I am currently using the delayed_job_active_record gem to run some scheduled tasks on a long run basis. The processes run in the background on a separate worker dyno on heroku and rarely go wrong but in some cases I would like to be able to stop a process mid run. I have been running the processes locally and because of the setup I have, the scheduled tasks only kick off the process which is essentially a very long loop.
Using
bin/delayed_job stop
only stops the jobs but since the process has started, it doesn't top this.
Because of this, I can't seem to stop the process once it has got going without restarting the entire dyno. This seems a bit excessive but is my only option at the moment.
Any help is greatly appreciated
I don't think there's anyway to interrupt it without essentially killing the process like you are doing. I would usually delete the job record in the database and then terminate the worker running it so it doesn't just retry the job (if you've got retries enabled for that job).
Another option... Since you know it's long running and, I imagine, has multiple steps... Modularize the operation and/or add periodic checks for a 'cancelled' flag you put somewhere in the model(s). If you detect the cancelled request, you can then give up and do any cleanup needed. This is probably preferred anyway so you can manage what happens when it's aborted more explicitly.
Related
our rails web app has to download/unpack archives with html pages from ftp on request for user's viewing through the browser.
the archive can be quite big, so user has to wait until it downloads/unpacks on the server.
i implemented progress bar the way that i call fork/Process.detach in user's request, so that his request is done but downloading/unpacking process continues running in the background. and javascript rendered in his browser pings our server for status until all is ready and then it redirects him to unpacked html pages.
as long as user requests one archive, everything goes smoothly, but if he tries to run 2 or more requests at the same time(so that more forks are started), it seems that only one of them completes, and the rest expires/times outs/gets killed by passenger(?). i suppose its the issue with Passenger/forking.
i am not sure if its possible to fix it somehow so i guess i need to switch to another solution. the solution needs to permit immediate and parallel processing of downloads. so that if user requests multiple archives, he has to see download/decompression progress in all of them at the same time.
i was thinking about running background rake job immediately but it seems very slow to startup(also there's a lot of cron rake tasks happening every minute on our server). reason i liked fork was that it was very fast to start. i know there is delayed job, we also use it heavily for other tasks. but can it start multiple processes at the same time immediately without queues?
solved by keeping the fork and using single dj worker. this way i can have as many processes starting at the same time as needed without trouble with passenger/modifying our product's gemset (which we are trying to avoid since it resulted in bugs in the past)
not sure if forking inside dj worker can cause any troubles, so asked at
running fork in delayed job
if id be free to modify gemset, id probably use resque as wrdevos suggested, or sidekiq, or girl_friday(but thats less probable because it depends on the server running).
Use Resque: https://github.com/defunkt/resque
More on bg jobs and Resque here.
https://github.com/blog/542-introducing-resque
Ok, so this is probably evil, however.. here's the question! I want to run a pretty lightweight app on a shared environment (site5). Ideally I would like to use delayed_job for the ease of queueing the mails (~200+ every so often). However, being a shared environment they don't want background processes running all the time (fair enough).
So, my plan, such as it is, is to queue the mails using delayed job, and then every hour or something, spin up a cron job, send a few emails (10 or something small) and then kill the process. And repeat.
Q) Is there a rake jobs:works:1 equivalent task it'd be easy to setup? - pointer would be handy.
I'm quite open to "this is a terrible idea, don't even go there" being the answer.. in which case I might look at another queuing strategy... (or heroku hire-fire perhaps..)
You can get delayed job to process only a certain number of jobs by doing:
Delayed::Worker.new.work_off(10)
You could fire a script to do that from cron or use "rails runner":
rails runner -e production 'Delayed::Worker.new.work_off(10)'
I guess the main issue on whether it is a good idea or not is working out what small value is actually high enough to make sure you process all your jobs in a reasonable time-frame. Also, you've got the overhead of firing up the rails environment every time you want to process, or even check whether you should process, any jobs. That might cause problems in a shared environment if they are particularly strict on spikes of memory or CPU usage.
Why not skip the 'workers' (which are just daemons which look for work else sleep) and have your cron fire a custom rake task of 10.times { MailerJob.first.perform }
You'd just need to require you're app in the line before that so its loaded ofc.
