When I try to save the result of several queries in a file with an unload command in Dbaccess environment , only the first one is saved, and if I use unload several times -one time per query-, only the last query result is saved.
unload to file1
select * from table1;
select * from table2;
select * from table3;
Can anyone help?
Related
I'm trying to obtain 2 different resultset from stored procedure, based on a single query. What I'm trying to do is that:
1.) return query result into OUT cursor;
2.) from this cursor results, get all longest values in each column and return that as second OUT
resultset.
I'm trying to avoid doing same thing twice with this - get data and after that get longest column values of that same data. I'm not sure If this is even possible, but If It is, can somebody show me HOW ?
This is an example of what I want to do (just for illustration):
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE MySchema.Test(RESULT OUT SYS_REFCURSOR,MAX_RESULT OUT SYS_REFCURSOR)
AS
BEGIN
OPEN RESULT FOR SELECT Name,Surname FROM MyTable;
OPEN MAX_RESULT FOR SELECT Max(length(Name)),Max(length(Surname)) FROM RESULT; --error here
END Test;
This example compiles with "ORA-00942: table or view does not exist".
I know It's a silly example, but I've been investigating and testing all sorts of things (implicit cursors, fetching cursors, nested cursors, etc.) and found nothing that would help me, specially when working with stored procedure returning multiple resultsets.
My overall goal with this is to shorten data export time for Excel. Currently I have to run same query twice - once for calculating data size to autofit Excel columns, and then for writing data into Excel.
I believe that manipulating first resultset in order to get second one would be much faster - with less DB cycles made.
I'm using Oracle 11g, Any help much appreciated.
Each row of data from a cursor can be read exactly once; once the next row (or set of rows) is read from the cursor then the previous row (or set of rows) cannot be returned to and the cursor cannot be re-used. So what you are asking is impossible as if you read the cursor to find the maximum values (ignoring that you can't use a cursor as a source in a SELECT statement but, instead, you could read it using a PL/SQL loop) then the cursor's rows would have been "used up" and the cursor closed so it could not be read from when it is returned from the procedure.
You would need to use two separate queries:
CREATE PROCEDURE MySchema.Test(
RESULT OUT SYS_REFCURSOR,
MAX_RESULT OUT SYS_REFCURSOR
)
AS
BEGIN
OPEN RESULT FOR
SELECT Name,
Surname
FROM MyTable;
OPEN MAX_RESULT FOR
SELECT MAX(LENGTH(Name)) AS max_name_length,
MAX(LENGTH(Surname)) AS max_surname_length
FROM MyTable;
END Test;
/
Just for theoretical purposes, it is possible to only read from the table once if you bulk collect the data into a collection then select from a table-collection expression (however, it is going to be more complicated to code/maintain and is going to require that the rows from the table are stored in memory [which your DBA might not appreciate if the table is large] and may not be more performant than compared to just querying the table twice as you'll end up with three SELECT statements instead of two).
Something like:
CREATE TYPE test_obj IS OBJECT(
name VARCHAR2(50),
surname VARCHAR2(50)
);
CREATE TYPE test_obj_table IS TABLE OF test_obj;
CREATE PROCEDURE MySchema.Test(
RESULT OUT SYS_REFCURSOR,
MAX_RESULT OUT SYS_REFCURSOR
)
AS
t_names test_obj_table;
BEGIN
SELECT Name,
Surname
BULK COLLECT INTO t_names
FROM MyTable;
OPEN RESULT FOR
SELECT * FROM TABLE( t_names );
OPEN MAX_RESULT FOR
SELECT MAX(LENGTH(Name)) AS max_name_length,
MAX(LENGTH(Surname)) AS max_surname_length
FROM TABLE( t_names );
END Test;
/
I've created one of many stored procedures as part of an ETL process and one of the queries within a stored procedure isn't executing.
The environment is SQL Server 2012 SP2.
The bizarre thing is this -
Run the select part of the insert (affected query) - returns rows
Run the insert (affected query) - inserts rows
Run the whole stored procedure via SSMS - inserts rows
Run via SSIS - all other queries run barring the one of concern!
There are no conditions in my stored procedure e.g. if x = True the Return and no debug code is in there either e.g. return. There are also no transactions and the table I am reading from is a staging table populated prveiously by a data flow.
