }.to change(subscriber, :visit).by(1)
end
end
I have an issue using my session stored return_to URL in my integration tests.
Because my controller can be accesses from different places I store the referer in the session on the new action and redirect to it in my create action.
cards_controller.rb:
class CardsController < ApplicationController
...
def new
#card = current_user.cards.build
session[:return_to] ||= request.referer
end
def create
#card = current_user.cards.build(card_params)
if #card.save
flash[:success] = 'Card created!'
redirect_to session.delete(:return_to) || root_path
else
render 'new', layout: 'card_new'
end
end
...
end
As I only use the create action in my test I would like to set the session variable in the integration test as I do in my unit test but it doesn't work. I always get redirected to the root path.
cards_interface_test.rb:
class CardsInterfaceTest < ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest
test 'cards interface should redirect after successful save' do
log_in_as(#user)
get cards_path
assert_select 'a[aria-label=?]', 'new'
name = "heroblade"
session[:return_to] = cards_url
assert_difference 'Card.count', 1 do
post cards_path, card: { name: name, icon: 'white-book', color: 'indigo', contents: 'subtitle | Rogue feature'}
end
assert_redirected_to cards_url
follow_redirect!
assert_match name, response.body
assert_select 'td', text: name
end
end
The test fails on the assert_redirected_to line.
I tried to call get new_card_path first but made no difference and now I'm a little bit lost. I don't know if this should basically work but I made a tiny mistake or if I try to do something completely against best practices and should refactor all my interface tests to use something like Selenium or similar tools.
I tried as well to provide the session variable as part of the request like the rails guide describes for functional tests with no effects:
post cards_path, {card: { name: name, icon: 'white-book', color: 'indigo', contents: 'subtitle | Rogue feature' }}, {'return_to' => cards_url}
I don't know if manually setting session is possible in integration tests (guess rather not) but you should be able to set the referer because it's just a normal HTTP header. Headers can be passed as the 3rd parameter to the request method helper (get etc.) in integration tests.
So, I think you should first call the new action with the referer header set (so that it gets into the session) and then the create action should work including the redirect.
class CardsInterfaceTest < ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest
test 'cards interface should redirect after successful save' do
log_in_as(#user)
# visit the 'new' action as if we came from the index page
get new_card_path, nil, referer: cards_url
assert_difference 'Card.count', 1 do
post cards_path, card: { name: name, icon: 'white-book', color: 'indigo', contents: 'subtitle | Rogue feature'}
end
assert_redirected_to cards_url
# ...
end
end
First we try get the new action with the referer set as if we came from the index page (so that the referer can get into the session). The rest of the test stays the same.
I was looking into some rspec testing lately and I was wondering how to properly test controllers. My controller is fairly simple so it shouldn't be something too hard:
class UsersController < ApplicationController
before_action :set_user, only: [:show, :edit, :update, :destroy]
# GET /users
def index
#q = User.search(params[:q])
#users = #q.result(distinct: true)
#q.build_condition if #q.conditions.empty?
#q.build_sort if #q.sorts.empty?
end
# GET /users/1
def show
end
# GET /users/new
def new
#user = User.new
end
# GET /users/1/edit
def edit
end
def archive
#q = User.search(params[:q])
#users = #q.result(distinct: true)
#q.build_condition if #q.conditions.empty?
#q.build_sort if #q.sorts.empty?
end
# POST /users
def create
#user = User.new(user_params)
if #user.save
redirect_to users_path, notice: 'Student was successfully added.'
else
render action: 'new'
end
end
# PATCH/PUT /users/1
def update
if #user.update(user_params)
redirect_to #user, notice: 'Student information was successfully updated.'
else
render action: 'edit'
end
end
# DELETE /users/1
def destroy
#user.destroy
redirect_to users_url, notice: 'Student information was successfully deleted.'
end
private
# Use callbacks to share common setup or constraints between actions.
def set_user
#user = User.find(params[:id])
end
# Only allow a trusted parameter "white list" through.
def user_params
params.require(:user).permit(:firstName, :lastName, :email, :dateOfBirth, :notes, :sex, :archive, :category => [])
end
end
So far I have written 2-3 tests but I am not sure if they even do anything:
describe 'GET #index' do
it "displays all users" do
get :index
response.should be_redirect
end
end
describe 'GET #new' do
it "creates a new user" do
get :new
response.should be_redirect
end
end
I tried doing the same for edit and show but they didn't work and I am not sure why (because as I said, I don't know what I am doing).