With a Rails stack, how can I create a background process that handles events by spawning threads that are worked in real time?
The workers on Heroku pick up jobs every 5 seconds. I need real time. Ideally I'd like to get this working on Heroku, but if I need to, I will move away from it.
This has a long list of background workers: Background Job Manager for Rails 3 but it is not clear if your question heroku specific or not
I think you are looking for something like "run_later" which instead of queueing a job actually returns the request and runs a block in a separate process.
Here is a link to the Rails 3+ version, you can follow the fork network to find many other implementations:
https://github.com/Zelnox/run_later
(I don't use Heroku so I don't know if it runs on it)
Heroku runs rake jobs:work, so you can replace that with your own rake task, either running delayed_job with a shorter than 5 second timeout, or just performing your own task. Probably a good idea to keep a sleep statement in there.
The new cedar stack will run anything you want, so it might be worth checking that out.
With regards to run_later, or spawning from the current request, this does work but if the background process doesn't complete within the 30 second request timeout then heroku will kill it.
I think you need delay_job. please checkout this gem
Here's my simple ideal case scenario for when I'd like delayed job to run:
When the first application server (whether through mongrel or passenger) starts, it'll start my delayed job workers.
When the last running application server terminates, it'll kill all the delayed job workers.
The first part (starting) is doable, although I'm not sure what the "right" or "best" way to do it is. Just make a conditional (on process not already running) system call to delayed_job start?
The second part (terminating) -- well, I'm not sure if it is doable or not. Definitely have no idea how this effect could be accomplished.
Any thoughts or ideas?
Is there another way that you start/end delayed job workers that you think is best?
Side question:
The main questions above are for the production environment -- a more difficult case because there are multiple app servers running at the same time. Could the same thing be easily done in the development environment (where there's guaranteed to only be one application server, not a cluster of them) by forking a child process to run the delayed job workers that would always terminate when the parent terminates? How would I go about doing this?
You could definitely pull the terminating off with god.
Simply watch the app processes and god will fire a callback when they're all stopped.
I've got an app that could benefit from delayed_job and some background processing. The thing is, I don't really need/want delayed_job workers running all the time.
The app runs in a shared hosting environment and in multiple locations (for different users). Plus, the app doesn't get a large amount of usage.
Is there a way to start and stop processing jobs (either with the script or rake task) from my app only after certain actions/events?
You could call out to system:
system "cd #{Rails.root} && rake delayed_job:start RAILS_ENV=production"
You could just change delayed_job to check less often too. Instead of the 5 second default, set it to 15 minutes or something.
Yes, you can, but I'm not sure what the benefit will be. You say you don't want workers running all the time - what are your concerns? Memory usage? Database connections?
To keep the impact of delayed_job low on your system, I'd run only one worker, and configure it to sleep most of the time.
Delayed::Worker::sleep_delay = 60 * 5 # in your initializer.rb
A single worker will only wake up and check the db for new jobs every 5 minutes. Running this way keeps you from 'customizing' too much.
But if you really want to start a Delayed::Worker programatically, look in that class for work_off, and implement your own script/run_jobs_and_exit script. It should probably look much like script/delayed_job does - 3 lines.
I found this because I was looking for a way to run some background jobs without spending all the money to run them all the time when they weren't needed. Someone made a hack using google app engine to run the background jobs:
http://viatropos.com/blog/how-to-run-background-jobs-on-heroku-for-free/
It's a little outdated though. There is an interesting comment in the thread:
"When I need to send an e-mail, copy a file, etc I basically add it to the queue. At the end of every request it checks if there is anything in the queue. If so then it uses the Heroku API to set the worker to 1. At the end of a worker getting a task done it checks to see if there is anything left in the queue. If not then it sets the workers back to 0. The end result is the background worker will just work for a few seconds here and there. I can do all the background processing that I need and the bill at the end of the month rarely ever reaches 1 hour total worth of work. Even if it does no problem, I'll pay $0.05 for background processing. :)"
If you go to stop a worker, you are given the PID. You can simply kill -9 PID if all else fails.