The query:
INSERT INTO Person.CustomerLinks
(PersonID, SystemID, CustomerID_bin, CustomerActive)
SELECT i.PersonID
, s.SystemDefID
, i.CustomerID_bin
, 0
FROM Staging.IdentifyOutput i
JOIN Config.SystemDef s ON s.OutputType = i.OutputType
WHERE i.CustomerID_bin IS NOT NULL
AND i.OutputType IN ('L', 'X')
AND i.PersonID > 0
AND i.FileDuplicate = 1
AND i.PreferredRecord = 1
AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1
FROM Person.CustomerLinks cl
WHERE cl.PersonID = i.PersonID
AND cl.CustomerID_bin = i.CustomerID_bin)
The procedure has a Try Catch block and the Catch will raise an error and no error is raised.
The only other non ETL code in the procedure is -
SET NOCOUNT ON
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
But I put this in all of my procedures in this application as I am not concerned about dirty reads as they won't happen.
I placed tsql directly after the insert to write to my audit system and ##RowCount was 0. Yet if I run the select now I get over 1.5 million rows back.
Any suggestions?
If you are using a Execute T-SQL task then please try replacing it with the Execute SQL Task.
I don't know what caused it, but I moved the specific SQL into another stored procedure and it worked. In reality, it warranted being in its own stored procedure by right as it was only semi related to the procedure in question.
I am using sqlite3 database in my project. for that I can retrive the data from the Database using following query "select * from tablename"..
But I want to take the hundred sequence records from the database, like If I scroll the UITableView based on the I want to take 100 100 records.
I have tried the following things,
SELECT * FROM mytable ORDER BY record_date DESC LIMIT 100; - It retrives only 100 records.When I scroll the table i want to fetch the next 100 records and show it.
Is it possible to do it
Please Guide me.
You could simply use the OFFSET clause, but this would still force the database to compute all the records that you're skipping over, so it would become inefficient for a larger table.
What you should do is to save the last record_date value of the previous page, and continue with the following ones:
SELECT *
FROM MyTable
WHERE record_date < ?
ORDER BY record_date DESC
LIMIT 100
See https://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=ScrollingCursor for details.
I'm searching a way to simulate "create table as select" in Firebird from SP.
We are using this statement frequently in another product, because it is very easy for make lesser, indexable sets, and provide very fast results in server side.
create temp table a select * from xxx where ...
create indexes on a ...
create temp table b select * from xxx where ...
create indexes on b ...
select * from a
union
select * from b
Or to avoid the three or more levels in subqueries.
select *
from a where id in (select id
from b
where ... and id in (select id from c where))
The "create table as select" is very good cos it's provide correct field types and names so I don't need to predefine them.
I can simulate "create table as" in Firebird with Delphi as:
Make select with no rows, get the table field types, convert them to create table SQL, run it, and make "insert into temp table " + selectsql with rows (without order by).
It's ok.
But can I create same thing in a common stored procedure which gets a select sql, and creates a new temp table with the result?
So: can I get query result's field types to I can create field creator SQL from them?
I'm just asking if is there a way or not (then I MUST specify the columns).
Executing DDL inside stored procedure is not supported by Firebird. You could do it using EXECUTE STATEMENT but it is not recommended (see the warning in the end of "No data returned" topic).
One way to do have your "temporary sets" would be to use (transaction-level) Global Temporary Table. Create the GTT as part of the database, with correct datatypes but without constraints (those would probably get into way when you fill only some columns, not all) - then each transaction only sees it's own version of the table and data...
I have two tables - tool_downloads and tool_configurations. I am trying to retrieve the most recent build date for each tool in my database. The layout of the DB is simple. One table called tool_downloads keeps track of when a tool is downloaded. Another table is called tool_configurations and stores the actual data about the tool. They are linked together by the tool_conf_id.
If I run the following query which omits dates, I get back 200 records.
SELECT DISTINCT a.tool_conf_id, b.tool_conf_id
FROM tool_downloads a
JOIN tool_configurations b
ON a.tool_conf_id = b.tool_conf_id
ORDER BY a.tool_conf_id
When I try to add in date information I get back hundreds of thousands of records! Here is the query that fails horribly.
SELECT DISTINCT a.tool_conf_id, max(a.configured_date) as config_date, b.configuration_name
FROM tool_downloads a
JOIN tool_configurations b
ON a.tool_conf_id = b.tool_conf_id
ORDER BY a.tool_conf_id
I know the problem has something to do with group-bys/aggregate data and joins. I can't really search google since I don't know the name of the problem I'm encountering. Any help would be appreciated.
Solution is:
SELECT b.tool_conf_id, b.configuration_name, max(a.configured_date) as config_date
FROM tool_downloads a
JOIN tool_configurations b
ON a.tool_conf_id = b.tool_conf_id
GROUP BY b.tool_conf_id, b.configuration_name