Could anyone give me a few test examples for these methods or could redirect me to an rspec guide for rails4?
Are you expecting the controller #index action to redirect? Because that wouldn't be typical.
I would
describe 'GET #index' do
get 'index'
it {expect(response).to be_success)}
end
This line...
it "displays all users" do
in a controller spec makes me wonder if your confusing controller and request specs. I did this when I first got running with testing. "Displaying all users" sounds like a request spec to me. Testing if a page redirects or response status codes is more akin to controller specs.
I found http://betterspecs.org/ to be a really helpful resource in understanding testing better.
RE: WHAT to test
This worked for me but results may vary.
Controller Specs - Don't test controllers
Controllers should be skinny so you're just testing whether Rails is working. e.g. an index action may contain #users = User.all or similar and very little else. What is there to test there? Nothing. If you have lots of code in your controller actions then it probably shouldn't be there. Move it out to the models. Remember: Fat models, skinny controllers. This is an example of how testing creates better code. I have very few controller specs and I think nearly all of them are double checking authorisation to pages. I only use them where there's code in the controller. Here's an example:
context "Non admin signed in" do
before(:each) do
sign_in user
controller.stub!(:current_user).and_return(user)
end
it {subject.current_user.should_not be_nil}
it "deny non admin access to index" do
sign_in user
get 'index'
expect(response).to render_template("pages/access_denied")
end
end
Request Specs Test what you would test in a browser (20% of tests)
Imagine that you weren't doing RSpec testing. If you're like me then this is not too hard to imagine. How would you test the thing you want to build? Chances are that the first thing you'd do is load up a browser and see if something is on the page that you were expecting. That IS a request spec. It's that simple. Request specs are the automated ways of loading up a browser, clicking on a few buttons and checking what happened. Whatever it is your checking in the browser... check that same thing using Capybara. If it has Javascript on the page then you'll need Webkit or Selenium on top of Capybara to push the buttons as you would. With selenium you actually see the browser window pop up on the desktop as if a mysterious gremlin had taken control of your keyboard. Don't test anything in a request spec that you wouldn't be testing manually in a browser. That means don't check the state of other models in the database. Request specs are what the user can see. If you can't see it, don't test it.
Model specs - Test what you would test in the console (80% of tests)
Before I became a good TDD/BDD boy I found I spent a lot of time loading up irb or console and making models and doing X to see if Y would happen. Automate that thing. That's a model spec. When your request spec fails (which it should at first if it's doing anything useful) then drop down into the model spec. A failing request spec might be:
it {expect(page.find('#login_box')).to have_content 'Logged in as Kevin Monk'}
from
no method full_name for instance of User
And if you weren't a TDD good boy you might load up the console and find what was happening with the full_name method.
> rails console
$> kevin = User.find(1)
$> kevin.full_name
And then visually check that you get the full name baack but this should be done as a model spec.
I hope that helps. A problem I've had with a lot of books on testing is that the authors tend to be such experts and therefore don't appreciate that us mortals really need to understand the basic premise of what it is your supposed to be testing.
you have a typo in your spec code , you have to change respone, for response
I think that´s the problem
you can find more information in about test controllers in
https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-rails/docs/controller-specs
regards
I'm trying to switch from using respond_to to respond_with in Rails controllers. Everything's going smoothly, except for testing invalid saves in controller specs. Here's an example:
describe MyController do
...
describe "PUT update" do
context "with invalid attributes" do
it "should re-render the edit page" do
style = stub_model(Style)
Style.stub(:find) { style }
Style.any_instance.stub(:save).and_return(false)
put :update
response.should render_template(:edit)
end
end
end
end
This works just fine with my old respond_to style update action, but with respond_with, I get
Failure/Error: response.should render_template("edit")
So, in short - how do I test this? ...Or should I just assume render_with knows what it's doing and not test at all? Any general suggestions?
Cheers in advance
PS: The update action:
def update
#style = Style.find(params[:id])
flash[:notice] = "Style updated" if #style.update_attributes(params[:style])
respond_with(#style)
end
I've been looking into this exact thing (how I found this topic) - so far I have the following:
Location.any_instance.stub(:valid?).and_return(false)
Location.any_instance.stub(:errors).and_return('anything')
(where Location is my model that uses respond_with)
however I believe there must be a nicer way to do it - if I find it, I'll be sure to post it!
Note: I'm also using the responders gem so one of these lines may not be necessary for you if you're not using it!