Appium doesn't seem to recognize the system alerts like normal elements. I have an alert box with only "Ok" button.
I have tried the following but nothing seems to work.
Add implicit wait conditions to find the elements as :
driver.manage().timeouts().implicitlyWait(25,TimeUnit.SECONDS);
MobileElement clickOK= (MobileElement) driver.findElement(By.id("android:id/button1"));
Thread.sleep(10)
driver.switchTo().accept().alert();
alert.accept();
How to handle the system alerts?
Usually Appium on Android are handles alerts as regular elements, so I suggest taking page source snapshot and inspect alert:
System.out.println(driver.getPageSource());
When you found it and get the right resource-id, you wait for it like this:
WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(driver, 30); //30 seconds should be enough?
WebElement alertButton = wait.until(ExpectedConditions.visibilityOfElementLocated(By.id("<full resource-id with package>")));
alertButton.click();
Related
This might seem a little sketch, but I am trying to automate a minor inconvenience that I have.
Every day at the beginning of the day, I want to start a chat on skype with a certain group of people.
I created an app so I can just type chat daily at the command line and it will create the chat automatically. The issue is that it's just a blank chat and I need to start the chat with the same message. I want to be able to pass a -m flag to the app followed by the message that should be sent to everyone. The issue is being able to get that text into the skype chat.
Here are my thoughts on how this could be done:
Send Keyboard events so that the text entered into the text box and then sent in the chat.
Add the message to the clipboard, and subsequently paste the message. If I can't get it to send the text and I have to manually click [enter] I'm ok with that.
Lastly, if there's not a way to send keyboard events already, a much more involved approach would be to somehow emulate a keyboard to the system.
So basically I want to know if there's a way to control the clipboard of the system (copy/paste) or if there's a way to send keypresses to the system.
If you have any other ideas on how this, or if this, can be achieved, I'd like to hear.
Thanks so much in advance
Have a look at the win32 package, which has some bindings from the Win32 Windows Api to Dart, it has a ton of examples, but what you need should be something like this:
final kbd = KEYBDINPUT.allocate();
// Send the A key.
kbd.wVk = VK_A;
var result = SendInput(
1, Pointer.fromAddress(kbd.addressOf.address), sizeOf<KEYBDINPUT>());
if (result != 1) print('Error: ${GetLastError()}');
kbd.dwFlags = KEYEVENTF_KEYUP;
result = SendInput(
1, Pointer.fromAddress(kbd.addressOf.address), sizeOf<KEYBDINPUT>());
if (result != 1) print('Error: ${GetLastError()}');
(from https://github.com/timsneath/win32/blob/master/example/sendinput.dart#L20-L30)
I have a dialog that displays on first execution of my app. I therefore want my test case to handle responding to the dialog - but only if it appears.
The waitForExpectations method will error out if the timeout is reached.
What is the best way to wait for this element to appear for a short time without failing the test case if it does not appear?
You will have to reimplement waiting. As terrible as it sounds, I recommend using Sleep and If statements; you want to lock your test thread while it waits for the app to finish presenting content, then evaluate.
Unfortunately, as far as I'm aware none of the options for waitForExpectationsWithTimeout permit you to not fail the test if the expectationForPredicate is not fulfilled at the end of the timeout time.
Try the following code:
addUIInterruptionMonitorWithDescription("SYSTEM_DESCRIPTION") { (alert) -> Bool in
alert.buttons["BUTTON_TITLE"].tap()
return true
}
app.buttons["BUTTON_TITLE"].tap()
app.tap()
SYSTEM_DESCRIPTION is the title or description of system alert.
BUTTON_TITLE is like "OK", "Allow", ...
Find out more in this answer:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/32228033/6657951
I am writing UI test cases using the new Xcode 7 UI Testing feature. At some point of my app, I ask the user for permission of camera access and push notification. So two iOS popups will show up: "MyApp Would Like to Access the Camera" popup and "MyApp Would Like to Send You Notifications" popup. I'd like my test to dismiss both popups.
UI recording generated the following code for me:
[app.alerts[#"cameraAccessTitle"].collectionViews.buttons[#"OK"] tap];
However, [app.alerts[#"cameraAccessTitle"] exists] resolves to false, and the code above generates an error: Assertion Failure: UI Testing Failure - Failure getting refresh snapshot Error Domain=XCTestManagerErrorDomain Code=13 "Error copying attributes -25202".
So what's the best way of dismissing a stack of system alerts in test? The system popups interrupt my app flow and fail my normal UI test cases immediately. In fact, any recommendations regarding how I can bypass the system alerts so I can resume testing the usual flow are appreciated.
