There are some possibilities to utilize standard output (stdout) by Dyalog APL language?
⎕←
Assigning to the system variable ⎕ has the side effect of outputting the assigned value to stdout (including a trailing line break):
⎕←'Hello, World!'
Hello, World!
Try it online!
See APL Wiki: Quad name for more.
Related
When I start an interactive Lua shell, io.write() adds unwanted material after the string I want it to print. print(), however does not:
[user#manjaro lua]$ lua
Lua 5.4.2 Copyright (C) 1994-2020 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
> io.write('hello world')
hello worldfile (0x7fcc979d4520)
> print('hello world')
hello world
And when I use io.write() in a program it works fine too:
--hello.lua
io.write('hello world\n')
print ('hello world')
Output:
[user#manjaro lua]$ lua hello.lua
hello world
hello world
I'm using Manjaro Linux on a Dell desktop. Can anyone tell me what's going on here? Thanks in advance.
EDIT: I should add, perhaps, that the unwanted material is always something like this:
file (0x7f346234d520)
It's always 'file' followed by what looks like a large hexadecimal number in parentheses. The exact number stays constant within one shell session but varies between different shell sessions.
"file (0x7fcc979d4520)" (or whatever address) is the return value of the io.write call, with an implicit tostring.
The lua(1) man page says
In interactive mode, lua prompts the user, reads lines from the standard input, and executes them as they are read. If the line contains an expression or list of expressions, then the line is evaluated and the results are printed.
The trouble here is that io.write('hello world') could be either an expression or a statement. Since it's a valid expression, the interpreter outputs that unwanted return value.
As a workaround, try adding a semicolon:
> io.write('hello world\n');
hello world
Although Lua usually doesn't require a semicolon for each statement if it's at the end of a line, it does allow it. And important here, it means the syntax can't be an expression, only a statement which calls the function. So the interpreter won't output the returned value.
You are just seeing the return value of io.write when you call io.write manually, interactively. When using the Lua, uh, shell, if you want to call it that, it almost always prints the return value of any function(s) you call.
file(blabblah) is the internal representation of the file you are writing to (probably just a hex memory address, but who knows?)
I'm trying to define custom characters on thermal printer NCR 7199.
I used ESC/POS command
ESC & y c1 c2 x d1...dn
and it works fine. But this command can change only characters in range 32-126, and those characters are latin letters and common symbols.
I'd prefer to replace characters with codes 8E-8F, for example, but cannot do it using this command.
Is it possible? Or is there any other ESC/POS command for user-defined characters?
UPD.
It seems like a firmware update can fix this problem. Firmware version on our printer is v99.21, and I saw this in release notes:
v99.25 "based on v99.24"
1. Allowed User-defined characters defined range from 20H to FFH in 7199 Emulation mode
Another user-defined character setting command for Kanji is for printers that support the MBCS character set, which is not what you want.
FS 2
Define user-defined Kanji characters
However, although it is unclear whether NCR 7199 supports it, ESC/POS has the ability to customize the font of the user-defined code page rather than the individual characters.
Please refer to the contents of the following pages.
GS ( E <Function 7>
Copy the user-defined page
GS ( E <Function 8>
Define the data (column format) for the character code page
GS ( E <Function 9>
Define the data (raster format) for the character code page
GS ( E <Function 10>
Delete the data for the character code page
Problem solved by updating firmware.
After updating "Main Firmware" to v99.27 (it seems that version must be greater or equal v99.25) and changing Emulation mode to "NCR 7199" I was finally able to define characters in all range 20-FF.
What syntax do I use to print "hello world" in the output window?
I simply want to specify the text in the syntax and have it appear in the output.
You need the title command:
title 'this is my text'.
Note that the title can be up to 256 bytes long.
Alternatively, you could use ECHO also. ECHO is useful for debugging macro variable assignements where as TITLE is useful for neat/organised presentation of your tables with intension to perhaps export output results.
If you want to write arbitrary text in its own block in the Viewer rather than having it stuck in a log block, use the TEXT extension command (Utilities > Create text output). You can even include html markup in the text.
If you don't have this extension installed, you can install it from the Utilities menu in Statistics 22 or 23 or the Extensions menu in V24.
example:
TEXT "The following output is very important!"
/OUTLINE HEADING="Comment" TITLE="Comment".
Outfile here is used in an ambiguous way. The prior two answers (the TITLE and ECHO commands) simply print something to the output window. One additional way to print to the output window is the PRINT command.
DATA LIST FREE / X.
BEGIN DATA
1
2
END DATA.
PRINT /'Hello World'.
EXECUTE.
If you do that set of syntax you will actually see that 'Hello World' is printed twice -- one for each record in the dataset. So one way to only print one line is to wrap it in a DO IF statement and only select the first row of data.
DO IF $casenum=1.
PRINT /'Hello World'.
END IF.
EXECUTE.
Now how is this any different than the prior two commands? Besides aesthetic looks in the output window, PRINT allows you to save an actual text file of the results via the OUTFILE parameter, which is something neither of the prior two commands allows.
DO IF $casenum=1.
PRINT OUTFILE='C:\Users\Your Name\Desktop\Hello.txt' /'Hello World'.
END IF.
EXECUTE.
I want to make use of Maxima as the backend to solve some computations used in my LaTeX input file.
I did the following steps.
Step 1
Download and install Maxima.
Step 2
Create a batch file named cas.bat (for example) as follows.
rem cas.bat
echo off
set PATH=%PATH%;"C:\Program Files (x86)\Maxima-5.31.2\bin"
maxima --very-quiet -r %1 > solution.tex
Save the batch in the same directory in which your input file below exists. It is just for the sake of simplicity.