This question might be related to this SO post which also doesn't have an answer: Xcode7 | Xcode UI Tests | How to handle location service alert?
Thanks in advance.
Xcode 7.1
Xcode 7.1 has finally fixed the issue with system alerts. There are, however, two small gotchas.
First, you need to set up a "UI Interuption Handler" before presenting the alert. This is our way of telling the framework how to handle an alert when it appears.
Second, after presenting the alert you must interact with the interface. Simply tapping the app works just fine, but is required.
addUIInterruptionMonitorWithDescription("Location Dialog") { (alert) -> Bool in
alert.buttons["Allow"].tap()
return true
}
app.buttons["Request Location"].tap()
app.tap() // need to interact with the app for the handler to fire
The "Location Dialog" is just a string to help the developer identify which handler was accessed, it is not specific to the type of alert.
I believe that returning true from the handler marks it as "complete", which means it won't be called again. For your situation I would try returning false so the second alert will trigger the handler again.
Xcode 7.0
The following will dismiss a single "system alert" in Xcode 7 Beta 6:
let app = XCUIApplication()
app.launch()
// trigger location permission dialog
app.alerts.element.collectionViews.buttons["Allow"].tap()
Beta 6 introduced a slew of fixes for UI Testing and I believe this was one of them.
Also note that I am calling -element directly on -alerts. Calling -element on an XCUIElementQuery forces the framework to choose the "one and only" matching element on the screen. This works great for alerts where you can only have one visible at a time. However, if you try this for a label and have two labels the framework will raise an exception.
Objective - C
-(void) registerHandlerforDescription: (NSString*) description {
[self addUIInterruptionMonitorWithDescription:description handler:^BOOL(XCUIElement * _Nonnull interruptingElement) {
XCUIElement *element = interruptingElement;
XCUIElement *allow = element.buttons[#"Allow"];
XCUIElement *ok = element.buttons[#"OK"];
if ([ok exists]) {
[ok tap];
return YES;
}
if ([allow exists]) {
[allow tap];
return YES;
}
return NO;
}];
}
-(void)setUp {
[super setUp];
self.continueAfterFailure = NO;
self.app = [[XCUIApplication alloc] init];
[self.app launch];
[self registerHandlerforDescription:#"“MyApp” would like to make data available to nearby Bluetooth devices even when you're not using app."];
[self registerHandlerforDescription:#"“MyApp” Would Like to Access Your Photos"];
[self registerHandlerforDescription:#"“MyApp” Would Like to Access the Camera"];
}
Swift
addUIInterruptionMonitorWithDescription("Description") { (alert) -> Bool in
alert.buttons["Allow"].tap()
alert.buttons["OK"].tap()
return true
}
Gosh.
It always taps on "Don't Allow" even though I deliberately say tap on "Allow"
At least
if app.alerts.element.collectionViews.buttons["Allow"].exists {
app.tap()
}
allows me to move on and do other tests.
For the ones who are looking for specific descriptions for specific system dialogs (like i did) there is none :) the string is just for testers tracking purposes. Related apple document link : https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xctest/xctestcase/1496273-adduiinterruptionmonitor
Update : xcode 9.2
The method is sometimes triggered sometimes not. Best workaround for me is when i know there will be a system alert, i add :
sleep(2)
app.tap()
and system alert is gone
God! I hate how XCTest has the worst time dealing with UIView Alerts. I have an app where I get 2 alerts the first one wants me to select "Allow" to enable locations services for App permissions, then on a splash page the user has to press a UIButton called "Turn on location" and finally there is a notification sms alert in a UIViewAlert and the user has to select "OK". The problem we were having was not being able to interact with the system Alerts, but also a race condition where behavior and its appearance on screen was untimely. It seems that if you use the alert.element.buttons["whateverText"].tap the logic of XCTest is to keep pressing until the time of the test runs out. So basically keep pressing anything on the screen until all the system alerts are clear of view.
This is a hack but this is what worked for me.
func testGetPastTheStupidAlerts() {
let app = XCUIApplication()
app.launch()
if app.alerts.element.collectionViews.buttons["Allow"].exists {
app.tap()
}
app.buttons["TURN ON MY LOCATION"].tap()
}
The string "Allow" is completely ignored and the logic to app.tap() is called evreytime an alert is in view and finally the button I wanted to reach ["Turn On Location"] is accessible and the test pass
~Totally confused, thanks Apple.