Step 3
Create the input file named main.tex (for example) as follows.
% main.tex
\documentclass[preview,border=12pt,12pt]{standalone}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\def\f(#1){(#1)^2-5*(#1)+6}
\begin{document}
\section{Problem}
Evaluate $\f(x)$ for $x=\frac 1 2$.
\section{Solution}
\immediate\write18{cas "x: 1/2;tex(\f(x));"}
\input{solution}
\end{document}
Step 4
Compile the input file with pdflatex -shell-escape main and you will get a nice output as follows.
!
Step 5
Done.
Questions
Apparently the output of Maxima is as follows. I don't know how to make it cleaner.
solution.tex
1
-
2
$${{15}\over{4}}$$
false
Now, my question are
how to remove such texts?
how to obtain just \frac{15}{4} without $$...$$?
(1) To suppress output, terminate input expressions with dollar sign (i.e. $) instead of semicolon (i.e. ;).
(2) To get just the TeX-ified expression sans the environment delimiters (i.e. $$), call tex1 instead of tex. Note that tex1 returns a string, which you have to print yourself (while tex prints it for you).
Combining these ideas with the stuff you showed, I think your program could look like this:
"x: 1/2$ print(tex1(\f(x)))$"
I think you might find the Maxima mailing list helpful. I'm pretty sure there have been several attempts to create a system such as the one you describe. You can also look at the documentation.
I couldn't find any way to completely clean up Maxima's output within Maxima itself. It always echoes the input line, and always writes some whitespace after the output. The following is an example of a perl script that accomplishes the cleanup.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
my $var = $ARGV[0];
my $expr = $ARGV[1];
sub do_maxima_to_tex {
my $m = shift;
my $c = "maxima --batch-string='exptdispflag:false; print(tex1($m))\$'";
my $e = `$c`;
my #x = split(/\(%i\d+\)/,$e); # output contains stuff like (%i1)
my $f = pop #x; # remove everything before the echo of the last input
while ($f=~/\A /) {$f=~s/\A .*\n//} # remove echo of input, which may be more than one line
$f =~ s/\\\n//g; # maxima breaks latex tokens in the middle at end of line; fix this
$f =~ s/\n/ /g; # if multiple lines, get it into one line
$f =~ s/\s+\Z//; # get rid of final whitespace
return $f;
}
my $e1 = do_maxima_to_tex("diff($expr,$var,1)");
my $e2 = do_maxima_to_tex("diff($expr,$var,2)");
print <<TEX;
The first derivative is \$$e1\$. Differentiating a second time,
we get \$$e2\$.
TEX
If you name this script a.pl, then doing
a.pl z 3*z^4
outputs this:
The first derivative is $12\,z^3$. Differentiating a second time,
we get $36\,z^2$.
For the OP's application, a script like this one could be what is invoked by the write18 in the latex file.
If you really want to use LaTeX then the maxiplot package is the answer. It provides a maxima environment inside of which you enter Maxima commands. When you process your LaTeX file a Maxima batch file is generated. Process this file with Maxima and process your LaTeX file again to typeset the equations generated by Maxima.
If you would rather have 2D math input with live typesetting then use TeXmacs. It is a cross-platform document authoring environment (a word processor on steroids if you like) that includes plugins for Maxima, Mathematica and many more scientific computing tools. If you need to or are not satisfied with the typesetting, you can export your document to LaTeX.
I know this is a very old post. Excellent answers for the question asked by OP. I was using --very-quiet -r options on the command line for a long time like OP, but in maxima version 5.43.2 they behave differently. See maxima command line v5.43 is behaving differently than v5.41. I am answering this question with a cross reference because when incorporating these answers in your solutions, make sure the changes in behavior of those command line flags are also incorporated.
In Pascal, I have write and writeln. Apparently Lua's print is similar to writeln of Pascal. Do we have something similar to write of Pascal? How can consecutive print commands send their output to the same line?
print("Hello")
print("World")
Output:
Hello
world
I want to have this:
Hello world
Use io.write instead print, which is meant for simple uses, like debugging, anyway.
Expanding on lhf's correct answer, the io library is preferred for production use.
The print function in the base library is implemented as a primitive capability. It allows for quick and dirty scripts that compute something and print an answer, with little control over its presentation. Its principle benefits are that it coerces all arguments to string and that it separates each argument in the output with tabs and supplies a newline.
Those advantages quickly become defects when detailed control of the output is required. For that, you really need to use io.write. If you mix print and io.write in the same program, you might trip over another defect. print uses the C stdout file handle explicitly. This means that if you use io.output to change the output file handle, io.write will do what you expect but print won't.
A good compromise can be to implement a replacement for print in terms of io.write. It could look as simple as this untested sample where I've tried to write clearly rather than optimally and still handle nil arguments "correctly":
local write = io.write
function print(...)
local n = select("#",...)
for i = 1,n do
local v = tostring(select(i,...))
write(v)
if i~=n then write'\t' end
end
write'\n'
end
Once you are implementing your own version of print, then it can be tempting to improve it in other ways for your application. Using something with more formatting control than offered by tostring() is one good idea. Another is considering a separator other than a tab character.
As an alternative, just build up your string then write it out with a single print
You may not always have access to the io library.
You could use variables for "Hello" and "World". Then concatenate them later. Like this:
local h = "Hello"
local w = "World"
print(h..w)
It will be display, in this case, as "HelloWorld". But that's easy to fix. Hope this helped!
Adding on to #Searous's answer, try the following.
local h = "hello"
local w = "world"
print(h.." "..w)
You can concatenate both together, just concatenate a space between both variables.
local h = "Hello"
local w = "World!"
print(h, w)