The only thing I found that reliably fixed this was to set up two separate tests to handle the alerts. In the first test, I call app.tap() and do nothing else. In the second test, I call app.tap() again and then do the real work.
On xcode 9.1, alerts are only being handled if the test device has iOS 11. Doesn't work on older iOS versions e.g 10.3 etc. Reference: https://forums.developer.apple.com/thread/86989
To handle alerts use this:
//Use this before the alerts appear. I am doing it before app.launch()
let allowButtonPredicate = NSPredicate(format: "label == 'Always Allow' || label == 'Allow'")
//1st alert
_ = addUIInterruptionMonitor(withDescription: "Allow to access your location?") { (alert) -> Bool in
let alwaysAllowButton = alert.buttons.matching(allowButtonPredicate).element.firstMatch
if alwaysAllowButton.exists {
alwaysAllowButton.tap()
return true
}
return false
}
//Copy paste if there are more than one alerts to handle in the app
#Joe Masilotti's answer is correct and thanks for that, it helped me a lot :)
I would just like to point out the one thing, and that is the UIInterruptionMonitor catches all system alerts presented in series TOGETHER, so that the action you apply in the completion handler gets applied to every alert ("Don't allow" or "OK"). If you want to handle alert actions differently, you have to check, inside the completion handler, which alert is currently presented e.g. by checking its static text, and then the action will be applied only on that alert.
Here's small code snippet for applying the "Don't allow" action on the second alert, in series of three alerts, and "OK" action on the remaining two:
addUIInterruptionMonitor(withDescription: "Access to sound recording") { (alert) -> Bool in
if alert.staticTexts["MyApp would like to use your microphone for recording your sound."].exists {
alert.buttons["Don’t Allow"].tap()
} else {
alert.buttons["OK"].tap()
}
return true
}
app.tap()
This is an old question but there is now another way to handle these alerts.
The system alert isn't accessibly from the app context of the app you are launched in, however you can access the app context anyway. Look at this simple example:
func testLoginHappyPath() {
let app = XCUIApplication()
app.textFields["Username"].typeText["Billy"]
app.secureTextFields["Password"].typeText["hunter2"]
app.buttons["Log In"].tap()
}
In a vacuum with a simulator already launched and permissions already granted or denied, this will work. But if we put it in a CI pipeline where it gets a brand new simulator, all of the sudden it won't be able to find that Username field because there's a notification alert popping up.
So now there's 3 choices on how to handle that:
Implicitly
There's already a default system alert interrupt handler. So in theory, simply trying to typeText on that first field should check for an interrupting event and handle it in the affirmative.
If everything works as designed, you won't have to write any code but you'll see an interruption logged and handled in the log, and your test will take a couple seconds more.
Explicitly via interruptionmonitor
I won't rewrite the previous work on this, but this is where you explicitly set up an interruptionmonitor to handle the specific alert being popped up - or whatever alerts you expect to happen.
This is useful if the built-in handler doesn't do what you want - or doesn't work at all.
Explicitly via XCUITest framework
In xCode 9.0 and above, you can switch between app contexts fluidly by simply defining multiple XCUIApplication() instances. Then you can locate the field you need via familiar methods. So to do this explicitly would look like the following:
func testLoginHappyPath() {
let app = XCUIApplication()
let springboardApp = XCUIApplication(bundleidentifier: "com.apple.springboard")
if springboardApp.alerts[""FunHappyApp" would like permission to own your soul."].exists {
springboardApp.alerts.buttons["Allow"].tap()
}
app.textFields["Username"].typeText["Billy"]
app.secureTextFields["Password"].typeText["hunter2"]
app.buttons["Log In"].tap()
}
Sounds like the approach to implementing camera access and notifications are threaded as you say, but not physically managed and left to chance when and how they are displayed.
I suspect one is triggered by the other and when it is programatically clicked it wipes out the other one as well (which Apple would probably never allow)
Think of it you're asking for a users permission then making the decision on their behalf? Why? Because you can't get your code to work maybe.
How to fix - trace where these two components are triggering the pop up dialogues - where are they being called?, rewrite to trigger just one, send an NSNotification when one dialogue has been completed to trigger and display the remaining one.
I would seriously discourage the approach of programatically clicking dialogue buttons meant for the user.
I'm writing a UIAutomation test case and I need to wait for the user to be activated before continuing. There doesn't seem to be a nice way to check for a button to change to the enabled state.
Whats the best was to wait for something to happen in the UI before checking it's status?
Neither dispatch_after nor NSTimer seem to work. They just block then fail.
It's actually pretty easy if you use NSPredicates and expectations. You can even set a timeout value. This example shows you how to do it with a 5 second timeout.
let exists = NSPredicate(format:"enabled == true")
expectationForPredicate(exists, evaluatedWithObject: app.tables.textFields["MY_FIELD_NAME"], handler: nil)
waitForExpectationsWithTimeout(5, handler: nil)
The better way to wait and check an element isn't the delay() function, but the pushTimeout() one. Apple recommends to use the second function. Here is a code sample:
UIATarget.localTarget().pushTimeout(10)
button.tap()
UIATarget.localTarget().popTimeout()
Apple will repeatedly try to tap the button and will wait up to 10 seconds. Here's a link to the documentation.
Etienne's answer is correct but in my scenario it required something extra.
I'm using React Native and had a <TouchableWithoutFeedback disabled={true}> component. However I could see that whenever XCUI tried to check its state it considered it enabled. Indeed, using a breakpoint and checking element.IsEnabled clearly contradicted what I was seeing in the UI.
Using AccessibilityState will achieve this however, for example:
<TouchableWithoutFeedback
accessibilityState={{
disabled: this.props.disabled,
}}
>
Experienced with RN 0.62.2
You should be able to implement a while loop to check for the condition you want (e.g. button enabled). That will stop the test case progress until the while condition is met and the tests will continue. Build in a delay to slow polling and make sure you have a timeout so you don't get stuck indefinitely.
Pseudocode:
While (/*button is disabled*/) {
if (/*timeout condition met*/) {
/*handle error*/
break;
}
UIATarget.delay(<duration in seconds>);
}
So I had this idea to test the implementation of my screen tracking (with Google Analytics) on my app using UI automation.
The original idea was to build a UI script to go through the screens while checking if the tracking events are being sent accordingly. I need this as sometimes I'm not able to compose everything out of view controllers or the events are not forwarded in the expected order. Regardless of that, I should test this aspect of my app as well and I thought that UI automation was the answer.
I have implemented a script to go through the screens using the UI automation instrument and this is working correctly. I even went so far as using tuneup js to make the code more streamlined and easier to follow.
I was expecting to have something like (in general terms, the syntax is only a simplification):
Being on screen X
Tap button A
Expect screen Y and tracking event for the screen Y
However, as far as I was able to check, testing the screen tracking is something that is not possible with the UI automation.
Or am I missing something?
I thought of creating an invisible view that stays on top of all the view hierarchy and changing its name every time a new screen is loaded to allow me to test it with UI automation but the idea sounded a little over the top...
What do you people suggest? Look for another UI automation tool? Do it with unit testing instead?
Thanks in advance for any help
You could use a UIAlertView and inspect those alerts. Instead of sending the analytics events you can pop up the alert so you can check on it in UIAutomation.
Analytics abstraction frameworks like AnalyticsKit provide an easy way to change the analytics provider. And AnalyticsKit even has an example for that (take a look at the AnalyticsKitDebugProvider class). So the changes to your production code are minimal.
You could use a build configuration where you set a build variable to control the initialization of your analytics
id<AnalyticsKitProvider> provider
#ifdef USE_UI_AUTOMATION_ANALYTICS
provider = [[TestAutomationProvider alloc] init];
#else
provider = [[RealProvider alloc] initWithApiKey:API_KEY];
#endif
[AnalyticsKit initializeLoggers:#[provider]];
In UIAutomation you can test for the alert coming up. You can utilize assertions.js out of the tuneup.js package to write a function like this
function checkForAlert()
{
var alert = null;
retry( function() {
log("wait until alert appaers");
alert = UIATarget.localTarget().frontMostApp().alert();
assertNotNull(alert, "No alert found");
assertTrue("The name you can choose for the alert" == alert.name());
}, 5, 1.0);
return alert;
};
This combines waiting for the alert and testing if it finally appear. If the alert not appears, the test will fail.
In your test you use this in the following way:
var analyticAlert = checkForAlert() // if alert appears it will be in the var, otherwise the test fails at this point.
analyticAlert.buttons()["OK"].tap(); // dismiss the alert
To make this work you also need to set an onAlert handler. Otherwise UIAutomation would try to dismiss your alert immediately. This has to be done before your tests code. Alert handling is explained in the UIAutomation docs.
function MyOnAlertHandler(alert)
{
if("The name you choose"==alert.name()) // filter all alerts created by analytics provider
{
return true; // handle alert in your test
}
return false // automaticly dismiss all other
}
UIATarget.onAlert = MyOnAlertHandler; // set the alert handler